
Monday briefing: Reports of late night breakthrough in landmark UK-EU reset deal
Good morning. Today, Keir Starmer will meet with EU leaders at a crucial Downing Street summit. On Saturday a press release all but said the deal was done – but on Sunday night government sources said talks were going 'down to the wire'. Then, a few minutes ago, the Guardian's Pippa Crerar reported a late breakthrough – but noted that there are 'still some steps to take'. You might remember the old Brexit phrase: 'Nothing is agreed until everything is agreed'.
Since Labour returned to government, it has made concerted efforts to warm up the frosty post-Brexit relationship. And the eye-catching news over the weekend that British holidaymakers could face shorter airport queues from this summer would certainly help sell the deal domestically.
But progress towards a new agreement, providing the government with a third success after trade deals with India and the US, was complicated by frustration from EU diplomats at the UK's refusal to budge on its red lines around issues such as fishing rights and youth mobility. Meanwhile, a measure of Starmer's domestic political difficulties has come in the assessment from the Conservatives and Reform UK, even before the details have been released, that the deal amounts to a 'surrender'.
For today's newsletter, I spoke with the Guardian's Brussels correspondent Jennifer Rankin about the thorniest issues between the two sides – and the prizes on offer for their resolution. Here are the headlines.
Israel-Gaza war | The Israeli army has announced the start of a large-scale offensive in Gaza as a second day of indirect ceasefire talks in Qatar ended without any breakthrough. Rescuers and medical sources said as many as 130 people, including many women and children, were killed in a wave of Israeli strikes overnight and through Sunday.
European elections | The pro-EU centrist mayor of Bucharest, Nicuşor Dan, was on track to win Romania's presidential election, sitting eight points clear of far-right rival George Simion with 99% of votes counted. In the first round of Poland's presidential election, the pro-European centrist Rafał Trzaskowski and populist right historian Karol Nawrocki each secured about 30% of the vote.
US politics | Joe Biden, the former US president, has been diagnosed with an 'aggressive form' of prostate cancer that has spread to his bones, his personal office announced on Sunday. Biden's doctors say that the cancer appears to be hormone-sensitive which allows for effective management.
Catholicism | Pope Leo XIV said he wanted the Catholic church to be a 'small leaven of unity' in a time of 'too much discord and too many wounds' during his inaugural papal mass. An estimated 150,000 pilgrims gathered for the mass in St Peter's Square.
Media | Gary Lineker is expected to announce he is leaving the BBC on Monday after apologising for amplifying online material with antisemitic connotations. Lineker will present his final Match of the Day on Sunday but will reportedly not present the 2026 World Cup or next season's FA Cup.
Today, as Starmer welcomes the European Council president, António Costa, and the European Commission president, Ursula von der Leyen, to Downing Street, he will be keen to frame it as a pragmatic reset in the UK's relationship with the EU.
The government needs to stick to its promises to cut spending, slash immigration numbers and guarantee the UK's sovereignty while also laying the groundwork to secure a future deal with Britain's most important trading partner.
Three prospective agreements have been flagged, on trade, defence, and a statement of geopolitical solidarity. And Starmer is said to have sought to rebuild trust with a promise to keep talks 'in the room' without media leaks. But there has also been a view among senior EU diplomats that Britain is demanding concessions without offering anything in return. 'There has been a period of hard negotiations,' said the defence secretary, John Healey. 'We're at the last hard yards of the last hard days.' The BBC reported that the final obstacles were resolved at about 10.30pm last night.
Why is improving trade relations with the EU so important?
While landing deals with India and the US is still a huge win for Starmer, the EU remains the UK's largest and most important trading partner by some stretch. In 2024 it accounted for 41% of UK exports and 51% of all imported goods.
While Starmer has said that making a deal with the EU would be 'incredibly beneficial', others have gone further, saying that a reset in trade relations with the EU is crucial to the recovery of the UK economy. 'The EU is the UK's biggest and important trading partner, so it is important to get the reset right even if none of the individual elements will make a dramatic difference to economic growth, which is the government's top priority,' says Jennifer.
Despite the government's red lines ruling out a customs union or rejoining the single market, the EU has complained that it does not really know what the UK wants.
'Starmer came into power wanting a big reset with the EU, and I think this raised expectations from their side that they would make quite bold moves back towards Europe, but those expectations have so far been disappointed,' she says. 'What the UK government is actually prepared to offer so far is pretty limited.'
How important is a security and defence partnership?
Jennifer says that the easiest – and one of the most important – deal under discussion is a new UK-EU security and defence partnership, likely to be the centrepiece of what is agreed.
'The feeling is that the security and defence pact will be the launching point for another set of negotiations, because with a war actively raging on the continent, everyone is singing from the same song sheet on the need for greater security cooperation,' she says.
The UK has said it hopes the proposal can extend to areas beyond military defence such as economic security, infrastructure, migration and transnational crime.
What about the veterinary deal?
One of the UK's key aims has been to sign what it frames as a 'veterinary' deal removing some of the border checks and inspections on the movement of food, drink, animals and plants into the EU.
However, this would mean that the UK would have to align with some EU regulations on food and drink standards – rules that are overseen by the European court of justice. One complexity is the demand from Brussels for 'dynamic alignment' where the UK must adhere to evolving regulations without getting a say in their formation.
'Although voters seem relaxed about common standards, this would prove politically controversial, because hardline Eurosceptics in the Conservative party and Reform UK would accuse the government of giving up sovereignty,' says Jennifer.
'Another issue is that some EU countries are saying, why should we give you this when you're not prepared to move on fishing, where we're asking for long-term guaranteed access to British waters.' Where the negotiations landed to resolve this issue should become clear later today.
Why has fishing been such a big problem?
Fishing has always been a huge sticking point between the UK and the EU.
After Brexit, many British fishers felt betrayed when Boris Johnson's government agreed to let EU fishing boats continue to access UK coastal waters until 2026.
With these arrangements set to expire, the EU wants them extended. The UK is understood to have offered continued access to fishing grounds for another four years to 2030.
The EU wants a longer-term arrangement and has been frustrated that the UK is demanding a veterinary deal but won't reciprocate on fishing.
'Taking back control of 'our' fishing waters was sold as one of the benefits of Brexit, so it's a sensitive issue for the government to cede ground on, especially with Reform UK looking over their shoulder,' says Jennifer. 'On the other hand, the EU believe that without a longer-term deal, it would destroy European fishing industries.'
Jennifer says this is a real point of tension. 'The UK has always been really keen to try and keep negotiations on issues like fishing and the veterinary deal separate,' says Jennifer. 'But some member states are pushing for there to be a hard link between fisheries and a veterinary deal before an agreement on either is struck.'
What about youth mobility?
The EU has been very keen to strike an agreement on a 'youth mobility scheme', a reciprocal programme that would offer visas to 18 to 30-year-olds to come to the UK from the EU, and vice versa, for work, study and travel.
As Lisa O'Carroll set out in this explainer, member states are so keen to get this across the line that they have scaled back the original three-year proposal to one year, with a quota of between 50,000 to 70,000 young people going in either direction each year. The Sunday Times reported yesterday (£) that the new crackdown on legal migration announced last week was intended to give the minister for European affairs Nick Thomas-Symonds more leeway to negotiate.
Sign up to First Edition
Our morning email breaks down the key stories of the day, telling you what's happening and why it matters
after newsletter promotion
Yet this has proved to be a politically thorny issue for the UK government, and the key details are not expected to be worked out until next year. 'For a government who wants to save money and reduce immigration, this has been another block,' Jennifer says. 'The idea of having an open-ended agreement with the EU where you could have thousands of young people coming to the UK every year, which they'd have to count in their immigration statistics, was just not flying with the Starmer government.'
What political pressures is the government under?
While Starmer has said he is not interested in rehashing the ghosts of Brexit past, his political opponents have other ideas – and whatever concessions or agreements have been made are likely to be weaponised against him.
On one side of the political spectrum, the Liberal Democrats have said that Starmer and his government are being too cautious and intractable, and businesses are desperate to exploit opportunities to work and trade with Europe.
Meanwhile, Reform UK has dismissed the summit as 'the Great British sellout' and the Tory leader, Kemi Badenoch, has accused Starmer of preparing to 'trade away our sovereignty behind closed doors'. The Mail on Sunday headlined its front page coverage 'Brexit? What Brexit?' However triumphant the announcement today, that kind of coverage is likely to continue.
Sophie McBain's interview with Yiyun Li, who has written a memoir of the loss of her two sons to suicide, is an extraordinary account of a writer who 'rejects the idea that grief is a process, that there's light at the end of the tunnel': 'My children were not my burden,' she says. 'My sadness is not my burden.' Archie
Social scientist Jonathan R Goodman asks if we are hardwired to fall for autocrats for the ongoing Big Idea series. A fascinating exploration of what might be behind the startling statistic that half of all 13 to 27-year-olds would prefer to be living in a dictatorship. Annie
The fact that The Thick Of It is now hopelessly overused as a descriptor of British political chicanery can't take away from its stunning originality way back when – and on the 20th anniversary of its arrival, Tim Jonze's oral history is a very satisfying tribute. Archie
This piece from Athena Kugblenu is great on why the ship has sailed for chefs trying to ban phones in restaurants: 'If you want my money, you have to accept my scrolling.' Annie
Donald Trump's tour of the Gulf states had a very clear shift in US policy at its heart, Nesrine Malik writes: 'You are rich, we need you. You do you.' What is much less clear is whether they can influence events in Gaza – the key measure of their 'ability to stabilise and determine the region's political future'. Archie
Football | Sonia Bompastor's Chelsea side were at their clinical best as they completed a 30-game unbeaten domestic treble with a 3-0 win over Manchester United in the FA Cup final. At the first sold-out Wembley Women's FA Cup final, two goals from Sandy Baltimore (above) and one from Catarina Macario secured the trophy for Chelsea.
Formula One | Red Bull's Max Verstappen won his fourth Grand Prix in a row at Imola with one of the best overtaking moves of his career, passing Oscar Piastri at turn one on the first lap. With McLaren's Piastri second and his team-mate Lando Norris in third, the result keeps Verstappen at the centre of the championship fight.
Golf | Scottie Scheffler enjoyed a comfortable victory in the US PGA at Quail Hollow, finishing five shots clear of the field to claim the third major of his career.
The Guardian carries the late-breaking news that 'Biden has 'aggressive form' of prostate cancer', while the lead is 'Talks on reset of UK-EU relations go 'down to wire' before summit'. 'Labour revolt over Brexit betrayal' is the Telegraph's take while the Times has 'EU's fishing demands pose late threat to deal'. 'PM risks Brexit vote 'betrayal'' says the Mail under the strapline 'Starmer's surrender summit' and the Express carries Tory leader Kemi Badenoch's message: 'PM is hellbent on selling out our Brexit freedoms'.
We dial it back down with the i paper: 'Cheaper food and boost to trade – as UK agrees to follow EU rules in today's big Brexit reset'. There's a very similar headline for that story in the Financial Times, but its splash is on a different topic: 'Boutique lenders power post-Covid upswing in blank-cheque Spac deals'. 'Hold on for your lives' – the Metro leads with 'Tall ship terror' after a sailboat's masts snapped off under the Brooklyn Bridge. 'You little beauties' – that's the Mirror after Jesy Nelson from Little Mix had twins.
Gary Younge on being pigeonholed as a black journalist
Former Guardian columnist Gary Younge reflects on the pressures faced by minority journalists to focus on certain types of stories, and how they can break free of 'the pigeonhole'
A bit of good news to remind you that the world's not all bad
When a man who is a retailer, designer and clothing manufacturer tells us that we should all be buying less stuff, it may seem a bit contradictory at best, and hypocritical at worst. But for Patrick Grant, his campaign against fast fashion is about encouraging consumers to make conscious shopping choices and focusing on quality over quantity.
The Scottish businessman, who is also a judge on The Great British Sewing Bee, launched the for-profit social enterprise Community Clothing in 2016. Its philosophy is simple: make things locally, make them to last and make them affordable, thereby sustaining jobs, communities and the planet. 'The whole idea of fashion with a big 'F' is a deliberate act on the part of commercial businesses to encourage people to buy things they don't need,' he says.
And finally, the Guardian's puzzles are here to keep you entertained throughout the day. Until tomorrow.
Quick crossword
Cryptic crossword
Wordiply

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


BBC News
10 minutes ago
- BBC News
Harlow housing block dubbed 'open prison' to be redeveloped
Councillors have unanimously backed their authority buying a 14-storey building that was controversially converted from offices into temporary leader of Harlow Council in Essex, Dan Swords, said Terminus House had been "a massive postcard image of the decline of Harlow" and said the authority would redevelop the town centre leader, Labour's James Griggs, said he supported the plans, but his primary concern was what would happen to the 150 to 200 people living council said it would take ownership once the current owner has re-housed the residents. The owner, Caridon, said the building had helped hundreds of people avoid homelessness. 'An open prison' Glen Lane, 65, has lived in the tower block in one room with an en-suite since 2018. He described conditions as "the worst place I have ever lived in", saying it "feels like an open prison, probably worse than an open prison".Mr Lane was homeless and said he struggled to get on the local council housing list."It's depressing. It's got a reputation this property. It's embarrassing when I put my address down," he said."I feel quite ashamed about it as I haven't always lived like this. I used to have my own property and job but I lost all that." His room is only a few square metres in size. At the end of his double bed, the kitchen the last eight months he said the property had been plagued with insects. He had used insect powder but they were still "climbing on me at night when I'm sleeping". Crime rose by 20% in the area around Terminus House after it was turned into accommodation in 2018, according to police figures.A BBC East and Panorama documentary highlighted the cramped conditions. In 2021, the government imposed a minimum size of 37 sq m (398 sq ft) on new office to flat conversions. 'Housed out of Harlow' Harlow Council has become the largest landowner in the town centre, buying up buildings to regenerate them into new housing, leisure and retail authority's latest decision to buy Terminus House has brought uncertainty about the building's future. Conservative leader Dan Swords said plans were being finalised on whether it would be demolished or he said in any scenario it would look "completely different from that which it does now"."The existing tenants, which have largely nearly all come through temporary accommodation from London boroughs, will be housed outside of Harlow," he said. Labour's James Griggs argued that "sending them back somewhere else seems completely wrong".He told the BBC that some people had been living there for years. "There are families who now consider themselves Harlow families. They have children in Harlow schools, the parents are working in the town."The redeveloped site would likely include housing. The local authority has not disclosed how much it was paying for Batrick, a charity organiser who supports local families, said many people living in Terminus House would be "reeling at the news that their homes will be going"."There is a real concern about the human element of this," she said. Caridon, the company that owns Terminus House, said in a statement the building met "a pressing need for temporary accommodation at a time of limited options". "The building has since supported hundreds of individuals and families in avoiding homelessness and finding stability during difficult periods," it at his flat, Mr Lane welcomed Harlow Council's plans."I'm glad they are doing it. It definitely needs upgrading," he where he and others will end up living is not currently known. Follow Essex news on BBC Sounds, Facebook, Instagram and X.


BBC News
10 minutes ago
- BBC News
Belfast City Hall: What do people think of new plans to charge £4 for exhibition?
Should people be charged to tour a Belfast City Hall exhibition?On Monday, People Before Profit councillor Michael Collins proposed to drop Belfast City Council's plan to charge people £4 to visit the venue's ground floor exhibition, which is usually a vote TUV councillor Ron McDowell was the only politician to second the proposal while the other parties voted against scrapping plans for the new News NI went along to find out what tourists and locals thought about being charged £4 for self-guided tours in the future. What are people being charged for? In May, Belfast City Council agreed plans to charge people a £4 entrance fee to the city hall ground floor exhibition as part of its 'City Hall Income Generation Project'.It was decided that free tours should take place through community visits organised by councillors and that under 18s would be exempt from the new members of the public can turn up for a walk-in booking or book exhibition tickets for up to nine people by email at no cost. Collins said plans to raise revenue by increasing the prices of services was "worrying"."An exhibition that really was free, is now going to be charged. Where does this end? Will we start charging people to access the building itself?", he who seconded the proposal said that he felt Collins had a point, "considering this building is owned by the citizens of Belfast" that it would be charging them for something they "already own". The DUP, SDLP, UUP, Green Party, Sinn Féin, Alliance Party and one Independent councillor voted against the proposal to scrap the new News NI contacted the main parties. A spokesperson for the DUP group on Belfast City Council said that they have a "strategic plan" to deliver more benefit to the ratepayers of the city. "At present tourists to the city, mainly large groups from cruise ships, are accessing the exhibition for free and costs for staffing etc are being absorbed by ratepayers."The £4 charge means visitors can pay £10 to access both the exhibition and a tour of city hall."Provision has been made for residents of the city to still access these for free through civic dignitaries or councillors." What's free and what's not? It is currently free to visit the City Hall visitor exhibition. The exhibition opened in 2017 and is found on the east wing of the ground floor. If offers a self-guided journey from Belfast's past to present across six themed zones, stretching through 16 city hall offers a separate 45 minute guided tour for visitors which costs £6 for adults and is free for tour offers glimpses into areas not usually accessible to the public like the council chamber and some of the upstairs public has full access the toilets, coffee shop, gift shop and stained windows along the north west and north east corridors from the main reception. There are no plans to change this. What do members of the public think? Geraldine and Martin O'Hare, originally from Belfast, came from Melbourne to visit O'Hares have lost neither their accent nor their nostalgia for Belfast."If you come to Belfast, you have to see the City Hall. For Australians or anyone, the City Hall is Belfast. Not the docks. Not the parks."That's what it's all about", Martin told BBC News later, he was reunited with his aunt outside the iconic building that he said is a central part of Belfast for tourists and locals alike. Geraldine told BBC News NI that everything in the city hall should be free for those who live in Northern Ireland, instead of the free tours having to be booked through a councillor."A public building should be available for the public, the people of Northern Ireland and Belfast especially.""It's there for the public to use and even a bonus for the visitors of Belfast", she added. Visiting Belfast from Copenhagen, Henrick thought that £4 "isn't too bad". Fresh from doing the tour, he said it was a "great experience" where you can "read a lot about the history of Belfast and Northern Ireland"."I think you can make tourists pay for it and then the members of the city or community should be free of charge. That's a way you can do it", he added. Sahid Zaman and Zerin Salma weren't as enthusiastic about paying for the tour."It's very good but not worth the money. I think it should be open to all people so they don't need to pay that", Sahid message for councillors was clear: "I think it should be free – keep it as it is". "This is our own history so you shouldn't pay", Zerin added. Fionnuala McCarten and Ted Workman were visiting the city hall to register the birth of their four-week-old daughter Fiadh. Asked if they would pay for the exhibition, Fionnuala said if she was tourist she would but if you live here, "there's no point".Ted agreed: "As someone who lives here I wouldn't pay £4 but maybe as a tourist I actually would because if I was visiting a different country I probably would to go in and check out the history and stuff". Stockport Trefoil members Eva, Ashley and Jean are in Northern Ireland for the Trefoil national meeting in Belfast on Saturday. They popped into the exhibition before heading over to the the Titanic museum. Jean told BBC News NI that in Manchester "a lot of the tours you have to pay but they are free to local residents so maybe that is the way to go".Eva thinks that £4 is a reasonable amount for visitors but said because it was free, it was "more of a tempting offer". She said she felt "rates" that local people pay mean it should be free for them. No date has been set yet for the charges to come into action and the council has already decided they will be reviewed after one year.


The Herald Scotland
28 minutes ago
- The Herald Scotland
So now you know, SNP: indy is not what people care about
There may have been little talk of independence in the campaign but Katy Loudon, the SNP candidate, put out a Facebook video on the morning of the by-election which made clear it's all about separating us from the rest of the UK. The unionist parties' share of the vote at the by-election was just short of 66%. If that doesn't send a clear message to the SNP and the Greens that independence is not what is important at the moment, I don't know what will. Maybe if the SNP improved our NHS, our education system, housing, our infrastructure, managed to build ferries and dual our roads on time and improve our economy, it might get more support. That would be novel, would it not? Jane Lax, Aberlour. Nothing short of humiliation It wasn't only the kitchen sink that the SNP flung at the Hamilton, Larkhall and Stonehouse by-election. It threw the washing machine, tumble drier and dishwasher as well. Anyone who saw on social media the gangs of SNP enthusiasts roaming the constituency, saturating it with MSPs including ministers, as well as foot soldiers, with a massive intensity, for weeks and especially in the last two weeks, must have imagined that it was a seat they could not lose. I wondered, in the last days, whether the SNP was not engaging in overkill, that the good folk of the constituency might be saturated with SNP propaganda to the point of apathy. The turnout, at 44 per cent, suggested that as a partial possibility. In this by-election, it was possible to utilise all the party's resources, and it did. That would not be remotely a possibility in any one constituency in a General Election. The result was nothing short of humiliation for the SNP. It is also a personal humiliation for John Swinney, who spent much time in the last week campaigning in the constituency rather than attending to First Minister's business. Nothing much will change at Holyrood, of course, but Mr Swinney's insistence that Scotland does not welcome Reform UK looks a bit hollow after it scooped up 26 per cent of the vote. Perhaps we can have a break from his preaching about Scotland being allegedly more moral than England. Ah well, one can but hope. Jill Stephenson, Edinburgh. Read more letters For many, politics is not working It is alarming that, in Thursday's by-election, Reform UK came third with 7,088 votes, a mere 1,471 behind Labour. The victorious Labour candidate, Davy Russell, is quoted as saying that 'this community has [also] sent a message to Farage and his mob tonight. The poison of Reform isn't us – it isn't Scotland and we don't want your division here.' I suspect Mr Russell was speaking from within the excitement of winning and did not realise the significance of Reform UK winning so many votes. The party of Nigel Farage, that enthusiastic Trump supporter, was understood to hold little attraction for the Scottish voter compared with his standing with the English electorate. The Hamilton, Larkhall and Stonehouse voters have demonstrated otherwise. The UK political establishment, Labour in particular, has one important lesson to learn, that being that politics in our country is not working for a significant element of our population. The vote for a disastrous Brexit was the first warning sign of a significant discontent with the inequalities and injustices in our society and economy. Uncontrolled neoliberalism has done untold damage to our social contract with our politicians accepting unquestionably the words of Mrs Thatcher, 'there is no alternative'. John Milne, Uddingston. Reform will be a Holyrood force The most interesting thing about the Hamilton, Larkhall and Stonehouse by-election for Holyrood is not who won, Labour, nor the fact that the voting was a three-way split between it, the SNP and Reform UK, but where Reform's votes came from. Compared to its vote share in the constituency in the last Holyrood election four years ago, the SNP vote dropped by almost 17% of the votes cast and the Tory vote by 11.5%. Labour's vote share actually went down by 2% as well. This means that Reform UK's 26% of the vote came more from parties of the left than the Tories. Clearly Reform is not just a threat to the Conservatives. In the climate of dissatisfaction with the established parties, Reform is on track to be a force at Holyrood next year. Otto Inglis, Crossgates, Fife. • After all the ballyhoo, the result is in and the real winner is Reform UK. John Swinney talked Reform up too effectively. Labour's candidate was nearly invisible. The result speaks volumes. The SNP lost. Labour just limped home despite being helped a huge amount by the SNP's travails. Reform UK came from a near-zero base to gain over 7,000 votes and run both other parties close. This by-election was a real test of public opinion for the shape of Holyrood in 2026. Reform could still founder given frequent party in-fighting. Equally the Tories could re-assert their desired position as defenders of the Union. John Swinney has made another major SNP blunder and released the genie from the bottle. Is he going to be the architect of the SNP's downfall? Dr Gerald Edwards, Glasgow. Labour far from home and hosed While Labour's victory in the Hamilton by-election seemingly points to the party winning the Scottish Parliament elections next year, if I were Anas Sarwar, I wouldn't be sizing up the curtains of Bute House just yet. The seat was won comfortably by the SNP in the last Scottish Parliament election in 2021 and is just the sort of seat that Labour needs to win if Anas Sarwar is to become Scotland's next First Minister. The SNP has made little progress in restoring its fortunes following its heavy defeat in last summer's Westminster election, with polls suggesting that the party's support across Scotland is still 15 points down on its tally in 2021. In the event, the fall in the party's support in Hamilton was, at 17 points, just a little higher than that. However, Labour's own tally was also down by two points on its vote in 2021, when overall the party came a disappointing third. That drop was very much in line with recent polling, which puts the party at just 19 per cent across Scotland as a whole, while the SNP has around a third of the vote. In addition, Labour is losing somewhere between one in six and one in five of its voters to Reform since last year's election. After nearly two decades in the political wilderness, there is little sign that Labour, as it currently stands, is set to regain the reins of power at Holyrood. Alex Orr, Edinburgh. Now flesh out the policies All the pundits initially claimed the Hamilton by-election would go to Labour, given local circumstances. Now a Labour win is described as a 'shock' after even some in Labour were describing their own candidate as not up to the job. But Labour needs to up its game for the next election. Criticism is easy, but Labour needs more fleshed-out policies for government, beyond centralising health in Scotland. The SNP needs to drop all the 'student politics' stuff; it was embarrassing to see a squabble over £2 million when it should be asking why Scotland does so poorly on defence procurement and jobs. Formulate a proper industrial policy for Scotland, and back any project that would enhance jobs and prosperity for Scotland. Refuse nothing and put the onus on unionists to explain their plans in detail. Trident: are the unionist plans for keeping Trident in Scotland similar to those for Diego Garcia? Nuclear power: why do they think Scotland should have it, given its high-cost electricity and the extensive lags on construction? What of waste disposal and site security? The SNP should be in favour of local pricing for electricity as a draw to attract jobs, and for North Sea oil/gas production (until Scots are empowered to decide its future). A Labour/SNP coalition? It looks like the only feasible outcome. GR Weir, Ochiltree. • For all the fuss about the Hamilton by-election, it should be noted that almost 56% of the electorate really don't care who represents them in the Scottish Parliament. Malcolm Parkin, Kinross. Russia claim is baseless Brian Wilson ("Yes, we should stand firm over Putin, but let's not make Russia our implacable foe", The Herald, June 5) tells us today that the rights of the former Soviet republics to seek security (membership of Nato) should have been balanced against Russian fears of encirclement. This raises two issues. Firstly, the Soviet Union consisted of 15 republics: the Russian Soviet Federative Socialist Republic (Russia itself) and 14 others. Of these, only three (the Baltic states,which were independent between the wars) have joined Nato. I am unclear as to how this constitutes encirclement. Does Mr Wilson envisage the Central Asian former republics (Uzbekistan, Kazakhstan etc) expressing a wish to join the alliance at some point, thus making encirclement a reality rather than a baseless claim? Secondly, does Mr Wilson not wonder why these small countries wished to be under the umbrella of the Nato alliance? To avoid the current fate of Ukraine perhaps? Alan Jenkins, Glasgow. • Brian Wilson expresses the hope that we should not categorise the Russian people as being inevitably in the enemy camp. He concluded his article by observing that narratives about Russia should have "due regard to past history and also future potential for peaceful co-existence". Such narratives should certainly not fail to take account of the contribution made by Russian armed forces and the civilian population during the Second World War, which is estimated to have resulted in some 25 million Soviet deaths. It is clear that the Russian effort during that war was profoundly influential in assisting toward the eventual defeat of Germany. The Russian people at the time called upon impressive levels of love of country and perseverance in the fight toward victory over a formidable enemy. Once we were allies. While Russia remains in the firm grip of the dictatorial, ambitious and ruthless Vladimir Putin, it is difficult to see to what extent meaningful steps can be taken to pursue the "potential for peaceful co-existence". Ian W Thomson, Lenzie. A Pride rally in Glasgow (Image: PA) Pride needed now as much as ever Gregor McKenzie (Letters, June 6) suggests that LGBT Pride has had its day. In fact, since the end of the pandemic restrictions, more people have been going to more Pride events across Scotland than ever before. Why? I think it's in part because people see how, after several positive changes in the law for LGBT people in the past 25 years, things are now starting to get worse again. Mr McKenzie asks why we can't all just let people be, and I wish we could. But the increased restrictions being introduced on trans people in the UK are quite the opposite of that. Trans people just want to get on with their lives, but the new rules make that much more difficult. And trans people are constantly maligned currently by some parts of the media. So Pride events are needed as much now as ever. They are a celebration of how far we have come in the 30 years since the first Pride Scotland, and they are a protest against the regression we're seeing now. One day perhaps Pride will be solely a celebration, but that day still seems some way off. Meanwhile people join together in the streets to say "Not going back". Tim Hopkins, Edinburgh.