logo
Musk's robotaxis under probe after video shows wrong-lane driving in Texas

Musk's robotaxis under probe after video shows wrong-lane driving in Texas

The National Highway Traffic Safety Administration said Tuesday that it has asked Tesla for information about the apparent errors
Press Trust of India Washington
Federal traffic safety regulators are looking into suspected problems with Elon Musk's test run of self-driving "robotaxis" in Texas after videos surfaced showing them braking suddenly or going straight through an intersection from a turning lane and driving down the wrong side of the road.
The National Highway Traffic Safety Administration said Tuesday that it has asked Tesla for information about the apparent errors. Though many other videos show robotaxis driving perfectly, if regulators find any major issues, that would likely raise questions about Musk's repeated statements that the robotaxis are safe and his claim that Tesla will dominate a future in which nearly all cars on road will have no one behind the wheel or even need a steering wheel at all.
"NHTSA is aware of the referenced incidents and is in contact with the manufacturer to gather additional information," the agency said in a statement.
Passengers in Tesla robotaxis on the road in Austin, Texas, have generally been impressed, and the stock rose 8 per cent Monday. Investors grew more cautious Tuesday after news of NHTSA's inquiry, and the stock fell more than 2 per cent.
Tesla did not immediately respond to a request for comment.
A bullish Tesla financial analyst who was driven around in a robotaxi on Sunday when the test runs began said his ride was perfect and suggested the videos on X and YouTube showing errors were no big deal.
"Any issues they encounter will be fixed," said Wedbush Securities' Dan Ives, calling the test a "huge success" in the past three days "despite the sceptics." One of those sceptics, a Telemetry Insight expert in car technology, said the videos were alarming enough that the tests as currently run should be halted.
"The system has always had highly erratic performance, working really well a lot of the time but frequently making random and inconsistent but dangerous errors," said Sam Abuelsamid in a text, referring to Tesla's self-driving software. "This is not a system that should be carrying members of the public or being tested on public roads without trained test drivers behind the wheel." In one video, a Tesla moves into a lane with a big yellow arrow indicating it is for left turns only but then goes straight through the intersection instead, entering an opposing lane on the other side. The car seems to realise it made some mistake and begins to swerve several times, with the steering wheel jerking back and forth, before eventually settling down.
But the Tesla proceeds in the opposing lane for 10 seconds. At the time, there was no oncoming traffic.
The passenger in the car who posted the video, money manager Rob Maurer, shrugged off the incident.
"There are no vehicles anywhere in sight, so this wasn't a safety issue," Maurer said in commentary accompanying his video. "I didn't feel uncomfortable in the situation." Another video shows a Tesla stopping twice suddenly in the middle of the road, possibly responding to the flashing lights of police cars. But the police are obviously not interested in the Tesla or traffic in front or behind it because they have parked on side roads not near it, apparently responding to an unrelated event.
Federal regulators opened an investigation last year into how Teslas with what Musk calls Full Self-Driving have responded in low-visibility conditions after several accidents, including one that was fatal. Tesla was forced a recall 2.4 million of its vehicles at the time.
Musk has said his Teslas using Full Self-Driving are safer than human drivers and his robotaxis using a newer, improved version of the system will be so successful so quickly that he will be able to deploy hundreds of thousands of them on the road by the end of next year.
Even if the Austin test goes well, though, the billionaire faces big challenges. Other self-driving companies have launched taxis, including Amazon's Zoox and current market leader Waymo, which is not only is picking up passengers in Austin, but several other cities. The company recently announced it had clocked its 10 millionth paid ride.
Musk needs a win in robotaxis. His work on in Trump administration as cost-cutting czar has alienated many buyers among Tesla's traditional environmentally conscious and liberal base in the US, tanking sales. Buyers in Europe having balked, too, after Musk embraced some extreme right-wing politicians earlier this year in both Britain and Germany.
(Only the headline and picture of this report may have been reworked by the Business Standard staff; the rest of the content is auto-generated from a syndicated feed.)

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Big tech under fire: What global antitrust battles mean for Indian consumers and startups
Big tech under fire: What global antitrust battles mean for Indian consumers and startups

Hindustan Times

time35 minutes ago

  • Hindustan Times

Big tech under fire: What global antitrust battles mean for Indian consumers and startups

The heat is on big tech giants like Google, Microsoft, Apple, and Meta are facing escalating antitrust scrutiny around the world. What started as scattered probes has turned into full-blown legal warfare. For Indian users and homegrown startups, these regulatory shake-ups aren't just distant headlines. They could redefine how digital ecosystems work here, too. Big tech and antitrust The biggest showdown? The U.S. Department of Justice's antitrust case against Google. Often compared to the historic Microsoft case from two decades ago. The focus this time: search dominance and the company's multibillion-dollar default search deals. Remedies on the table range from structural divestitures to tighter restrictions on distribution agreements. Microsoft is also under the scanner. The FTC is investigating its AI and cloud business practices, especially post-OpenAI partnerships. Apple is dealing with lawsuits tied to internal employee surveillance and App Store competition policies. And in a headline-grabbing move, Elon Musk had sued OpenAI, alleging anti-competitive conduct and deviations from its original nonprofit goals. All of this is unfolding as U.S. regulators roll out tougher merger guidelines and expand their enforcement playbook. The message is clear: the era of unchecked dominance is being challenged—loudly. Implications for Indian consumers and startups Why should Indian users care? Because when regulators take on tech monopolies, the ripple effects travel. Fairer competition means better privacy protections, more innovation, and fewer walled gardens. For Indian startups, these global cases are more than case studies. They reflect challenges faced locally, be it app store commissions, discoverability issues, or restricted access to platforms. When tech giants self-preference their own products, smaller players often get buried. The Competition Commission of India (CCI) has already started taking cues. It's pushed for platform neutrality and continues to encourage complaints from smaller companies. As global watchdogs raise the bar, India is likely to follow. Expert opinions and regulatory trends Analysts say enforcement is entering a new phase. It's not just about penalties but proactive control. Agencies are demanding deeper transaction disclosures, and even smaller deals are coming under scrutiny. In the UK, the Competition and Markets Authority (CMA) plans to label Google as having 'strategic market status,' which could force changes to its search algorithm and limit how it hoards data. The broader goal? Curb monopolistic behaviour without killing innovation. But the spotlight is firmly on AI, advertising models, and platform control. Three areas where Big Tech holds disproportionate power. Lessons for India and the road ahead As the global tide turns against Big Tech excess, India has a front-row seat, and a lot to learn. Stronger competition laws and smarter enforcement could level the playing field for startups while protecting users from exploitative practices. The road ahead won't be easy, but the momentum for accountability is finally here.

Big B**** quits DOGE: Who is the 19 year-old ex-Neuralink prodigy? Departs months after Elon Musk
Big B**** quits DOGE: Who is the 19 year-old ex-Neuralink prodigy? Departs months after Elon Musk

Time of India

time3 hours ago

  • Time of India

Big B**** quits DOGE: Who is the 19 year-old ex-Neuralink prodigy? Departs months after Elon Musk

Big B**** quits DOGE: Who is the 19 year-old ex-Neuralink prodigy? Departs months after Elon Musk Edward Coristine known by the online pseudonym 'Big B***', is a 19-year-old high-profile DOGE operative who has resigned from his federal government post on Monday morning, just a month after the departure of his former boss, Elon Musk . Born in December 2005, Edward Coristine is a high school graduate who had previously worked with Elon Musk's Neuralink as an intern before he was hired by the Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE) last year. In his brief period at DOGE, Coristine worked across several agencies, including the General Services Administration, USAID, USCIS, and the Departments of Education, Health and Human Services, and Homeland Security. Most recently, he was active at the Social Security Administration with an agency-linked email address. He previously helped draft plans to cut the State Department's budget, shut diplomatic offices, and reduce overseas staff. He also contributed to developing a system to sell $5 million special immigration visas, dubbed "gold cards" by President Donald Trump. Coristine's time at DOGE has been shadowed by controversies. In March, Reuters reported that he had provided technical support to a cybercrime group that boasted about trafficking stolen data and harassing an FBI agent.

Elon Musk's Grok shows 'flaws' in fact-checking Israel-Iran war: study
Elon Musk's Grok shows 'flaws' in fact-checking Israel-Iran war: study

Economic Times

time3 hours ago

  • Economic Times

Elon Musk's Grok shows 'flaws' in fact-checking Israel-Iran war: study

Elon Musk's AI chatbot Grok produced inaccurate and contradictory responses when users sought to fact-check the Israel-Iran conflict, a study said Tuesday, raising fresh doubts about its reliability as a debunking tool. With tech platforms reducing their reliance on human fact-checkers, users are increasingly utilizing AI-powered chatbots -- including xAI's Grok -- in search of reliable information, but their responses are often themselves prone to misinformation. "The investigation into Grok's performance during the first days of the Israel-Iran conflict exposes significant flaws and limitations in the AI chatbot's ability to provide accurate, reliable, and consistent information during times of crisis," said the study from the Digital Forensic Research Lab (DFRLab) of the Atlantic Council, an American think tank."Grok demonstrated that it struggles with verifying already-confirmed facts, analyzing fake visuals, and avoiding unsubstantiated claims."The DFRLab analyzed around 130,000 posts in various languages on the platform X, where the AI assistant is built in, to find that Grok was "struggling to authenticate AI-generated media." Following Iran's retaliatory strikes on Israel, Grok offered vastly different responses to similar prompts about an AI-generated video of a destroyed airport that amassed millions of views on X, the study found. It oscillated -- sometimes within the same minute -- between denying the airport's destruction and confirming it had been damaged by strikes, the study said. In some responses, Grok cited the a missile launched by Yemeni rebels as the source of the damage. In others, it wrongly identified the AI-generated airport as one in Beirut, Gaza, or Tehran. When users shared another AI-generated video depicting buildings collapsing after an alleged Iranian strike on Tel Aviv, Grok responded that it appeared to be real, the study Israel-Iran conflict, which led to US air strikes against Tehran's nuclear program over the weekend, has churned out an avalanche of online misinformation including AI-generated videos and war visuals recycled from other chatbots also amplified the Israel-Iran war intensified, false claims spread across social media that China had dispatched military cargo planes to Tehran to offer its users asked the AI-operated X accounts of AI companies Perplexity and Grok about its validity, both wrongly responded that the claims were true, according to disinformation watchdog say Grok has previously made errors verifying information related to crises such as the recent India-Pakistan conflict and anti-immigration protests in Los month, Grok was under renewed scrutiny for inserting "white genocide" in South Africa, a far-right conspiracy theory, into unrelated startup xAI blamed an "unauthorized modification" for the unsolicited response. Musk, a South African-born billionaire, has previously peddled the unfounded claim that South Africa's leaders were "openly pushing for genocide" of white himself blasted Grok after it cited Media Matters -- a liberal media watchdog he has targeted in multiple lawsuits -- as a source in some of its responses about misinformation."Shame on you, Grok," Musk wrote on X. "Your sourcing is terrible."

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store