This house believes private schools should be abolished
Seven per cent of British children attend private school – a tiny minority – and yet they retain a grip on our elite institutions. The latest figures show that 65% of judges, 44% of newspaper columnists and 23% of MPs were independently educated.
Fee-paying schools, however, do not merely cater for the privileged few, but hard-working aspirational parents who want the best for their children. They also allow for a quality that is essential in all aspects of raising children: choice. Is this two-tier system an archaic injustice that needs total reform? Or is it the route to a better education for all?
This debate was recorded at the Cambridge Literary Festival. You can watch and listen to more on cambridgeliteraryfestival.com
Subscribers to the New Statesman can listen ad-free in our app. Download it on iOS or Android.
Not a regular podcast listener? Read our guide on how to listen to New Statesman
Subscribe to The New Statesman today from only £8.99 per month Subscribe
Related
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Metro
26 minutes ago
- Metro
Free travel for over-60s costs taxpayers £100,000,000 more than fare dodgers
Freebie travel benefits for pensioners are costing the taxpayer three times as much as London Underground fare dodgers do. More than 1.5million Londoners aged 60 and over can travel for free on London's buses, Tubes, trains and trams. But the schemes – the 60+ Oyster Card and the Freedom Pass – cost nearly £500million a year to fund, well over the £400million lost to fare-jumping nationwide, the Office of Rail and Road found. Transport for London (TfL) is predicted to spend £135million on the 60+ Oyster Card this year, up from £60million in 2016. As Britain faces an ageing population, the cost is expected to increase to £185million a year by 2027, according to an analysis by The Telegraph. The Freedom Pass for people over 66 costs London boroughs another £350million a year and will rise to £498million by the end of the decade. Almost one in 20 Tube passengers dodge fares, costing TfL £130million a year. The 60+ Oyster Card is available for Londoners aged between 60 and 65, among the highest earners in the capital, at £42,000 a year, double that of people in their 20s. TfL says 60% of 60+ Oyster Card holders are still working, with two in 10 using it to commute. The card, introduced by then-Mayor of London Boris Johnson in 2012, is funded by tax bills and daily driving fees like the congestion charge. Speaking to Metro, Liz Emerson, chief executive of the research charity International Foundation said: 'This is a disservice to younger colleagues who are paying more for their travel than those who still work and are over 60. 'It impacts their essential spending power and helps instead those who are older and wealthy. 'This is unfair for younger colleagues who already struggle with housing costs, wages and the cost-of-living crisis. More Trending 'The least the Mayor can do is align free London travel with the state pension age. A TfL spokesperson told Metro: 'Both the Mayor and TfL are committed to making public transport in London as accessible, convenient, and affordable as possible. View More » 'We regularly review our range of concessions to ensure that they continue to benefit Londoners, while also remaining affordable for TfL to operate.' Get in touch with our news team by emailing us at webnews@ For more stories like this, check our news page. MORE: Samurai sword killer 'screamed in delight' after nearly decapitating schoolboy MORE: British couple feared to have been on Air India flight named and pictured MORE: Three teenage girls admit killing 75-year-old man in the street Your free newsletter guide to the best London has on offer, from drinks deals to restaurant reviews.
Powys County Times
38 minutes ago
- Powys County Times
April Jones' family join calls for a new criminal offence
The Prime Minister has been invited to meet with the family of murdered Machynlleth girl April Jones to discuss the creation of a new criminal offence for desecrating a body. April was only five years old when she went missing on the evening of October 1, 2012, after playing on her bike with friends near her home on the Bryn-y-Gog estate. Her disappearance shocked the nation and became the biggest search in British police history with specialist teams scouring around 40 square miles over six months. Paedophile and former slaughterman Mark Bridger, 47, was given a whole life sentence for April's abduction and murder, as well as being convicted for perverting the course of justice of disposing, concealing or destroying the girl's body. There had been strong evidence of a burnt human skull found in the fireplace of Bridger's cottage in Ceinws, which was a 10-minute drive from April's home. Mark Bridger was convicted of April's abduction and murder. The families of people who have been murdered, including Michael O'Leary and Sarah Everard, have called on the Prime Minister to create a new criminal offence of desecrating a body. At Prime Minister's Questions on Wednesday (June 11), Sir Keir Starmer was asked to meet with the families of people who have been murdered and hear their plea to make it a crime to desecrate a body. Plaid Cymru MP Ann Davies, who represents Caerfyrddin, said: 'My constituent Mr Michael O'Leary was brutally murdered five years ago, and his body was desecrated. 'I've made a number of requests to discuss his and other victims' cases with ministers and to explore introducing legislation making the desecration of a body a criminal offence. 'Would the Prime Minister meet with Mr O'Leary's family, along with other victims' families, including April Jones of Machynlleth, Sarah Everard and Helen McCourt, to hear why they are calling for a new criminal offence of desecrating a body to be introduced?' Responding, Sir Keir said: 'Can I thank her for raising this horrific case and the other similar cases and my thoughts, and I'm sure the thoughts of the whole House, are with Michael's family and all those affected by such vile crimes. 'I think we all need to listen to what they have to say… 'I'm sure the justice minister will be in touch at the first opportunity to take this forward.' Mr O'Leary, a 55-year-old father of three, was shot dead by his friend Andrew Jones in 2020, after Jones found out the victim was having an affair with his wife. He then burned Mr O'Leary's body on a funeral pyre made of wood pallets, and tried to make it look like he killed himself. Sarah Everard, 33, was kidnapped and murdered by off-duty police officer Wayne Couzens in 2021, who then burned her body in the woods. Helen McCourt was 22 years old when she was killed while walking home in Merseyside, and her murderer never revealed the location of her body. Her mother, Marie McCourt, has campaigned for Helen's Law, which would make it a criminal offence to conceal a body, and Helen's Law 2, which would make a new offence of desecrating a body.
The Independent
44 minutes ago
- The Independent
Look away, Sir Keir! Labour's bible has given its verdict on you
There was a time when the question of who would be editor of the New Statesman really, really mattered in the Labour leader's office. I know, because I was a journalist on the left-wing weekly when Neil Kinnock took a close interest in who would succeed Hugh Stephenson, an ally of the Labour leader, when he left in 1986. With a general election looming, Kinnock was determined that the title should not fall into the hands of the Bennites, as the Corbynites of those days were known. Fortunately, the board of the magazine was chaired by the former Labour MP Phillip Whitehead, and John Lloyd, a Financial Times journalist on the right of the Labour Party, was safely installed. Unfortunately for Kinnock, Lloyd was a principled Labour right-winger: so much so that he wrote a leading article on the eve of the 1987 election condemning Kinnock's policy of one-sided nuclear disarmament. Labour duly lost – but Kinnock seemed to conclude that the New Statesman was not the decisive factor in that defeat and that, actually, Lloyd was right. He took no interest in who would take over when Lloyd's brief but brilliant editorship ended after the election, but he did ditch the defence policy of giving up 'something for nothing'. It wasn't until Tony Blair that the relationship was restored, when Ian Hargreaves, a former editor of The Independent, turned the magazine into a cheerleader for New Labour – although in 1996-97, few outposts of cultural life had not been drawn into the collective ra-ra for the Great Moderniser. Blair lost interest the moment he became prime minister, but Gordon Brown, who hoped to succeed him, remained engaged. Brown had the advantage that the magazine at this stage was owned by Geoffrey Robinson, his friend and, briefly, a fellow minister – but, according to Peter Wilby, editor from 1998 to 2005, Robinson didn't interfere: 'I knew that, on critical appointments such as political editor, Robinson would want to establish 'what Gordon thinks' (fortunately, Gordon was usually too indecisive to settle on any particular name).' Since then, Jason Cowley, who was editor for 16 years until the end of 2024, barely concealed his disdain for Ed Miliband's leadership and was hostile to Jeremy Corbyn. Cowley was positive but distant towards Starmer. But now, Tom McTague, a former political editor at the Independent on Sunday and Cowley's successor, has launched his editorship with a 9,500-word profile of the prime minister, having accompanied Starmer on his recent travels. McTague succeeds, more than any recent interviewer, in giving a sense of Starmer's character. He asks about Nick – Starmer's brother who had learning difficulties and who died of cancer on Boxing Day last year – and produces an unexpectedly emotional and inarticulate response. 'I can't really explain this,' Starmer admits. McTague writes: 'He leans forward, still staring into my eyes, intense and lost, no longer a prime minister but a normal man bereaved, the tears back in his eyes.' Since the 1980s, the roles of New Statesman editor and Labour leader seem to have reversed. Starmer seems puzzled and unsure about McTague's interest in him, while McTague insists that the prime minister ought to have something to say to the British people, including the left-wing segment of them that read the New Statesman. McTague sees the magazine's role as being to explore and give voice to whatever it is that the modern Labour Party – or more specifically, the current Labour government – stands for. Yet he seems to come away from his time spent with Starmer with a sense of frustration and disappointment. He sets off on a weeks-long project asking what connects Labour's missions and milestones: 'How do they form a coherent analysis of what has gone wrong in Britain and, therefore, what the government needs to do to fix it? Over the next few weeks, I will come back to these questions again and again, and wonder whether the nation will ever hear a convincing answer to them.' McTague says of Starmer: 'He seems reluctant to poke at the reasons the country is so tense and angry and poor, to analyse the cause of the country's malaise.' One striking feature of the profile is that Starmer's aides seem to have a clearer idea of the government's purpose than the prime minister himself. One of them is quoted as saying: 'If you don't give people hope, you will get the alternative – the destruction of failing institutions.' McTague comments: 'On one level the prime minister appears intellectually to understand the challenge, even sometimes to agree with the analysis. And yet on another, he does not seem able – or willing – to channel such thoughts in a way that the country understands.' It is a damning verdict because McTague is so obviously sympathetic to Starmer the person. It would seem that the latest episode of the on-off relationship between Labour leader and the country's leading left-wing magazine will not end in a breach over an election-losing policy – as was the case with Kinnock and Lloyd – but in a complaint that Starmer seems unable to communicate what he thinks he won the election to do.
