logo
Aberdeen IT firm sets sights on £2m turnover and 60 staff as growth accelerates

Aberdeen IT firm sets sights on £2m turnover and 60 staff as growth accelerates

Aberdeen-based IT and cybersecurity specialist Alto is setting its sights on significant expansion, with plans to increase its workforce and double turnover.
The firm, based in Tullos, has already more than doubled revenue since Bruce Skinner took the helm – breaking the £1 million mark for the first time.
It currently employs 11 people and is looking to expand its headcount to 60 staff within the next five years.
Bruce revealed the ambition is also to double turnover within the next two years.
Alto provides managed IT and security products and services to a range of businesses with its specialist consultants' combined experience totalling more than 100 years.
It has a growing base of clients in the UK and overseas locations including Spain, France, Denmark, Canada, the US and the Philippines.
Alto, based at Citrus House on Greenbank Road, was founded in 2009 – under the Pisys brand – through a franchise arrangement.
When Bruce first took over the business in 2020 it generated a revenue of £500,000.
The 50-year-old said: 'It's a case of now looking to double turnover over the next two years.
'I believe once we go over that £2m that'll be quite a significant landmark.
'The plan is to keep growing the business by the number of employees and clients.
'In five years' time, if we've got to 60 staff and 100 clients, that would be an awesome place to be.'
Alto works in a number of sectors including manufacturing, food, energy services, healthcare and renewables.
The company has also shown a strong commitment to developing talent, taking on six apprentices since Bruce took the helm – one of whom, Dawid Szymaniuk, is now chief technology officer.
Bruce is now looking at different ways to keep growing Alto and the services it offers.
He said: 'We offer a unique proactive service where we're an IT department for companies that don't have the capacity to employ their own full-time IT people.
'My desire would be to look to potentially employ or start up smaller pods of Alto, in other towns and cities, but still grow the business in Aberdeen with the amount of help desk staff and business team.
'We've worked with Opportunity North East on their business growth programme, and that's been brilliant.
'It's really made me realize that the north-east of Scotland needs to grow the technology sector, rather than just focusing on energy.
'Although energy is a fantastic resource and it's got a lot of engineering capability in Aberdeen.
'There's loads of opportunities out there right now, especially with the cybersecurity stuff and proactive work we're doing with businesses.
'And I think there's a lot to be excited about in terms of our industry.'
For the third year in a row, Alto has been named as one of the best places to work in the UK.
Bruce said: 'When I took over the business I had this dream of having a place where people wanted to come and thrive and are really supportive of each other.
'Being recognised by the Sunday Times Best Places to Work reflects the culture we've built around being supportive, committed and authentic in everything we do.
'It's a credit to the whole team and the environment we've created together.'
Alto recently won a three-year contract, in parntership with Cobra Wind and Dragados, to maintain internet connectivity for five floating offshore wind turbines at the Kincardine Offshore Wind Farm.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

China increases scrutiny over rare earth magnets with new tracking system
China increases scrutiny over rare earth magnets with new tracking system

Reuters

time36 minutes ago

  • Reuters

China increases scrutiny over rare earth magnets with new tracking system

BEIJING, June 4 (Reuters) - China has introduced a tracking system for its rare earth magnet sector, three sources said, as its export restrictions on them begin to cut off customers around the world. The national tracking system, which went into effect last week, requires producers to submit extra information online including trading volumes and client names, said two sources familiar with the matter and another briefed by those involved. The world's largest rare earth magnet supplier and exporter, China in early April imposed export restrictions on seven medium to heavy rare earth elements and several magnets, requiring exporters to obtain licences. Delays getting approvals have upended supply chains for automakers, semiconductor companies and others, with global automakers already beginning to stop some production lines as reserves run out. Beijing unveiled high-level plans to establish an information tracing system for rare earth products last June, but there had been no mention of it again until last week, according to the source briefed on the matter. The added level of scrutiny suggests that China's export controls on rare earths and the associated magnets - where it has a near-monopoly on production - could become a permanent feature for the products. There have been hopes in the U.S. and elsewhere that this would be removed as part of a trade truce agreed in Geneva last month. In previous cases where China has imposed export curbs on metals, exports have tended to slowly rebound after the imposition of restrictions as exporters apply and receive licences. "Our current hypothesis is that China would continue its export control mechanism on rare earths, as its an ace card for China to hold," said Tim Zhang, founder of Singapore-based Edge Research. Beijing's long-term target is to track the whole rare earth production chain, not just magnets, strengthen its control over the sector, and crackdown on smuggling, illegal mining and tax evasion, according to a fourth source who was also briefed on the matter.

Coinbase was hacked by snarky teens; Circle upsizes IPO
Coinbase was hacked by snarky teens; Circle upsizes IPO

Coin Geek

time38 minutes ago

  • Coin Geek

Coinbase was hacked by snarky teens; Circle upsizes IPO

Getting your Trinity Audio player ready... Coinbase (NASDAQ: COIN) was aware of its customer data leak far earlier than the digital asset exchange previously acknowledged, while its stablecoin partner Circle is supersizing its initial public offering (IPO) plans. On June 3, Reuters reported that the recently disclosed hack of Coinbase's customer data by customer support staff in India involved the local operation of a Texas-based business process outsourcing firm called TaskUs. In January, at least one TaskUs employee was caught using their phone to photograph Coinbase customer information from a computer screen. Four sources, including three TaskUs staffers, told Reuters that Coinbase was notified immediately of the security breach, and TaskUs promptly fired two staffers involved in the incident. Coinbase responded by cutting ties with TaskUs, resulting in over 200 staff in the city of Indore losing their jobs. The mass layoff was reported in Indian media at the time. And yet, it wasn't until May 15 that Coinbase acknowledged the breach in a filing with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC). Coinbase said at the time that it knew the contractors had improperly accessed customer data in 'previous months' but didn't realize the extent of the breach until May 11, when it received a ransom demand from individuals to whom the data had been forwarded. Coinbase estimated that nearly 70,000 of its customers have been impacted. Coinbase CEO Brian Armstrong later claimed that the exchange began notifying impacted users on April 11 but failed to explain why the SEC wasn't notified until a month later. Crypto journalist Molly White noted that Coinbase revised its user agreement on April 12 to limit customers' ability to participate in class action suits against the exchange. TaskUs has since been hit with a class action suit by Coinbase customers alleging negligence. TaskUs said it 'believes these claims are without merit' and will defend itself in court. Coinbase's customer support is notoriously glacial in its response to complaints, a bad reputation that shows little sign of improvement. Some U.S. customers have resorted to filing complaints with the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB) based on its requirements for companies to respond within 15 days. That could explain CEO Armstrong's (incorrect) view that the CFPB is an 'unconstitutional' body that should be 'deleted' because it has 'done enormous harm to the country.' Coinbase has been the subject of over 8,000 complaints with the CFPB, a body that the current federal administration is in the process of dismantling. Insult to injury Fortune reported that Coinbase has used TaskUs services since 2017, but the latter firm's reliance on poorly paid staff in India opens up the potential for staff to supplement their wages with bribes. A TaskUs spokesperson told Fortune that its research suggests the Indore staff who leaked the Coinbase data 'were recruited by a much broader, coordinated criminal campaign against [Coinbase] that also impacted a number of other service providers servicing [Coinbase].' Fortune reported communicating with one of the alleged hackers, who went by the name 'puffy party' on Telegram. This individual claimed to be part of a loosely affiliated group of teenagers and twenty-somethings calling itself 'the Comm' or 'Com' (short for 'community'). This group has been linked to other notable exploits, including the blackmailing of some Las Vegas casino operators in 2023. 'Puffy party' also claimed that members of the Comm/Com perform specific aspects of a heist based on their individual skillsets. One team bribed the TaskUs staff, another performed the social engineering scams, with the spoils divided amongst the teams. In a reflection of this team's juvenile status, 'puffy party' shared screenshots of messages they'd exchanged with what they claimed was a member of Coinbase's security team. The messages show the hackers mocking Armstrong, saying they would use some of the proceeds of their blackmail efforts to 'sponsor a hair transplant so that he may graciously traverse the world with a fresh set of hair.' Back to the top ↑ No KYC, no hacks, no problem Incredibly, the crypto sector's collective response to Coinbase's data hacking scandal is not that the exchange needs to beef up its digital defenses and be more upfront with its customers. Instead, calls are mounting to lift 'know your customer' (KYC) requirements on digital asset operators based on the view that hackers can't steal data that companies don't possess. As some online critics have observed, traditional banks haven't been as supportive as they might of the digital asset legislation currently kicking around Congress because banks 'think it is unfair for a non-bank to do banking without any of the laws and regulations applicable to banks. And they kind of have a point.' Back to the top ↑ Coinbase v Oregon Coinbase responded at the time by claiming that Oregon was 'trying to revive regulation by enforcement,' the catchphrase popularized by digital asset firms that reject nearly all aspects of regulatory oversight with which they disagree. On June 2, Coinbase filed a petition in federal court asking for the suit to be moved out of Oregon and under federal jurisdiction. The petition calls the suit a 'regulatory land grab' and notes that Oregon's Division of Financial Regulation generally takes point on securities transactions, not the AG, calling into question Rayfield's authority to file the suit in the first place. Coinbase VP of legal Ryan VanGrack tweeted Tuesday that the petition was filed because 'the case is fundamentally about federal law.' VanGrack claimed Rayfield's suit 'would undermine recent bipartisan progress towards crypto clarity by creating a patchwork of state regulations that harms consumers, innovation, and economic freedom.' Coinbase's chief legal officer Paul Grewal added that '[b]ecause Oregon's claims raise fundamentally federal issues like the meaning of 'investment contract,' [as defined by the Howey Test] they should be resolved by federal courts.' Back to the top ↑ Circle supersizes IPO Coinbase's share price has ridden a roller coaster so far in 2025, hitting peaks of over $300 in January and troughs of less than half that sum by mid-April. But the company's inclusion in the S&P 500 index last month and the expectation of a major payday from its stablecoin partner Circle currently have Coinbase shares hovering just under $260. USDC-issuer Circle filed its IPO paperwork in early April, and the company has been dotting its i's and crossing its t's in anticipation of that magical Nasdaq debut later this week. On May 27, Circle announced plans to offer 24 million shares of its Class A common stock at an expected range of $24-$26, with Circle offering up 9.6 million of that total and selling stockholders accounting for the other 14.4 million. On June 2, Circle upsized that offer to 32 million shares at a range of $27-$28, allegedly reflecting 'strong investor appetite' for all things crypto under President Donald Trump's second go-round. The IPO is now expected to raise nearly $900 million, while assigning Circle a valuation of up to $7.2 billion. Coinbase holds 8.4 million shares in Circle after converting its equity in the now defunct Centre consortium that originally oversaw USDC's business. Should the IPO go off at the upper end of its expected price range, Coinbase's Circle stock would be worth over $235 million, ~$25 million more than Coinbase's equity in Circle at the time of the conversion. Coinbase is unlikely to be selling much of its Circle stake in order to preserve the sweetheart revenue-sharing deal it worked out when it negotiated its exit from Centre. With both companies now required to issue financial report cards, it seems Coinbase actually makes more money off USDC activity than Circle does, while Circle shoulders most USDC expenses. Last month, reports emerged that Circle was a potential acquisition target of both Coinbase and Ripple Labs, the issuer of the XRP token (as well as its own stablecoin RLUSD). Ripple's offer was said to be in the $4-$5 billion range, which Circle rejected as too low, a view now apparently confirmed by its IPO valuation. (Ripple CEO Brad Garlinghouse recently denied that his company had pursued a Circle deal.) A distinctly contrary view of Circle's prospects was presented in the Financial Times last month. The article called into question Circle's whole business model, as '98 per cent of Circle's revenue is interest on the securities holdings which back its stablecoins … although it issues USDC and holds the offsetting assets, it's not generating revenue from trading or staking transactions involving the stablecoins in either the cryptoverse or the real world.' 'Financially, Circle is a highly levered, uninsured narrow bank with nearly all of its revenue coming from a big bucket of short-term cash investments. It makes money when rates are higher, up to a point, and makes less or loses money when rates are low. That makes Circle a market play on—or a plaything of—volatile short-term interest rates … This then brings us to the unanswerable question at the heart of Circle's business: Does anyone know where short-term interest rates will be in the future?' Back to the top ↑ Coinbase left its keys in San Francisco Coinbase must indeed be feeling flush, as it just announced a deal to lease 150,000 square-feet of new office space in San Franciso. The new space will automatically become the company's single largest geographical footprint and marks a homecoming of sorts for Coinbase, albeit one that's a little hard to fathom. In 2021, as the pandemic forced offices to temporarily close and many tech-firms switched to a remote-first staffing model, Coinbase paid $25 million to break the lease on its former San Francisco office space. At the time, the move was pitched as the company embracing a 'no headquarters' philosophy but it seems times (and philosophies) have changed. CEO Armstrong tweeted that Coinbase was 'excited to reopen an office in SF,' adding that the company 'never left California' as many of its employees live in the state and '[w]e go to where the talent is.' Addressing San Francisco Mayor Daniel Lurie, who was elected last year, Armstrong said the city was 'so badly run for many years, but your excellent work has not gone unnoticed.' Rival exchange Kraken also shut its SF headquarters in 2022 because founder/then-CEO Jesse Powell believed the city was 'not safe.' Efforts to reduce the city's crime rate got a potential boost from Ripple co-founder Chris Larsen, whose nonprofit group San Francisco Police Community Foundation has offered the SF Police Department a $9.4 million donation to improve the SFPD's Real Time Investigation Center. The gift comprises a $2.15 million retroactive lease of office space and $7.25 million worth of new toys, including nearly $5.3 million in drone surveillance gear. Larsen, a San Francisco native, previously donated millions to expand the city's security camera network, but controversies surround how some of these funds were allocated. Mayor Lurie has indicated he's in favor of allowing the police to accept the donation. We suspect Coinbase's Armstrong is, as well. After all, there's some dangerous teenagers out there who've put a target on his head. Back to the top ↑ Watch: Teranode is the digital backbone of Bitcoin title="YouTube video player" frameborder="0" allow="accelerometer; autoplay; clipboard-write; encrypted-media; gyroscope; picture-in-picture; web-share" referrerpolicy="strict-origin-when-cross-origin" allowfullscreen="">

What do Aberdeen need in transfer window?
What do Aberdeen need in transfer window?

BBC News

timean hour ago

  • BBC News

What do Aberdeen need in transfer window?

The transfer window opened on Sunday - albeit for 10 days initially, mainly so sides competing in the Club World Cup can get early business done - before reopening for the rest of the summer on 16 have already been active this summer, with Australian winger Nicolas Milanovic on his way from Western Sydney Wanderers and goalkeeper Nick Suman signed from Cove there still an area of the squad that needs improving, or certain players you are desperate for the Dons to sign? Or maybe holding on to a key player is the biggest priority?And what about departures? Jamie McGrath and Jack MacKenzie have gone, but does anyone else need to go?Let us know here

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store