UK lawmakers vote to decriminalize abortion amid concern about the prosecution of women
'This piece of legislation will only take women out of the criminal justice system because they are vulnerable and they need our help,' she said. 'Just what public interest is this serving? This is not justice, it is cruelty and it has got to end.'
Advertisement
The amendment passed 379-137. The House of Commons will now need to pass the crime bill, which is expected, before it goes to the House of Lords, where it can be delayed but not blocked.
Under current law, doctors can legally carry out abortions in England, Scotland, and Wales up to 24 weeks, and beyond that under special circumstances, such as when the life of the mother is in danger. Abortion in Northern Ireland was decriminalized in 2019.
Changes in the law implemented during the COVID-19 pandemic allow women to receive abortion pills through the mail and terminate their own pregnancies at home within the first 10 weeks.
That has led to a handful of widely publicized cases in which women were prosecuted for illegally obtaining abortion pills and using them to end their own pregnancies after 24 weeks or more.
Advertisement
Anti-abortion groups opposed the measures, arguing it would open the door to abortion on demand at any stage of pregnancy.
'Unborn babies will have any remaining protection stripped away, and women will be left at the mercy of abusers,' said Alithea Williams, public policy manager for the Society for the Protection of Unborn Children, which describes itself as the UK's biggest pro-life campaign group.
The debate came after recent prosecutions have galvanized support to repeal parts of the 1861 Offences Against the Person Act.
In one case, a mother of three was sentenced to more than two years in prison in 2023 for medically inducing an abortion about eight months into her pregnancy.
Carla Foster, 45, was released about a month later by an appeals court that reduced her sentence. Judge Victoria Sharp said that case called for 'compassion, not punishment' and there was no useful purpose in jailing her.
Last month, a jury acquitted Nicola Packer on a charge of unlawfully self-administering poison or a noxious thing with intent to procure a miscarriage. Packer, who took abortion medicine when she was about 26 weeks pregnant, testified that she did not know she had been pregnant more than 10 weeks.
Supporters of the bill said it was a landmark reform that would keep women from going to prison for ending their pregnancy.
'At a time when we're seeing rollbacks on reproductive rights, most notably in the United States, this crucial milestone in the fight for reproductive rights sends a powerful message that our lawmakers are standing up for women,' said Louise McCudden of MSI Reproductive Choices.
Advertisement
A second amendment that would have gone even further than Antoniazzi's proposal, barring the prosecution of medical professionals and others who help women abort their fetuses, did not get to a vote.
A competing Conservative measure that would have required an in-person appointment for a pregnant woman to get abortion pills was defeated.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
New York Post
2 hours ago
- New York Post
Michael Goodwin: Cuomo should thank Mamdani for making him look like the safe, stable choice for NYC mayor
In his race for mayor, Queens Assemblyman Zohran Mamdani has done the impossible: He's made Andrew Cuomo look like a safe, stable choice. Mamdani pulled off the remarkable feat by breaking a cardinal rule of politics: Don't scare people. But he has done exactly that by taking such radical positions in the Democrats' mayoral primary that the portion of the electorate that hasn't fallen for his vision of a socialist utopia realizes his policies would wreck New York. His mantra of free this and free that, combined with a rent freeze on 1 million privately owned rent-regulated apartments, while promising that higher taxes on the rich would pay for everything, is music only to the ears of those who are ignorant about history and the laws of economics and human nature. He's also anti-cop to the core, which is the absolute last thing New York needs in City Hall. Mamdani, just 33 years old, is vying to become the city's youngest mayor. He's got clever videos and a lively presence on social media. The base of his support comes from young New Yorkers, which proves the wisdom of George Bernard Shaw's observation that 'youth is wasted on the young.' Then there are those ardent leftists behind him who refuse to grow up, such as Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez and Sen. Bernie Sanders. Born in Uganda, Mamdani would also be Gotham's first Muslim mayor, and his refusal to recognize Israel as the legitimate homeland for Jews is another bridge too far. New York has more Jews than any other city in the world, and the idea that its mayor would support BDS and other policies that aim to damage and even destroy Israel is unthinkable. 'New antisemitism' There's already been a disgraceful outbreak of that virus on city college campuses, especially Columbia. The chants of 'from the river to the sea, Palestine will be free' are a call for the elimination of Israel. As the late British rabbi Jonathan Sacks put it, 'Denying Israel's right to exist is the new antisemitism.' All these radical positions from his top challenger have served to rescue Cuomo from his own dustbin. Forced to resign in his third term as governor in August 2021 by an avalanche of sexual discrimination and harassment complaints, he left Albany with some significant accomplishments, but without a single friend. He would have been impeached and forced from office had he not resigned. His handling of the COVID pandemic, which initially brought him national acclaim, was flipped on its head by his disastrous order requiring nursing homes to take infected patients. More than 15,000 elderly people died in nursing homes or got fatal doses of COVID in them, a fact that became even more notorious when it was learned Cuomo had concealed some 4,000 of the deaths connected to the facilities while he negotiated a $5 million book deal with Crown publishing. His decision to run for mayor has always seemed more motivated by a desire to redeem his name and get back into politics rather than a passion for the day-to-day grind of City Hall. Indeed, many of the issues facing New York — such as too lenient criminal justice measures and congestion pricing — were ones he signed into law as governor. There's also the question of how he would deal with his many enemies in Albany, given that the Legislature and governor control billions in subsidies the city counts on and that the state Constitution limits the city's powers. Lackluster frontrunner Not surprisingly, Cuomo's campaign has been lackluster, but he has maintained a consistent lead in the polls owing largely to some of his successful projects, such as the redevelopment of La Guardia Airport, and the fact that most of his eight competitors are either unimpressive or relatively unknown. He also has been diligent in courting Orthodox Jewish voters in Brooklyn and middle-class black voters in his native Queens. Cuomo's refusal to concede any error in the nursing home catastrophe has been shameful and likely would have sealed his fate — were it not for the rise of Mamdani. The assemblyman has consistently been in second place but some recent polls indicate he has closed to within striking distance. That change has alarmed elements of the city's old guard establishment, which is suddenly rallying to Cuomo's side. Former Mayor Michael Bloomberg was never close to Cuomo when they were both in office, but he has become a major supporter. He endorsed Cuomo last week and three days later made a $5 million donation to Fix The City, a super PAC supporting the former governor that has been flooding local television with ads calling Mamdani a 'risk.' It may not be a coincidence that similar language and tone dominated a shocking New York Times editorial Monday, where the paper all but endorsed Cuomo. It accused Mamdani of embracing 'a certain version of progressive city management that has failed,' which it identified as the 'version pushed by Mayor Bill de Blasio [inset] that was skeptical of if not hostile to law enforcement, claimed schools needed more money and less evaluation and blamed greedy landlords for high rents, instead of emphasizing the crucial role of housing supply.' The opinion writers went on to say, 'We do not believe that Mr. Mamdani deserves a spot on New Yorkers' ballots,' because 'his experience is too thin, and his agenda reads like a turbocharged version of Mr. de Blasio's dismaying mayoralty.' To twist the knife, the editorial added that Mamdani 'shows little concern about the disorder of the past decade, even though its costs have fallen hardest on the city's working-class and poor residents.' Still, there was no love for Cuomo, with the paper saying 'we have serious objections to his ethics and conduct, even if he would be better for New York's future than Mr. Mamdani.' Talk about a backhanded endorsement! Although it credited him with enacting measures it supports, including paid family leave, a higher minimum wage, strict gun-control and fossil-fuel restrictions, the editorial was effectively repudiating much of the Times' own agenda. Reality bites leftist NYT After all, it endorsed Bill de Blasio for mayor, consistently railed against the NYPD and supported every new cockamamie social program City Hall could devise. Suddenly, now the paper deems his eight years in City Hall a total failure. Welcome to reality, Gray Lady! Early voting in advance of next Tuesday's primary day suggests there will be a larger turnout than the 2021 primary, where about 950,000 people voted, or 25% of registered Dems. Perhaps equally important, far left groups are trying to game the ranked-choice system by urging voters to rank Mamdani and anyone else except Cuomo among their five choices. In effect, all those votes would end up going to Mamdani, starting in the convoluted second round of counting.
San Francisco Chronicle
2 hours ago
- San Francisco Chronicle
Cuban diplomat defends foreign medical missions under pressure from US
FILE - Cuban doctors arrive at the Jose Marti International Airport in Havana, Cuba, June 8, 2020, after traveling to Italy to help with the COVID-19 emergency response. (Ismael Francisco/Pool via AP, File) Ismael Francisco/AP UNITED NATIONS (AP) — A senior Cuban diplomat has accused the Trump administration of trying to discredit the thousands of Cuban doctors working around the world and deprive the country of an important source of income. Deputy Foreign Minister Carlos Fernandez de Cossio, who was at U.N. headquarters this week for a debate on sanctions, told The Associated Press that the U.S. is putting pressure on other countries and financial institutions to break their ties with Cuba. Cossio said over the decades Cuba has sent more than 100,000 doctors to more than 70 countries to provide much needed medical care. More than 22,000 doctors are now working in more than 50 countries, according to the government. Advertisement Article continues below this ad U.S. Secretary of State Marco Rubio has described the program as 'forced labor.' He announced visa restrictions in late February on Cuban and foreign government officials involved in Cuba's medical missions. In June, the Trump administration imposed visa restrictions on several unidentified officials from Central America for their involvement with the Cuban program. And in a letter obtained by AP last week, the Inter-American Commission on Human Rights asked the 34 members of the Organization of American States for details of any agreements with Cuba for medical missions. It specifically requested information on whether the medical workers have labor and union rights, and about any labor complaints. The commission, an independent body of the OAS, which is heavily funded by the United States, said it would analyze the data and make recommendations, 'given the persistence of reports of rights violations.' The State Department said Tuesday it was pleased its action 'has prompted meaningful discussion of this exploitative labor export program after years of denial.' It said the U.S. will not stop raising these issues until Cuba curtails the 'forced labor' of its own citizens. Cossio defended the program in an interview on Monday. He said all Cuban doctors working abroad receive their regular salary, plus 'a dignified stipend.' Advertisement Article continues below this ad Starting about 15 years ago, he said, Cuba began receiving compensation from wealthier countries for providing the doctors. That money covers the stipends, with the rest going to finance Cuba's public health system, he said. Cossio accused the United States of trying to discredit the medical missions, first by saying that Cuba was not sending doctors but agents to 'subvert' these counties. He said the U.S. then accused Cuba of human trafficking and put pressure on the countries that have agreements with Cuba to refuse any future medical missions. He said the U.S. wanted to stop the praise Cuba has received for sending doctors to many poor and developing countries and to deprive Cuba of a "legitimate source of income.' Cossio said Cuba would not break its agreements. Cossio also criticized the Trump administration for reversing a U.S. policy of welcoming Cubans into the country. Advertisement Article continues below this ad The administration has started cracking down on Cubans who have entered the U.S. since October 2022 on two-year permits to live and work, a Biden administration program known as humanitarian parole. President Donald Trump this month also announced additional restrictions on visitors from Cuba, among other countries. The restrictions have come as a shock to the 2.4 million Cuban-Americans. They strongly backed the Republican president in both elections and have long enjoyed a place of privilege in the U.S. immigration system.
Yahoo
3 hours ago
- Yahoo
Dismissed vaccine advisers: Removals left program ‘critically weakened'
The members of a key federal vaccine advisory panel who were unceremoniously dismissed earlier this month said the recent actions of the Trump administration have 'critically weakened' the U.S. vaccine program, undermining decades of successful vaccine policy. In an opinion piece published in the JAMA medical journal, the former members of the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP) for the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) spoke out directly against Health Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr.'s decision. Kennedy announced this month he was removing all 17 members of ACIP, saying, 'A clean sweep is needed to re-establish public confidence in vaccine science.' But the terminated members pushed back on this narrative. 'Health care providers and the US public trust ACIP. For the past 18 years, the National Immunization Survey has shown that 99 of every 100 children in the US have received at least some recommended vaccines by 2 years of age, consistent with acceptance of ACIP recommendations implemented by trusted clinicians,' wrote the former members. 'This does not suggest the population is so distrustful that it warrants dismantling the process by which vaccines have been recommended,' they added. They noted that meetings and agendas were all publicly available, potential conflicts of interest were regularly reviewed, and public comment was included in the committee's activities. 'The abrupt dismissal of the entire membership of the ACIP, along with its executive secretary, on June 9, 2025, the appointment of 8 new ACIP members just 2 days later, and the recent reduction of CDC staff dedicated to immunizations have left the US vaccine program critically weakened,' their op-ed continued. 'These actions have stripped the program of the institutional knowledge and continuity that have been essential to its success over decades.' The eight new members chosen by Kennedy include COVID-19 contrarians who are known to have spread vaccine misinformation. Along with their dismissal, the former 17 members also pointed to the changes Kennedy has made to COVID-19 vaccine policy as signs of a 'troubling disregard for the scientific integrity that has historically guided US immunization strategy.' Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
