logo
Outrage as Queensland considers recriminalising public drunkenness, sparking fears for First Nations people

Outrage as Queensland considers recriminalising public drunkenness, sparking fears for First Nations people

SBS Australia3 hours ago

Indigenous leaders and community advocates have condemned a proposal by the Queensland Government to reintroduce laws making public drunkenness a criminal offence, warning the move would disproportionately harm First Nations people and roll back decades of progress. Just last year, Queensland became the final Australian state to decriminalise public intoxication , more than 30 years after the Royal Commission into Aboriginal Deaths in Custody recommended the practice be abolished nationwide.
Now, the state's Liberal National Party government – citing public concerns around safety and crime – says it is considering re-criminalisation, sparking alarm across First Nations communities. More than 50 people gathered at a community forum in Brisbane on Friday last week, seeking clarity and information about the proposed changes. Organised by Brisbane Murri Action Group (BMAG), the event aimed to equip the community with facts, facilitate discussion, and amplify voices being sidelined from the political debate. Many at the forum expressed frustration and fear that the government's shift in stance ignores the evidence and the historical injustices faced by Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people in the justice system.
BMAG spokesperson Adrian Burragubba said the move would be a step backwards. 'The reintroduction of public drunkenness laws will stereotype and target First Nation people," he said. "This is another notch in the belt of the Crisafulli Government after they rolled back the Truth and Treaty Commission and suspended the Human Rights Act to incarcerate our youth. 'These laws will criminalise our people again and our human rights will be denied. "As the Royal Commission into Aboriginal Deaths in Custody said 30 years ago, public drunkenness laws are an actual threat to our lives."
First Nations advocates say the proposed reforms would be a regressive step, which risks repeating the very mistakes that the Royal Commission sought to address. The 1991 Royal Commission into Aboriginal Deaths in Custody made 339 recommendations — one of the most urgent being the removal of criminal penalties for public intoxication. Its findings highlighted how over-policing of Aboriginal people for minor offences frequently led to unnecessary and avoidable deaths in custody. Queensland's 2023 reforms were widely welcomed by health professionals, legal experts and Indigenous organisations, who had long argued that decriminalisation would help reduce incarceration rates and improve safety outcomes for vulnerable people.
But Premier David Crisafulli's government has now indicated it may reverse course. In a statement provided to NITV, a spokesperson said: 'Our government is working with the Queensland Police Service to ensure they have the laws and resources they need to keep people safe.' While the government hasn't confirmed a timeline for potential legislation, its stance has alarmed many – particularly in light of a national reckoning around systemic racism, policing, and the ongoing failures to meet Closing the Gap justice targets.
Those in attendance at the Brisbane forum stressed the importance of meaningful consultation and self-determination in any reform process, which they say is currently lacking. Speakers urged the government to consider community-led alternatives such as sobering-up shelters, expanded health outreach, and Aboriginal-controlled services that prioritise care over punishment.
Mr Burragubba called on Premier David Crisafulli to meet with Elders and First Nations leaders. 'Intoxication alone should not be a crime, and we should not lose our rights for other people because of their fears," he said. "Their problem is we are seen as a burden and inconvenience on the public – but go to any major entertainment centre on a Friday evening and see the double standards in policing public drunkenness. "The government can't just stereotype and discriminate against certain groups, such as Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people."
Legal experts also warned that a return to criminalisation would likely result in a spike in Indigenous incarceration – a trend at odds with the National Agreement on Closing the Gap, which commits all governments to reducing the number of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people in prison.
Advocates are calling on the government to halt any proposed changes until comprehensive consultation with First Nations communities takes place. They say evidence must guide decision-making, not knee-jerk reactions to media narratives or political pressure. "We are most at risk from this policy," Mr Burragubba said. "We are way over-represented in the statistics, and we know where this leads. "We don't want that escalation and have our community being locked up for having a few drinks in public, with all the risk to our lives and the damage to our community that it entails.'

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Ratepayers slugged with new healthcare levy as ACT budget deficit balloons to $1.1 billion
Ratepayers slugged with new healthcare levy as ACT budget deficit balloons to $1.1 billion

ABC News

time30 minutes ago

  • ABC News

Ratepayers slugged with new healthcare levy as ACT budget deficit balloons to $1.1 billion

Canberra ratepayers will be slugged with a new health levy as the ACT government works to rein in its ballooning budget deficit. In handing down his first ACT budget, Treasurer Chris Steel said rising healthcare costs would push the territory further into the red to the tune of $1.1 billion for 2024-2025. Mr Steel expects to claw back some $600 million in the coming year to bring down the budget deficit to $425 million for 2025-2026, with forward estimates predicting the budget to have a small surplus in four years. With healthcare costs expected to increase to $2.9 billion in the next financial year, ratepayers will have to pay a new $250 health levy to help cover costs. "We have had to confront, in this budget, the need to invest in our healthcare system," Mr Steel said. Businesses which earn $1.75 million will be required to pay payroll tax. Previously, only businesses which earned more than $2 million were required to pay it. Mr Steel said the Commonwealth needed to fund their "fair share" of health care, which he estimated would be about 45 per cent of the cost of the service in the ACT by the year 2035. The Commonwealth funded around 37 per cent of the ACT's healthcare bill in 2024-25. "We do need to see the Commonwealth contributing more and we'll be very strongly advocating for that," he said. There will be a general rates increase of 3.75 per cent in addition to the emergency services levy increasing by $30, and the safer families levy increasing by $10. You can see how much average rates are going up in your suburb here: Michael Johns is one Canberran whose hip pocket will take a hit. Mr Johns labels himself the "sandwich generation" — living with his wife and two kids while also caring for his two elderly parents. "We're sailing pretty close to the wind at the moment, but rates do provide services." Mr Johns is currently living in an apartment in Braddon because the build on his family house dragged on with delays, meaning he currently pays two lots of rates. "My earning capability because of home obligations are really limited. That's what's making it hard," he said. "I'm not against paying rates but at the moment it's really tough." More to come.

Wondering what the 2025 ACT budget includes? Here are five key takeaways
Wondering what the 2025 ACT budget includes? Here are five key takeaways

ABC News

time30 minutes ago

  • ABC News

Wondering what the 2025 ACT budget includes? Here are five key takeaways

Treasurer Chris Steel has used his first ACT budget to deal Canberrans a tough set of cards. Barely two months on from a federal election dominated by the cost of living, only a very small pool of Canberrans will see any sort of relief in this latest outlook. In fact, hip pockets will be hit even harder — especially for homeowners. The ACT government is using a backdrop of lower interest rates and reduced inflation to justify its efforts to boost much needed revenue, as its budget deficit spills over to $1.1 billion. Let's take a look at the five key takeaways from the 2025-26 ACT budget. The biggest takeaway from this budget is a $250 health levy. It'll apply to all ratepayers and will be attached to rates notices every year until 2028-29, when the ACT government says it'll review it to see if it is still necessary. The levy is expected to bring the territory's coffers an extra $205.7 million over the next four years, starting with $50 million in 2025-26. The ACT government says the extra cash will fund health care, which is the biggest cost to the ACT budget, accounting for roughly a third of all spending. And according to the government, health is the main reason it has such a big budget blowout, with a deficit of $1.1 billion. It says it's had to shoulder the cost of increased demand on services driven by more expensive GP visits, aged care, and private healthcare costs, as well as people catching up on the care they deferred during COVID. At the same time, there's also spending on the design and construction of the new northside hospital in Belconnen, the new Canberra Hospital masterplan in Woden, and health centres in southern Tuggeranong, the inner south, and Gungahlin. But the ACT government has also given the federal government a nudge for not chipping in enough — saying the Commonwealth funded around 37 per cent of the ACT's healthcare bill in 2024-25, but that that amount will fall to around 33 per cent in the next year. That's despite an agreed target to get that Commonwealth contribution to 45 per cent in the next 10 years, so the ACT government is miffed it is missing out on a shortfall of about $190 million. If you're a property owner, rates will only be going in one direction — up. But by how much depends on where you live. For houses, average rate rises range from $47 a year in Chapman to $2,332 in Forrest — that's an increase of 18 per cent! For units, average rate rises start at $25 a year in Coombs to $334 in Yarralumla. The reason why parts of Canberra's inner south are on the upper end of the scale is because of a new threshold the government has introduced. It'll apply to what the government says are 'high value' residences — those with an unimproved land value worth $1 million or more. It means those in that new land value bracket will be hit with a higher rate of 0.5743 per cent, up from 0.4832 per cent, bringing in an extra $17.8 million over the next four years. High value commercial properties with a land value of $5 million or more will also have their own higher threshold, raking in another $5.29 million over the next four years. We'll begin to see little increases in some everyday costs like parking, car rego, and driver licence renewals. Some more niche changes include a jump in storage fees for impounded vehicles, up by 730 per cent to $25 a day. And it'll now cost $11 to get a volunteer working with vulnerable people card — they've been free since the scheme was rolled out in 2011. It seems the ACT has also been undercharging for tobacco licence fees compared to New South Wales, so they will increase by 72 per cent from $638 to $1,100. And if you thought vomiting in a taxi couldn't get much more humiliating, you were wrong. The government will be letting taxi drivers increase what they can charge if they need to clean up after you from $85 to $135. Canberrans love an electric vehicle (EV, leading the country in EV adoption rates with around one in five new vehicles sold being plug-ins. Part of the reason is the ACT's generous incentives to invest in zero-emissions vehicles, including a stamp duty exemption — but no more! From September 1, 2025, there'll be a minimum 2.5 per cent duty on new cars, which will increase in line with emissions and value. The higher the emissions, the higher the duty. On top of that, there'll be an additional 8 per cent tax on vehicles worth $80,000 or more. The government is saying that EVs have now established themselves in the market, and it can't keep giving away these incentives for free. It's the same case for battery storage, ceiling insulation and energy efficient electric appliances which, until now, have been available with zero-interest loans through the Sustainable Household Scheme. From July 1, those loans will now come with a 3 per cent interest rates. But there has been more money allocated to the scheme, which means there should be more people eligible for the low-interest loans. Solar panels won't be included in that scheme at all anymore and will only be available through Home Energy Support Program loans. A $1.1 billion deficit has forced the ACT government to find ways to bring in all the revenue it can muster. The government says with inflation and interests now coming down, now is the time to claw back. High and middle income earners — especially home owners — will feel the brunt of it. On top of the new health levy, the Safer Families Levy will jump from $10 to $60 in 2025-26, and the Police, Fire and Emergency Services Levy will increase by $30 to $426. That's a total levy increase on rates of $290, on top of the general rates increase of 3.75 per cent. Small and medium businesses will also be forced to contribute more, with businesses that earn $1.75 million now required to pay payroll tax. It's intended to capture more businesses. Previously, only businesses which earned more than $2 million were required to pay payroll tax. Low-income earners and Canberra's vulnerable will be largely spared. Electricity, gas and water rebates will be permanently increased by $50 to $800 to help those disproportionately affected by cost-of-living pressures. The number of properties that can be rented out through the government's affordable community housing scheme will also increase from 250 to 1,000. And a $1.5 million Food Bank Fund will also be established for groups offering food relief.

Tasmanian Nationals announce former JLN, Liberal MPs among seven candidates for snap election
Tasmanian Nationals announce former JLN, Liberal MPs among seven candidates for snap election

ABC News

time43 minutes ago

  • ABC News

Tasmanian Nationals announce former JLN, Liberal MPs among seven candidates for snap election

The Tasmanian Nationals have confirmed two former Jacqui Lambie Network (JLN) MPs, one former JLN candidate and a former Liberal who split from the party as its state election candidates. The party announced seven candidates across three electorates, running with policies of renegotiating with the AFL over the Macquarie Point stadium, and addressing the state budget. Former JLN MP Miriam Beswick, who became independent, will run in Braddon, and former JLN MP Andrew Jenner, who stayed with the JLN until the election was called, will run in Lyons. John Tucker — who left the Liberals to become independent which was a key precursor to the last state election, where he lost his seat — will also be a Nationals candidate in Lyons. They were joined at the candidate announcement by former JLN candidate and solicitor Angela Armstrong and former federal Nationals candidate and Rowella farmer Carl Cooper, who will both run in Bass. The identity of the other two candidates was unclear at the announcement. The candidates said that one is named Rick, and the other Francis, who Mr Tucker said has a "double-barrelled" surname. They said their names would be on a press release later, but they were not on the press release. A party spokesperson later confirmed them as accountant Rick Mandelson and retired barrister Francis Haddon-Cave, who appears to have practiced in Hong Kong. Both are candidates for Lyons. Mr Tucker's decision to leave the Liberal party was due, in part, to his opposition to the proposed Macquarie Point stadium. He said the Tasmanian Nationals' policy is to "bench" the stadium. "We see that [Launceston's] York Park is a possible solution going forward with that. "Renegotiating the deal with the people and coming back with a solution." He said the party would release other policies later in the campaign. The list of candidates includes multiple people who have quit their parties, and others who were key precursors to the Liberals calling state elections. Mr Tucker said he had no hard feelings with the Liberals. "I'm quite happy to be working with the Liberals, I've still got some very close friends in the Liberal party that I still talk to," he said. Premier Jeremy Rockliff said he "welcomes anyone who is willing to stand for parliament", but wanted "stability" in Tasmania. The Nationals have struggled to make inroads in Tasmania across numerous state and federal elections. In the 2014 state election, the party reached 2 per cent of the vote in Braddon, and 1.1 per cent in Lyons. In the 2019 federal election, the Nationals managed to get 15.7 per cent of the vote in Lyons, mainly due to Liberal candidate Jessica Whelan resigning and the party directing voters to the Nationals. Nathan Richardson — who grows potatoes and cereals at Thirlstane in the state's north-west — said there was a need for an alternative for rural voters. "We really need people that just represent people, that don't represent multinationals, international corporations, the big end of town, actually get back to representing businesses, people and taxpayers."

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store