Poor grid planning could shift Europe's data centre geography, report says
By Forrest Crellin
PARIS (Reuters) -Europe's leading data centre hubs face a major shift as developers will go wherever connection times are shortest, unless there is more proactive electricity grid planning, a report on Thursday by energy think-tank Ember showed.
Data centre buildout has exploded in recent years as tech companies race to put together the strongest offering of competitive artificial intelligence (AI) models, which rely on a new generation of power-hungry data centres.
This could lead to a geographical shift in investment in Europe as developers look for new places with easier power access and shorter lead times, the report said.
By 2035, half of Europe's data centre capacity could be located outside the current main hubs Frankfurt, London, Amsterdam, Paris and Dublin, the report said.
This could leech billions of euros in investments from the congested countries, as data centres in Germany contributed 10.4 billion euros ($12 billion) in GDP in 2024 which should more than double by 2029, and it could slow job growth, it said.
Only France, is expected to maintain continued data centre investment as the grid remains relatively unconstrained, the report said.
Connecting a new data centre to the grid in legacy hubs can take an average of 7–10 years, with some projects facing delays of up to 13 years, the report said.
However, wait times in newer markets are much shorter, with Italy taking just three years, it said.
"Grids are ultimately deciding where investments go ... they are now effectively a tool to attract investment," said Elisabeth Cremona, Senior Energy Analyst at Ember.
"In Europe's push for competitiveness and economic growth, it now needs to be taking into account grids and driving investment to that infrastructure if it wants to see other projects materialise," she said.
She added that this is not unique to data centres but covers all industry, as any kind of industry that is either new or looking to electrify is going to go through the same process.
In Sweden, Norway and Denmark, data centre electricity demand is expected to triple already by 2030. In Austria, Greece, Finland, Hungary, Italy, Portugal and Slovakia data centre consumption is projected to increase by three to five times by 2035 compared to 2024.
($1 = 0.8692 euros)
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Wall Street Journal
10 minutes ago
- Wall Street Journal
Macquarie Collects $8 Billion for Infrastructure Investments in the Americas
Macquarie Asset Management, one of the world's largest private infrastructure investors by assets under management, has closed its latest fund dedicated to investing in infrastructure projects and companies in the Americas. The investment arm of Australian financial services provider Macquarie Group collected a little over $6.8 billion for Macquarie Infrastructure Partners VI, the firm said, slightly less than a $6.9 billion predecessor pool that closed in 2021.
Yahoo
23 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Better Artificial Intelligence Stock: C3.ai vs. SoundHound AI
The artificial intelligence market remains resilient amid macroeconomic uncertainty, making AI stocks SoundHound and compelling investments. SoundHound's voice-activated AI is popular, resulting in 151% year-over-year sales growth in the first quarter. partnerships with the likes of Microsoft produced 73% of the agreements closed in its fiscal 2025. 10 stocks we like better than SoundHound AI › Artificial intelligence (AI) stocks remain attractive investments despite the current macroeconomic turmoil exasperated by President Trump's mercurial trade policies. Wall Street analyst Dan Ives explained why, stating, "In 25 years covering tech, I've never seen a bigger theme than the AI revolution." Two newcomers to this hot industry are (NYSE: AI) and SoundHound AI (NASDAQ: SOUN). The former went public in 2020, and the latter in 2022. SoundHound and businesses are already going strong, and as new public companies, they are just getting started. But if you had to choose one, which is the superior AI investment for the long haul? Examining both companies can help to identify the better choice. SoundHound has built an impressive business around AI capable of understanding human speech. Its tech is used by Stellantis and other automakers to provide drivers with voice-activated commands inside cars, as well as by restaurants, such as White Castle, to handle phone and drive-thru orders. Adoption of the company's AI-powered voice platform is growing. In the first quarter, SoundHound activated over 1,000 new restaurant locations, the first time it's achieved so many in a single quarter. As customer adoption has grown, so has revenue. Q1 sales hit a record $29.1 million, representing a 151% year-over-year increase. And the dynamic macroeconomic environment isn't denting the company's sales growth in 2025. SoundHound forecasts this year's revenue will reach between $157 million and $177 million, up from 2024's $84.7 million. This illustrates the company's confidence in its AI platform's continued popularity. SoundHound's excellent sales growth also translated into strong financials as well. It exited Q1 with no debt. Moreover, its balance sheet boasted $587.5 million in total assets, and its cash hoard of $245.8 million alone eclipsed total liabilities of $190.5 million. artificial intelligence offerings cater to a different market from SoundHound's more consumer-facing AI applications. focuses on organizational needs with turnkey AI software for fast deployment, as well as custom solutions. For example, its AI proactively identifies maintenance needs for U.S. Air Force planes. The program proved so successful that the Air Force expanded its agreement with in May. Other customers include the U.S. Navy and the Department of Defense. In fact, contracts with federal, state, and local governments comprised over a third of bookings in its 2025 fiscal year (FY), which ended April 30. The company's other big sector is the oil and gas industry, which represented nearly 20% of bookings in FY 2025. Here, a joint venture with energy giant Baker Hughes played a key role in generating sales. Because of this alliance, gained customers such as Shell and ExxonMobil. At the end of May, renewed its partnership with Baker Hughes through June of 2028. This is one of many partnerships established to capture customers. Its partner network includes tech giants Microsoft and Alphabet-owned Google Cloud. The partnerships contributed 73% of the agreements closed in fiscal 2025. This sales approach resulted in record revenue of $108.7 million, a 26% year-over-year increase, in the company's fiscal Q4. Sales growth is anticipated to continue, with Q1 revenue in FY 2026 forecast to hit at least $100 million, up from $87.2 million in the prior year. In addition, its full-year fiscal 2025 revenue of $389.1 million represented 25% year-over-year growth, and expects to up that in the next fiscal year. It estimated between $447.5 million and $484.5 million in fiscal 2026 sales. Both and SoundHound are successfully expanding their AI businesses. So how do you decide which is the better buy right now? To assess that, here's a look at the price-to-sales (P/S) ratio for both companies, a commonly used metric that measures how much investors are willing to pay for every dollar of revenue. SoundHound's P/S multiple was sky-high at the start of the year but has since dropped. Even so, it remains far higher than indicating is the better value. With its key Baker Hughes partnership renewed, is positioned for years of growth ahead. That's in spite of the current macroeconomic uncertainty, thanks to the secular trend of AI. After all, industry forecasts predict substantial growth in the AI market, from 2024's $184 billion to a remarkable $826 billion by 2030. And as Nvidia CEO Jensen Huang stated, "Countries around the world are recognizing AI as essential infrastructure -- just like electricity and the internet." This suggests government business is likely to remain a growth area as the AI ramp-up extends over the ensuing years. With this factor in its favor and a lower valuation compared to SoundHound, wins out as the better long-term investment in AI. Before you buy stock in SoundHound AI, consider this: The Motley Fool Stock Advisor analyst team just identified what they believe are the for investors to buy now… and SoundHound AI wasn't one of them. The 10 stocks that made the cut could produce monster returns in the coming years. Consider when Netflix made this list on December 17, 2004... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $660,821!* Or when Nvidia made this list on April 15, 2005... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $886,880!* Now, it's worth noting Stock Advisor's total average return is 791% — a market-crushing outperformance compared to 174% for the S&P 500. Don't miss out on the latest top 10 list, available when you join . See the 10 stocks » *Stock Advisor returns as of June 9, 2025 Suzanne Frey, an executive at Alphabet, is a member of The Motley Fool's board of directors. Robert Izquierdo has positions in Alphabet, Microsoft, Nvidia, and SoundHound AI. The Motley Fool has positions in and recommends Alphabet, Microsoft, and Nvidia. The Motley Fool recommends and Stellantis and recommends the following options: long January 2026 $395 calls on Microsoft and short January 2026 $405 calls on Microsoft. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy. Better Artificial Intelligence Stock: vs. SoundHound AI was originally published by The Motley Fool Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Amazon's bleak job update exposes major AI warning for Aussie workers: 'Will reduce'
Thousands of office workers at Amazon and Microsoft could soon be without a job as the two companies invest more heavily in artificial intelligence and outsourcing. Major warnings have been issued in recent months about how AI could create high levels of unemployment in Australia and around the world. Amazon chief executive Andy Jassy wrote a memo to staff that cautioned this tech takeover would likely hit its workforce in the coming years. But he suggested that some who lose their jobs could find new roles in other sectors. 'As we roll out more generative AI and agents, it should change the way our work is done. We will need fewer people doing some of the jobs that are being done today, and more people doing other types of jobs,' he said. AI warning following 'extraordinary' prediction of job wipe out Centrelink age pension changes coming into effect from July 1 $1,000 ATO school fees tax deduction that Aussies don't realise they can claim 'It's hard to know exactly where this nets out over time, but in the next few years, we expect that this will reduce our total corporate workforce as we get efficiency gains from using AI extensively across the company.' Meanwhile, Bloomberg is reporting Microsoft is gearing up for another round of 'thousands' of job cuts after getting rid of 6,000 roles just last month. During that blitz, the tech company slashed the product and engineering departments; however, this potential new round of cuts could focus more on the sales teams. Microsoft warned back in April that it was looking to use third-party firms to take on software sales rather than do things of Australian companies have started throwing big sums of cash into AI to help improve their products, backend operations, and customer services. But Telstra recently admitted roles would likely be cut in the future due to this new focus. 'Our workforce will look different in 2030 as we develop new capabilities, find new ways to leverage technology, including AI, and we have to stay focused on becoming more efficient,' Vicki Brady said. 'We don't know precisely what our workforce will look like in 2030, but it will be smaller than it is today.' The head of AI leader Anthropic, Dario Amodei, suggested half of all entry-level white-collar jobs could get the flick in the US by 2030. Meanwhile, the Australian Council of Trade Unions (ACTU) said late last year that one in three workers were at risk from AI. Australia's productivity commissioner Danielle Wood isn't convinced the AI bloodbath will be that bad. Still, she didn't deny the workforce matrix we're familiar with now will inevitably go through some big changes. 'Am I going to sit here and say, 'No jobs are going to go?' No, clearly not. There will be some impacts," she told the ABC. She hoped AI would allow people to have more time for "the uniquely human parts of jobs". The Prime Minister has announced a huge summit in August a bid to fix the country's lagging productivity. The government believes AI could be a game-changer in this realm and is keen to explore ways the technology can be deployed across multiple sectors. While the ACTU is on board with AI in certain scenarios, it wants assurances for workers' rights. 'To achieve good adoption of AI, Australia needs responsible regulation which both protects Australian workers and Australian industries from malicious use and theft by overseas big tech," ACTU secretary Sally McManus said. The union is pushing for workers to have the right to refuse to use AI in fields where it would be 'inappropriate or carry undue risk', like in medical decision-making. Finance Sector Union national secretary Julia Angrisano, who has been carefully watching Australia's banking industry adopt new tech, said the roundtable will be a good opportunity to set up some ground rules. 'AI is a fundamental and growing part of the finance sector, but this growth is happening in an almost entirely unregulated and uncontrolled way,' she said. 'The economic benefits and productivity gains of AI must flow on to workers, and not just improve the profits of banks and major companies.' Australian Services Union national secretary Emeline Gaske went as far as saying workers should be 'fairly compensated' for using AI. 'AI will undoubtedly reshape the way we work, but we can't lose sight of the people behind the progress,' she said. 'Workers whose knowledge, experience and judgement are used to train and refine these systems deserve to be recognised."Sign in to access your portfolio
