Transport minister Catherine King reaches out to State counterparts over e-scooter regulation
The Federal Government is talking to its State counterparts about regulation of e-scooters after a spate of incidents involving riders, including the death of a pedestrian after a serious crash in Perth.
Transport Minister Catherine King sees making cities safer for pedestrians and other road users as a priority for the national road safety strategy.
She's facing calls from the Opposition to convene a road accidents summit with all stakeholders and users to look at how best to make sure the rules are the same across the country.
Thanh Phan, 51, died in hospital following a serious crash in Perth's CBD earlier this month, prompting inner-city councils to suspend e-scooter programs and police to launch a crackdown.
Research published about the same time found almost 180 young people aged under 16 on Queensland's Sunshine Coast required hospital treatment over two years after being seriously injured while riding e-scooters.
Transport expert
Geoff Rose said the Federal Government should step in
to coordinate measures across all jurisdictions to make sure scooters were used safely.
A spokeswoman for Ms King said the Commonwealth worked with State and Territory governments to reduce road trauma, although regulation of e-scooters was ultimately a matter for the lower jurisdictions.
'One of the Australian Government's responsibilities under the strategy's action plan is to invest in infrastructure and non-infrastructure programs to reduce risks to vulnerable road users like cyclists and pedestrians, and we continue to do this through programs like our Active Transport Fund,' she said.
'We consider a wide range of things in relation to road safety and will continue to work with state and local governments to make our cities safer for pedestrians and road users.'
The minister's thoughts were with Mr Phan's family and loved ones after the tragic incident.
Shadow transport minister Bridget McKenzie said the idea of harmonising regulations across the country should be examined.
'I think it's worthy, because it isn't just happening in WA it's happening wherever these e-scooters abound,' she told The West.
'A road deaths, road accident summit with all representatives, users and all modes of transport would be a positive step and something that the Federal Government could take a leadership role (in), even though the regulatory environment for many of these things is at a local and state level.'
Senior Greens senator Sarah Hanson-Young said she regularly heard from community members worried about the safety of e-scooters and how they were regulated, as did other politicians.
'I am always of the view that if we can have Federal cooperation and consistency with regulation that's in the best interest of the community, then we should do that,' she said.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Advertiser
2 hours ago
- The Advertiser
Corruption watchdog makes ruling on govt's multimillion-dollar Higgins settlement
A multimillion-dollar settlement payment between Brittany Higgins and the Commonwealth involved no corrupt conduct, the federal watchdog has declared. The National Anti-Corruption Commission on Thursday confirmed it had conducted an extensive preliminary investigation into the $2.445 million settlement following "scrutiny and speculation". It also revealed the settlement figure was less than the maximum amount recommended by external independent legal advice. The Commonwealth agreed to the settlement - without admitting any liability - with Ms Higgins following her alleged rape inside Parliament House in 2019. She received $400,000 for "hurt, distress and humiliation" and $1.48 million relating to her loss of earning capacity. In 2023, The Australian reported that former Liberal senator Linda Reynolds had raised the issue with the anti-corruption commission. Ms Higgins worked in Senator Reynolds' office at the time of the alleged rape. "There is no evidence that the settlement process, including the legal advice provided, who was present at the mediation, or the amount, was subject to any improper influence by any Commonwealth public official," the anti-corruption commission's statement reads. "To the contrary, the evidence obtained reflected a process that was based on independent external legal advice, without any inappropriate intervention by any minister of either government. "There is therefore no corruption issue." The anti-corruption watchdog has made a habit of making statements on issues that are well publicised, often finding it in the public interest to disclose findings of preliminary investigations in these cases. The commission said it had analysed thousands of documents provided by the relevant departments and considered aspects of the legal advice, mediation and settlement amount. It found that decisions made on the settlement were based on advice from independent external solicitors and experienced senior and junior counsel, and that there "was no material difference" in the initial advice provided to the Coalition government in 2022, compared to updated advice provided to Labor when it took power. The commission also found former attorney-general Mark Dreyfus approved the settlement in accordance with the departmental advice. It found that a mediation conference with Ms Higgins which was wrapped up within a day was "unexceptional". "It was the culmination of a process which took approximately 12 months," its statement reads. "None of this is unusual for a non-litigated personal injury claim." A multimillion-dollar settlement payment between Brittany Higgins and the Commonwealth involved no corrupt conduct, the federal watchdog has declared. The National Anti-Corruption Commission on Thursday confirmed it had conducted an extensive preliminary investigation into the $2.445 million settlement following "scrutiny and speculation". It also revealed the settlement figure was less than the maximum amount recommended by external independent legal advice. The Commonwealth agreed to the settlement - without admitting any liability - with Ms Higgins following her alleged rape inside Parliament House in 2019. She received $400,000 for "hurt, distress and humiliation" and $1.48 million relating to her loss of earning capacity. In 2023, The Australian reported that former Liberal senator Linda Reynolds had raised the issue with the anti-corruption commission. Ms Higgins worked in Senator Reynolds' office at the time of the alleged rape. "There is no evidence that the settlement process, including the legal advice provided, who was present at the mediation, or the amount, was subject to any improper influence by any Commonwealth public official," the anti-corruption commission's statement reads. "To the contrary, the evidence obtained reflected a process that was based on independent external legal advice, without any inappropriate intervention by any minister of either government. "There is therefore no corruption issue." The anti-corruption watchdog has made a habit of making statements on issues that are well publicised, often finding it in the public interest to disclose findings of preliminary investigations in these cases. The commission said it had analysed thousands of documents provided by the relevant departments and considered aspects of the legal advice, mediation and settlement amount. It found that decisions made on the settlement were based on advice from independent external solicitors and experienced senior and junior counsel, and that there "was no material difference" in the initial advice provided to the Coalition government in 2022, compared to updated advice provided to Labor when it took power. The commission also found former attorney-general Mark Dreyfus approved the settlement in accordance with the departmental advice. It found that a mediation conference with Ms Higgins which was wrapped up within a day was "unexceptional". "It was the culmination of a process which took approximately 12 months," its statement reads. "None of this is unusual for a non-litigated personal injury claim." A multimillion-dollar settlement payment between Brittany Higgins and the Commonwealth involved no corrupt conduct, the federal watchdog has declared. The National Anti-Corruption Commission on Thursday confirmed it had conducted an extensive preliminary investigation into the $2.445 million settlement following "scrutiny and speculation". It also revealed the settlement figure was less than the maximum amount recommended by external independent legal advice. The Commonwealth agreed to the settlement - without admitting any liability - with Ms Higgins following her alleged rape inside Parliament House in 2019. She received $400,000 for "hurt, distress and humiliation" and $1.48 million relating to her loss of earning capacity. In 2023, The Australian reported that former Liberal senator Linda Reynolds had raised the issue with the anti-corruption commission. Ms Higgins worked in Senator Reynolds' office at the time of the alleged rape. "There is no evidence that the settlement process, including the legal advice provided, who was present at the mediation, or the amount, was subject to any improper influence by any Commonwealth public official," the anti-corruption commission's statement reads. "To the contrary, the evidence obtained reflected a process that was based on independent external legal advice, without any inappropriate intervention by any minister of either government. "There is therefore no corruption issue." The anti-corruption watchdog has made a habit of making statements on issues that are well publicised, often finding it in the public interest to disclose findings of preliminary investigations in these cases. The commission said it had analysed thousands of documents provided by the relevant departments and considered aspects of the legal advice, mediation and settlement amount. It found that decisions made on the settlement were based on advice from independent external solicitors and experienced senior and junior counsel, and that there "was no material difference" in the initial advice provided to the Coalition government in 2022, compared to updated advice provided to Labor when it took power. The commission also found former attorney-general Mark Dreyfus approved the settlement in accordance with the departmental advice. It found that a mediation conference with Ms Higgins which was wrapped up within a day was "unexceptional". "It was the culmination of a process which took approximately 12 months," its statement reads. "None of this is unusual for a non-litigated personal injury claim." A multimillion-dollar settlement payment between Brittany Higgins and the Commonwealth involved no corrupt conduct, the federal watchdog has declared. The National Anti-Corruption Commission on Thursday confirmed it had conducted an extensive preliminary investigation into the $2.445 million settlement following "scrutiny and speculation". It also revealed the settlement figure was less than the maximum amount recommended by external independent legal advice. The Commonwealth agreed to the settlement - without admitting any liability - with Ms Higgins following her alleged rape inside Parliament House in 2019. She received $400,000 for "hurt, distress and humiliation" and $1.48 million relating to her loss of earning capacity. In 2023, The Australian reported that former Liberal senator Linda Reynolds had raised the issue with the anti-corruption commission. Ms Higgins worked in Senator Reynolds' office at the time of the alleged rape. "There is no evidence that the settlement process, including the legal advice provided, who was present at the mediation, or the amount, was subject to any improper influence by any Commonwealth public official," the anti-corruption commission's statement reads. "To the contrary, the evidence obtained reflected a process that was based on independent external legal advice, without any inappropriate intervention by any minister of either government. "There is therefore no corruption issue." The anti-corruption watchdog has made a habit of making statements on issues that are well publicised, often finding it in the public interest to disclose findings of preliminary investigations in these cases. The commission said it had analysed thousands of documents provided by the relevant departments and considered aspects of the legal advice, mediation and settlement amount. It found that decisions made on the settlement were based on advice from independent external solicitors and experienced senior and junior counsel, and that there "was no material difference" in the initial advice provided to the Coalition government in 2022, compared to updated advice provided to Labor when it took power. The commission also found former attorney-general Mark Dreyfus approved the settlement in accordance with the departmental advice. It found that a mediation conference with Ms Higgins which was wrapped up within a day was "unexceptional". "It was the culmination of a process which took approximately 12 months," its statement reads. "None of this is unusual for a non-litigated personal injury claim."
Sky News AU
3 hours ago
- Sky News AU
'Extensive preliminary investigation': Corruption watchdog makes bombshell decision about Brittany Higgins' $2.4 million payout
The National Anti-Corruption Commission has shared a major update about Brittany Higgins' compensation payout by the Albanese government. Ms Higgins was paid about $2.4 million by the Commonwealth in compensation in 2022 after she was raped by Bruce Lehrmann in Parliament House in 2019. The multi-million dollar payout by the government was in recognition of lost earnings after she was diagnosed as 'medically unfit' to work due to the impacts of the rape. It is understood then-Liberal Senator Linda Reynolds, who employed Ms Higgins at the time of the assault, referred the payment to the National Anti-Corruption Commission. On Thursday, the NACC took the unusual step of addressing the 'scrutiny and speculation' surrounding the payout. 'The National Anti-Corruption Commission (the Commission) conducted an extensive preliminary investigation into the settlement and found no corruption issue,' the NACC said in a statement. 'During the preliminary investigation, the Commission issued multiple notices to produce to the relevant departments and legal representatives, and analysed thousands of documents tracking the claims and negotiation of the settlement.' Ultimately, the NACC said there was no evidence of corruption or any intervention by either the Coalition or Albanese governments in the mediation process. 'There is no evidence that the settlement process, including the legal advice provided, who was present at the mediation, or the amount, was subject to any improper influence by any Commonwealth public official,' the NACC said. 'To the contrary, the evidence obtained reflected a process that was based on independent external legal advice, without any inappropriate intervention by any minister of either government. 'There is therefore no corruption issue.' After receiving the payout, the ex-political staffer subsequently married longtime love David Sharaz in a lavish wedding on the Gold Coast last year and welcomed a son earlier this year. The couple also purchased a chateau in France but have listed the property for sale at a steep discount after relocating to Melbourne. It is understood that a significant portion of the multi-million dollar payout remains held in a trust managed by an entity called 'Power Blazers Pty Ltd'. Details about the trust were revealed in court during Ms Higgins' ongoing defamation lawsuit brought by her former employer Linda Reynolds. Ms Reynolds has alleged that Higgins is using the trust to shield her fortune from potential creditors that might pursue her.
News.com.au
3 hours ago
- News.com.au
National Anti-Corruption Commission declares no corruption issue with Brittany Higgins' $2.4m payout
The national anti-corruption agency has made a rare statement, doubling down against claims the $2.4m payout given to Brittany Higgins was political amid a legal suit mounted by former Liberal minister Linda Reynolds. Ms Higgins settled a civil claim with the Commonwealth in December after the former political staffer alleged she had been raped by her colleague Bruce Lehrmann at Parliament House. The payment was made in relation to future lost earnings, medical bills, legal bills and the distress she endured. Mr Lehrmann has always denied the allegation. A criminal trial was aborted due to juror misconduct and a charge against him dropped, and he is appealing a Federal Court finding, made on the civil standard of the balance of probabilities, that he raped Ms Higgins. The lengthy statement comes after Ms Reynolds launched legal action against the Commonwealth over the payment, claiming government lawyers had been 'hopelessly conflicted'. 'It sent a message to the nation that those allegations were so true, so damning, so abhorrent that the Commonwealth was prepared to pay her $2.445 million after only a single instance of mediation,' she said in a statement. However on Thursday, the National Anti-Corruption Commission (NACC) said there was 'no evidence that the settlement process, including the legal advice provided, who was present at the mediation, or the amount was subject to any improper influence by any Commonwealth public official'. 'To the contrary, the evidence obtained reflected a process that was based on independent external legal advice, without any inappropriate intervention by any minister of either government. 'There is therefore no corruption issue.' The body said the mediation undertaken by the government during the process was 'informed by legal advice' and said the single session was 'unexceptional' and followed 'approximately 12 months' of prior discussions. 'None of this is unusual for a non-litigated personal injury claim. A critical consideration during the settlement process was avoiding ongoing trauma to Ms Higgins,' the statement said. It also declared that the $2.445m received by Ms Higgins was 'less than the maximum amount recommended by the external independent legal advice'.
