Controversial ex-Ofsted chief warns against ‘vilifying' public bodies
A former Ofsted chief inspector, who led the watchdog when a headteacher took her own life, has warned against 'casually vilifying' public bodies.
In her maiden speech in the House of Lords, Baroness Amanda Spielman said it can be 'easy' to label those having to make difficult decisions as 'soulless and unfair'.
The new Conservative peer also used her speech to say she finds it 'worrying when the interests of children are subordinated to those of adults'.
Lady Spielman was Ofsted chief inspector when Ruth Perry died in 2023 after a report downgraded her Caversham Primary School in Reading, Berkshire, from its highest rating to its lowest over safeguarding concerns.
An inquest into the headteacher's death found the inspection was a contributory factor.
Ofsted's response to the tragedy was subsequently criticised as 'defensive and complacent' by an independent review.
Professor Julia Waters, Ms Perry's sister, said the ex-head of Ofsted being 'rewarded' with a peerage was 'a disgrace and an insult' to her sibling's memory.
Lady Spielman made her first speech in the Lords during the second reading of the Public Authorities (Fraud, Error and Recovery) Bill, which aims to crack down on fraud against the public purse.
The former watchdog chief said: 'Among the millions of decisions made by public authorities, there will always be difficult and borderline cases.
'Where, say, a claim in such a case is properly refused, it can be easy for a disappointed claimant to paint the public body and the individual decision-makers as soulless and unfair.
'And yet that authority and its staff should not be casually vilified.
'True fairness of all citizens, young and old, and maintaining that all important social contract, depends on those people having the skills and the confidence to make those difficult calls, humanely but without partiality.'
Lady Spielman, who led Ofsted for seven years, said they made an inspection model 'based on professional dialogue, grounded in evidence and emphasising educational substance and integrity'.
She said: 'Ofsted does sometimes have to report findings that are profoundly uncomfortable for those whose failings are exposed.
'Incompetence is one dimension and ethical slippage is the other.
'And I use that term because fraud, which is the main focus of this Bill, sits at one end of an ethical spectrum.
'Some behaviour can be considered unethical to a greater or lesser extent.
'For example, it's worrying when the interests of children are subordinated to those of adults, contrary to the principles that underlie the policies of successive governments.
'It isn't criminal, but it can harm children.'
The Government announced last year that headline Ofsted grades for overall effectiveness for schools in England would be scrapped following Ms Perry's death.
Previously, the watchdog awarded one of four single-phrase inspection judgements: outstanding, good, requires improvement and inadequate.
In February, Ofsted launched a consultation on its plans to introduce a report card system for grading schools in England.
However, critics, including Prof Waters, have urged for a delay, warning of 'real concerns' the proposals could drive 'excessive pressure, ill-health and stress for the profession'.
In March, Lady Spielman publicly criticised Education Secretary Bridget Phillipson and her proposed school reforms that would curb the freedoms of academies.
She said the legislation was likely to make education in England worse, and accused Ms Phillipson of being 'influenced' by the unions.
Lady Spielman was rebuked at the time by a Government source, who claimed she should 'spend less time criticising the reforms this Government is bringing, and more time reflecting on her failure at Ofsted'.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
North Wales Chronicle
30 minutes ago
- North Wales Chronicle
Starmer and Reynolds meet US commerce secretary in push to implement trade deal
The Prime Minister dropped in on a meeting between Howard Lutnick and Business Secretary Jonathan Reynolds in Downing Street on Tuesday. Mr Lutnick was in London for talks with China on resolving the trade war between Washington and Beijing, and Mr Reynolds took the opportunity to meet him in person to push for the UK-US trade deal announced last month to be implemented as soon as possible. The meeting follows talks between the Business Secretary and US trade representative Jamieson Greer in Paris last week. Under the terms of the agreement announced by Sir Keir and Donald Trump, the US will implement import quotas that will effectively eliminate tariffs on British steel and cut the levy on vehicles to 10%. But the deal has yet to be implemented and tariffs on both steel and cars remain at 25%, although the UK has been spared the increase on steel duties to 50% that Mr Trump imposed on the rest of the world last week. In a post on social media, Mr Reynolds said he had discussed 'progress on our trade deal – including UK autos and steel' with Mr Lutnick. UK officials remain hopeful that the deal will be implemented soon, but Tuesday's meeting does not appear to have moved the issue beyond both sides agreeing the need to move quickly. Speaking in the Commons last week, Sir Keir said he was 'very confident' that tariffs would come down in line with the deal 'within a very short time'. Implementing the deal will require the UK to pass legislation, likely to involve regulations rather than a full Act of Parliament, while the US will also need to create a legal mechanism to bring steel and vehicle quotas into effect.
BBC News
an hour ago
- BBC News
Ban 'no ball games' signs to get children off devices, play experts say
Play experts want to ban "no ball games" signs and protect playtime during school breaks, to reduce the time children spend on are being forced "indoors on to digital devices", according to the Raising the Nation Play Commission, whose year-long inquiry calls for an end to "anti-play culture".It warns outdoor play in England has declined by 50% in a generation because of streets dominated by traffic, fear about crime and "public spaces where young people are not welcome".The government says it is working with experts to develop a framework to improve access to activities outside of school. The report is calling for a national Play Strategy for England and has made a number of recommendations including:A national ban on "no ball games" signsUpdating planning policy to require developers to consult with children on all new developmentsGovernment guidance protecting play at break time and lunchtime in schools and banning practices like withdrawing playtime for poor behaviourOpening up school playgrounds to the community outside of school hoursRaising the digital age of consent to 16 and a ban on phones in schoolsChair of the commission, Paul Lindley, says in England "we've made it incredibly hard for children to play"."Creating truly playful communities is not just about better street design, traffic management, and reduced crime, but also about a reversal of the growing culture of intolerance towards children playing."In London, there are more than 7,000 signs limiting play for more than half a million children, according to the councils are beginning to remove signs amid concerns that children are exercising less. For Samantha and her four-year-old son Chester, who live in Blackpool, having a playground far away from traffic is vital."It's free," she says and it's somewhere her son can play without having to worry "about someone coming to tell him he can't"."A lot of children are growing up and don't have the opportunity to be able to go to other places or travel, so having somewhere close to home, that is free, is so important."More than 400 playgrounds closed in England from 2012 to 2022 and annual park budgets have fallen, the report Better Start, which helps families with young children like Chester, has been working to transform the city's less used parks and green spaces over the last ten years."It is so important for families to have safe spaces to play. Families identify with the park. They feel a sense of ownership and they feel like it belongs to them," director Clare Law explains. And there are calls for changes in schools 1995, break times in schools were around 23 minutes longer for young children than they are now, the report found. The commission wants to see playtime during breaks and lunchtime at St Ambrose Catholic Academy in Liverpool are guaranteed an hour's quality play every Tracy Moorcroft says it is a massive part of the school day."If they are building, we see them as future architects, if they're in the kitchen, could they be the next future chef? We try to link their play with aspirations for later in life."But Ms Moorcroft is less convinced about the idea of having "always-active uniforms" which have already been introduced in some says the school has "very high standards" for the uniform, as the children are being prepared for life beyond the get to wear their PE kit some days and wear wellies and coats so they can go outside regardless of the weather. General Secretary of the Association of School and College Leaders, Pepe Di'Iasio agrees that playtime has been squeezed "by the drive to improve academic outcomes", but cautioned against an "overly prescriptive approach to play" as this may impact on other areas of the Wales and Scotland have already made it a legal requirement for local authorities to ensure enough opportunities for children to commission in England is calling for a national play strategy with an annual budget of £125m, led by a minister with a responsibility for Anne Longfield from the Centre for Young Lives think tank, who worked on the report, said it should provide a "blueprint for how we can get children playing again and also tackle the scourge of addictive doom-scrolling".A government spokesperson said its Plan for Change was "setting young people up to achieve and thrive – both inside and outside the classroom", and that it is investing in grassroots sports facilities and in a programme to help turn "grey school spaces green". "From July, new rules under the Online Safety Act will require social media platforms to protect children in the UK from seeing harmful content online," the spokesperson reporting by Hayley Clarke and Rahib Khan
The Independent
an hour ago
- The Independent
Arizona governor vetoes bill to ban teaching antisemitism in Arizona's public schools
Arizona Gov. Katie Hobbs has vetoed a proposal that would ban teaching antisemitism at the state's public K-12 schools, universities and colleges and expose educators who violate the new rules to discipline and lawsuits. On Tuesday, the Democratic governor said the bill is not about antisemitism but rather about attacking teachers. 'It puts an unacceptable level of personal liability in place for our public school, community college, and university educators and staff, opening them up to threats of personally costly lawsuits," she said in a statement. "Additionally, it sets a dangerous precedent that unfairly targets public school teachers while shielding private school staff." The measure cleared the Legislature last week on a 33-20 vote by the House, including a few Democrats who crossed party lines to support it. It's one of a few proposals to combat antisemitism across the country. The proposal would prohibit teachers and administrators from teaching or promoting antisemitism or antisemitic actions that create a hostile environment, calling for the genocide of any group or requiring students to advocate for an antisemitic point of view. It also would bar public schools from using public money to support the teaching of antisemitism. Educators would personally be responsible for covering the costs of damages in lawsuits for violating the rules. Democrats tried but failed to remove the lawsuit provision and swap out references to antisemitism within the bill with 'unlawful discrimination' to reflect other discrimination. The bill's chief sponsor, Republican Rep. Michael Way, of Queen Creek, has said his proposal would create accountability when educators fail to protect students from the rise in antisemitism since the start of the Israel- Hamas war. Opponents say the bill aims to silence people who want to speak out on the oppression of Palestinians and opens up educators to personal legal liability in lawsuits students could file. Students over the age of 18 and the parents of younger pupils would be able to file lawsuits over violations that create a hostile education environment, leaving teachers responsible for paying any damages that may be awarded, denying them immunity and prohibiting the state from paying any judgments arising from any such lawsuits. The proposal would create a process for punishing those who break the rules. At K-12 schools, a first-offense violation would lead to a reprimand, a suspension of a teacher or principal's certificate for a second offense and a revocation of the certificate for a third offense. At colleges and universities, violators would face a reprimand on first offense, a suspension without pay for a second offense and termination for a third offense. The proposal also would require colleges and universities to consider violations by employees to be a negative factor when making employment or tenure decisions. Under the proposal, universities and colleges couldn't recognize any student organization that invites a guest speaker who incites antisemitism, encourages its members to engage in antisemitism or calls for the genocide of any group. Elsewhere in the U.S., a Louisiana lawmaker is pushing a resolution that asks universities to adopt policies to combat antisemitism on campuses and collect data on antisemitism-related reports and complaints. And a Michigan lawmaker has proposed putting a definition of antisemitism into the state's civil rights law.
