&w=3840&q=100)
Iran president says nuclear activity ‘will not halt under any circumstances', warns of ‘more devastating' response to Israel
Pezeshkian warned that his country's response to continued Israeli 'aggression' will be 'more devastating', as fighting raged between the two foes for a ninth day. read more
Rocket trails are seen in the sky above the Israeli coastal city of Netanya amid a fresh barrage of Iranian missile attacks on June 21, 2025. Photo- AFP
Iran will not halt nuclear activity 'under any circumstances', Iran's President Masoud Pezeshkian said Saturday amid ongoing fighting with Israel which hit nuclear sites.
'We are ready to discuss and cooperate to build confidence in the field of peaceful nuclear activities, however, we do not agree to reduce nuclear activities to zero under any circumstances,' said Pezeshkian during a phone call with French President Emmanuel Macron, according to the official IRNA news agency.
STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD
Pezeshkian warned that his country's response to continued Israeli 'aggression' will be 'more devastating', as fighting raged between the two foes for a ninth day.
'Our response to the continued aggression of the Zionist regime will be more devastating,' said Pezeshkian during a phone call with French President Emmanuel Macron, according to the official IRNA news agency.
He also said that his country's right to pursue a civilian nuclear programme cannot be taken away by war, as it traded fire with Israel for a ninth day.
'Iran has always announced that it is ready to provide guarantees and build confidence in its peaceful nuclear activities within the framework of international law,' Pezeshkian told French President Emmanuel Macron in a phone call, according to the official IRNA news agency.
'The rights granted to countries and nations by international law cannot be taken away from them by threats or war.'
Talks in Geneva on Friday failed to produce a breakthrough. European officials expressed hope for future discussions. Iran's foreign minister said he was open to further dialogue while emphasizing that Tehran had no interest in negotiating with the U.S. while Israel continues to attack.
'Iran is ready to consider diplomacy once again, and once aggression is stopped and the aggressor is held accountable for the crimes committed,' he told reporters.
No date was set for a new round of talks.
For many Iranians, updates remained difficult. Internet-access advocacy group NetBlocks.org said Saturday that limited internet access had again 'collapsed.' A nationwide internet shutdown has been in place for several days.
STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD
With inputs from agencies
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Hindustan Times
31 minutes ago
- Hindustan Times
Trump shares social media post suggesting Iran's Fordow nuclear site ‘is gone' after US strikes
Jun 22, 2025 05:54 AM IST In a major development in the Iran-Israel conflict, the US officially directly joined the Israeli campaign with President Donald Trump confirming on Saturday of the military having conducting strikes on three nuclear sites in Iran – Fordow, Natanz, and Esfahan. President Donald Trump walks on the South Lawn upon arriving at the White House, Saturday, June 21, 2025, in Washington(AP) Donald Trump shared a post Truth Social, confirming the US strikes on Iranian nuclear sites. Follow Iran Israel conflict live updates Donald Trump shared another post moments later, which suggested that Fordow nuclear site 'is gone'. The Israeli efforts to decapitate Iran's nuclear plans began June 13, saying that the country was close to getting a weapon. 'We have completed our very successful attack on the three Nuclear sites in Iran, including Fordow, Natanz, and Esfahan," Trump said in his first post on Truth Social. "All planes are now outside of Iran air space. A full payload of BOMBS was dropped on the primary site, Fordow. All planes are safely on their way home,' Trump's post added. Get the latest headlines from US news and global updates from Pakistan, UK, Bangladesh, and Russia get all the latest headlines in one place with including Vance Luther Boelteron Hindustan Times.
The Hindu
39 minutes ago
- The Hindu
How will Israel-Iran conflict impact India?
The story so far: As the latest Israel-Iran conflict crossed the one-week mark, the Indian government began to bring back Indian citizens from both countries, fearing a further escalation. In a sudden attack on June 13, Israel launched strikes on Iranian nuclear installations, assassinated top generals, and bombed several cities across the country. Iran's response has been more robust than expected, as it too has launched barrage after barrage of ballistic missiles on military targets and research facilities in Israel. How has India reacted to the conflict? Prime Minister Narendra Modi received a call from Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu on June 13, briefing him on the attack by Israel on Iran's nuclear facilities in several cities, including Tehran, where senior Iranian generals were assassinated through targeted strikes. The strikes were a clear violation of international law, Iran argued at the U.N. Security Council, as even Israel claimed they were 'pre-emptive' and not in retaliation to an attack. In a statement, the government said Mr. Modi had 'shared India's concern and emphasised the need for early restoration of peace and stability in the region.' In a call with Iranian Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi, External Affairs Minister S. Jaishankar expressed the 'deep concern of the international community at the turn of events,' and urged against retaliation and for diplomacy. Mr. Jaishankar also spoke to Israeli Foreign Minister Gideon Sa'ar. The Ministry of External Affairs (MEA) statement played safe, calling for dialogue and diplomacy while making no criticism of Israel for launching the strikes. It also disassociated from a statement of the Shanghai Cooperation Organisation (SCO), which includes China, Russia, Iran, Pakistan, Belarus and Central Asian states, that had condemned Israel's 'aggression'. Also read: India stands 'isolated' over abstention on Gaza ceasefire in the UNGA, says Congress Last week, India had abstained in a UN resolution for a ceasefire in Gaza. Every other member of BRICS, SCO and SAARC and even all G-7 members minus the U.S. had voted in favour of the resolution critical of Israel's bombardment of Gaza. In a break from older positions, New Delhi has made it clear that India will not criticise Israel. What about Indians caught in the conflict? As the conflict escalated, the MEA and its embassies in Tehran and Tel Aviv put evacuation efforts, as part of what was named 'Operation Sindhu', on priority. Unlike the rest of West Asia, where nearly 10 million Indians reside, relatively fewer numbers live in Iran and Israel. There are about 10,000 students and professionals in Iran and about 25,000 workers, students and researchers in Israel, many of whom only moved recently to fill in for construction and caregiver jobs after Israel dismissed thousands of Palestinian workers in the wake of the October 7 terror attacks in 2023. The evacuation efforts are multi-pronged and require the cooperation of both governments to help Indians cross over to bordering countries and fly back. Iran has even opened its airspace, otherwise closed due to the war, to allow chartered flights carrying Indian citizens home. While it is important to keep them safe, the government has learnt from past conflicts that it is necessary to find work and study opportunities for those coming back, or they end up returning to the conflict zones. Apart from the loss in remittances, what's at stake for India economically? India has had declining levels of trade with both Iran and Israel in the last few years due to tensions in the region. After India bowed to the previous Trump administration's demand to cancel oil trade or face sanctions, its trade with Iran dropped from about $14 billion in 2017 to $1.4 billion last year. Tensions in the Gulf region post-attacks as well as Israeli operations on Gaza have also sent trade with Israel down from $11 billion in 2022 to $3.75 billion last year, the Indian embassy said. However, India's defence imports from Israel have soared in the past decade, from about $5.6 million in 2015 to $128 million presently. However, where India will feel the pinch financially, is in trade route disruptions, especially if the Strait of Hormuz is closed as a pressure tactic by Iran, or due to intensified fighting. According to thinktank GTRI, this could sharply increase oil and LNG prices, given that 40-50% of India's energy imports come through the area. Shipping costs, security, and insurance premiums would rise, leading to more costly imports, less competitive exports, and inflation. What are the geopolitical impacts of the conflict for New Delhi to worry about? Dealing with the Israel-Iran conflict has always meant a tricky tightrope balance for New Delhi, given its strong ties with both countries. The balance is also required in view of the two polarised parts of the world they represent. The U.S. and G-7 countries have largely backed Israel strikes as its 'right to defend itself'. In a joint statement at the summit in Canada this week, they called Iran the 'principal source of regional instability and terror' that can 'never have a nuclear weapon'. U.S. President Donald Trump is mulling a decision to formally join the attack on Iran, but U.S. support for Israel is crucial and unquestioning, even if he doesn't. Mr. Trump's lunch invitation to Pakistan's Army chief General Asim Munir this week, and speculation that the U.S. may ask Pakistan for support in a possible operation in Iran, from logistics to overflight and refuelling to intelligence sharing, will make India's path more difficult. Also read: Huge blow to Indian diplomacy, says Congress on Trump-Munir lunch On the other hand, the Global South, which has been very critical of Israel's war in Gaza, has also expressed sympathies with Iran during the current crisis. After the stand India took with the SCO, all eyes will be on what position Mr. Modi takes when he travels to Brazil for the BRICS summit of emerging economies on July 6-7. Apart from founders Brazil, Russia, India, China and South Africa, the BRICS grouping includes new members Iran, the UAE, Egypt, Ethiopia, Iran, and now Indonesia (Saudi Arabia has yet to formally join), and India will face a harder challenge in separating itself from any statement that is issued there. There's also the possible cost to India's ties with the Gulf region that has to be factored in. For India, West Asia is not just the source of 40% of its remittances but also 54% of oil imports and the region accounts for over $170 billion in trade. A perceived pro-Israel shift has a reputational impact for India, which was the first non-Arab nation to recognise the Palestinian State. Finally, there is the impact of a prolonged Israel-Iran conflict on India's connectivity plans. Plans for the India Middle East Europe Economic Corridor had already run aground after the October 7 attacks given that it requires connectivity through Arab countries and through Israel to Haifa port. With the current crisis, India's investment in the Chabahar port project and the International North-South Transport Corridor for trade and connectivity to Afghanistan, Central Asia and Eurasia will be affected, and New Delhi's best hope is an early end to the conflict.
Indian Express
an hour ago
- Indian Express
‘Iran could produce nuclear weapon within weeks': US intel chief Tulsi Gabbard's U-turn after Trump rebukes her
The US Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard, who had earlier stated during a Congressional hearing in March that Iran was not building a nuclear weapon, has now said that Tehran could produce nuclear weapons 'within weeks'. This comes after President Donald Trump rebuked her at an airport in Morristown, New Jersey on Saturday when asked about Gabbard's Congressional testimony and said 'She's wrong.' The US spy chief, in her defence, has said that her testimony in the Congress in March – where she stated that Iran had a stock of materials but was not building these weapons – were taken out of context by 'dishonest media'. The dishonest media is intentionally taking my testimony out of context and spreading fake news as a way to manufacture division. America has intelligence that Iran is at the point that it can produce a nuclear weapon within weeks to months, if they decide to finalize the… — DNI Tulsi Gabbard (@DNIGabbard) June 20, 2025 Gabbard's change of stance over Iran's nuclear programme comes as Trump rejected her Congressional testimony and said she was 'wrong' and that intelligence showed Iran had a 'tremendous amount of material' and could have a nuclear weapon 'within months'. 'The dishonest media is intentionally taking my testimony out of context and spreading fake news as a way to manufacture division. America has intelligence that Iran is at the point that it can produce a nuclear weapon within weeks to months, if they decide to finalize the assembly,' Gabbard said in a post on X. Iran has always reiterated its stance that its nuclear programme is peaceful and that it has never sought to develop a weapon out of it. President Trump on Thursday said that he has given Tehran a maximum of two weeks to reach a deal with Washington on its nuclear programme and in the meantime, he'll decide whether the United States should join the Israeli offensive against Iran. Iran's Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi, in response to Trump's statement said on Saturday, 'his country was 'absolutely ready for a negotiated solution' on their nuclear programme but that Iran 'cannot go through negotiations with the US when our people are under bombardment,' BBC reported.
