Aussie council calls to lock out tourists from popular island: 'We need to do something'
The local West Australian mayor told Yahoo authorities are open to 'every option' to protect penguins on the island visited by 130,000 people annually.
The council is considering the closure of Penguin Island after a shocking decline in its penguin population. Source: Penguin Island
A popular Aussie island could be closing its doors to the public for good as conservationists and the local council push to protect the native penguin species living there.
Estimates suggest the little penguins have suffered a 94 per cent decline in their population since 2007 on the aptly named Penguin Island, situated off the Perth coast, approximately 660 metres from Shoalwater on the mainland. It's believed just over 100 penguins now remain on the tiny island.
Mayor of the governing City of Rockingham, Deb Hamblin, confirmed to Yahoo News a notice of motion was recently set by the council and it is "doing the very best" to safeguard the native species.
"Our penguin numbers are really diminishing... we need to do something about it," Hamblin told Yahoo News, confirming she has recently written to Western Australia's Premier and the Minister for the Environment to notify both of the issue.
Authorities 'grasping at straws' to protect native penguin species
A board of advisors, which Deb Hamblin is on, is due to meet at the end of the month and discuss what can be done to protect the little penguin species. Many locals and members of the council hope the decision will be made to close Penguin Island off to tourists and the wider general public.
ADVERTISEMENT
"I think we really need to look at absolutely every option," Hamblin said. "The advisory group, which has scientists from across the entire country, are ready to come back with recommendations around not just access to the island, but breeding patterns, and looking at their food sources, a whole range of those things. I think people are just grasping at straws so they'll try anything at the moment."
More than 130,000 people visit Penguin Island every year.
It's believed there are approximately 114 little penguins left on the island. Source: City of Rockingham council
Push to close off Penguin Island not supported by everyone
Others believe closing off the island to the general public will not be the solution people hope, with Corey Bradshaw — a Flinders University Professor who specialises in extinction risk in small populations — previously telling Yahoo News unless people are physically touching the animals, it's unlikely closing access will help.
ADVERTISEMENT
"[Banning tourists] might help reduce disturbance somewhat, [but it] depends how close they're allowed to get," he said. "It won't reverse trends, [and] unless the tourists are actually handling penguins, or disturbing breeding sites, their impact is likely minor."
He suspects overfishing and prey changes from climate change are instead responsible.
Do you have a story tip? Email: newsroomau@yahoonews.com.
You can also follow us on Facebook, Instagram, TikTok, Twitter and YouTube.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
4 hours ago
- Yahoo
6 Ways to Support LGBTQ+ Youth for Pride Month (and Beyond)
This article may contain affiliate links that Yahoo and/or the publisher may receive a commission from if you buy a product or service through those links. June 1 marks the beginning of Pride Month, a celebration of the LGBTQ+ community that includes parades, festivals, and other community-building events. Pride Month acknowledges the contributions of the LGBTQ+ community as well as their struggles throughout history for equal rights and opportunities. Pride Month gives parents and caregivers a chance to discuss LGBTQ+ issues with kids in an age- and stage-appropriate way, to celebrate your own household if you are a part of the LGBTQ+ community, to show support for the community, and to establish yourself as an ally, especially if you care for a child who identifies as LGBTQ+. Here are some ways to support LGBTQ+ youth during Pride Month and beyond. Pride month events are joyful celebrations of the community, and there are often plenty of family-friendly opportunities to engage with throughout the month. For example, in our community, there are Pride Month Maker's Markets and a celebration at our local botanical garden. Research events in advance to make sure they are truly family-friendly, and then make a plan to attend and support those events with your family. No matter how your own family is structured, showing support for LGBTQ+ folks models acceptance and inclusion to your kids. If your child or their friends use chosen pronouns or a name that was not assigned to them at birth, make an effort to accept that as part of their identity, and use their preferred pronouns and names as much as possible. Be honest with your child if this is challenging for you, and let them know that, even if you don't always get it right, you are trying to do your best. If you care for a child who is LGBTQ+, educate yourself and them about LGBTQ+ history in a safe, age-appropriate way. Share with your children the many diverse family structures and gender identities that exist and affirm that they are all valid. Visit your local library to find books on specific subjects related to LGBTQ+ history (examples include Stonewall: A Building, an Uprising, a Revolution and Rainbow Revolutionaries: 50 LGBTQ+ People Who Made History. And if you're an educator, check out GLSEN for more resources. LGBTQ+ youth face a lot of challenges, and it's important to make sure they find supportive environments for asking questions, sharing their feelings, and connecting with friends and allies. Look for organizations that support LGBTQ+ youth, and facilitate your child attending meetups and support groups. In addition to local groups, national organizations like The Trevor Project, The LGBT National Help Center, and Trans Lifeline offer support for folks across the country. Find therapists and mental health providers who can support your child with ongoing therapy as needed to help them develop tools to navigate the world around them. Supporting LGBTQ+ youth means standing up for their rights, not just during Pride Month, but year-round. Practice affirming, non-discriminating behavior, challenge stereotypes, and stand alongside the LGBTQ+ community in your daily actions and political activities to show that you are fully committed and invested. Find organizations that are already doing this work, either in your own community or nationally, and support them by donating your time and, if possible, making financial contributions. People all want the same basic things — to be heard, seen, and loved — and this is especially important for kids. Devote specific, quality time to listening to your children, no matter where they are on their gender and sexuality journey. Create safe, private time in which they can ask you about anything, and make an effort to answer honestly. If you don't know the answer to a question, show them how to do the research to educate themselves. Ask them questions to better understand their perspective, and be an active listener. Let them know that you are learning and growing, just like they are, and most importantly, express to them that you love them for who they are, unconditionally. These 15 Kids' Storage Beds Have Hidden Depths The 14 Best Costco Items to Buy for Quick Family Meals The Best Zipper Sheets to Solve the Worst Bed-Making Task
Yahoo
13 hours ago
- Yahoo
My husband and I forgot how to be a team after having kids. These 4 steps saved our marriage.
The founders of the popular parenting platform Big Little Feelings — moms and real-life best friends Deena Margolin, a child therapist specializing in interpersonal neurobiology, and Kristin Gallant, a parenting coach with a background in maternal and child education — are back with more parenting wisdom in Yahoo's new column called , a companion to their podcast, After Bedtime With Big Little Feelings. In the third episode of their show, Margolin and her husband open up about how communication, or a lack thereof, played a role in their marital challenges, including leading to feelings of resentment. Margolin reveals that she felt alone and unheard while her husband tended to overthink in isolation rather than talk things through. Margolin explains how their different communication styles set up roadblocks in their relationship and shares the four strategies that saved their marriage. Before kids, my husband and I rarely fought. We had different personalities, sure — me, more internal and emotional; him, more logical and reserved. But we clicked. We were in love. We knew how to laugh. We were a team. And then we had a baby. And then we quickly had another baby. Then somewhere between the 2 a.m. feeds, the cracked nipples, the mounting work deadlines and the Costco-size packs of diapers, we forgot how to be that team. We didn't yell. We didn't throw plates. But we didn't connect at all. In fact, we barely talked, at least not in a way that made either of us feel seen. I felt so alone in our relationship, and he felt like he couldn't win. And neither of us knew how to say or get what we really needed from each other. Here's the dangerous lie many couples fall into: 'If they really loved me, they'd just know what I need.' But here's the truth, both personally and professionally: Your partner is not a mind reader. And they never will be! I spent so much time feeling invisible, unheard and unsupported. I was carrying the entire mental load of parenting and managing our household, while also building a business and trying not to completely lose myself in motherhood. Meanwhile, my husband was doing all his problem-solving and decision making in his own head. So by the time he brought something to me, it was already fully formed: 'This is what I think we should do.' And I was sitting there, like: Wait. What about me? What about what I think? We weren't screaming at each other — we were slowly drifting. And what grew in that silence wasn't peace, it was resentment. Psychologist John Gottman refers to the 'four horsemen of the apocalypse' in relationships — criticism, contempt, stonewalling and defensiveness — and resentment can be a part of that. Once it's there, it poisons everything, which definitely was true for my relationship. When we're not talking openly and vulnerably and truly hearing each other, we make assumptions. We project stories. We stop being partners and start becoming adversaries. So, what actually helped us? Here's what finally started to shift things in our marriage — not overnight, but over time: Emotional intelligence is the ability to notice, name and regulate emotions, and it's one of the strongest predictors of relationship satisfaction (and yes, it can be learned!). My husband couldn't communicate because he didn't have the tools or even the language to do so. That's not a flaw. It's how a lot of men (and people) are raised. Emotions were never modeled or named in his home. He had to learn how to feel and speak. And well, I am a therapist, who had also been in therapy myself, so we had different skill sets. That had never really been a major issue for us until now, in this new chapter as parents. Therapy gave my husband that ability, and that gave us a starting place. I'm an external processor, so I like to 'walk the parking lot,' meaning talk it out in real time. My husband is an internal processor, so he loops through everything in his own mind before sharing. This used to make us clash, but now we name it and work with it. We know we need more check-ins, more intentional time and more conversations that are just about us. (Not the grocery list. Not the school calendar. Us.) We started being explicit and made invisible expectations visible. Here's what that looks like: 'I need you to tell me you see how hard I'm working right now.' 'I'm overwhelmed. Can we talk through who's doing what this week?' 'I don't want you to solve this. I just want you to listen.' And yes, it was awkward at first. But it was better than the guessing game. And research shows that couples who clearly state their needs and check in about expectations regularly have better conflict recovery and stronger emotional bonds. When we'd relied on spontaneity and hope that it would just 'figure itself out' when it came to chores, communication and more, we failed. We learned that when we had more structure, we succeeded more. We started a shared Google calendar. We wrote down the weekly division of labor. We scheduled time to actually talk without distractions and without phones. One of the biggest steps for us: We also gave each other alone time on purpose, so we could fill our own tanks and show up as a more grounded version of ourselves when together. Sure, scheduling isn't romantic, but it definitely saved us!
Yahoo
2 days ago
- Yahoo
Are dads doing enough? What the data tells us about the state of modern fatherhood.
As Father's Day approaches, American dads insist they're doing a lot more parenting than the men who raised them, according to a new Yahoo News/YouGov poll. Some dads even claim they're doing more than the women they're parenting with. Yet the survey of 1,560 U.S. adults also taps into the complexities and contradictions of contemporary fatherhood, revealing that even the most egalitarian dads might see themselves in ways that don't quite match up with how others see them. Their partners included. I know a little something about this. One of my duties as national correspondent for Yahoo News is to collaborate on our monthly polls with YouGov, a leading public-opinion firm. I write the questions, then analyze and report on the results. At the same time, my wife and I are trying our best to help our two kids — a 9-year-old girl and an 8-year-old boy — grow up to be good people. Like many other millennial parents — I just turned 43 — we aspire to contribute equally to that effort. And so I figured Father's Day would be as good a time as any to ask my fellow dads some of the questions I'm always asking myself. How much are we really doing these days? And is it enough? Gender roles are a perennial topic in the parenting world, and the general consensus is that even though more opposite-sex couples than ever believe in 50/50 parenting — and even though dads have become more involved over the years — moms still do most of the domestic labor. According to a 2023 study by the Pew Research Center, for example, wives in so-called egalitarian marriages — that is, couples where each partner earns about the same amount of money — still spend more than twice as much time on housework than their husbands, and almost two hours more per week on caregiving, including tending to children. 'Egalitarian' husbands, meanwhile, spend three-and-a-half more hours per week on 'leisure activities' than their wives. Yet there may be more to the data than meets the eye, at least based on the results of the new Yahoo News/YouGov poll. For one thing, nearly two-thirds of American dads (63%) now say they spend more time with their kids than their fathers spent with them — and a full 37% describe that generational difference as 'significant.' Dads feel like they're putting in the hours and making progress. What's more surprising, however, is that a third of fathers (34%) also say they carry more than half of their family's "mental load," while another four in 10 (39%) say they shoulder about half. Combined, that's roughly three-quarters of dads who believe the balance is either 50/50 or skewed in their direction. In contrast, just 28% of dads admit to bearing less than half (14%) or none (4%) of their family's mental load. It's fair to say those numbers contradict what researchers have found — and what most moms would tell us if we asked them the same questions about the fathers in their lives. When I shared the poll with my wife and asked how she would answer for me, we agreed on everything — except mental load. And when I told her how many dads seem to believe they shoulder at least half the mental load, she scoffed. My sense is that this disparity reveals a lot about the state of dads today. For the record, I don't really think I take on more of the mental load than my wife — not as the term is typically defined. But I also think the tasks we typically define as 'mental load' fail to fully capture what dads tend to contribute. Here's how the poll put it: 'Mental load refers to the cognitive and emotional effort involved in managing and coordinating household tasks, responsibilities and relationships. As a father, how much of your family's mental load do you believe you carry?' Again, nearly three out of four dads say they do half or more of this invisible labor — these hidden forms of care. Yet when asked which specific parenting responsibilities they 'regularly take on,' relatively few fathers with children aged 18 or younger pick things like 'make the kids' doctor appointments' (36%), 'sign up the kids for camps/school activities/lessons' (26%), 'schedule playdates with the kids' friends' (18%), 'volunteer for school activities' (15%) or 'book babysitters/child care' (10%) — i.e., the classic mental load stuff. Instead, these dads are much more inclined to say they "play with the kids" (72%), "help with homework" (54%), "take the kids on outings" (52%), 'put the kids to bed' (44%) and 'make dinner' (42%). So it's not like dads are deluded. When asked point-blank about their role — Who are your kids closer to? Who spends more time parenting? Who would your kids' school call first? — a majority of fathers answer either 'me' or 'it's about equal.' But an even larger majority answer either 'it's about equal' or 'their mother.' In other words, dads understand that the parenting scales still aren't perfectly balanced. Why, then, do so many dads seem to think that we're carrying more of the mental load than we get credit for? My guess is that we consider that category to be a little more capacious than our partners do. For the initial draft of the Yahoo News/YouGov Father Day's poll, my editors — both moms — floated a fairly narrow set of options for the 'parenting responsibilities' question: booking babysitters, volunteering at school, making doctor appointments and so on. I responded with some additional choices that 'might capture more of what most dads do': playing with the kids, going on outings, cleaning up after dinner, etc. I also told my editors that 'in general, I think mental load conversations miss things like this (even if they are more about household management than parenting, per se): take care of the house, take care of the yard, take care of the car, take care of the garbage, take care of the finances. We didn't end up asking dads about those duties. But looking back, I can't help but wonder if they would have polled even higher than, say, playing with the kids — and if they were the kinds of responsibilities our dad respondents had in mind when assessing their own share of the mental load. For me, I think the answer is yes. In 2010, I wrote an essay for Newsweek explaining why marriage mattered so much to me; it was a direct rebuttal to a piece by two of my female colleagues about why the institution is 'quite simply, no longer necessary." I agreed with my coworkers that all of marriage's 'antiquated ancillary benefits — its grubby socioeconomic justifications' — no longer really applied. But that, I argued, was 'the point.' 'Dustin and I are not 'getting anything' out of this deal,' I explained. 'Or at least we're not getting what previous generations of men and women were conditioned to expect. I'm not getting a cooking, cleaning, child-rearing machine. She's not getting a bringer-home of the bacon. I clean. Both of us cook. Sometimes, Dustin earns more money than I do. Sometimes she doesn't. We both go to work every day. We both have careers. And when we have children, we'll both take turns staying home to raise them. 'In other words,' I continued, 'our roles within the relationship are not defined by gender. They're defined by who we are as people. … In a world where the practical reasons for marriage no longer apply, the only reason left is love.' Fifteen years and two kids later, nearly every word of that essay still rings true to me. I do all of the laundry — and almost all of the cleaning. She packs lunches; I make dinner. She works longer hours. I drop off the kids at school in the morning, then pick them up in the afternoon. I coach their soccer teams. She plays with them more. We both read books at bedtime. But if I'm being honest with myself, our 'roles within the relationship' are still somewhat 'defined by gender.' As my wife was quick to point out when I shared the mental load results with her, she's the one who makes the doctor appointments, schedules the playdates, books the babysitters and signs up for summer camps. 'OK,' I said. 'But what about all the 'invisible labor' I do?' I mentioned the finances, the house, the yard, the car, the garbage. 'That doesn't have anything to do with parenting,' she responded. 'It's household management,' I responded. 'Someone has to do it.' 'But someone would have to do it even if we didn't have kids,' she said. I think we both have a point here. I feel like I'm doing about half of the hands-on parenting, plus a bunch of hidden work that keeps our lives running smoothly. She feels like she's doing about half of the hands-on parenting, plus a bunch of hidden work that keeps our kids' lives running smoothly. We've gravitated toward these roles — mine indirectly related to parenting, hers directly — because of gender. Or, more specifically, because of gender expectations. The truth is, I don't feel judged for not volunteering at school, or not packing a particularly healthy lunch, or not hosting a playdate. My wife does. She even judges herself. As a dad, I tend to feel OK about how much I do. As a mom, she tends to feel guilty for not doing more. We've inherited and internalized different standards of what it means to be a parent — and hers are higher. That's hard to shake. Egalitarian dads might think they're shouldering half of the mental load, or more. But as hard as we're lifting, most of us still don't know what that feels like. __________________ The Yahoo News survey was conducted by YouGov using a nationally representative sample of 1,560 U.S. adults interviewed online from May 22-27, 2025. The sample was weighted according to gender, age, race, education, 2024 election turnout and presidential vote, party identification and current voter registration status. Demographic weighting targets come from the 2019 American Community Survey. Party identification is weighted to the estimated distribution at the time of the election (31% Democratic, 32% Republican). Respondents were selected from YouGov's opt-in panel to be representative of all U.S. adults. The margin of error is approximately 2.9%.
