logo
Gen Z feels trapped between the pros and cons of gen AI

Gen Z feels trapped between the pros and cons of gen AI

West Australian4 days ago

Nine in 10 young Australians are using artificial intelligence tools in their everyday life, a study has found, but few are using the software to "cheat" at school and many are changing their career paths to avoid its impact.
A gender gap is also emerging among generative AI users, with women more concerned about creative work being stolen to train tools while men are more confident in its use.
Research firm The Insight Centre released its findings into young Australians' use of generative AI tools based on a survey of 560 people aged between 14 and 27.
The report comes as a growing number of Australians report using AI tools, and one week after tech giant Google used its developers' conference to unveil more AI features.
The report, From Gen Z to GenAI, surveyed young people studying at high school, university and TAFE and working in full-time jobs and as apprentices and interns.
Ninety per cent of those surveyed used generative AI tools, with almost one in five using AI once a day and almost twice as many using it once a week.
Reasons for using AI were mixed, with many asking it for personal advice or emotional support, and others using it to improve their communication.
Amid concerns of the technology's use in education, seven in 10 said they had not passed AI-generated work off as their own, and one in 10 said they would not do so again.
One in 10 said they planned to use AI to plagiarise assignments in future.
Young people's opinions on AI showed they were aware of the risks and rewards, The Insight Centre associate director Dr Anna Denejkina said.
The technology's convenience, productivity gains, and access to information rated highest among its benefits, while concerns about cheating, misinformation and a lack of originality were its biggest downsides.
"There is a clear tension between the opportunities Gen Zs see in AI and the significant concerns they hold about its impact on their future," she said.
"Gen Z remains deeply concerned about how gen AI could affect their job prospects, the creative industry and their online safety."
One in three people surveyed said the arrival of generative AI had made them reconsider their future study and careers.
Male respondents were more likely to feel confident using AI (41 per cent) than their female counterparts (20 per cent), however, and women were more concerned about creative theft to train AI (73 per cent vs 59 per cent).
"A concerning AI gender gap is forming," Dr Denejkina said.
"There is a risk that AI could deepen existing inequalities if we don't take steps to ensure women are equipped with the skills and confidence to engage with these tools."
One male university student surveyed said he had used AI to teach him how to write computer code despite no coding background.
But a young female data analyst said she had stopped using ChatGPT after becoming concerned about political deepfakes and the role it played in her personal life.
"It was doing all the micro-decisions and that felt like it was rewiring my brain," she said.
The findings come as the federal government considers mandatory AI guardrails following a public consultation and a Senate inquiry in late 2024.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

TikTok's advertising push as under-16 social media ban looms
TikTok's advertising push as under-16 social media ban looms

Herald Sun

time2 hours ago

  • Herald Sun

TikTok's advertising push as under-16 social media ban looms

Don't miss out on the headlines from Social. Followed categories will be added to My News. TikTok is pushing the app's benefits for teens into as many faces as it can as the under-16 social media ban looms at the end of this year. The social media giant took out sprawling ads in the Australian Financial Review last week, covering 4½ full pages with marketing, promoting the platform's utility for getting teens to read, engage with education and even cast a lure. The newspaper ads, along with a big spend on billboards and bus shelters, comes as the under-16 social media ban is just six months away. Advertisements in the May 26 edition of the AFR claim TikTok serves up 10 million videos in its science, technology, engineering, and maths feed. Another of the full-page ads extols the benefits of the massively popular 'bookTok' – TikTok's literary community. The third subject-specific ad claims Australian teenagers are 'getting outside', inspired by the platform's fishing content. A TikTok Australia spokesman said the company had also invested in billboard and bus shelter ads recently but was unable to provide numbers or details. In six months', any Australian under the age of 16 will be banned from all social media; YouTube has been granted an exemption on educational grounds, drawing the ire of the other platforms. How the social media ban will work is still up in the air. The federal government has been sitting on a report since January concerning Australians' attitudes toward age assurance technologies. A British company has been tasked with trialling which technologies could be used to implement the world first, under-16 ban. On Friday, that UK firm revealed a report on its findings had been pushed back to July. Originally published as TikTok's advertising push as under-16 social media ban looms

Video of Chinese paraglider Peng Yujiang likely manipulated with AI, experts say
Video of Chinese paraglider Peng Yujiang likely manipulated with AI, experts say

ABC News

time4 hours ago

  • ABC News

Video of Chinese paraglider Peng Yujiang likely manipulated with AI, experts say

Video of a Chinese paraglider widely published by news media outlets around the world was at least partly manipulated by generative artificial intelligence tools, experts said. Remarkable footage of 55-year-old paraglider Peng Yujiang, face encrusted with ice after purportedly being sucked into the upper atmosphere, was widely covered by Chinese and international media outlets last week including the ABC. The video had been sourced from Chinese state media outlet CCTV via Reuters. Reuters distanced itself from the content in a statement. "The content is clearly labelled as third-party content and is not verified or endorsed by Reuters," the company said. "When we became aware of a piece of content that likely contained AI-generated elements on the Reuters Connect platform, we investigated and took it down because the material does not comply with our partner content policy." The ABC also removed the original story and published an editor's note clarifying that Mr Peng's claim that he was lifted 8,598 metres could not be independently verified. Associate Professor Abhinav Dhall from Monash University's Department of Data Science and AI said there were several factors that meant the video was difficult to identify as manipulated, including the low quality of the footage. "It's difficult to figure out if it's real or fake," he told the ABC. "[But] if we closely observe the starting say 3 or 4 seconds of this video we can see that the clouds in the background do not really look real. They look like as if, you know, it's a 2D picture." Dr Dhall said it was difficult even for experts to detect "subtle manipulations" to images or video. RMIT generative AI and journalism researcher TJ Thomson agreed. "But if you look at it more closely, I think things start to come to the surface. You can pick up little things — the colour of the helmet, for example, changing colour. "Looks like the colour of cord shifts over time, looks like the ground's visible and then not a few seconds later." It is plausible that Mr Peng did indeed reach the height he claimed, despite the video being doctored. German paraglider Ewa Wisnierska was sucked nearly 10,000 metres into the air above NSW by a storm front in 2007 and lived to tell the tale. "It could be that they're splicing together multiple clips of actual real footage or that AI has been used here to generate or edit some content," Dr Thomson said. Still, he said the case demonstrated the risks of generative AI for shrinking newsrooms, which have become ever-more reliant on crowd-sourced material. "We see 728,000 hours of video being uploaded online every day and more than three billion images being uploaded online every day," he said. "It can be helpful to integrate that crowd-sourced footage into our reporting, but it's the scale and speed by which that content travels is really hard for journalists to fact-check." Australia's journalist union, the Media, Entertainment and Arts Alliance (MEAA), told the ABC it had been calling on the federal government to regulate AI. "Our members have been telling us that they are concerned about misinformation and disinformation and the potential erosion of public trust in journalism and the media," a spokesperson said. MEAA chief executive Erin Madeley said last year that use of AI generation would "drive the erosion of our news and information to the point where the community cannot tell fact from fiction". Monash's Dr Dhall said there was a "big, generational change" happening regarding the creative ways in which users could manipulate data — and that there was a role for both industry and government. "I reckon it will take some time for systems — automatic systems and human observers — to get on page and quickly realise that something is fake or not," he said. "But there is hope. There is research going on within academia and industry, developing tools that will be able to identify [AI manipulation], along with a human being."

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store