The other side of the world's largest EV maker: China's Byd sued by Brazil for slave-like conditions at its plant
Brazil is taking legal action against Chinese EV maker BYD and two partners over alleged mistreatment of Chinese workers at a factory site. The workers were said to be misled and kept in poor living conditions. BYD says it's cooperating with the probe.
Tired of too many ads?
Remove Ads
Tired of too many ads?
Remove Ads
FAQs
Brazilian prosecutors are suing Chinese electric car company BYD and two other companies. The other two companies are China JinJiang Construction Brazil and Tecmonta Equipamentos Inteligentes, as per reports.They are accused of using workers in slave-like conditions and doing international human trafficking. The prosecutors want 257 million Brazilian ($50 million) reais in damages from the three companies. The case started after an investigation that found 220 Chinese workers in bad conditions last year, according to an AP news report.As per the reports, these workers were rescued from a construction site for BYD's new factory in Camacari city, Brazil. Prosecutors said the workers were brought from China with wrong visas and were tricked about their jobs. The workers were living in very poor and degrading conditions.The companies had five worker camps, where conditions were bad. Some workers slept on beds without mattresses and kept food next to their personal items. There were not enough bathrooms, and they were not separated for men and women, as stated in the reports.In one place, there was only 1 toilet for 31 people, so workers had to wake up at 4 a.m. just to get ready. BYD said it is working with the investigation and will talk more as the case goes on. The company said it follows Brazilian laws and international labor rules, according to an AP news report.In December, a BYD spokesperson said reports about bad conditions were trying to make China and Chinese brands look bad, as per reports.It's over claims of using Chinese workers in slave like conditions.At a BYD factory construction site in Camacari, Brazil.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Economic Times
2 hours ago
- Economic Times
Nvidia sounds the alarm: Chinese AI talent defecting to Huawei as U.S. chip curbs push them out the door
Nvidia is sounding the alarm about the unintended impact of US export restrictions on sending chips to China, as the company's senior VP of research and chief scientist, Bill Dally, said that the chipmaker is now witnessing an increasing number of former Nvidia AI researchers joining Huawei, a move prompted primarily by the tightening export controls, as per a PC Gamer to Dally's calculation, the number of AI researchers working in China has grown from a third of the world's total in 2019 to nearly half at present, reported PC Gamer, which cited a translation from the Taiwan Economic Daily report. The AI chipmaker's rationale is that without US restrictions, Huawei wouldn't be forced to focus so much on domestic AI solutions, but now it must do so to keep up, according to the PC Gamer report. However, this is not the first time Nvidia is pointing out that the US export restrictions for China are harming the AI industry in America. Even during Computex last month, Nvidia CEO Jensen Huang said, "AI researchers are still doing AI research in China and if they don't have enough Nvidia, they will use their own [chips]," and he also spoke regarding Huawei specifically, saying the company has become "quite formidable", reported PC Gamer. While, it is not just the US national interest that has urged Nvidia to highlight all the possible negatives of export controls, as these restrictions have cost and will cost the chipmaker lots of money, according to the report. Nvidia had revealed that after billions of dollars lost due to the restrictions of its H20 chips to China in Q1, it's expecting another $8 billion to be lost for the same reason in Q2, reported PC Gamer. According to the report, Huawei's latest Ascend 910 and 920 chips, with the help of China's SMIC (Semiconductor Manufacturing International Corporation), would be a better option for Chinese AI companies than trying to get their hands on Nvidia chips, as per the report. Why is Nvidia concerned about its AI researchers joining Huawei? Because it signals that export restrictions might be pushing top talent and innovation into China, instead of slowing its progress. How much money has Nvidia lost from these restrictions? Nvidia says it lost billions in Q1 and expects another $8 billion in losses in Q2 due to blocked chip sales to China.
India Today
2 hours ago
- India Today
US suspends nuclear equipment exports to China amid escalating trade war: Report
The US in recent days suspended licenses for nuclear equipment suppliers to sell to China's power plants, according to four people familiar with the matter, as the two countries engage in a damaging trade suspensions were issued by the US Department of Commerce, the people said, and affect export licenses for parts and equipment used with nuclear power equipment suppliers are among a wide range of companies whose sales have been restricted over the past two weeks as the US-China trade war shifted from negotiating tariffs to throttling each other's supply chains. It is unclear whether a Thursday call between US President Donald Trump and Chinese President Xi Jinping would affect the suspensions. The US and China agreed on May 12 to roll back triple digit, tit-for-tat tariffs for 90 days, but the truce between the two biggest economies quickly went south, with the US claiming China reneged on terms related to rare earth elements, and China accusing the US of "abusing export control measures" by warning that using Huawei Ascend AI chips anywhere in the world violated US export controls. After Thursday's call, further talks on key issues were US Department of Commerce did not respond to a request for comment on the nuclear equipment restrictions. On May 28, a spokesperson said the department was reviewing exports of strategic significance to China."In some cases, Commerce has suspended existing export licenses or imposed additional license requirements while the review is pending," the spokesperson said in a statement. The Chinese Embassy in Washington did not immediately respond to a request for nuclear equipment suppliers include Westinghouse and Emerson EMR.N. Westinghouse, whose technology is used in over 400 nuclear reactors around the world, and Emerson, which provides measurement and other tools for the nuclear industry, did not respond to requests for suspensions affect business worth hundreds of millions of dollars, two of the sources also coincide with Chinese restrictions on critical metals threatening supply chains for manufacturers worldwide, especially America's Big Three could not determine whether the new restrictions were tied to the trade war, or if and how quickly they might be reinstated. Department of Commerce export licenses typically run for four years and include authorized quantities and many new restrictions on exports to China have been imposed in the last two weeks, according to sources, and include license requirements for a hydraulic fluids supplier for sales to license suspensions went to GE Aerospace for jet engines for China's COMAC aircraft, sources U.S. also now requires licenses to ship ethane to China, as Reuters reported first last week. Houston-based Enterprise Product Partners EPD.N said Wednesday that its emergency requests to complete three proposed cargoes of ethane to China, totaling some 2.2 million barrels, had not been said a May 23 requirement for a license to sell butane to China, in addition to the ethane, was subsequently withdrawn. Dallas-based Energy Transfer said it was notified on Tuesday about the new ethane licensing requirement, and planned to apply and file for an emergency sectors that have been hit with new restrictions include companies that sell electronic design automation software such as Cadence Design Systems CDNS.O.
Mint
2 hours ago
- Mint
Court Fight Over Trump Ending Tariff Exemption Goes Forward
A court fight over President Donald Trump's decision to end a US policy that exempted small-value packages from China from tariffs is moving ahead over the administration's opposition. A federal judge on Thursday denied the US Justice Department's request to pause litigation over what's known as the 'de minimis' tariff exception while a broader fight over Trump's move to raise global tariffs on imported goods is pending. Amid that fight, the president's tariffs remain in effect. Packages coming into the US have qualified for the exception if they have a retail value of $800 or less. Trump's move to end the exemption for China and Hong Kong is hurting discount Chinese marketplaces such as Temu and Shein Group Ltd. that ship low-cost clothing, household goods and other items directly to US consumers. But it could also hurt US small businesses. QuickTake: What's the De Minimis Tariff Loophole Trump Closed? In the case at hand, auto parts distributor Detroit Axle argued that it has separate claims against Trump's revoking the exemption that aren't on the table in other active cases. The company says it will be forced to fire hundreds of workers and potentially shut down by the end of June if it can't get a final court ruling soon. The Justice Department argued that Detroit Axle was 'hard-pressed' to demand urgency since it didn't sue right away over the challenged executive orders and that it would make more sense for the court to wait for other lawsuits to be resolved before deciding next steps in the retailer's case. Detroit Axle's lawyers and a Justice Department spokesperson didn't immediately respond to requests for comment on Thursday's ruling. The case raises some of the same claims broadly contesting Trump's tariff hikes, but Detroit Axle's lawyers said they're pushing for faster court action only on the small-value import exemption. The company contends that the administration exceeded its authority and failed to go through the administrative rule-making process required under US law. The administration hasn't filed its response to Detroit Axle's claims yet but in other cases has defended Trump's use of executive power to carry out his trade policies. Trump has separately taken steps to end the de minimis exemptions for certain imports from other countries, but that hasn't taken effect yet. Late last month a federal appeals court temporarily allowed Trump's global 'reciprocal' tariffs to take effect, pausing a ruling by the US Court of International Trade that struck down Trump's use of an economic emergency law to impose the levies, currently at 10% for most major trading partners. The Court of International Trade ordered briefing to wrap up in early July on Detroit Axle's request to reinstate the de minimis exception. That would mean the court is poised to rule after the company says it would exhaust its pre-tariff stockpile and face dire financial consequences. On Friday, Detroit Axle asked the court to set a faster schedule. Meanwhile the appeals court is set to rule as early as next week on whether to give the administration a longer-term win and keep the lower court's judgment blocking the tariffs on hold while the legal fight plays out. The case is Axle of Dearborn v. Department of Commerce, 25-cv-91, US Court of International Trade. This article was generated from an automated news agency feed without modifications to text.
