New Charity Welcomes Private Bill To Set Minimum Age Of 16 To Access Social Media
A newly established charity dedicated to improving online safety for children is welcoming the Government's announcement this morning that a private member's bill has been introduced to set a minimum age of 16 to access social media.
B4-16 (Before 16) is a non-partisan, independent group of parents, public health experts and business leaders who have been advocating for greater online protection for children, saying New Zealand is falling behind comparable countries in protecting children from online harm.
Today's announcement follows Australia's groundbreaking move in November last year to introduce the world's first age restriction for under-16s on social media, requiring platforms to take 'reasonable steps' to prevent underage use.
B4-16 is urging New Zealand policymakers to follow suit with a recent Horizon poll revealing 74% of adults support setting an age limit for social media access for children.
'Children need to be tech-savvy to thrive in today's digital world - digital literacy is 100% essential. But social media is a different beast. It's designed to be addictive, persuasive, and often exposes young minds to harmful content and pressures they're not developmentally ready to handle.
'Delaying access for children doesn't mean denying technology. It just means we're giving Kiwi kids time to build resilience, critical thinking, and emotional maturity before we open the gates to an environment that is built for adult engagement,' says B4-16 co-Chair Cecilia Robinson.
While Australia, the UK, the EU and the US have introduced legislation to regulate social media and shield young people from online harm, New Zealand has not followed suit.
Unlike Australia – which has an independent eSafety Commissioner with powers to investigate harm, enforce standards, and hold platforms accountable – New Zealand has no dedicated regulator.
'At the moment, we put Big Tech first. We need a system that puts our children first,' says Dr Samantha Marsh, a public health researcher with the University of Auckland, and B4-16 advisor.
'It's time for a truly independent regulatory body with the power to protect our children. Social media is harmful in a variety of ways, but particularly for young children. Education alone doesn't change behaviour – regulation is needed," says Marsh.
A growing body of international evidence shows that social media is a high-risk environment for children's mental health, emotional wellbeing, and cognitive development.
'At Outward Bound, I've seen first-hand the positive impact on teens' mental resilience when they step away from social media for days and weeks at a time. If we can protect growing brains and bodies for longer from addictive and harmful algorithms, we will be a better society for it. There is so much at stake,' said B4-16 's Malindi Maclean who is also tumuaki CEO of Outward Bound New Zealand.
The Ministry of Health's latest New Zealand Health Survey revealed the number of 15–24 year olds in high or very high psychological distress increased by 400% for the eleven year period to 2023.
Studies consistently link social media use with anxiety, depression, disordered eating, sleep disruption, and poor academic outcomes.
In 2023, Youthline's State of the Generation Report found that 75% of young people believed mental health was the biggest issue they face, and half of all young people in Aotearoa said social media was a major issue for them.
B416 says it's a complex issue which is too big for parents to manage on their own.
'We've got strong research showing social media is harmful, that it's structurally changing our children's brains – and it's doing it at scale,' said Marsh.
'It's a public health issue that requires regulation. New Zealand has laws to protect our children from smoking and alcohol and we need to do the same for social media.'
A 2024 Horizon Research poll found that 74% of New Zealanders support a legal age restriction for social media, with 83% concerned about harmful and inappropriate content online.
In its report, Meeting the Mental Health needs of young New Zealanders, the Office for the Auditor-General also raised concerns about rising levels of mental distress among young people aged 12-24. It estimated that mental illness costs New Zealand about 5% of gross domestic product annually – more than $20b.
B4-16 says the campaign presents a clear opportunity for cross-party action and is seeking government-wide support for regulation.
B4-16 is calling for:
legislation to set a minimum age of 16 to access social media platforms
the implementation of stronger 'age assurance' systems for age verification
a dedicated online safety regulator who is responsible for protecting children and young people from online harm, and has enforceable powers
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Scoop
13 hours ago
- Scoop
The House: Parliamentary Week Achieves Two Out Of Three Goals
Sanctions against Te Pti Mori MPs were historic, but they weren't the only thing that happened in the house. , Editor: The House While Parliament's week was dominated by its final event – Thursday's debate on the report from the Privileges Committee into a haka performed in the chamber – the rest of the week focussed on other business that, while more mundane, was still worthy of note. The Government appeared to have three objectives for this week in the house. Crucial to the administration's continuance, the first goal was to successfully complete the initial debate on the budget. The long initial budget debate could no longer dribble on over weeks, so the house spent six hours of the week completing the second reading debate, which is the first debate a budget gets. The reading was accomplished and so the Government continues. This may sound silly, but a Government cannot survive, if the house votes against its budget. Agreeing to vote for budget and taxation bills are the 'supply' portion of the 'confidence and supply' agreement that is the foundation of any coalition agreement. The budget focus now turns to select committees and what is called 'Scrutiny Week', when ministers appear before various subject committees to defend their budget plans. Scrutiny Week begins on 16 June. Slow seconds A second objective was possibly not in earlier plans for this week – to finally polish off the bills originally slated for completion two weeks ago during budget week urgency. Then, the Leader of the House had asked the house to accord urgency for 12 bills the Government hoped to progress through 30 stages of parliamentary debate. The plan was ambitious and it did not succeed. Despite day-long sittings until midnight Saturday (when urgency must end), only two bills were completed, others were untouched, and 13 stages were unfinished or unstarted. This week's plan for the house had MPs returning to the well for more of the same. Just like last time, progress was at a snail's pace. After quite a few hours, the Government had slugged its way through just a few more stages. The plan was slowed to a crawl by bills' committee stages (formally known as the Committee of the Whole House). Committee stages are a crucial way for MPs to publicly interrogate the minister in charge of a bill. With patience, they can tease out a lot about both a government's development of legislation and its intended real-world impacts. Because the committee stage has no set duration, it is also a way for the opposition to make the Government really work for progress. The Government did achieve progress on the bills left incomplete from budget week, but again, it was probably not what was hoped for. They will need to come back yet again in three weeks to have a third crack. The Opposition is showing itself to be quite effective at the filibuster. The Government's third objective was to have the debate on the recent Privileges Committee Report on three Te Pāti Māori MPs done by the week's end. As Leader of the House Chris Bishop said in re-initiating the debate: 'My encouragement would be for everybody to finish this debate today. 'Have a robust debate, but let's end this issue once and for all, and deal with the issue and get back to the major issues facing this country.' That wish was fulfilled with apparent agreement from across the house. As 6pm neared, the MP who eventually moved that a vote be taken was Te Pāti Māori co-leader Rawiri Waititi. The frankly fascinating debate on the report will be reported separately.
Scoop
16 hours ago
- Scoop
The House: Parliamentary Week Achieves Two Out Of Three Goals
, Editor: The House While Parliament's week was dominated by its final event - Thursday's debate on the report from the Privileges Committee into a haka performed in the chamber - the rest of the week focussed on other business that, while more mundane, was still worthy of note. The Government appeared to have three objectives for this week in the house. Crucial to the administration's continuance, the first goal was to successfully complete the initial debate on the budget. The long initial budget debate could no longer dribble on over weeks, so the house spent six hours of the week completing the second reading debate, which is the first debate a budget gets. The reading was accomplished and so the Government continues. This may sound silly, but a Government cannot survive, if the house votes against its budget. Agreeing to vote for budget and taxation bills are the 'supply' portion of the 'confidence and supply' agreement that is the foundation of any coalition agreement. The budget focus now turns to select committees and what is called 'Scrutiny Week', when ministers appear before various subject committees to defend their budget plans. Scrutiny Week begins on 16 June. Slow seconds A second objective was possibly not in earlier plans for this week - to finally polish off the bills originally slated for completion two weeks ago during budget week urgency. Then, the Leader of the House had asked the house to accord urgency for 12 bills the Government hoped to progress through 30 stages of parliamentary debate. The plan was ambitious and it did not succeed. Despite day-long sittings until midnight Saturday (when urgency must end), only two bills were completed, others were untouched, and 13 stages were unfinished or unstarted. This week's plan for the house had MPs returning to the well for more of the same. Just like last time, progress was at a snail's pace. After quite a few hours, the Government had slugged its way through just a few more stages. The plan was slowed to a crawl by bills' committee stages (formally known as the Committee of the Whole House). Committee stages are a crucial way for MPs to publicly interrogate the minister in charge of a bill. With patience, they can tease out a lot about both a government's development of legislation and its intended real-world impacts. Because the committee stage has no set duration, it is also a way for the opposition to make the Government really work for progress. The Government did achieve progress on the bills left incomplete from budget week, but again, it was probably not what was hoped for. They will need to come back yet again in three weeks to have a third crack. The Opposition is showing itself to be quite effective at the filibuster. The Government's third objective was to have the debate on the recent Privileges Committee Report on three Te Pāti Māori MPs done by the week's end. As Leader of the House Chris Bishop said in re-initiating the debate: "My encouragement would be for everybody to finish this debate today. "Have a robust debate, but let's end this issue once and for all, and deal with the issue and get back to the major issues facing this country." That wish was fulfilled with apparent agreement from across the house. As 6pm neared, the MP who eventually moved that a vote be taken was Te Pāti Māori co-leader Rawiri Waititi. The frankly fascinating debate on the report will be reported separately. - RNZ's The House, with insights into Parliament, legislation and issues, is made with funding from Parliament's Office of the Clerk. Enjoy our articles or podcast at RNZ.
The Spinoff
a day ago
- The Spinoff
The Spinoff Essay: A bit of pain
'I'm lucky; I've had it for only five years or so.' David Hill on living with chronic pain. The Spinoff Essay showcases the best essayists in Aotearoa, on topics big and small. Made possible by the generous support of our members. I ache. I'm sore, nearly all the time. I'm one of the estimated 900,000 New Zealanders who suffer from chronic pain. Chronic or neuropathic pain is usually defined as pain that's lasted for more than three months. I'm lucky; I've had it for only five years or so. Multiple thousands of Kiwis have suffered for decades, or their entire life. More statistics. Over 40% of people in the UK are thought to suffer, at various times and to various degrees. (The US estimates almost 50%.) For over-75s in Britain, the figure lifts to 65%. About 80% of this is back and neck pain. In Aotearoa, a 2018 report from research group Sapere suggested that chronic pain costs our health system some $2 billion annually, plus another $15 billion in lost production and benefit costs. Utterly predictably (think housing, working conditions, $60 for a GP visit, $75 for a physio session), it affects lower socio-economic groups more. Oh, and (think trad Kiwi male stereotypes this time), women are more likely to report it than men. In my case, it's cervical spondylosis with foraminal narrowing and radiculopathy. I like to roll out the phrase so I can watch listeners' eyes cross as they wonder how much time I've got left. English translation: my neck is stuffed. Age, plus bad posture at the keyboard, means the cushioning discs between cervical vertebrae have worn thin. Bone spurs have formed. My mobility is limited; I get deep pain in the neck and between shoulder blades, plus intermittent giddiness. I've gone into detail because, like most sufferers – and I dislike that word – I usually don't say much about it. People with chronic pain get little sympathy. Who wants to hear about an ailment that goes on and on, especially when it usually comes with no bandages, slings, plaster, other visible signs of affliction? Like Chronic Fatigue Syndrome and Long Covid, it's easily seen, even by some health professionals, as self-pitying, even malingering. ' Whatever happened to 'pull yourself together'?' I heard one sceptic sniff, after an acquaintance had vented over his months of continuing hip and leg discomfort. It's the least telegenic of ailments; if we do appear on screen, we're usually caricatured as boring old whingers who need to snap out of it. ' It's all in your head,' is another common dismissal. True. Also stupid. Of course it's in the head, because that's where the brain's pain receptors are. We don't register any injury or discomfort till those receptors fire. Trouble is, if the pain continues for more than a few hours, your pre-frontal cortex starts assessing the sensation in terms of what it may mean long-term, and begins reinforcing the synapses associated with stress and discomfort. The brain's 'pain switch' gets stuck in the ON position, and your body becomes convinced of its distress. Neurologist William Davies notes that 'pain carves a path directly between the realms of mind and body'. It's called Control Sensitisation: just as Pavlov's dogs slobbered when a bell rang, almost any tug or tension for a chronic pain sufferer sends those brain receptors into power drive. It means that pain can become a habit, and like many unpleasant habits, it's hard to get rid of. A cycle of discomfort – sleep deprivation – stress – more discomfort and more stress can become established. Withdrawal and depression may follow, with the symbolic Black Dog liable to squat and crap on any of your days. So yes, it is all in the head, and it's utterly genuine. There have been some curious associated discoveries. Women's limbic system responds to pain more than men's, so women often experience greater emotional distress, while the fact that men's pre-frontal cortex is more affected means they may see the issue primarily as a problem to be analysed. And chronic pain may be exacerbated by apparently unassociated events; Brexit, the Covid pandemic, even the Trump presidency saw a rise in reported cases. You're right: the Orange Roughy can indeed become a pain in the arse. Bad news for the next few years. Chronic pain victims make unrewarding patients, even to sympathetic doctors – and not all are. Symptoms are frequently vague and diverse. We're the unwell who can sometimes seem well. Our GPs ask questions, refer us to specialists who ask more questions, at $2 per syllable, rule out nastier possibilities if you're lucky (and that is indeed a help), and usually intone variations on the theme of 'y ou'll have to live with it'. I sympathise with them, actually: as with Chronic Fatigue or Long Covid, we seldom give them the satisfaction of finding a specific cause. So chronic pain is a formless and often unresponsive condition. It can take a long time to get a diagnosis, and it seldom comes with any clear path of action. It can be treated, but seldom cured – whatever that last word may mean. What are the treatments? Painkillers, anti-inflammatories of course, though all of them, except perhaps paracetamol, come with potential side effects. A TROUP (Trends and Risks of Opioid Use for Pain) study in the US found that 22-26% of people prescribed opioids for non-malignant chronic pain ended up misusing their drugs. Distraction, meditation, exercise, diet, therapy, physio and chiropractic, the analytical and shared talk of Cognitive Behavioural Therapy are other courses of action – and action is an early step to taking some degree of control. The New Zealand Pain Society (you'll find them online) offers sensible, practical programmes and resources. Complex Chronic Illness Support, also online, can help as well. Our local hospital used to run chronic pain workshops, where physio, dietitian, psychiatrist, counsellor would reassure attendees that they weren't malingerers; it was a genuine ailment, and here was a list of things that might help. They're the only workshops I've ever attended where some participants stood up every 10 minutes and lay down in the aisle for a bit. They were enormously valuable for their collegial quality, finding that you weren't the only sufferer. They've been discontinued – more funding cuts at Whatu Ora, I gather. Alan Gordon in his book The Way Out estimated that in 2021, there were 1.2 billion chronic pain sufferers worldwide. The number is rising: we're living longer and hurting for longer periods. Other contributing factors include people expecting to be pain-lite and becoming more inclined to seek help when we're not, plus our living in an increasingly isolated society, where loneliness aggravates almost any condition. The outlook isn't great. The future, for me at any rate? Keep learning – in the most positive sense of the verb – to live with it. Take unexpected solace from the fact that on good days, the world can seem brighter and more rewarding than it did before my neck started to pack up. And wonder if assault with the nearest deadly weapon might be a pretty reasonable response to anyone who tells me that it's all in my head.
