IHC rules telecom's tower deal taxable
At high tax rates, profit margins for sellers decrease, leaving them with options to pass on the burden to consumers, compromise on the quality of products, evade taxes or find cheaper illicit goods. photo: file
A Division Bench of the Islamabad High Court (IHC), led by Justice Babar Sattar, has recently delivered a significant ruling in favour of revenue in a tax reference filed by a major telecom operator.
The ruling upholds the powers and jurisdiction of the Federal Board of Revenue (FBR) in assessing tax liability on a high-value intra-group transaction involving the transfer of telecom operator's tower assets. As a result, the telecom operator is now liable to pay taxes amounting to approximately Rs22 billion ($78 million) on its gain from the transaction.
The landmark case focused on a 2018 internal asset reorganisation, where the Telecom Operator transferred its nationwide tower infrastructure to its wholly owned subsidiary.
The disposal of these assets for Rs98.5b ($940m) by the telecom operator was recorded in its financial statements as an accounting gain of approximately Rs75.9b. However, the telecom operator contended that the transaction was not taxable because the asset was disposed of to its wholly owned subsidiary, according to section 97(1) of the Income Tax Ordinance, 2001 (ITO) concerning intra-group transfers.
The IHC dismissed the petitioner's argument, stating that the provision permits a tax-neutral event only if all conditions of section 97 of the ITO are met. This includes ensuring that the written-down value of the transferred asset remains unchanged in the hands of the transferee compared to the transferor, meaning the transaction should not generate any economic value leading to taxable income. The Court determined that the transaction was conducted at a fair market value of USD 940 million, accepted by the petitioner as consideration, thereby violating section 97 of the ITO.
Consequently, the court concluded that the gain from the transaction was clearly a taxable event since nothing remained to defer taxation to a later date. Additionally, the Court ruled that the Commissioner had the authority to consider accounting income when evaluating taxable income.
This remarkable success of the FBR on judicial front is another step toward accomplishment of vision of the Hon'ble Prime Minister for expeditious liquidation of state revenue involved in the cases pending before the various appellate fora.
Under the guidance of Rashid Mehmood, Chairman of the FBR, Legal Wing of the FBR headed by Mir Badshah Khan Wazir, Member (Legal IR) in association with Director General (Law) has already taken a number of initiatives to actively pursue the pending cases by providing proper assistance to the courts.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Business Recorder
19 hours ago
- Business Recorder
IHC ruling favours FBR: Leading telecom co to pay Rs22bn
ISLAMABAD: The Islamabad High Court (IHC) has issued a judgement against a leading telecom operator, which would result in payment of Rs22 billion (US$78 million) to the Federal Board of Revenue (FBR). In this regard, a Division Bench of the Islamabad High Court, led by Justice Babar Sattar, has delivered a significant ruling in favor of revenue in a tax reference filed by a major Telecom operator. This ruling upholds the powers and jurisdiction of the Federal Board of Revenue (FBR) in assessing tax liability on a high-value intra-group transaction involving the transfer of Telecom Operator's tower assets. As a result, the Telecom Operator is now liable to pay taxes amounting to approximately Rs. 22 billion (USD 78 million) on its gain from the transaction. The landmark case focused on 2018 internal asset reorganization, where the Telecom Operator transferred its nationwide tower infrastructure to its wholly owned subsidiary. The disposal of these assets for Rs. 98.5 billion (USD 940 million) by the Telecom Operator was recorded in its financial statements as an accounting gain of approximately Rs. 75.9 billion. However, the Telecom Operator contended that the transaction was not taxable because the asset was disposed of to its wholly owned subsidiary, according to section 97(1) of the Income Tax Ordinance, 2001 (ITO) concerning intra-group transfers. The high court dismissed the petitioner's argument, stating that the provision permits a tax-neutral event only if all conditions of section 97 of the ITO are met. This includes ensuring that the written-down value of the transferred asset remains unchanged in the hands of the transferee compared to the transferor, meaning the transaction should not generate any economic value leading to taxable income. The Court determined that the transaction was conducted at a fair market value of USD 940 million, accepted by the petitioner as consideration, thereby violating section 97 of the ITO. Consequently, the Court concluded that the gain from the transaction was clearly a taxable event since nothing remained to defer taxation to a later date. Additionally, the Court ruled that the Commissioner had the authority to consider accounting income when evaluating taxable income. This remarkable success of the FBR on judicial front is another step toward accomplishment of vision of the Hon'ble Prime Minister for expeditious liquidation of state revenue involved in the cases pending before the various appellate fora. Under the guidance of Rashid Mehmood, Chairman, FBR, Legal Wing of the FBR headed by Mir Badshah Khan Wazir, Member (Legal IR) in association with Director General (Law) has already taken a number of initiatives to actively pursue the pending cases by providing proper assistance to the courts. These collective efforts have resulted in resolution of large number of pending tax disputes at various legal fora involving revenue in billions of rupees. Asma Hamid, ASC, and Dr. Ishtiaq Ahmed Khan (DG Law) effectively represented the Federal Board of Revenue in this case. While dismissing another petition of the same telecom operator filed against a show cause notice issued under the Federal Excise Act, 2005, the court-imposed cost of Rs. 100,000 upon the petitioner to be paid to Deputy Commissioner-IR, LTO, Islamabad within four weeks. Copyright Business Recorder, 2025
Business Recorder
19 hours ago
- Business Recorder
The post-budget govt press conference
EDITORIAL: The post-budget press conference held by the federal finance minister Muhammad Aurangzeb, flanked by Chairman FBR and Secretary Finance, was initially boycotted by a section of the independent media in protest against the cancellation of the traditional technical briefing given by the Federal Board of Revenue (FBR) Chairman immediately after the budget speech. The protesting journalists returned after an apology was tendered by the Information Minister with the pledge that a technical briefing would be given though no date has yet been scheduled. A technical briefing provides details of how much revenue is projected to be generated from each proposed new and/or additional tax measure or through improved enforcement or through higher growth or higher inflation. It also provides the estimated decrease in collections as and when a tax is reduced. Given that FBR has been unable to meet the projected targets in previous years, partly due to lower than projected growth rate and inflation or through a contraction in aggregate demand or when on an International Monetary Fund programme being set unrealistic targets, data released during a technical briefing enables tax experts to assess the possibility of meeting targets. The Finance Minister and the Chairman FBR appeared on several private channel talk shows on Wednesday but shared only partial data that is shared in a technical briefing. One data shared by the two men was the claim that enforcement measures had been very effective in the outgoing year and had generated around 390 billion rupees, which was the root cause of the IMF agreeing to the authorities' proposal that a similar amount, if not more, would be generated from this source. This measure must be fully supported because without strict enforcement of fiscal measures contained in a Finance Bill increasing tax collections in this country have been at the cost of the existing taxpayers'. Be that as it may, the fact remains that the enforcement measures identified by both the Finance Minister (who in one interview no doubt inadvertently indicated that the farm tax on the income of rich landlords, effective from January this year to be implemented from 1 July 2025, may be included under the head of improved enforcement though this tax is a provincial tax) and the Chairman FBR relate to indirect taxes including sales tax/federal excise duty, which are passed on in their entirety onto the consumers. The Chairman FBR mentioned better enforcement at sugar mills, which he claimed had increased collections manifold but did not follow through to the rise in sugar prices. One would therefore hope that enforcement gains are not limited to sales tax/FED but extend to the rich who currently operate in the informal sector. He also referred to the need for the legislature to approve laws and amendments to strengthen FBR's enforcement capacity and cautioned that if this is not implemented the government has agreed with the IMF to levy around 500 billion rupees in additional taxes. However, laws can and have been challenged in the past and one would assume that a time lag in implementation is taken into account when projecting collections under this head. The Finance Minister also claimed that taxes on the salaried class had been reduced in an attempt to inform those who were impacted in the 2024-25 budget that the government is aware of their problems and would continue to reduce rates subject to a widening of the currently narrow fiscal space. He referred to the success in reducing inflation but sadly did not touch on current poverty levels having reached a high of 44.7 percent as per the World Bank's recently revised global income thresholds (poverty line for Pakistan as a middle income country now set at 4.20 dollars per day instead of the previous 3.65 dollars per day). True; that the increase in Benazir Income Support Programme (BISP) is sizeable in percentage terms — 21 percent — yet the actual amount of 716 billion rupees next year against 592 billion rupees provides little comfort level, given the rise in unemployment (inexplicably not tabulated by government's statistical body since 2020-21), which is being cited at over 20 percent by independent experts based on negative large-scale manufacturing sector and poor growth of the farm sector that are major sources of employment. The Finance Minister's comment on the National Finance Commission award must be fully appreciated as the population component needs to be further revised downward. However, he surely must be aware that as the finance minister he has to create the consensus to reach an agreement. The last time an award was agreed in 2010 and a new award is long overdue. And finally, the Finance Minister noted that overall there are 7,000 tariff lines and additional customs duty has been removed on 4,000 lines and removed on 2,700 of those the customs duty has been reduced with 2,000 lines directly linked to raw materials and intermediary goods used by exporters. This action needs to be fully supported; and while reducing tariffs, a primary source of tax collection in many developing countries, including Pakistan, is a multilateral objective premised on a slowly receding globalisation policy, yet as repeatedly acknowledged by the economic team, Pakistan is currently operating under severe financial constraints and does not have the luxury of resisting IMF diktat at present. Copyright Business Recorder, 2025
Business Recorder
19 hours ago
- Business Recorder
Tariff cuts to cause Rs200bn revenue loss
ISLAMABAD: The tariff rationalization including changes in import duties slabs, abolition/reduction in customs duties, Additional Customs Duties (ACDs) and regulatory duties (RDs) in budget (2025-26) will result in revenue loss of Rs 200 billion in 2025-26. Break-up of revenue loss in 2025-26 revealed that the reduction in rates of ACDs would cause revenue loss of Rs 126.7 billion. Changes in RDs would cause revenue loss of Rs 57.7 billion and revision in rates of customs duties would have revenue implications of Rs 15.6 billion. The Federal Board of Revenue (FBR) has estimated to collect huge revenue of Rs 56 billion from increase in tax from profit on debt during 2025-26. Massive tariff overhaul unveiled According to the revenue impact of taxation and relief measures (federal budget 2025-26) prepared by the FBR, previously profit on debt was taxed at 15 percent as final discharge of tax liability for individuals earning less than Rs5 million. It is now proposed to increase tax rate on profit on debt from bank deposits to 20 percent to bring it closer to the effective rates on other income sources taxed at normal rates, with highest slab bearing tax rate of 35-45 percent. This tax would now be treated as 'minimum tax liability' ensuring it cannot be used to avoid standard tax obligations. Break-up of new taxation measures revealed that the FBR has estimated to collect Rs 26 billion from taxation of e-commerce/digital transactions during 2025-26. The rate of deduction for payments through digital means and cash on delivery would have positive impact on revenue collection. It is proposed to levy 1 percent of the gross amount if payment is less than Rs 10,000; 2 percent of the gross amount if payment is less than Rs 20,000 and levy 0.25 percent of the gross amount if payment is more than Rs 20,000. For cash on delivery, the tax rate will be 0.25 percent of the gross amount paid for all electronic goods; the rate will be 2 percent of the gross amount paid for supply of clothing articles and one percent of the gross amount paid on supply of goods other than electronic goods and clothing goods. According to the revenue impact of taxation and relief measures prepared by the FBR for 2025-26, the FBR will generate revenue to the tune of Rs 20 billion from imposition of sales tax on solar panels during next fiscal year. The imposition of 10 percent sales tax on erstwhile tribal areas would generate additional revenue of Rs 30 billion in 2025-26. The FBR has estimated to generate revenue of Rs 10 billion from tax on income from Coupon Washing. It has been proposed that the advance tax under section 151A shall be deducted on the profits arising from the trading of Pakistan Investment Bonds (PIBs) and T-Bills across the counters before the date of maturity. The reintroduction of tax credit for housing loan for small residences will have negative impact on FBR's tax collection during next fiscal year. Similarly, the removal of Federal Excise Duty (FED) on immovable properties will also have a negative impact on tax collection. The rationalized dividend tax rates on mutual funds would generate additional revenue of Rs7 billion in the national exchequer. The removal of less than 18 percent sales tax rate on motor vehicles would generate revenue of Rs7 billion. The 12.5 percent concessional sales tax on hybrid and less than 1800cc cars was meant to support middle-income buyers, but did not deliver the intended benefits due to maintenance of high prices by car manufacturers. Now, it is proposed to withdraw the concession, applying standard 18 percent sales tax on such vehicles. The FBR will generate Rs2 billion from tax at 5 percent rate proposed on pension income exceeding Rs10 million for individuals less than 70 years old. The increase in advance tax from 10 percent to 15 percent on fee for offshore digital services would have positive impact on revenue collection of the FBR. On the other hand, the FBR has calculated a positive revenue impact of 7-9 percent in overall tax collection considering all factors of customs tariff rationalization i.e. increased demand, economic growth, transparency, decrease in under-invoicing, smuggling, compliance cost and Global Trade Analysis Project (GTAP) calculations with increase in exports by 10-14 percent. Copyright Business Recorder, 2025
