A reminder this Earth Day: The fight to save the Lowcountry is up to us
Ahead of America's first Earth Day in 1970, an oil spill famously stained a California beach and a polluted river was on fire in Ohio. But in the South Carolina Lowcountry, a great environmental battle was being waged that's also worthy of the history books.
Here, a small but diverse band of natives and newcomers, shrimpers and developers, children and retirees successfully fought off the powers that be to stop a BASF chemical plant from locating on the pristine Colleton River near Bluffton and Hilton Head Island.
The humble Capt. Dave shrimp trawler gave the fight its lasting image when it chugged to Washington, D.C., to deliver to Secretary of the Interior Walter Hickel more than 40,000 petition signatures in opposition to the chemical plant.
The Capt. Dave was part of a new Hilton Head Fishing Cooperative that enabled Black shrimpers to get a bigger piece of the economic pie. And in the spring of 1971, the Capt. Dave and all aboard cruised into Harbour Town to celebrate the first anniversary of their historic trip to Washington.
This is where we can see the ingredients to success as we mark the 55th Earth Day on Tuesday.
We can see it through the eyes of the Rev. Boyd Cook. He attended the second annual Capt. Dave celebration after just arriving on the island to bring Christ Lutheran Church to life after six years in Memphis when it was being torn apart by racial violence.
'There were all these yachts tied up,' he told The Island Packet newspaper in the spring of 1972. 'Then into the harbor streamed the shrimp boats draped with banners and pennants, horns blowing, people waving and yelling. Everybody got off the boats and had a party. There was shrimp boiling in 50-gallon drums, a band playing and a beer truck.
'Here was a community getting together as one. I was overwhelmed. 'Can this really be South Carolina?' I thought.'
A lesson: They banded together as one. They remembered the fight. They celebrated.
The next spring it was even bigger.
'An estimated 800 people showed up on Sunday to dance to the rock 'n roll of the 'Chariots,' drink beer, eat hamburgers and frankfurters and recall the historic 1970 voyage,' The Island Packet reported.
It had the feel of the Fourth of July, New Year's Eve and Bastille Day rolled into one.
Amid all the fanfare, a petition was circulated. This time it was in opposition to a planned Chicago Bridge and Iron plant at the same Victoria Bluff site BASF had eyed.
That lesson: The fight to protect the Earth never ends.
The community also celebrated on the day Walter Hickel, the Interior Secretary, came to see the land and water he had helped protect by writing a pointed letter to BASF saying the government would not allow environmental degradation.
'If I live to be very old, I will never forget the day the Capt. Dave came up the Potomac River with the petition of a list of names protesting the plant,' Hickel said. 'The powers on Capitol Hill backed off.'
In a speech at the Port Royal Inn, Hickel said that 'caring' was more important than money in getting things done. He said laws already on the books offered environmental protection — but only if they were enforced.
'Someone has to care,' he said. 'Someone has to make it happen. Laws alone won't do it.'
He said the threat to Port Royal Sound would never have come to his attention without the concern of individuals.
'Wars will always be won by the concern of one human being for another — not by billions of dollars.'
The Rev. Cook had a similar message.
When he left for another charge after a decade on the island he said the concern and caring that he had so admired in the past was needed more than ever.
'The big fear is not the growth of the island,' he said, 'but the attrition of concern. Apathy and frustration should be fought more than windmills. When people no longer get involved, when they no longer care, then everything we don't want to happen will happen by default.
'It is a matter of caring so intently that you keep trying. You refuse to quit.'
The same is true today. The fight to save the Lowcountry is up to us.
David Lauderdale may be reached at lauderdalecolumn@gmail.com.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
33 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Republicans Say They're Cool With Trump Deploying Troops Against Protesters
The U.S. secretary of defense has threatened to send active-duty Marines into the streets of Los Angeles to confront protesters opposing the administration's detention and deportation of immigrants. At least three prominent Republicans don't seem concerned about potential overreach. 'The [Department of Defense] is mobilizing the National Guard IMMEDIATELY to support federal law enforcement in Los Angeles. And, if violence continues, active duty Marines at Camp Pendleton will also be mobilized — they are on high alert,' Hegseth wrote late Saturday on X, formerly Twitter, on his personal account. This prompted ABC's Jonathan Karl to ask House Speaker Mike Johnson: 'Could we really see active duty Marines on the streets of Los Angeles?' 'One of our core principles is maintaining peace through strength,' Johnson said during an interview on Sunday's episode of This Week. 'We do that on foreign affairs and domestic affairs as well. I don't think that's heavy handed. I think that's an important signal.' 'You don't think sending Marines into the streets of an American city is heavy-handed?' Karl asked. 'We have to be prepared to do what is necessary, and I think the notice that that might happen might have the deterring effect,' Johnson said. Active-duty military troops have not been sent in to suppress unrest since the 1992 Los Angeles protests after a jury acquitted four white police officers in the beating of Rodney King, a Black man who was pulled over for a traffic violation. The Posse Comitatus Act prohibits federal troops from engaging in civilian law enforcement unless there is a clear legal or constitutional basis for doing so. It was created to restrict the president's ability to use the military against civilians. The exception to Posse Comitatus is the Insurrection Act, which Trump has not invoked. Instead, Trump invoked Title 10 of the U.S. Code on Armed Services, which limits the troops' actions to protecting federal officials rather than enforcing laws. Title 10 gives Trump authority to deploy the National Guard during 'a rebellion or danger of a rebellion against the authority of the Government of the United States' and two other specific circumstances. Chris Mirasola of Lawfare wrote that Trump's justification for using this authority is 'factually contestable and, even on the face of the memorandum, unusually weak.' Republican Sen. James Lankford on NBC's Meet the Press argued that by deploying the National Guard, Trump is 'trying to deescalate all the tensions that are there.' Newsom has said that Trump activating National Guard troops is 'purposefully inflammatory and will only escalate tensions' 'This is an American city, and to be able to have an American city where we have people literally flying Mexican flags and saying, 'You cannot arrest us,' cannot be allowed,' Lankford said on Sunday. 'If someone violates the law, no matter what state that they're in, they're in violation of a federal law. They should face consequences for that.' Republican Sen. Markwayne Mullin also criticized protesters for carrying Mexican flags. 'They were literally out there protesting, carrying a foreign flag. That is absolutely insane. They are not just peaceful protesters. These are illegals,' he said Sunday on State of the Union. 'Carrying a flag is not illegal, as you know,' CNN's Dana Bash responded. 'Foreign flag while you're attacking law enforcement, it's pretty bad,' Mullin said. Carrying a Mexican flag and saying 'You cannot arrest us' is not a prosecutable offense. It is free speech protected by the First Amendment. And the Los Angeles Police Department (LAPD) has been clear that anyone found destructing property will be arrested. 'Everyone has the right to peacefully assemble and voice their opinions,' LAPD posted on X. 'However, vandalizing property and attempting to seriously injure officers, whether Federal or LAPD, is not peaceful.' When Meet the Press host Kristen Welker pointed out to Lankford that 'Governor Newsom says there is no unmet law enforcement need. The LAPD says the protests were peaceful,' the senator claimed that it is 'clear' that the LAPD is 'being overwhelmed.' (LAPD has not said they are overwhelmed.) 'This wouldn't be an issue if California didn't promote sanctuary city policies to be able to tell people literally, 'You can violate federal law and live in our state, and no one will arrest you for this,'' Lankford said. 'Now suddenly when they are arrested for federal crimes then suddenly they go into this kind of protest saying, 'No, you can't arrest us here. We're immune from federal law.' That's not true.' Here, Lankford is being misleading. Sanctuary city policies do not grant anyone immunity, they only limit how state and local resources are allocated to aid federal immigration enforcement. Under the Tenth Amendment, states have the right to allocate resources as they see fit, and states have used that amendment in court to justify not assisting with federal immigration raids. It's disturbing that prominent GOP lawmakers are signing on to the president's use of authority to activate the National Guard — against a governor's wishes — and signaling their agreement that deploying active duty Marines against civilians would be fine with them should Trump choose to do so. 'Don't kid yourself they know they are absolutely getting cooked politically [with] their terrible bill and rising prices, and they want to create a violent spectacle to feed their content machine,' Democratic Sen. Brian Schatz posted on X late Saturday. 'It's time for the mainstream media to describe this authoritarian madness accurately.' More from Rolling Stone Trump's Response to L.A. Protests: What We Know The Biggest Boondoggles in Trump's Big Beautiful Bill Donald Trump Is Destroying the Economy and Waging War on the Poor Best of Rolling Stone The Useful Idiots New Guide to the Most Stoned Moments of the 2020 Presidential Campaign Anatomy of a Fake News Scandal The Radical Crusade of Mike Pence
Yahoo
33 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Fact Check: Doctored photo shows ICE agents arresting man wearing 'Latinos for Trump' T-shirt
Claim: A photo authentically shows U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) agents arresting a man wearing a "Latinos for Trump 2024" T-shirt. Rating: In June 2025, online users claimed a picture showed U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) agents arresting a man wearing a "Latinos for Trump 2024" T-shirt. On June 1, an X user posted (archived) the photo with a caption mocking the man's alleged vote of Trump, whose immigration policies supposedly led to his arrest. The user wrote, "Well that did not go well huh?" The post received over 500,000 views. (Image courtesy of @JamesTate121/X) Following that post, other users shared the same picture on Bluesky (archived), Facebook, iFunny (archived), Mastodon (archived), Threads and X (archived). However, an unknown user doctored the photo with the "Latinos for Trump 2024" logo. The same user altered the agents' uniforms to read "ICE," when the original picture showed "HSI" for Homeland Security Investigations. ICE and HSI both operate under the umbrella of the Department of Homeland Security. The Alamy and Getty Images websites both hosted the original, unedited photo for licensing. The genuine caption read, "U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement's (ICE) Homeland Security Investigations (HSI) special agents arrested alleged immigration violators at Fresh Mark [in] Salem, [Ohio, on] June 19, 2018." The original picture confirmed no visible writing or logos appeared on the back of the detained man's T-shirt. ICE published the original photo (Image courtesy of Getty Images) As The Associated Press reported, based on its own survey of over 120,000 voters, Trump gained a larger share of both Black and Latino voters in 2024 than in the 2020 election, most notably among men under age 45. For further reading, Snopes compiled a collection of 20 fact checks involving U.S. immigration authorities. Brown, Matt, et al. "Young Black and Latino Men Say They Chose Trump Because of the Economy and Jobs. Here's How and Why." The Associated Press, 10 Nov. 2024, Catalini, Mike, and Rebecca Santana. "Just Days into the New Trump Administration, Worries Spike amid a Show of Force on Immigration." The Associated Press, 24 Jan. 2025, Chappell, Bill. "Homeland Security Secretary Orders ICE to Stop Mass Raids on Immigrants' Workplaces." Connecticut Public, 12 Oct. 2021, Santana, Rebecca. "Immigration Officers Are Operating with a New Sense of Mission. Now, 'Nobody Gets a Free Pass.'" The Associated Press, 28 Jan. 2025, "U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement's (ICE) Homeland Security Investigations (HSI) Special Agents Arrested Alleged Immigration Violators at Fresh Mark [in] Salem, [Ohio, on] June 19, 2018." Getty Images, ICE, 19 June 2018, Younge, Gary. "'They Want to Take Me Away': Immigrants under Attack as Trump Tries to Rally Republican Base." The Guardian, 23 Oct. 2018,


San Francisco Chronicle
an hour ago
- San Francisco Chronicle
Trump's National Guard deployment in L.A. is a move last seen in Civil Rights era
The last time a president deployed the National Guard without a request from a governor was an entirely different era in American history. President Donald Trump's order of 2,000 National Guard troops to quell what his administration described as 'insurrectionists' in Los Angeles drew strenuous objections from California Gov. Gavin Newsom. 'It's very much outside our constitutional norms and traditions for the military to be deployed under federal control in the United States,' said Laura Dickinson, a George Washington University Law School professor who specializes in armed conflict. 'It's particularly rare when a governor objects.' Sixty years ago, President Lyndon Johnson deployed the Alabama National Guard to protect a march led by the Rev. Martin Luther King Jr. from Selma to Montgomery, the state's capital, after George Wallace, Alabama's segregationist governor, declined to provide Guard protection. The march followed 'Bloody Sunday' — March 7, 1965 — when Alabama state troopers brutally attacked marchers attempting to cross the Edmund Pettus Bridge in Selma. They used clubs and gas canisters to force marchers, who had planned to walk to Montgomery, back to Selma. The marchers had been galvanized by the slaying of a young Black man from Alabama, Jimmie Lee Jackson, who had been shot as he attempted to prevent his mother from being further beaten by police. The civil rights era also saw numerous other instances of the federalization of the National Guard — to protect Black students integrating Southern schools and to quell unrest. On Sunday, the California National Guard began to arrive in Los Angeles after protests over wide-scale arrests by Immigration and Customs Enforcement officers in recent days. Dickinson noted that what the federalized Guard will be doing is 'unclear': Will the troops be doing direct law enforcement, or will they be in a supportive role? What are their rules of engagement, and will they use force? It's also unclear how much training they have received, she noted. 'If they were to use force, this really could risk politicizing the military, which historically has enjoyed broad bipartisan support,' Dickinson said. It could also, she said, bring liability concerns. Newsom has called for calm, and, indeed, reports from Los Angeles suggested that the streets were quiet Sunday morning. 'Trump is sending 2,000 National Guard troops into LA County — not to meet an unmet need, but to manufacture a crisis,' Newsom wrote on social media. 'He's hoping for chaos so he can justify more crackdowns, more fear, more control. Stay calm. Never use violence. Stay peaceful.'