Ford government used code words to make it 'unduly difficult' to search Greenbelt records: report
Social Sharing
Ontario Premier Doug Ford's government broke its legal, record-keeping obligations amid its now-reversed decision to open up parts of the protected Greenbelt lands for housing, the province's information and privacy commissioner has found.
Political staff were using code words to thwart document requests and left a surprisingly small paper trail for such a consequential policy, Commissioner Patricia Kosseim wrote as part of her annual report.
A number of freedom-of-information appeals her office received on Greenbelt-related requests revealed concerning, systemic issues, she wrote.
"The Greenbelt-related appeals offer a clear example and cautionary tale about the consequences of inadequate recordkeeping," the IPC report said.
"When key government decisions are not properly documented, when code words are used, or when records are stored in fragmented ways across personal and official systems, transparency suffers, and with it, public trust."
In addition to issues previously highlighted by the auditor general around political staff deleting Greenbelt emails and using personal accounts, the government sometimes used code words in communications.
Staffers sometimes referred to the Greenbelt project in messages as "special project," or "GB," or "G..," with references to G.. being next to impossible to find. Those terms and their inconsistent use made it "unduly difficult" to search for Greenbelt-related records, Kosseim wrote.
"Worse, the use of the code word "G.." made it virtually impossible to find relevant records, given that the asterisk ("..") is used as a technical wildcard when conducting text searches, returning any word starting with "G," she wrote.
That meant having to forego using the code word "G.." as a search term, so some Greenbelt records may have been missed, Kosseim wrote.
"These practices not only violate legal record-keeping obligations, they also erode public trust in the integrity of government decision-making," she wrote.
"The public has a fundamental right to know how and why decisions are made, especially those that impact protected lands like the Greenbelt. When records are obfuscated and made difficult, if not impossible, to find through evasive code words, transparency is compromised, and oversight becomes illusory."
But there was also a "surprising" lack of Greenbelt documentation at all, which undermines transparency, Kosseim found.
"The near-total absence of decision-making documentation is particularly concerning, especially on a file as high profile and consequential as changes to the Greenbelt," the report said.
"Despite evidence of meetings and discussions involving premier's office staff and ministry staff about the Greenbelt, there was very little documentation of what was said or decided in those conversations, aside from a few contemporaneous notes taken by ministry staff."
The RCMP is in the midst of an investigation into the government's decision to remove 15 parcels of land from the Greenbelt to remove 50,000 homes — a process the auditor general and integrity commissioner have found favoured certain developers.
Premier Doug Ford's office says the government has taken several steps to strengthen record-keeping practices, including reminding staff to preserve and manage records in accordance with requirements and holding training sessions, and will continue to comply with legal obligations.
NDP Leader Marit Stiles said "enough is enough," because the last time political staff were found to be deleting government records, one went to jail.
A top aide to former premier Dalton McGuinty was convicted of illegal use of a computer relating to his destruction of potentially embarrassing documents about the Liberal government's costly decision to cancel two gas plants before the 2011 provincial election.
Stiles said there should be consequences for these new failings.
"When will the premier finally answer for the disturbing culture of dodging accountability and disappearing records within this government?" she wrote in a statement.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
CBC
40 minutes ago
- CBC
N.B. legal aid commission to review eligibility criteria in wake of auditor general report
The New Brunswick legal aid commission says it is proud of the service it provides, despite the auditor general's recent finding that some people might not be getting the help they need under eight-year-old eligibility criteria. In the last fiscal year, the Legal Aid Services Commission provided services in family and criminal law to more than 31,000 clients — 4,000 more than in the previous year, said Chantal Landry, the commission executive director. But Landry doesn't disagree with concerns raised by Auditor General Paul Martin about eligibility requirements. "We do recognize that, given the economic realities and the inflation observed in the last few years, it would be appropriate for a review of the financial eligibility grids, and we take no exception to the recommendation made by Mr. Martin on this." Martin reviewed the efficiency and effectiveness of the commission in providing legal aid across the province between April 1, 2023, and Dec. 31, 2024. His report was released earlier this week. Martin commended the commission for a number of things, including the timely processing of applications and the consistent application of financial eligibility criteria. But he found the "lack of timely review of the eligibility grid may contribute to the risk that [the commission] may not be fulfilling its mandate to serve low-income individuals as intended." Landry said an "appropriate analysis" is to be done, but if it determines an increased need for legal aid, the commission needs to be "properly resourced" to meet it. Before the current eligibility grid for legal aid was adopted, eligibility was decided based on a means test that looked at the amount of disposable income an applicant had left at the end of each month. "It was a very convoluted and very, honestly, inequitable system, because for clients who were financially responsible, they typically didn't qualify," Landry said. The income grid used now is based on gross household income. For example, according to the grid posted in 2017, a single-person household making more than $2,600 per month is not eligible for legal aid. Landry said the reason the criteria haven't been reviewed in eight years is that there were other priorities and an increase in clients coming through the door. In Martin's report, he also found no formalized financial appeals process, and people who did appeal were not treated consistently. The audit found that of the 140 appeals, 14 applicants were approved with an income of more than 10 per cent above the threshold, while 15 were denied despite their income being within 10 per cent of the threshold. Landry said that in recent years, the commission looked at accepting people who were just above the eligibility cut-off and appealed being denied aid. "We developed kind of a discretionary standard of accepting a client if their income was within 10 per cent over the top of the grid," said Landry. "So to address the recommendation of Mr. Martin, we've already put in place some directives to staff, and we will further develop processes to provide more transparency for clients who will want to appeal under this guideline." Landry said she understands why there needs to be more process in that particular system, and hopes it will be achieved in the near future. Landry said she was pleased with the positive comments that came out of the auditor general's report, but said there's always room for improvement in any program.
National Post
an hour ago
- National Post
Ontario Unions to Picket Ford Fest in Solidarity with WSIB Strike
Article content ETOBICOKE, Ontario — Members of the Ontario Compensation Employees Union (OCEU/CUPE 1750), currently on strike, will be joined by the Ontario Public Service Employees Union (OPSEU/SEFPO), and other labour organizations today, June 13 th, at Ford Fest 2025 in Centennial Park, Etobicoke. Article content The coordinated action comes as striking WSIB frontline staff enter over three weeks on the picket line, demanding fair wages, job security, and safer working conditions. With the Ford government continuing to ignore workers' calls and outsourcing Ontario jobs to the U.S., union solidarity is growing, and now it's going straight to the Premier's doorstep. Article content Article content Friday's picket action at Ford Fest aims to shine a spotlight on a broader crisis: the Ford government's pattern of attacking workers, undermining unions, and weakening the public services Ontarians rely on. Harry Goslin, President of OCEU/CUPE 1750 will join the Ontario Federal of Labour and unions across the province to demand action from the Government. Article content Where: Article content When: Article content Friday, June 13, 2025 5:00 p.m.- 9:00 p.m. Article content 'While the Premier throws a party to celebrate his government, thousands of frontline public service workers are being disrespected, underpaid, and pushed to the brink,' said Harry Goslin, President of OCEU/CUPE 1750. 'We're here to remind Premier Doug Ford that public service workers keep this province running, and we won't be silent while he tears it down.' Article content Article content Article content Article content Article content Contacts Article content For more information, please contact: Article content Article content Article content
CBC
an hour ago
- CBC
Leaseholder of Whitehorse's 'purple cabin' back in court, appealing order to vacate
The fate of a building in downtown Whitehorse known as the "purple cabin" is, once again, before the court. Lawyer Vincent Larochelle, who's representing the cabin's owner Len Tarka and tenant Eric DeLong, said during an appeal court hearing Wednesday that the terms of a decades-old contract were as ambiguous at the time of signing as they are now — a claim the territory's counsel hotly contests. In 2021, the Yukon government sued Tarka and DeLong after they refused to vacate the property. Tarka had been renting the property from the government for $100 per year for a term of "30 years, or the life of the Lessee" since Oct. 1, 1991. The government said Tarka's lease had expired, but Tarka's interpretation of the agreement was that the property was his to rent for life. In a decision last year, Supreme Court Justice Karen Wenckebach sided with the government, and ordered Tarka and DeLong to vacate by December 2024. Tarka and DeLong asked the court to throw out that decision. The appeal court granted a temporary stay of that vacancy order until a final decision on the appeal is made. During Wednesday's appeal hearing, Larochelle argued that Wenckebach ignored context, relying only on what's written into the 1991 contract. Compounding things, Larochelle said, is that Tarka was offered a life estate lease in early discussions with the government in the 1980s, and that's why Tarka was under the impression that the lease agreement was life-long. He says the government "created ambiguity." "What else could it possibly mean by 'life,'" Larochelle said. "Don't say life estate if you don't mean life." Larochelle argues that if the lease was only 30 years, Tarka may not have invested roughly $3,000 in improving the property before the 1991 contract was signed. Among other things, Larochelle said Tarka paid for land surveys. The Yukon government's lawyer Kimberly Sova disagreed with the appellants in her submissions on Wednesday. Sova said it was unlikely that Tarka was offered a life estate lease, because the territory's lands legislation caps leases at 30 years with room to extend. If the overseeing minister diverted from the rules, there would have been some acknowledgement of that, Sova said. Sova also argued that communication prior to the lease agreement should not be legally binding. Sova suggested that Tarka did not have any legal right to the property before signing that lease, since he was applying under the territory's squatter policy. She also said the early correspondence concerning a life estate lease were suggestions, not promises. She said policies change all the time after the government has taken feedback from residents. Three judges from B.C. heard the appeal. They reserved their decision.
