logo
Britain will need Trump's permission to use new nuclear bombs

Britain will need Trump's permission to use new nuclear bombs

Telegraph5 hours ago

Britain will need permission from Donald Trump to deploy any tactical nuclear weapons from its new fighter jets.
The Government has agreed to purchase 12 F-35A fighter jets from the US, meaning British aircraft will carry nuclear warheads for the first time since the Cold War.
The Telegraph, however, understands that there is no intention for the UK to develop its own sovereign nuclear bomb capability and they will therefore have to purchase the B61-12 thermo bombs that the planes carry from the US.
Under Nato's nuclear sharing arrangements any of the US's B-61 weapons carried by Nato allies remain under US custody.
For a nuclear mission to be conducted by a Nato country approval must be granted by the alliance's Nuclear Planning Group (NPG) with final sign off from both the US president and British Prime Minister.
An RAF source asked why the UK could not have negotiated a deal which did not leave it so reliant on the US for permission to protect itself.
'This is good we are talking to Nato, but there is a question over whether the UK would like its own sovereign airborne capability,' he said. 'Can't they negotiate a new deal with the Americans which explores this?'
It has not been decided where the B-61 weapons purchased from the US would be based once on British soil.
The US is already planning to station nuclear weapons at its US air base, RAF Lakenheath, according to Pentagon documents.
Another possibility would be to house them at the neighbouring British base RAF Marham.
An RAF source added that from a UK perspective it made sense to store the weapons at a British base, as they will be British owned.
The last UK warplanes capable of carrying tactical nuclear weapons were Tornados, which deployed the British-made WE177 nuclear bomb. This was retired in 1998 after the Iron Curtain had fallen and it was widely felt that Russia was no longer a threat.
Other sovereign bombs included the Blue Danube, the first UK-built nuclear deterrent, which was carried by V-bombers.
In 1956 a Vickers Valiant became the first RAF aircraft to drop the British atomic bomb during a test at the Maralinga range in Australia.
However, as a member of the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty, which strives for a world without nuclear weapons, the UK has not invested in its own tactical nuclear weapon arsenal since 1998.
Trident, the continuous at-sea deterrent, is the only nuclear weapon system operated by the UK that has a day-to-day operation independent of the US.
It consists of four Vanguard-class submarines which can carry up to 16 warheads each.
France's nuclear deterrent, which is believed to contain an estimated 300 nuclear weapons, under its 'force de dissuasion' programme, with sea and air-based launch capabilities, is also currently independent from Nato.
The US has long guaranteed Europe's safety with an arsenal of around 100 nuclear missiles, many of them stationed in a US military base in Germany.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

'Great progress' made in Gaza ceasefire talks, says Donald Trump
'Great progress' made in Gaza ceasefire talks, says Donald Trump

Sky News

time27 minutes ago

  • Sky News

'Great progress' made in Gaza ceasefire talks, says Donald Trump

Donald Trump has suggested a ceasefire in Gaza may be imminent. The US president told reporters that "great progress" had been made in talks as a result of the end of the recent 12-day conflict between Israel and Iran. At the weekend, the US carried out strikes on three Iranian nuclear enrichment sites. "Because of this attack that we made [in Iran], I think we're going to have some good news… Gaza's very close," he added. While missile strikes between Israel and Iran have dominated headlines in recent days, the war in Gaza has ground relentlessly on. On Wednesday, Israeli officials said seven soldiers were killed by an explosive device in Khan Younis, in the south of the territory. That was the highest number of deaths for its forces in a single incident since the breakdown of a previous truce in March. Meanwhile, the Hamas-run Gaza health ministry said another 33 people had been killed and 267 people injured while seeking aid at food distribution points. Sky News's Gaza Team observed bodies being laid out at Nasser Hospital, and people being treated, after reports of gunfire at an aid point near the Netzarim Corridor in central Gaza. Rabih Abed-Rabo, a Palestinian man, told Sky News that tens of thousands of people had gone to the site to seek food. "I'm really thanking God I managed to get this bag. I have to feed 15 people. We've been trying for three months," he said. "I went back and forth to that area 10 times. Near the tanks, near the Israelis, through intense gunfire. Thank God." The Gaza health ministry said a total of 549 people had now been killed at food distribution centres since March. The aid stations are operated by the Gaza Humanitarian Foundation (GHF), a private organisation backed by Israel and now funded directly by the US too. A UN official has described the aid delivery mechanism as a "death trap". The Israeli military did not comment on the latest incident but told Sky News: "The Ministry of Health in Gaza is controlled and directed by Hamas, and is therefore subject to its agenda.

The alluring fantasy of a quick win in Iran
The alluring fantasy of a quick win in Iran

Economist

time32 minutes ago

  • Economist

The alluring fantasy of a quick win in Iran

AFTER THE elation, the doubt. President Donald Trump said that 'Operation Midnight Hammer', had 'totally obliterated' Iran's uranium-enrichment facilities. But now an early intelligence assessment leaked on June 24th suggests the nuclear programme has only been set back by months and that some enriched uranium may have been spirited away. The report is an early 'low-confidence' assessment that both the Trump administration and Israeli sources eschew. But it illuminates a bigger problem. Mr Trump wants a quick-fix to the Iran nightmare with a single, clarifying mega-strike, a ceasefire and then prosperity. Instead America faces years of uncertainty over Iran's capabilities and intentions. As a result Mr Trump's assumption—that he can have a one-day Middle East military triumph and then quickly secure a lasting deal—may be badly misplaced.

Republicans dangle reprieve from tax retaliation as Trump bill heads toward votes
Republicans dangle reprieve from tax retaliation as Trump bill heads toward votes

Reuters

time41 minutes ago

  • Reuters

Republicans dangle reprieve from tax retaliation as Trump bill heads toward votes

WASHINGTON, June 25 (Reuters) - A tax proposal that would enable U.S. President Donald Trump to retaliate against countries that impose taxes that he considers unfair could be removed from a sweeping budget bill, if an international deal can be struck before it passes, top White House and congressional Republicans said on Wednesday. The proposal, known as Section 899, opens new tab, is currently part of Trump's tax-cut and spending bill, which Republicans hope to enact as early as Saturday so that the president can sign it into law before the July 4 U.S. Independence Day holiday. House of Representatives Ways and Means Committee Chair Jason Smith told Reuters that the provision could be removed from the legislation if other countries and the European Union agree to suspend taxes such as the "Pillar Two" global minimum corporate tax. "If there's an agreement before the bill's passed, I'd see it to come out. But until the European Union treats U.S. businesses fairly, it will be in the bill," Smith said in an interview. White House economic adviser Kevin Hassett made similar remarks about Section 899, saying: "Maybe it doesn't have to be in the bill if they pull those things back ahead of the vote." Hassett specifically cited Pillar Two and digital service taxes, which impact large U.S. technology companies like Amazon and Alphabet. "We don't like those things, and we've got a tax response, a tax retaliation, a reciprocal retaliation in the bill," he said in an interview with the Fox Business Channel. "And so, we're in negotiations over tax issues," Hassett added. The provision in Trump's One Big Beautiful Bill Act would impose a progressive tax burden of up to 20% on foreign investors' U.S. income, raising concerns on Wall Street about the attractiveness of U.S. investments. Lawmakers have done little to address concerns on Wall Street, despite calls for clarifying language and leeway for the Treasury to exempt countries in negotiations with the Trump administration. The Senate version of the provision would take effect in 2027, one year later than an earlier House version. Senate Republican leaders are aiming to pass the Trump bill as soon as Saturday, and Hassett said the White House would expect the House to vote on full passage later in the day.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store