Pacers' Rick Carlisle thought Knicks' Tom Thibodeau firing ‘was one of those fake AI things'
Rick Carlisle couldn't believe the Knicks' firing of Tom Thibodeau.
During a pre-NBA Finals press conference on Wednesday, the Pacers head coach sounded off on the shocking move that rocked the NBA world a day earlier.
'Thibs went in and changed so much. You look at all that and what happened yesterday, I thought [the news] was one of those fake AI things,' Carlisle said. 'No way. No way possible. I know how the players feel about him, too.'
Advertisement
The Pacers eliminated the Knicks in six games during the Eastern Conference finals, ending Thibodeau's five-year run as the franchise's head coach.
Head coach Rick Carlisle of the Indiana Pacers looks on during the second quarter against the New York Knicks in Game Six of the Eastern Conference Finals of the 2025 NBA Playoffs at Gainbridge Fieldhouse on May 31, 2025 in Indianapolis, Indiana.
Getty Images
Carlisle said he doesn't think it'll be long before Thibodeau is back in the league after he went 226-174 during the regular season with the Knicks and made the postseason four times in five seasons.
Advertisement
'Teams and ownership can make these decisions unilaterally and it's their right to do that. Tom will certainly be fine. I don't think he's going to have any problem finding his next job. It's just going to depend on when he's ready to jump back in. I have great respect for Thibs. I go back with him a very long way. I was surprised.'
The Knicks are now in the early days of a head coaching search with names like Johnnie Bryant and Jay Wright, among others, floating around.
New York Knicks head coach Tom Thibodeau reacts in the fourth quarter against the Indiana Pacers during game five of the Eastern Conference finals for the 2025 NBA Playoffs at Madison Square Garden.
Vincent Carchietta-Imagn Images
Advertisement
No matter who gets the job, Carlisle said it won't come easy.
'The Knicks have such a unique situation with so much attention and such a large fan base and such a worldwide following,' he said. 'It's one of the most difficult jobs to take. The guys that have been most successful — Red Holzman, Pat Riley, Jeff Van Gundy, Rick Pitino — had a short run but a very effective run. And then, there were a lot of lean years.'
Carlisle and the Pacers tip off on Thursday night in Oklahoma City against the Thunder in Game 1 of the NBA Finals.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Wall Street Journal
11 minutes ago
- Wall Street Journal
How to Get Off the Investing Sidelines - Your Money Briefing
A turbulent spring in the stock market spooked some investors — and now, they're struggling to get back in . Host Julia Carpenter talks with WSJ's The Intelligent Investor columnist Jason Zweig about how these same folks can reshape their investing strategy with some much-needed historical perspective. Full Transcript This transcript was prepared by a transcription service. This version may not be in its final form and may be updated. Julia Carpenter: Here's Your Money Briefing for Friday, June 6th. I'm Julia Carpenter for The Wall Street Journal. What do you think the opposite of FOMO or the fear of missing out is? FOGI. The fear of getting in, and FOGI is all too common among investors these days. Jason Zweig: When people sense a high level of uncertainty in the market, it makes these kinds of decisions more complicated, because often, people are making these judgments partly based on what their peers are doing. And if all your peers are doing is expressing confusion and watching the headlines nonstop, it can be hard to figure out what to do. Julia Carpenter: After such an up and down few months in the stock market, spooked investors know they're probably playing it a little too safe, but what's the first step to jumping back in the fray? We'll talk with WSJ's The Intelligent Investor columnist, Jason Zweig, about how to conquer FOGI and maybe even how to use it to your advantage. That's after the break. Investors haven't had a quiet 2025. After the Trump Administration's tariff plan sent the market into a tailspin earlier this spring, some investors decided to pull out rather than play ball, and others had taken a step back even earlier. But now the market seas have calmed. So how do you get back in? Wall Street Journal's The Intelligent Investor columnist, Jason Zweig, joins me to talk more. Jason, one of your readers, Michael McCowin, wrote to you and coined this new term: FOGI. Or fear of getting in. How did he arrive at this FOGI place? Jason Zweig: Well, he would say a couple of things. First of all, he got old, and he became a FOGI, an old FOGI. And secondly, he has pretty strong views. He's fortunate. He's a former professional investor. He has plenty of assets to see him through. He's 86, and he feels that the potential upside from staying in the market at this point is not as great as the potential downside of staying in and perhaps losing a lot of his money without time to recover. Julia Carpenter: And after such a turbulent period in markets, you talk to some investors who say they think they should be more fully invested, but they still are in that place that Michael is in, that sort of FOGI place. Why do you think so many investors feel this way? Jason Zweig: Uncertainty is always high except at total market turning points, like say, 2020 or in 1987. And when people sense a high level of uncertainty in the market, it makes these kinds of decisions more complicated, because often, people are making these judgments partly based on what their peers are doing. And if all your peers are doing is expressing confusion and watching the headlines non-stop, it can be hard to figure out what to do. Julia Carpenter: FOGI is contagious. Jason Zweig: Yeah, it absolutely is. Julia Carpenter: And your column, which is linked in our show notes, does such a great job of giving us some much-needed historical perspective. How do the last few market cycles fit into the big picture of the last 80 years in markets? Jason Zweig: The key thing to put in perspective as an investor is that, the long run, tells us unambiguously that you should be rewarded for sticking with U.S. stocks if you can stick with them long enough. We've had over 60 instances of stocks losing 5% or more. We've had a couple dozen corrections where they went down 10 or 20%. And, just in the past few years, we've had two severe bear markets where stocks lost 20% or more. And, over time, the markets have always overcome that and delivered ample returns for people who could stick with it. However, it's not a guarantee. And, ultimately, if you try to force yourself to be the kind of investor you're not, you might end up worse off. People who really feel they need to sleep well at night should listen to that intuition, because if you compel yourself against your own gut to stick with the market during times that look tough, when times that actually feel tough come along, you may get shaken out. So, having a little bit higher allocation to cash or bonds might not be a bad thing for someone who is inclined to get spooked out of the market. Julia Carpenter: I wanted to ask you about a hindsight bias. What is it, and how should we be thinking about it as investors? Jason Zweig: Hindsight bias is a fallacy of human reasoning. It essentially trains us to think, after the fact, that what did happen is what we predicted would happen. And just think about presidential elections, for example. People say things like, "Oh, I knew all along it would be a landslide," or, "I knew all along it would be close." But if you go back and look at what they actually were saying before the election, they weren't saying that. And the advantage of what's just happened, particularly in April and the rebound in May, is that it's so fresh in all of our minds, that it's kind of hard to lie to ourselves. And it gives us a great opportunity to look back and say, "What was I actually saying and thinking? Oh, I was actually saying and thinking this was almost the end of the world, and it's turned out not to be, at least so far. So maybe the lesson I should learn is not to be so certain about my forecasts." Julia Carpenter: So thinking about investors like Michael, what would you tell them to consider as they weigh their options and try to conquer this fear of getting in? Jason Zweig: I like to say, if you must panic, panic slowly, panic gradually. Maybe take one percentage point of your allocation to stocks and reduce that each month. And, within a retirement account, where you don't have immediate tax consequences, you can do that quite easily. And making gradual change, first of all, will make you feel better, because you'll feel you're responding to the thing you're afraid of. But more importantly, it prevents you from overreacting to a fear you feel that ultimately doesn't turn out to be actual. Julia Carpenter: And just to emphasize to those who are still sort of spooked, Jason, managing investments is just one part of an overall financial plan, but it's an important one nonetheless. I wonder what would you say to someone about using the market to build wealth and this sense of security? Jason Zweig: So, the thing to keep in mind is that, while there are no guarantees, and it is not actually true that if you hold stocks long enough you're guaranteed to outperform all other assets, it's a bet about probabilities. It's highly likely that you will do extremely well if you hold stocks for the long term. And the fact that the probability isn't a hundred percent, I don't think should really discourage you from doing it. Just as it can rain on a day when the forecast is 100% sunshine, stocks can disappoint people who hold them for decades at a time, but in the long run, it is a very high probability bet. And putting most of your money in stocks, particularly when you're young and your labor income gives you a hedge against fluctuations in the value of your stock portfolio, is a good idea. It's the best bet for long-term investing, even if it's not quite a certain bet. Julia Carpenter: That's Jason Zweig, columnist for WSJ's: The Intelligent Investor. And that's it for Your Money Briefing. Tomorrow we'll have our weekly markets wrap up, What's News and markets, and then we'll be back on Monday. This episode was produced by Ariana Aspuru. I'm your host, Julia Carpenter. Jessica Fenton and Michael LaValle wrote our theme music. Our supervising producer is Melony Roy. Aisha Al-Muslim is our development producer. Scott Saloway and Chris Zinsli are our deputy editors. And Philana Patterson is The Wall Street Journal's head of news audio. Thanks for listening.
USA Today
11 minutes ago
- USA Today
Oklahoma City Thunder vs. Indiana Pacers NBA Finals odds, tips and betting trends Game 2
Oklahoma City Thunder vs. Indiana Pacers NBA Finals odds, tips and betting trends | Game 2 | June 8 The Oklahoma City Thunder will take on the Indiana Pacers in Game 2 of the NBA Finals. The Thunder are a double-digit favorite against the Pacers when the Thunder and the Pacers square off. The Thunder are favored by 11 points. The matchup's point total is set at 227.5. Thunder vs. Pacers betting odds NBA odds courtesy of BetMGM Sportsbook. Odds updated Friday at 3:29 a.m. ET. For a full list of sports betting odds, access USA TODAY Sports Betting Scores Odds Hub. Spread: Oklahoma City -11 Oklahoma City -11 Total: 227.5 227.5 Moneyline: Oklahoma City -581, Indiana +429 Pacers at Thunder odds, spread, & more Prediction Pick ATS: Thunder (- 11) Thunder (- 11) Pick OU: Over (227.5) Over (227.5) Prediction: Thunder 122 - Pacers 107 The Thunder have won 66 of the 79 games they were listed as the moneyline favorite this season (83.5%). When it has played as a moneyline favorite with odds of -581 or shorter, Oklahoma City has a record of 28-2 (93.3% win percentage). Based on this contest's moneyline, the Thunder's implied win probability is 85.3%. The Pacers have entered the game as underdogs 33 times this season and won 16, or 48.5%, of those games. Indiana has played as an underdog of +429 or more once this season and lost that game. The Pacers have a 18.9% chance to win this game based on the implied probability of the moneyline. The Thunder put up 120.5 points per game, 5.4 more points than the 115.1 the Pacers give up. When Oklahoma City puts up more than 115.1 points, it is 40-14 against the spread and 47-7 overall. Indiana is 38-33-1 against the spread and 48-24 overall when it scores more than 107.6 points. Oklahoma City's record is 51-12-2 against the spread and 61-4 overall when it gives up fewer than 117.4 points. The Thunder are the NBA's fourth-ranked scoring team (120.5 PPG), while the Pacers rank 17th in points per game allowed (115.1) in the league. Indiana is the NBA's seventh-ranked offense (117.4 PPG), while Oklahoma City is the third-ranked defense (107.6). The Thunder have out-scored their opponents by a total of 1055 points this season (12.9 points per game on average), and the Pacers have put up 183 more points than their opponents on the year (2.3 per game). Oklahoma City has an average implied point total of 118.5 this season, which is 0.5 points lower than its implied total in Sunday's game (119). So far this season, Oklahoma City has put up more than 119 points in 46 games. The 119.6-point average implied total on the season for Indiana is 11.6 more points than the team's 108-point implied total in this matchup. How to watch Thunder vs. Pacers Game day: Sunday, June 8, 2025 Sunday, June 8, 2025 Game time: 8 p.m. ET 8 p.m. ET TV channel: ABC ABC Location: Oklahoma City, Oklahoma Oklahoma City, Oklahoma Arena: Paycom Center Paycom Center Live stream: Watch this game Fubo Watch this game Fubo NBA League Pass: The most live games plus NBA TV. Sign up today Watch the NBA on NBA League Pass!
Washington Post
44 minutes ago
- Washington Post
Inside the Comeback: How the Pacers pulled off a stunner in Game 1 of the NBA Finals
OKLAHOMA CITY — The game plan was the obvious one. Just chip away, the Indiana Pacers said, because there was no other option that would have made any sense at that point. They were down by 15 with 9:42 remaining. They were turning the ball over about once every three possessions, couldn't stop Shai Gilgeous-Alexander, and had the Oklahoma City crowd in a deafening fury. 'We just said, 'Hey, let's just keep chipping away at the rock,'' Pacers coach Rick Carlisle said. 'Got to keep pounding the rock and just chip away and hang in.' With 0.3 seconds left, there was no more rock left to pound. Not for Game 1, anyway. Tyrese Haliburton scored with that much time left and the Pacers stunned the Oklahoma City Thunder 111-110 in the opener of this year's NBA Finals on Thursday night. A look inside the comeback: The Pacers outscored the Thunder 32-16 in that final 9:42, with only six players getting used for those final minutes and all of them figuring into the scoring column. Obi Toppin took two shots. Both were 3-pointers. Both connected. Myles Turner and Andrew Nembhard each scored eight points to lead Indiana during the flurry. Aaron Nesmith led the Pacers with four rebounds in that stretch. And Haliburton provided the exclamation point with the jumper at the end. 'I've worked my entire life to get to this stage, so there's no holding back,' Turner said. The Thunder shot 4 for 16 in that closing stretch. Gilgeous-Alexander was 2 for 4; everyone else on the Thunder combined to shoot 2 for 12. The MVP had 10 points; everyone else on the Thunder combined for six. The reasons for all that? 'A little bit of everything,' Thunder coach Mark Daigneault said. 'They made some plays. On some of those plays they made some shots. They got a couple that you wish you'd get back. We had bonus fouls, which were costly. Then offensively we didn't move the scoreboard as well as we could have. So you just add all that up and that's how you get that sort of comeback.' There was no choke sign from Haliburton, no celebratory dance, just a bunch of hugs with teammates and a big hug with his father John Haliburton in the hallway near the Pacers' locker room afterward. The Pacers, coach Rick Carlisle said, haven't engaged in a ton of raucous postgame victory laps during this playoff run. 'This is going to be a long journey and a lot going on,' Carlisle said. 'So, we're just going to have to keep our eye on the ball and keep focusing on one another.' Here were some of the key moments: — Carlisle subbed in five new players — Haliburton, Nembhard, Nesmith, Toppin and Turner — with 9:42 left and Indiana trailing 94-79. — Turner hits a 3-pointer with 7:47 left, cutting the lead to 96-88 and forcing an OKC time-out. — Toppin and Turner made 3-pointers on consecutive possessions (Turner keeping the second one alive with an offensive rebound) to get Indiana within 98-94 with 6:16 left. — Gilgeous-Alexander's two free throws with 2:52 left pushed the Thunder lead to 108-99. Nesmith and Nembhard connected on back-to-back 3s, and Indiana was within thee with 1:59 left. — The Pacers got a stop with 11 seconds left and didn't call time, having taken advantage of a challenge stoppage 11 seconds earlier to map out scenarios. The clock kept running and Haliburton hit the winner with 0.3 seconds left. 'I don't know what you say about it but I know that this group is a resilient group and we don't give up until it's 0.0 on the clock.' — Haliburton. ___ AP NBA:
