China EV giant BYD reboots Europe operations after strategic stumbles
Live Events
China's leading EV maker BYD is overhauling its European operations after strategic missteps including failures to sign up enough dealers and hire executives with local-market knowledge and to offer hybrids in markets resistant to fully electric vehicles, six current and former BYD executives said.BYD has moved swiftly to address these early stumbles in this critical export market, greatly expanding its dealer network and offering hefty pay packages to poach executives from European automakers, especially Stellantis, the executives said.The Chinese EV leader announced in December that plug-in hybrids would be crucial to its European strategy. That decision came after BYD European special adviser Alfredo Altavilla - among the key executives hired in BYD's European reboot - advised BYD Founder and Chairman Wang Chuanfu that a pure EV strategy was still a hard sell in many European countries."He was very quick to get the message and give the input to BYD's engineers that every new model would have to come both in EV and hybrid" versions for Europe, Altavilla told Reuters. "It is necessary to educate customers in the green transition."Hires of some individual European executives have been reported, and BYD has publicly acknowledged problems in the German market. This is the first detailed account of the problems identified by executives inside BYD and its systematic efforts to address them. Most of the executives spoke on condition of anonymity to discuss sensitive strategic issues.BYD declined to comment.In December, Altavilla announced in Italy that plug-in hybrids would be "at the core of BYD strategy in Europe" moving forward, adding it would be "stupid" to go against consumer preferences by offering only EVs.BYD first approached Altavilla, a former Fiat-Chrysler executive, last June and announced his appointment in August. He had been working as a senior adviser to private equity firm CVC Capital Partners.Altavilla in turn hired several rising-star managers from Stellantis, including Maria Grazia Davino to run Germany and a handful of other central European countries, Alessandro Grosso in Italy and Alberto De Aza in Spain. The Chinese automaker offered them significant pay increases and a "chance to grow," a current BYD executive said."These were not people that we were happy to lose," said a Stellantis source familiar with the work of the executives poached by BYD.In another sign of BYD's determination to swiftly bolster its European operations, the company last year put its No. 2 executive, Stella Li , in charge of the region.She replaced former European chief Michael Shu , who had predicted BYD would capture at least 5% of Europe's EV market before it launches production at its first European plant in Hungary later this year. BYD ended 2024, however, with just a 2.8% share and sales totalling 57,000 vehicles, below company expectations.BYD's urgency to grow in Europe stems in part from its track record of soaring sales in China, which have increased seven-fold since 2020 to 4.2 million vehicles in 2024. BYD surpassed Tesla last year as the world's top EV seller and is now the sixth-largest global automaker.BYD also faces Chinese rivals rushing to enter Europe, including Chery, Geely, Xpeng and most recently Changan. All Chinese automakers face pressure to grow in foreign markets to boost profits, which are hard to sustain in China because of a protracted price war among scores of EV brands.BYD partners and industry experts say BYD has acknowledged its Europe problems and moved decisively to address them."They are taking this very seriously, but they need to understand that building up a position in Europe takes time," said Tim Albertsen , CEO of Ayvens, one of Europe's largest leasing companies and a BYD partner in the region. "Just like European or American automakers coming to China, what the Chinese do well in China doesn't always work in Europe."There are early signs that BYD's European reboot is showing results. BYD's European sales, including the United Kingdom, have more than tripled in the first quarter of 2025 to more than 37,000 vehicles, compared to about 8,500 in the first quarter of 2024.BYD's strength in China in part reflects its ability to "evolve very quickly to give consumers what they want," said Bo Yu, China country manager at research firm JATO Dynamics.The EV giant, for instance, undercut Chinese rivals in February by offering its "God's Eye" assisted-driving technology for free across its lineup, including in vehicles costing less than $10,000.At this week's Shanghai auto show, BYD put on an enormous display of vehicles under four different brands that dwarfed those of most other automakers. The company unveiled new models ranging from the low-cost Seal 06 and Sealion 06 - starting at about 100,000 yuan ($13,700) and 160,000 yuan, respectively - to the Yangwang U8L, an ultra-luxury three-row SUV, and the Denza Z, a high-end sports car concept.After its meteoric rise in China, BYD expanded to Europe in 2023 with bold ambitions. Former Europe boss Shu said last May that BYD aimed to be the region's top EV seller by 2030.But BYD failed to study Europe's markets beforehand, the current and former managers said.In a telling example, BYD bought an expensive and high-profile sponsorship of the Euro 2024 soccer championship in Germany, where it billed itself as the No. 1 "NEV" maker, meaning "new energy vehicle." That is a term commonly used in China to describe the combined EV-and-hybrid sector - but the acronym is meaningless to German customers.BYD's initial dealer network was also too small and too concentrated in major cities, the BYD sources said.In Germany, BYD now plans to expand its dealer network to 120 locations from 27, BYD's Davino, the former Stellantis manager tapped to run Germany, told Reuters in March.Germany's is Europe's largest auto market with 2.8 million vehicles sold last year. BYD sold fewer than 2,900 cars there in 2024. "The market in Germany is not easy," Davino said. "The basics are still missing here."Former managers said BYD's core mistake prior to launching Europe was to treat it like a single market - like China or the United States - rather than dozens of different countries.One former BYD manager compared Europe's national markets to "frogs in a pan," all jumping in different directions, adding: "BYD is only now beginning to learn that."
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Time of India
42 minutes ago
- Time of India
Amazon and Microsoft-backed startup to build Recycling Plant of rare earths in Canada, the 'rare minerals' that analysts say gives China upper hand in trade war with the US
Cyclic Materials , a startup supported by Amazon, Microsoft, and BMW Group, plans to invest $25 million in a rare-earths recycling plant and research center in Ontario, Canada, according to a statement reported by Bloomberg. The facility, set to begin operations in the first quarter of 2026, aims to bolster North America's supply of critical minerals amid rising global demand and China's dominance over rare-earth markets. Cyclic's technology extracts rare earths from end-of-life products like wind turbines, data-center hard drives, and electric vehicle components, addressing supply chain vulnerabilities highlighted by China's export restrictions in retaliation to U.S. tariffs, Bloomberg noted. The company already operates a demonstration facility in Kingston and a processing site in Arizona. What is the rare earth minerals tussle between US and China The rare earth minerals issue between the U.S. and China centers on a trade dispute over critical minerals essential for advanced technologies, including defense systems, electric vehicles, semiconductors, and renewable energy. China mines about 70% of the world's rare earth elements (17 metallic elements with unique properties) and processes over 90%, giving it significant control over global supply chains. They also produce 85% of rare earth magnets used in electric motors and other tech. 'Rare-earth elements are a $20 billion to $30 billion market globally, but they unlock multi-trillion-dollar industries,' Ahmad Ghahreman, CEO of Cyclic Materials, told Bloomberg. 'We are creating a secure, local supply for these critical metals.' The Kingston plant is designed to process 500 metric tons of feedstock annually, producing rare-earth oxides for magnets used in EV motors, wind turbines, and consumer electronics. Feedstock will be sourced from Cyclic's Arizona facility and a network of partners, with output supplied to companies like Solvay SA. The project aligns with Canada's push to become a hub for critical minerals, supported by government incentives and growing interest from automakers and tech giants. Cyclic's initiative could reduce reliance on Chinese rare earths, which account for over 80% of global supply, per Bloomberg. The research center will also develop advanced recycling techniques, positioning Cyclic to meet surging demand for sustainable mineral sources in industries critical to the green energy transition.
Indian Express
an hour ago
- Indian Express
Trump says China trade deal ‘done': 55% tariff, supply of rare earth minerals
President Donald Trump said Wednesday that the United States has reached a trade agreement with China, including an easing of curbs imposed by Beijing on export of rare earth minerals and magnets that are key inputs for industries ranging from automobiles to electronics. 'Our deal with China is done, subject to final approval with President Xi and me,' Trump said in a post on Truth Social. He said China would supply 'any necessary rare earths' and magnets, while the US would make concessions on allowing Chinese students to attend American universities. The Trump administration had recently begun to clamp down on the presence of Chinese nationals on US college campuses. 'We are getting a total of 55% tariffs, China is getting 10%. Relationship is excellent!' Trump wrote, without elaborating. Bloomberg quoted a White House official as saying that the agreement allows the US to charge a 55 per cent tariff on imported Chinese goods, which, crucially, includes a 10 per cent baseline 'reciprocal' tariff, a 20 per cent tariff for fentanyl trafficking, and a 25 per cent tariff reflecting pre-existing tariffs (imposed by Trump in his first term, that the Biden administration persisted with). China would charge a 10 per cent tariff on American imports, the official said. Though the details of the deal were still unclear, analysts predicted that China seems to have gained the upper-hand after its rare earth restrictions prompted US carmakers, including Ford Motor and Chrysler, to cut production. Significantly, Trump said a final deal is subject to approval from him and Chinese President Xi Jinping. Chinese state media said earlier Wednesday that Beijing had reached a 'framework' for an agreement with the US during talks in London, but there was no official response from China on Trump's subsequent claims on Truth Social. Earlier, both the negotiating sides said they had agreed in principle to a framework for dialling down trade tensions between the world's two biggest economies. After the meeting in London — the second time the two sides have met in the last couple of months, since Trump's sweeping tariff onslaught — there were indications of a reconciliation. What is beginning to get clearer after the second meeting is that this is perhaps not how the US imagined the trade war to unfold. China is beginning to dictate the direction of the bilateral talks, with the US almost seen as requesting for much-needed concessions on the resumption of supplies of critical inputs. In the first round of talks in Geneva, the US delegation led by Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent had asked the Chinese to cut its tariffs in tandem with theirs, primarily because the Americans were facing the heat back home from the early fallout of the high tariffs, including empty shelves at grocery stories and surging prices of daily use commodities. In London, the US side is learnt to have specifically asked the Chinese to 'suspend or remove' restrictions on rare earths magnets, which had forced a supply-chain crunch. The London meeting follows a call between Trump and Xi on June 5, which was initiated by the White House — the first call since Trump's reciprocal tariff announcement. After the London talks, US Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick said the deal should result in restrictions on rare earth minerals and magnets 'being resolved'. 'We have reached a framework to implement the Geneva consensus… Once the Presidents approve it, we will then seek to implement it,' he said. 'The two sides have, in principle, reached a framework for implementing the consensus reached by the two heads of state during the phone call on June 5 and the consensus reached at the Geneva meeting,' the BBC quoted China's Vice Commerce Minister Li Chenggang as saying. Chinese export controls over rare earth minerals were high on the agenda of the meetings. While Beijing has not imposed an outright ban on the export of rare earth magnets, the process has been made very difficult; it could take a long time to source, posing shortage risks. Rare earth magnets, especially neodymium-iron-boron (NdFeB) magnets, are crucial for EV manufacturing. They provide the strong magnetic fields needed for efficient and powerful electric motors, including traction motors that drive EVs. These magnets also play a major role in other EV components like power steering systems, wiper motors and braking systems. China has a virtual stranglehold over these rare earth magnets. In May, talks held in Geneva led to a temporary truce after the tit-for-tat tariff increases by both sides, which led to duties that peaked at 145 per cent. Trump called the outcome of the talks in Switzerland a 'total reset', which brought US tariffs on Chinese products down to 30 per cent, while Beijing cut duties on US imports to 10 per cent. Both sides also agreed to a 90-day deadline to try to reach a trade deal. However, the US and China have since accused each other of breaching the deal. The US has said that Beijing has been dragging its feet on opening up exports of rare earth metals and magnets while the Chinese claim that Washington has restricted its access to American goods such as semiconductors and other related technologies linked to artificial intelligence. US Trade Representative Jamieson Greer had said China had failed to roll back restrictions on exports of rare earth magnets. In the run-up to this week's talks, the Chinese Ministry of Commerce said on Saturday that it had approved some applications for rare earth export licences. The problem for the US is that the Chinese side has wrested some advantage, especially by leveraging its strategy of weaponing its dominance in key sectors. Rare earth minerals and magnets is one such area, where the US is now desperate for concessions. Both sides have since claimed breaches on non-tariff pledges, but the Americans clearly seem more eager for a reconciliation, given the impact of the Chinese blockade on its key manufacturing sectors. These Chinese trade blockades are already impacting companies in other geographies. Hamamatsu-based small car maker Suzuki Motors, for instance, said last week it plans to suspend the production of its flagship Swift compact hatchback due to China's rare earth restrictions, becoming the first Japanese automaker to be impacted. There are similar worries among other manufacturing entities across the world, including in the US. Anil Sasi is National Business Editor with the Indian Express and writes on business and finance issues. He has worked with The Hindu Business Line and Business Standard and is an alumnus of Delhi University. ... Read More
India.com
an hour ago
- India.com
India Won Operation Sindoor – But What Does The Army Want Next, And Who Poses The Greatest Threat?
New Delhi: India crushed Pakistan's assault during Operation Sindoor. But after the dust settled, something more alarming came into view. China was not sitting on the sidelines. It was pulling strings from behind the curtain. Indian radars picked up Chinese-made jets in Pakistani skies. Chinese missiles were used to target Indian bases. Beijing was deeply involved. That means India was not fighting just Pakistan. India was up against two enemies at once. Military officers have sounded the alarm. They want India's defence budget raised to 2.5% of the Gross Domestic Product (GDP). Right now, the defence allocation stands at just 1.9%. A huge portion of that money goes into salaries and pensions. Only a quarter of it helps modernise the military. This cannot continue. Not when two hostile neighbours are preparing for something bigger. China has been pumping weapons into Pakistan. In the May 7-10 clashes, Pakistan deployed Chinese J-10 jets and HQ-9 missile systems. Beijing has promised to send more – stealth fighters, long-range air defence weapons and new-generation drones. China is flooding Pakistan with cutting-edge military tools. Pakistan's economy is in crisis. But even then, Islamabad raised its defence budget by 20%. It cut development. It ignored debt. It focused on weapons. India must respond, believe experts, arguing that it is time for total self-reliance in defence production. India must build fighter jets, drones, loitering munitions and missiles on its own. The private sector must step in. Half-measures will not do. Half-prepared armies lose wars. India's Advanced Medium Combat Aircraft (AMCA) project has started moving. But it must move faster. Tejas took decades. The same mistake cannot happen again. The Indian Air Force is short on fighter squadrons. It has just 30. The target is 42.5. Drones are the new face of war. Swarm drones. FPV kamikaze drones. Loitering drones. India needs all of these, and it needs them in bulk. No country will come to India's rescue in a full-scale war. India must stand on its own. During Operation Sindoor, India used Russian S-400s, Israeli Barak-8s and its own Akash missiles. These systems intercepted and neautralised many Pakistani drone and missile attacks. But more layers are needed. DRDO must now accelerate two things – short-range air defence systems and long-range strike missiles like Project Kusha. Military reform is also crucial. India has a huge army. It must cut unnecessary spending. It must remove red tape from weapons procurement. And it must create joint theatre commands that allow the Army, Navy and Air Force to fight as one. A senior military commander put it bluntly. India is now staring at a superpower that is feeding a hostile neighbour. Pakistan may fire the bullets. But China is loading the gun. India cannot look away anymore. The next battle may not wait for long.
