Formula E race case: KTR declines to submit mobile phone to ACB
HYDERABAD
BRS working president K.T. Rama Rao has declined to submit his mobile phone to the Anti-Corruption Bureau (ACB) that is probing the Formula E race case citing privacy issues.
Interestingly, the former MA&UD minister claimed that he had replaced his old mobile phone in the first quarter of 2024 with a new one and not used any other electronic devices during the relevant period pertaining to the Formula E race case.
In his written reply to the ACB, KTR stated that such a direction violates fundamental rights and personal privacy guaranteed under the Constitution. Questioning the ACB's direction, he said that he had personally appeared before the ACB on June 16 and responded to all queries.
Stating that ACB had served him a notice to submit the mobile phone used between November 1, 2021, and December 1, 2023, along with other electronic devices used by him, KTR pointed out that the notice did not specify the reason or purpose for seeking these devices.
KTR emphasised that all official records relevant to the Formula E case were already available with the State Municipal Administration and Urban Development (MA&UD) department, and all decisions related to the case were made in his official capacity as Minister of that department. He added that if any electronic devices were to be examined, strict protocols laid down by the Supreme Court must be followed to avoid any tampering or misuse of data.
He highlighted the importance of the right to privacy citing a relevant case in which the Supreme Court granted interim relief to a petitioner and instructed the Enforcement Directorate not to access or copy the contents of the petitioner's mobile phone.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Hans India
an hour ago
- Hans India
Seminar in Madikeri Revives Codava Demand for Geo-Political Autonomy, Tribal Status, and Constitutional Recognition
Madikeri: A renewed call for Codava autonomy and tribal recognition resonated from the hills of Kodagu as the Codava National Council (CNC) organised a high-profile seminar near Madikeri, marking 35 years of the organisation's apolitical movement seeking constitutional and cultural safeguards for the Codava people. Delivering the keynote lecture, Supreme Court advocate and constitutional law expert Vikram Hegde underscored the community's long-standing demands, including geo-political autonomy under the Sixth Schedule of the Constitution, Scheduled Tribe status, language inclusion in the Eighth Schedule, and protection of traditional land, cultural, and religious rights. Referring to the Codavas as an 'animistic, mono-ethnic group with deep-rooted ties to their ancestral lands,' Hegde noted that the community met several criteria under both domestic law and international conventions on indigenous peoples, particularly the United Nations Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples (UNDRIP). He argued for a 'holistic and historically informed assessment' of the Codavas' demand for Scheduled Tribe classification. CNC President N.U. Nachappa Kodava, who presided over the seminar, reiterated the community's call for a Codava Autonomous Region (CAR) within the Indian Union—akin to the Gorkha Hill Council or the Ladakh Autonomous Hill Development Councils. 'Our aspiration is not secession but dignity—through federal accommodation of our unique identity,' Nachappa said. The CNC's multi-pronged demands include: Restoration of hereditary Jamma land rights; Recognition of Codava Thakk as a scheduled language; Protection of customary gun rights, granted under the Indian Arms Act since 1963; Reservation in legislatures akin to arrangements made for cultural minorities in other parts of the country; Exemption of religious and cultural sites from State intervention. Citing the dilution of Codava presence in Parliament since the 1967 election of C.M. Poonacha, the seminar highlighted how Kodagu's merger with Karnataka in 1956 eroded the political representation of the community. Hegde called for serious consideration of Constitutional mechanisms such as inclusion under the Fifth or Sixth Schedule or a new provision like Article 371 tailored for Kodagu. 'Asymmetric federalism is not alien to India—it is the framework by which we have protected many identities. Codavas, with their contributions to national defence and administration, deserve similar recognition,' he said. The seminar also addressed growing concerns over the application of general laws—such as the Karnataka Hindu Religious Institutions Act and the SARFAESI Act—which threaten to undermine Codava religious freedom and land tenure. Senior Karnataka High Court advocate M.T. Nanaiah, supporting the CNC's legal initiatives, emphasised the community's peaceful advocacy over decades. 'Codavas have not resorted to agitation. They have used democratic and legal means. That alone deserves attention from the Centre,' he said.
The Hindu
an hour ago
- The Hindu
‘₹2,000-cr. classroom scam': ED raids 37 locationsin Delhi
The Enforcement Directorate (ED) on Wednesday conducted searches on at least 37 locations in the city in connection with the alleged '₹2,000-crore classroom construction scam', sources at the agency said. The searches were carried out on premises linked to contractors and private entities purportedly involved in the scam, sources added. The ED launched its probe after registering a criminal case under the Prevention of Money Laundering Act (PMLA) based on a May 30 FIR registered by the Delhi government's Anti-Corruption Branch (ACB) against Aam Aadmi Party (AAP) leaders and former Ministers Satyendar Jain and Manish Sisodia for alleged irregularities in the construction of 12,748 classrooms in Delhi government schools during Arvind Kejriwal's term as Chief Minister. In a statement, AAP said, 'These 'raids' are a desperate attempt to divert public attention from issues such as waterlogging, fee hikes by private schools, and power cuts.' The ACB had questioned Mr. Jain, who served as the Public Works Department Minister in the previous AAP government, for five hours on June 6 in connection with the 'scam'. It had also summoned Mr. Sisodia, who held the Education portfolio, on June 9. However, he cited 'prior commitments' and did not appear before the agency. The ACB has also booked Mr. Jain in a separate '₹571-crore CCTV project scam'. According to senior ACB officials, the project was awarded to contractors associated with AAP, which was then in power, and 'significant deviations and cost escalations' were observed, even as the work was not completed within the prescribed time frame. The case stems from a complaint filed in 2019 by BJP's North East Delhi MP Manoj Tiwari, alleging that an average of ₹28 lakh had been spent on constructing each classroom, which was several times higher than the usual market estimate of ₹5 lakh.
Time of India
2 hours ago
- Time of India
US Supreme Court upholds Tennessee ban on transgender youth care; major blow to trans rights; paves way for similar laws in 26 states
US Supreme Court on Wednesday upheld Tennessee's ban on gender-affirming care for transgender minors, marking a major setback for transgender rights across the country. The 6-3 ruling allows the state's restrictions to remain in place, setting a precedent that could shield similar laws in 26 other states from legal challenges. Tired of too many ads? go ad free now The decision marks a major victory for Republican-led efforts, many backed by US President Donald Trump's administration, to limit access to medical treatments for transgender youth. Chief Justice John Roberts, writing for the conservative majority, stated that the law banning puberty blockers and hormone treatments for transgender minors does not violate the Constitution's equal protection clause, which requires the government to treat people in similar situations equally. "This case carries with it the weight of fierce scientific and policy debates about the safety, efficacy, and propriety of medical treatments in an evolving field. The voices in these debates raise sincere concerns; the implications for all are profound," Roberts wrote. "The Equal Protection Clause does not resolve these disagreements. Nor does it afford us license to decide them as we see best," Roberts added. Justice Sonia Sotomayor, speaking for the court's three liberal justices, delivered a dissenting opinion in the courtroom, stating, "By retreating from meaningful judicial review exactly where it matters most, the court abandons transgender children and their families to political whims. In sadness, I dissent." She noted that the legislation also restricts parents' authority regarding their children's healthcare decisions. The ruling occurs amidst various federal and state initiatives to regulate transgender individuals' lives, including their participation in sports competitions and bathroom access. Earlier in April, Trump's administration initiated legal action against Maine for resisting the government's initiative to exclude transgender athletes from girls sports. Tired of too many ads? go ad free now The Republican president has additionally sought to prevent federal funding for gender-affirming medical care for individuals under 19, advocating instead for exclusive use of talk therapy for young transgender individuals. Furthermore, the Supreme Court has permitted his dismissal of transgender service members from the military, whilst legal proceedings continue. The president implemented an additional order defining sexes exclusively as male and female. The debate over transgender rights intensified in Congress after Delaware Democrat Sarah McBride became the first openly transgender person elected to the US House of Representatives. Her historic win drew backlash from some Republicans, including House Speaker Mike Johnson and Rep. Nancy Mace, who questioned which bathroom she would be allowed to use. Meanwhile, the broader battle over gender-affirming care has led to disruptions in healthcare access. Even in states where such care remains legal, providers are growing cautious. Following a Trump-era executive order, some institutions have begun scaling back services. Wednesday's Supreme Court ruling upholding Tennessee's ban on gender-affirming care for minors does not affect the landmark 2020 decision that protects LGBTQ workers under federal anti-discrimination laws. According to the Williams Institute at UCLA School of Law, approximately 300,000 teens (ages 13–17) and 1.3 million adults identify as transgender in the US, the Associated Press reported. When the case was argued in December, the Biden administration and families of transgender youth urged the court to strike down Tennessee's ban, calling it unconstitutional and discriminatory. They pointed out that the law bans certain treatments for transgender minors while allowing the same procedures for other medical purposes. After President Trump took office, however, the Justice Department reversed its position, backing the ban.
