Kerala HC seeks report on 300 tribal families in Nilambur
Kochi: High court has sought instructions from the Malappuram district collector regarding the condition of approximately 300 tribal families residing in the Pothugal, Vazhikadavu and Karulai grama panchayats in Nilambur.
The collector has been directed to submit the details by next Friday.
The bench of Chief Justice Nitin Jamdar and Justice Basant Balaji issued the directive while hearing a petition filed by Aryadan Shouketh, former chairman of Nilambur municipality, and Sudha Vaniyampuzha. During the hearing on Friday, the petitioners submitted that the condition of the tribal communities was extremely grave. The court directed the state govt to obtain instructions from the collector and furnish the necessary details.
The petition, originally filed in Feb 2024, alleged that the tribal communities in the panchayats were living in deplorable conditions due to govt inaction. The petitioners highlighted that the families were residing in makeshift sheds covered with plastic sheets deep within the forest, facing constant threats to their safety. They also raised concerns over the lack of basic connectivity to the mainland, pointing out that the Iruttu Kuthi Concrete Bridge over the Chaliyar River and the Punjakolli Iron Bridge over the Punnapuzha River were destroyed during the floods of 2018 and 2019, leaving the region cut off from essential services and support.
Get the latest lifestyle updates on Times of India, along with
Brother's Day wishes
,
messages
and quotes !
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Time of India
8 hours ago
- Time of India
Commercial film shoots in national parks: Kerala HC seeks state govt's views
Kochi: High court has asked the state govt to clarify whether commercial film shoots should be permitted in national parks, wildlife sanctuaries and tiger reserves. The bench of Chief Justice Nitin Jamdar and Justice Basant Balaji further enquired whether the state govt has any policy on the issue beyond prescribing shooting fees. The court was hearing an appeal by Angels Nair, general secretary of NGO Animal Legal Force Integration, Ernakulam. Nair's appeal raised concerns regarding the 2018 shoot of the Malayalam film Unda, including soil dumping in a reserved forest in Kasaragod. Responding to the petition, the forest and wildlife department's under secretary filed a counter-affidavit enclosing a GO that revises entry fees and security deposits for filming in protected areas. The order sets separate fee schedules for commercial, documentary and educational films. After examining the documents, the court questioned whether commercial shoots should be allowed at all in such areas. At the special govt pleader's request, the matter was adjourned to Jun 23 for instructions, and Manu Vyasan Peter was appointed amicus curiae.
Time of India
16 hours ago
- Time of India
Lakshadweep's ban on Mahal and Arabic in schools stayed by Kerala High Court amid cultural concerns
KOCHI: The Kerala High Court has stayed the Lakshadweep administration's recent decision to remove Mahal and Arabic from the curriculum of schools in the Union Territory. The division bench, chaired by Chief Justice Nitin Jamdar and Justice Basant Balaji, stayed the administration's decision. "The point emphasized by the Petitioner, which prima facie, we find merit in, is that for the implementation of the (National Education) Policy in a particular area, there has to be an application of mind and a study of local conditions to determine what is best for the educational interests of the community, in order to achieve the objectives of the Policy. The Policy itself contemplates such an application of mind, noting that various factors are involved in the said decision. As contended by the learned counsel for the Petitioner, a language holds deep cultural significance, and any changes could have serious ramifications," said the Court. The Court pointed out, "Ordinarily, the Court would not interfere in matters of education policy, particularly with respect to the selection of languages in the curriculum. However, this is self-restraint based on the premise that decisions relating to education policy are made by experts in the field after an in-depth study and wide consultation," added the Bench. Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Classic Solitaire , Built for Desktop Play Solitaire Download Undo Incidentally, it was on May 14th, the Education Department of the Union Territory issued the order removing the two languages under the 2023 National Curriculum Framework (NCF), which is part of the 2020 National Education Policy (NEP). According to the order, all schools in Minicoy island will offer Malayalam and English as the first and second languages, and Hindi will replace the local language Mahal and Arabic as the third language. This led to widespread protests on the islands. It was against this order that a public interest litigation (PIL) was filed by Ajas Akber, a social worker and President of the Lakshadweep Unit of the National Students Union of India . The petitioner pointed out that Mahal is the exclusive language spoken by Minicoy islanders, and it symbolises their tradition and culture. He went on to further point out that Mahal was being taught only in primary classes and was a foundation course to consolidate and uphold the tradition and culture of Minicoy, which happens to be a pure linguistic minority among the Union Territory. Akber also pointed out that by removing the Mahal from the curriculum, the Lakshadweep administration has placed an open challenge to the constitutional rights of a minority community, which has distinct traditions and culture. The Court, after hearing both parties, stayed the order for the pendency of the PIL and left it open to the Lakshadweep Administration to conduct appropriate studies on the issue. "It is open to the Union Territory to conduct a study of the local conditions in the context of the prevailing Education Policies and to engage with all the stakeholders through a meaningful process of consultation (not merely for the purpose of record). If such studies and consultations are carried out, it will be open to the Respondents to apply for appropriate orders, and such application will be considered on its own merits," read the Court order. Is your child ready for the careers of tomorrow? Enroll now and take advantage of our early bird offer! Spaces are limited.
Indian Express
a day ago
- Indian Express
Policy that excluded Mahl, Arabic from Lakshadweep schools deferred by Kerala High Court
In an interim order, a Division Bench of the Kerala High Court deferred the implementation of a policy under which Mahl and Arabic were excluded as optional languages at schools in the Union Territory of Lakshadweep. The Bench of Chief Justice Nitin Jamdar and Justice Basant Balaji acted upon a public interest litigation moved by Ajas Akber, the president of the Lakshadweep unit of the National Students Union of India. He had sought orders to the islands' administration to desist from terminating or removing Arabic and Mahl as optional languages under the three-language formula. The court said the order on the language was issued without conducting any study, and so its implementation is deferred. 'The position which has existed so far (in respect of CBSE and non-CBSE schools) in the Union Territory of Lakshadweep shall continue,' the court said. The new language policy was set to be implemented at schools on the islands from July 1. The petitioner had argued that the decision was taken by the director of education without consultation with stakeholders and without conducting any study on its implications on the education system in Lakshadweep. The education system in Lakshadweep for the past 70 years had the option of Arabic or Mahl as a third language. With regard to Minicoy Island, the Mahl language holds a distinct cultural identity. The court said it is open to the Union Territory conducting a study of the local conditions in the context of the prevailing education policies and to engage with all the stakeholders through a meaningful process of consultation. The Lakshadweep administration told the court that no study had been carried out before issuing the controversial order. The administration made reference to the National Education Policy 2020 issued by the Union Ministry of Human Resource Development, the National Curriculum Framework for the Foundational Stage 2022, and the National Curriculum Framework for School Education 2023.
