logo
How to keep children safe online as social media compared to 'cancer risk of smoking'

How to keep children safe online as social media compared to 'cancer risk of smoking'

Yahoo06-02-2025

Britain's counterterrorism chief has compared the harm caused by social media to the "cancer" of smoking and has raised the idea of a potential ban on its use by children under 16.
Giving evidence to The Times Crime and Justice Commission Matt Jukes said his team had discussed the issue with colleagues in Australia, which implemented world-first legislation last year, unveiling plans to ban social media use by U16s.
Mr Jukes said the UK could not afford to delay taking serious action on the negative impacts of social media. "If I give you a parallel with the harm caused by smoking, by 1950, it was clear that smoking was causing lung cancer and killing people," he said. "But it took decades for governments to decide to regulate, not even the supply of tobacco more closely, but even just the advertising of tobacco to young people in places where young people could see it."
Mr Jukes added the 'cancer' of dangerous online content 'which is driving violence is in our communities and in the lives of young people now'.
The call for greater discussion around social media use in children comes after Meta's decision to drop its fact-checkers caused further anxiety for parents. In a series of changes, Mark Zuckerberg announced earlier this year that Meta, the parent company of Facebook and Instagram, will stop paying organisations to fact-check posts. Instead the social media giant will start to use a "community notes" system similar to that on Elon Musk-owned X (formerly Twitter).
While not all social media posts were vetted previously, the move means it's more important than ever to take an active role in helping children navigate what they see online.
A great first step parents can take is having regular, age-appropriate conversations with their children about their online lives. These conversations can be difficult, but the NSPCC has provided some tips.
Stay calm, balanced and non-judgemental – "Don't tackle the conversation when you're feeling highly emotional," Rani Govender, regulatory policy manager at the NSPCC, advises.
Talk to someone else about it. "Your child's school can be a great source of information, particularly the class teacher and the Designated Safeguarding Lead," Govender adds.
Keep listening, try not to interrupt even if there is a period of silence. "They may be thinking how they word something," Govender says.
Children often talk of being punished. "For example, if they open up to you and say that they have seen explicit content by accident, they are scared of their devices being removed from them," Govender explains. "This is seen as a punishment and consequence for something that was out of their control. This is a judgement call that needs to be carefully handled."
Keeping an open dialogue about their online experiences is important. "Instead of just monitoring their activity, ask them what they're interested in or what's trending among their friends," suggests Dr Huriye Atilgan, neuroscientist and expert on internet safety.
"This not only helps you stay informed but also makes it easier for them to approach you if something feels off."
Building up trust between a parent and child is crucial to a safe online life. "Parents should show an interest in what their children does online and have open conversations about the potential risks online," Govender advises. "It is also important that the growing independence children have as they get older is respected."
Talk about red flags like exaggerated headlines or sources that aren't familiar. "Using tools like Full-fact, Snopes or Google's Fact Check Explorer together can turn this into a learning moment rather than a lecture," advises Dr Atilgan. "If your child sees something questionable, encourage them to show you so you can figure it out together."
Often online platforms will show us content based on what we like, but Govender suggests trying to encourage children to look at a range of different resources to learn and access new information.
If your child sees something online that worries or upsets them encourage them to not re-share. Govender advises reminding them they can speak to you, another trusted adult, or a Childline Counsellor if they have questions about something they've seen.
These allow you to block and filter upsetting or inappropriate content. "They work across your WiFi, phone network, individual apps and devices," advises Govender. "Ensure you have this conversation with your child so it's seen as a joint decision what controls are put in place, rather than a one-sided decision."
Dr Atilgan describes the importance of helping children find a balance between online and offline activities. "Whether it's hobbies, sports, or simply spending time as a family, these moments reduce screen time and help kids stay grounded," she says.
For further tips and advice, visit the NSPCC's Online Safety Hub. Parents can also visit the fake news, hoaxes and misinformation section of the website for further information and find information on how to set up parental controls.
You can also access the TRUST toolkit, in partnership with Vodafone, which aims to keep children safe online by giving parents helpful advice when buying their child their first phone.
Non-profit organisation Internet Matters has a wealth of resources and expert guidance to help parents navigate the ever-changing world of child internet safety.
Childnet has a wide range of helpful information and guidance for parents on a range of key online safety topics.
Read more about parenting and social media:
1 in 4 parents unaware if children are accessing anonymous chat rooms (Yahoo Life UK, 5-min read)
How to speak to girls about sexual assault, according to experts (Yahoo Life UK, 5-min read)
What to do if you think your child is being radicalised (Yahoo Life UK, 5-min read)

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

YouTube now allows more harmful misinformation on its platform
YouTube now allows more harmful misinformation on its platform

Engadget

time15 hours ago

  • Engadget

YouTube now allows more harmful misinformation on its platform

YouTube is following in the potentially dangerous steps of Meta and X (formerly Twitter) by relaxing its content moderation policies. New internal training materials viewed by The New York Times instruct moderators to leave videos live if up to half its content violates YouTube's policies, an increase from a quarter of it. The platform introduced the new policy in mid-December, a month after President Trump was re-elected. The new guidelines reflect what YouTube deems as "public interest." These areas include discussing or debating elections, movements, race, gender, immigration and more. "Recognizing that the definition of 'public interest' is always evolving, we update our guidance for these exceptions to reflect the new types of discussion we see on the platform today," Nicole Bell, a YouTube spokesperson, told The New York Times . "Our goal remains the same: to protect free expression on YouTube while mitigating egregious harm." The platform has reportedly removed 22 percent more videos due to hateful and abusive content than last year. It's not clear how many videos were reported or would have been removed under the previous guidelines. YouTube reportedly told moderators to now value keeping content up if it's a debate between freedom of expression and risk. For example, they were shown a video called "RFK Jr. Delivers SLEDGEHAMMER Blows to Gene-Altering JABS" which falsely stated that Covid vaccines can change people's genes. However, YouTube told the moderators that public interest "outweighs the harm risk" and the video should stay up. It has since been removed, though the reason why is unclear. Other videos allowed to remain online included one with a slur aimed at a transgender person and one in which a commentator discussed a graphic demise for former South Korean president Yoon Suk Yeol. Engadget has reached out to YouTube for comment.

Stocks Muted Ahead of US-China Talks; Tech AI Deals; LA Protest Clashes
Stocks Muted Ahead of US-China Talks; Tech AI Deals; LA Protest Clashes

Bloomberg

time17 hours ago

  • Bloomberg

Stocks Muted Ahead of US-China Talks; Tech AI Deals; LA Protest Clashes

US equity futures hold steady ahead of the latest round of trade talks between the US and China taking place in London. Meta is said to be in talks to invest in Scale AI while Qualcomm agrees to buy Alphawave IP Group for $2.4 billion. Nvidia CEO Jensen Huang speaks with Prime Minister Keir Starmer at London Tech Week. President Trump clashes with California Governor Gavin Newsom over the deployment of National Guard troops to anti-deportation protests in Los Angeles. Elsa Lignos of RBC says the dynamic around the US dollar has become structurally bearish. Aaron Kennon of Clear Harbour Asset Management says the market is trying to look through shifting trade dynamics to focus on the excitement of AI. (Source: Bloomberg)

The job market is brutal for women executives
The job market is brutal for women executives

Axios

time17 hours ago

  • Axios

The job market is brutal for women executives

It's a brutal time for women executives and others who don't neatly fit the stereotypical ideal of a leader. Why it matters: Not only has the zeal for diversity that's defined the past decade faded, but backlash from the White House has made firms even less willing to take risks on "nontraditional" candidates, including women, people of color and LGBTQ+ people. The big picture: For years, executive recruiters were asked to find diverse slates to fill the top spots inside U.S. companies, moving up the numbers, if only slightly, inside these firms. That's not happening anymore, says Lindsay Trout, a partner and talent consultant at executive search firm Egon Zehnder, who finds candidates at the C-suite and board level for large companies. How it works: A board running a search for a CEO will draw up a list of specifications for candidates. They might say, "We're looking for public company CEOs who are in the tech industry at companies that are at X scale," Trout explains. Go with those specs and "you end up with a list that inevitably excludes females from consideration." It would be like looking for someone to head an NGO and only considering those with experience as a U.S. president or secretary of state. Zoom out: For a few years, firms would also say they would like to consider a "diverse slate" so you could bring in other qualified candidates with potential who did not exactly meet the criteria. "Now that is not part of the conversation or expectation," Trout says. "I took my pronouns out of my resume," an editorial leader who was recently hunting for jobs tells Axios, asking for anonymity to speak freely while still searching. They decided to "tone it down," feeling like being too openly queer was hurting the search. They locked down a contract job soon after making those adjustments, though it was not clear if that was a factor. Zoom in: There was rising backlash and some fatigue at the board level even before President Trump took office in January and made ending DEI efforts a priority. "People are generally satisfied with the progress that they have made," Trout says. Context: After a surge of appointments in 2020 and 2021, companies are now naming fewer women and people of color to their boards, Axios reported last year. Some firms have started to reverse course. At Meta, women make up 23% of board directors. Just a few years ago in 2022, that figure was 44%. Over the past year, no women CEOs were recruited into Fortune 500 firms. The ones who nabbed that top spot were internal hires. Between the lines: The process of looking for diverse slates did drive some resentment and likely hurt some men. "It probably is true that equally as compelling white male talent didn't get the nod" for board roles, Trout says. Reality check: Many large companies have continued to defend DEI efforts, at least from shareholder attacks. Not all firms have walked away from this work, says Jennifer McCollum, CEO of Catalyst, a nonprofit that advocates for women in the workplace. Scaling back entirely from DEI can lead to increased risks on the legal side, as well as talent loss and reputational damage, she says.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store