‘Arrogant' Albanese slashes staff for Coalition MPs
The federal opposition has had its staffing allocation slashed by the Albanese government, in a move that potentially limits the Coalition's ability to hold the government to account.
For decades, by convention, the opposition of the day has been given about 21 per cent of the staff allocated to the government to do tasks like analyse legislation, meet with community representatives and prepare for hearings.
In practice, the opposition would typically have about 80 staff shared between a 30-member shadow ministry. The government of the day would typically share about 500 advisers among the 30-member ministry, assistant ministers and special envoys.
Prime Minister Anthony Albanese has written to opposition leader Sussan Ley and advised her that the opposition, which now has just 43 MPs in the lower house, will have its staffing levels reduced.
In the last parliament, the government had about 500 advisers and the opposition had about 100. The number of opposition advisers for the new parliament has been reduced to the 80s, while the government allocation has also fallen, but by fewer roles.
Loading
The move prompted shadow special minister of state James McGrath to accuse the Albanese government of acting arrogantly and vindictively.
'The prime minister has personally cut the opposition's staffing allocation and made the Australian parliament less capable of holding him and his government accountable,' McGrath said.
'The prime minister today has shown himself to be personally vindictive and nasty. By breaking convention and stripping staff from the opposition, the prime minister's arrogance is an attack on accountability.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

Sky News AU
an hour ago
- Sky News AU
AUKUS unity in doubt as Anthony Albanese hesitates and UK PM Keir Starmer refuses to support President Trump's Iran strikes
The AUKUS alliance has shown signs of strain after Australia and the UK adopted 'ambiguous' positions on US President Donald Trump's strikes against Iran. In an exclusive interview with Sky News, Prime Minister Anthony Albanese insisted he had acted in an 'orderly' way after taking 24 hours to support the strikes. Meanwhile, UK Prime Minister Keir Starmer has been condemned in London for failing to support the strikes at all. British media called into question which side Mr Starmer was on—Iran or US—after he refused to take a position. Splashed across UK tabloid The Daily Mail, Mr Starmer was accused of a "lack of moral clarity" for not backing US military intervention. The delay, or reluctance, of the UK and Australia willing to support the United States' actions has appeared at odds with the founding principles of the trilateral AUKUS defence pact. In the immediate aftermath of the attacks, some global powers were ambivalent on the US military action, calling for peace or de-escalation, rather than expressing support. When asked why his government waited 24 hours before declaring support for the US strikes, Mr Albanese dismissed the criticism as politically motivated. He also rejected the suggestion that Australia was being sidelined by the US after President Trump cancelled their meeting at the G7 in Canada. 'I met with President Trump's key economic advisors on the sidelines of the G7… (but) President Trump took the understandable decision to leave that meeting,' Mr Albanese said. Despite those meetings, Australia's initial response on Sunday came not from Mr Albanese, but via a short statement from a government spokesperson. That statement notably refrained from supporting the US action, calling only for 'de-escalation' and 'dialogue'. The government's 'ambiguous' response drew criticism from the opposition, with acting shadow foreign affairs minister Andrew Hastie accusing it of being 'flat-footed'. 'He should have called a national security committee meeting and he should have stood up and spoken to the Australian people,' Mr Hastie told Sky News on Monday. 'Sending out a government spokesman to make a brief comment about one of the biggest events to happen in the last five years was not good enough.' Meanwhile, the Pentagon recently announced it would review the AUKUS security pact to ensure it aligned with President Trump's "America First" agenda. The decision came after Mr Albanese resisted US demands to lift defence spending to 3.5 per cent of GDP. Mr Albanese said he would not react to political pressure but that he would address defence policy according to need and capability. Under the AUKUS deal, Australia would acquire nuclear power submarines and share advanced technologies with the US in a $368 billion deal over three decades. The Australian Strategic Policy Institute's Senior Analyst in Defence Strategy, Malcolm Davis, told Sky News the review was likely tied to the lack of defence spending. 'I think it is (related to calls to lift defence spending) … I think that he (Mr Albanese) does need to do more to increase defence spending,' Mr Davis said Several Australian politicians have since called for the Albanese government to do its own review of AUKUS, to ensure it is in the national interest.

The Age
an hour ago
- The Age
Iran has vowed to choke global shipping. That could push petrol to $2.50 a litre
Australian petrol prices could hit $2.50 a litre while electricity and gas prices spike if Iran closes its shipping channels to the world, blocking the conduit for Middle Eastern energy exports representing about 20 per cent of globally traded oil and gas. Iran's parliament is reported to have agreed to close the Strait of Hormuz, but it is unclear if the nation's military will implement a blockade, which could draw brutal retaliation from the US and its allies. However, just the threat of global disruption can drive commodity prices higher. When Vladimir Putin invaded of Ukraine in 2022, fears over shortages due to widespread embargoes on Russia's oil and gas exports helped drive price spikes along with the physical shortage of fuel. Any shift in global markets will affect local energy prices because Australia imports the vast majority of its petroleum. Despite Australia being a major gas exporter, local gas prices are set by the international market because buyers here compete with the rest of the world. Loading Schneider Electric senior director Lisa Zembrodt, who advises some of Australia's biggest corporate energy users, said disruption to shipping through the Strait of Hormuz would affect 20 per cent of the world's petroleum liquids consumption and 20 per cent of liquified natural gas. She said more than 80 per cent of these exports go to Asian markets, which drives prices in Australia. 'When the price of oil rises, we see this at the pump. When the international price of gas rises, the price of gas as a fuel for heating may rise, despite that we produce twice as much as we consume domestically. The cost of gas-fired generation can also rise, causing electricity prices to rise at times when gas is setting the price in the market – for example recently during the cold snap in Victoria.' And while only around 10 per cent of Australia's electricity is generated by gas, it is the most expensive compared to the dominant fuel sources of coal and renewable energy, which means it sets a benchmark price that drives all the others up if its price spikes. The 2022 electricity crisis culminated in price spikes so high that the regulator imposed the first-ever suspension of the market, and bills have remained elevated ever since.

Sydney Morning Herald
2 hours ago
- Sydney Morning Herald
What we know about the ceasefire and Iran's attack against the US
A ceasefire is an agreement between warring parties to cease fighting. If the ceasefire is realised in the terms Trump has announced, it would lead to a total end in fighting between Israel and Iran, which, this time around, began on the June 13. (Israel and Iran had traded limited striked in October.) Loading According to Trump's statement, Iran will cease its strikes against Israel by 2pm, and by 8pm, Israel will stop bombing Iran. By 8am Wednesday, 'an Official END to THE 12 DAY WAR will be saluted by the World' Trump said. What has Australia said about the ceasefire? Prime Minister Anthony Albanese has welcomed Trump's announcement. He reiterated calls for peace in the Middle East and said the government's priority was assisting Australians in the region. 'Australia welcomes President [Donald] Trump's announcement of a ceasefire between Israel and Iran,' he said. 'We have consistently called for dialogue, diplomacy and de-escalation.' Foreign Affairs Minister Penny Wong earlier condemned the attack by Iran and said the government continued 'to call for de-escalation, dialogue and diplomacy' in a post on X. 'We do not want to see further escalation. A full-scale war in the Middle East would be devastating for the people of the region and the world,' she said. Wong encouraged travelling Australians to follow Smartraveller advice. Australians in need of emergency consular assistance should contact the Australian Government's 24-hour Consular Emergency Centre 1300 555 135 (calling within Australia) and +61 2 6261 3305 (from overseas), she said. Are Israel and Iran still attacking each other? In the hours before the ceasefire, Iran and Israel were continuing to exchange attacks. Under the terms of the agreement, Iran would have until 2pm, and Israel until 8pm, to complete their 'in-progress, final missions,' Trump said. Israel's military has issued new evacuation warnings for Tehran, CNN reported, telling residents in parts of the city to flee. Notably, Israel targeted Tehran's Evin Prison, which historically has held political prisoners and Westerners, including Australian researcher Kylie Moore-Gilbert, from 2018 to 2020. There were no immediate reports of casualties or damage to the prison. Black-and-white footage shared by Iranian state-TV showed the facilities' front gate being exploded in the strike. France's foreign minister accused Israel of endangering two French citizens detained inside the prison. Where did Iran attack? Before the ceasefire was announced, Iran fired missiles at the Al Udeid Air Base, which houses US troops, as well as the air forces of Qatar and Britain. Explosions could be heard overhead in the Gulf-state's capital of Doha as air defences worked to intercept the attack. The Qatar Defence Ministry said Iran fired 19 missiles and one made landfall, but there were no deaths or injuries. This is in part to Iran warning the US before the attack, which enabled the evacuation of personnel. What did the US and Iran say about the attack? Posting on his Truth Social platform, Trump said the Iranian response was 'very weak' and it was both expected and effectively countered. He said 14 missiles were fired, of which 13 were intercepted and one passed by air defences 'because it was headed in a nonthreatening direction'. His numbers were different to those reported by the Qatari ministry. US Vice President J.D. Vance said the attack appeared to be symbolic rather than malicious. 'They [Iran] actually gave us some warning here... because they didn't want to kill Americans, and they didn't want to escalate,' he told Fox News. 'There's definitely some symbolism to this ... if you look at the Iranian attack, it was fourteen missiles that they telegraphed ahead of time [and] we dropped fourteen bunker buster bombs.' Iran described the attack as 'powerful and destructive'. The regime's Revolutionary Guard Corps said the wave of missiles was in retaliation to 'the blatant military aggression by the criminal regime of the United States' and that Iran 'will never leave any aggression against its territorial integrity, sovereignty, or national security unanswered'. Will the US retaliate? It's hard to say, but it appears Trump is publicly indicating the US does not intend to retaliate. Upon announcing the ceasefire deal, Trump publicly called for peace and said the war would soon be 'officially' over. Loading 'IT'S TIME FOR PEACE' he posted on Truth Social after Iran's attack. The president added Iran had now 'gotten it all out of their system' and he hoped there would be 'no further HATE'. However, in his statements after the US attacked Iranian nuclear sites, Trump warned Iran he would attack other sites if peace was not brokered swiftly. 'There will be either peace or there will be tragedy for Iran, far greater than we have witnessed over the last eight days,' he said in an address from the White House. It is worth noting that Trump has previously given misleading information publicly before launching an attack. Before striking Iran on Sunday, Trump said he would decide within the next two weeks on the United States' next move, which was used to create a false sense of security ahead of the American attack. How did the attack impacting flights? The missile attack has forced planes to turn around mid-flight and necessitated the cancellation of some journeys. Qatar closed its airspace for a couple of hours after the strike but reopened it shortly after 7am AEST. The Gulf state's carrier Qatar Airways said it anticipated 'significant delays'.