Kurdish PKK disbands and ends 40-year Turkey insurgency
The Kurdistan Workers Party (PKK) militant group, which has been locked in bloody conflict with Turkey for more than four decades, has decided to disband and end its armed struggle, group members and Turkish leaders say.
Since the PKK launched its insurgency in 1984 - originally with the aim of creating an independent Kurdish state - the conflict has killed more than 40,000 people, exerted a huge economic burden and fuelled social tensions.
The PKK's decision could boost NATO member Turkey's political and economic stability and encourage moves to ease tensions in neighbouring Iraq and also in Syria, where Kurdish forces are allied with US forces.While Ankara welcomed the decision to dissolve, it does not guarantee peace.
Rather it paves the way for agreeing to a tricky legal framework for securely disarming the PKK, which is designated a terrorist group by Turkey and its Western allies.
"The PKK 12th Congress decided to dissolve the PKK's organisational structure... and end the armed struggle," Firat news agency reported it as saying on Monday in the closing declaration of a congress held last week in northern Iraq, where the group is based.
A PKK official separately confirmed the decision and said all military operations would cease immediately, adding weapon handovers were contingent on Ankara's response and approach to Kurdish rights, and the fate of PKK fighters and leaders.
Kurds make up 20 per cent of Turkey's 86 million population.
The PKK held the congress in response to a February call to disband from its jailed leader Abdullah Ocalan, who has been imprisoned on an island south of Istanbul since 1999.
It said on Monday that he would manage the process.
However, it was not clear whether Ankara agreed to Ocalan's continued role, which polls suggest could be unpopular among Turks.
It was also unclear how the process would affect the Kurdish YPG militia in Syria.
YPG leads a US-allied force against Islamic State there and is regarded by Turkey as a PKK affiliate.
YPG has previously said Ocalan's call did not apply to it, contradicting Ankara's view.
It did not immediately comment on the PKK's announcement.
The disbanding will give President Recep Tayyip Erdogan a chance to boost development in Turkey's mainly Kurdish southeast, where the insurgency has impaired the regional economy for decades.
Turkey would take necessary measures to ensure smooth progress towards a "terror-free" country after the PKK decision, said the presidency's communications director, Fahrettin Altun.
In its statement, the PKK said it "has completed its historic mission", which over the years shifted to seeking greater Kurdish rights and limited autonomy in southeast Turkey, rather than an independent state.
"The PKK struggle has broken the policy of denial and annihilation of our people and brought the Kurdish issue to a point of solving it through democratic politics," it said on the Firat website.
The PKK decision comes amid tumult in Turkish politics: Istanbul's opposition mayor Ekrem Imamoglu, Erdogan's main challenger, was jailed in March pending corruption charges in a move that sparked the country's largest protests in a decade.
There have been intermittent peace efforts over the years, most notably a ceasefire between 2013 and 2015 that ultimately collapsed.
Ending the insurgency would remove a constant flashpoint in Kurdish-run, oil-rich northern Iraq, while facilitating efforts by Syria's new administration to assert greater sway over areas in northern Syria controlled by Kurdish forces.
Ocalan's call was prompted by a surprise proposal in October by Devlet Bahceli, Erdogan's ultra-nationalist ally.
It had been welcomed by the United States, the European Union and also by Iraq and Iran, which have significant Kurdish populations.
The Kurdistan Workers Party (PKK) militant group, which has been locked in bloody conflict with Turkey for more than four decades, has decided to disband and end its armed struggle, group members and Turkish leaders say.
Since the PKK launched its insurgency in 1984 - originally with the aim of creating an independent Kurdish state - the conflict has killed more than 40,000 people, exerted a huge economic burden and fuelled social tensions.
The PKK's decision could boost NATO member Turkey's political and economic stability and encourage moves to ease tensions in neighbouring Iraq and also in Syria, where Kurdish forces are allied with US forces.While Ankara welcomed the decision to dissolve, it does not guarantee peace.
Rather it paves the way for agreeing to a tricky legal framework for securely disarming the PKK, which is designated a terrorist group by Turkey and its Western allies.
"The PKK 12th Congress decided to dissolve the PKK's organisational structure... and end the armed struggle," Firat news agency reported it as saying on Monday in the closing declaration of a congress held last week in northern Iraq, where the group is based.
A PKK official separately confirmed the decision and said all military operations would cease immediately, adding weapon handovers were contingent on Ankara's response and approach to Kurdish rights, and the fate of PKK fighters and leaders.
Kurds make up 20 per cent of Turkey's 86 million population.
The PKK held the congress in response to a February call to disband from its jailed leader Abdullah Ocalan, who has been imprisoned on an island south of Istanbul since 1999.
It said on Monday that he would manage the process.
However, it was not clear whether Ankara agreed to Ocalan's continued role, which polls suggest could be unpopular among Turks.
It was also unclear how the process would affect the Kurdish YPG militia in Syria.
YPG leads a US-allied force against Islamic State there and is regarded by Turkey as a PKK affiliate.
YPG has previously said Ocalan's call did not apply to it, contradicting Ankara's view.
It did not immediately comment on the PKK's announcement.
The disbanding will give President Recep Tayyip Erdogan a chance to boost development in Turkey's mainly Kurdish southeast, where the insurgency has impaired the regional economy for decades.
Turkey would take necessary measures to ensure smooth progress towards a "terror-free" country after the PKK decision, said the presidency's communications director, Fahrettin Altun.
In its statement, the PKK said it "has completed its historic mission", which over the years shifted to seeking greater Kurdish rights and limited autonomy in southeast Turkey, rather than an independent state.
"The PKK struggle has broken the policy of denial and annihilation of our people and brought the Kurdish issue to a point of solving it through democratic politics," it said on the Firat website.
The PKK decision comes amid tumult in Turkish politics: Istanbul's opposition mayor Ekrem Imamoglu, Erdogan's main challenger, was jailed in March pending corruption charges in a move that sparked the country's largest protests in a decade.
There have been intermittent peace efforts over the years, most notably a ceasefire between 2013 and 2015 that ultimately collapsed.
Ending the insurgency would remove a constant flashpoint in Kurdish-run, oil-rich northern Iraq, while facilitating efforts by Syria's new administration to assert greater sway over areas in northern Syria controlled by Kurdish forces.
Ocalan's call was prompted by a surprise proposal in October by Devlet Bahceli, Erdogan's ultra-nationalist ally.
It had been welcomed by the United States, the European Union and also by Iraq and Iran, which have significant Kurdish populations.
The Kurdistan Workers Party (PKK) militant group, which has been locked in bloody conflict with Turkey for more than four decades, has decided to disband and end its armed struggle, group members and Turkish leaders say.
Since the PKK launched its insurgency in 1984 - originally with the aim of creating an independent Kurdish state - the conflict has killed more than 40,000 people, exerted a huge economic burden and fuelled social tensions.
The PKK's decision could boost NATO member Turkey's political and economic stability and encourage moves to ease tensions in neighbouring Iraq and also in Syria, where Kurdish forces are allied with US forces.While Ankara welcomed the decision to dissolve, it does not guarantee peace.
Rather it paves the way for agreeing to a tricky legal framework for securely disarming the PKK, which is designated a terrorist group by Turkey and its Western allies.
"The PKK 12th Congress decided to dissolve the PKK's organisational structure... and end the armed struggle," Firat news agency reported it as saying on Monday in the closing declaration of a congress held last week in northern Iraq, where the group is based.
A PKK official separately confirmed the decision and said all military operations would cease immediately, adding weapon handovers were contingent on Ankara's response and approach to Kurdish rights, and the fate of PKK fighters and leaders.
Kurds make up 20 per cent of Turkey's 86 million population.
The PKK held the congress in response to a February call to disband from its jailed leader Abdullah Ocalan, who has been imprisoned on an island south of Istanbul since 1999.
It said on Monday that he would manage the process.
However, it was not clear whether Ankara agreed to Ocalan's continued role, which polls suggest could be unpopular among Turks.
It was also unclear how the process would affect the Kurdish YPG militia in Syria.
YPG leads a US-allied force against Islamic State there and is regarded by Turkey as a PKK affiliate.
YPG has previously said Ocalan's call did not apply to it, contradicting Ankara's view.
It did not immediately comment on the PKK's announcement.
The disbanding will give President Recep Tayyip Erdogan a chance to boost development in Turkey's mainly Kurdish southeast, where the insurgency has impaired the regional economy for decades.
Turkey would take necessary measures to ensure smooth progress towards a "terror-free" country after the PKK decision, said the presidency's communications director, Fahrettin Altun.
In its statement, the PKK said it "has completed its historic mission", which over the years shifted to seeking greater Kurdish rights and limited autonomy in southeast Turkey, rather than an independent state.
"The PKK struggle has broken the policy of denial and annihilation of our people and brought the Kurdish issue to a point of solving it through democratic politics," it said on the Firat website.
The PKK decision comes amid tumult in Turkish politics: Istanbul's opposition mayor Ekrem Imamoglu, Erdogan's main challenger, was jailed in March pending corruption charges in a move that sparked the country's largest protests in a decade.
There have been intermittent peace efforts over the years, most notably a ceasefire between 2013 and 2015 that ultimately collapsed.
Ending the insurgency would remove a constant flashpoint in Kurdish-run, oil-rich northern Iraq, while facilitating efforts by Syria's new administration to assert greater sway over areas in northern Syria controlled by Kurdish forces.
Ocalan's call was prompted by a surprise proposal in October by Devlet Bahceli, Erdogan's ultra-nationalist ally.
It had been welcomed by the United States, the European Union and also by Iraq and Iran, which have significant Kurdish populations.
The Kurdistan Workers Party (PKK) militant group, which has been locked in bloody conflict with Turkey for more than four decades, has decided to disband and end its armed struggle, group members and Turkish leaders say.
Since the PKK launched its insurgency in 1984 - originally with the aim of creating an independent Kurdish state - the conflict has killed more than 40,000 people, exerted a huge economic burden and fuelled social tensions.
The PKK's decision could boost NATO member Turkey's political and economic stability and encourage moves to ease tensions in neighbouring Iraq and also in Syria, where Kurdish forces are allied with US forces.While Ankara welcomed the decision to dissolve, it does not guarantee peace.
Rather it paves the way for agreeing to a tricky legal framework for securely disarming the PKK, which is designated a terrorist group by Turkey and its Western allies.
"The PKK 12th Congress decided to dissolve the PKK's organisational structure... and end the armed struggle," Firat news agency reported it as saying on Monday in the closing declaration of a congress held last week in northern Iraq, where the group is based.
A PKK official separately confirmed the decision and said all military operations would cease immediately, adding weapon handovers were contingent on Ankara's response and approach to Kurdish rights, and the fate of PKK fighters and leaders.
Kurds make up 20 per cent of Turkey's 86 million population.
The PKK held the congress in response to a February call to disband from its jailed leader Abdullah Ocalan, who has been imprisoned on an island south of Istanbul since 1999.
It said on Monday that he would manage the process.
However, it was not clear whether Ankara agreed to Ocalan's continued role, which polls suggest could be unpopular among Turks.
It was also unclear how the process would affect the Kurdish YPG militia in Syria.
YPG leads a US-allied force against Islamic State there and is regarded by Turkey as a PKK affiliate.
YPG has previously said Ocalan's call did not apply to it, contradicting Ankara's view.
It did not immediately comment on the PKK's announcement.
The disbanding will give President Recep Tayyip Erdogan a chance to boost development in Turkey's mainly Kurdish southeast, where the insurgency has impaired the regional economy for decades.
Turkey would take necessary measures to ensure smooth progress towards a "terror-free" country after the PKK decision, said the presidency's communications director, Fahrettin Altun.
In its statement, the PKK said it "has completed its historic mission", which over the years shifted to seeking greater Kurdish rights and limited autonomy in southeast Turkey, rather than an independent state.
"The PKK struggle has broken the policy of denial and annihilation of our people and brought the Kurdish issue to a point of solving it through democratic politics," it said on the Firat website.
The PKK decision comes amid tumult in Turkish politics: Istanbul's opposition mayor Ekrem Imamoglu, Erdogan's main challenger, was jailed in March pending corruption charges in a move that sparked the country's largest protests in a decade.
There have been intermittent peace efforts over the years, most notably a ceasefire between 2013 and 2015 that ultimately collapsed.
Ending the insurgency would remove a constant flashpoint in Kurdish-run, oil-rich northern Iraq, while facilitating efforts by Syria's new administration to assert greater sway over areas in northern Syria controlled by Kurdish forces.
Ocalan's call was prompted by a surprise proposal in October by Devlet Bahceli, Erdogan's ultra-nationalist ally.
It had been welcomed by the United States, the European Union and also by Iraq and Iran, which have significant Kurdish populations.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
West Australian
21 hours ago
- West Australian
Agriculture key sticking point in EU trade negotiations
Agriculture has continued to be the main sticking point in free trade negotiations with the EU overnight, NewsWire understands. Both Canberra and Brussels have said a free-trade agreement is on the brink of being inked, with unpredictability from the US instilling a sense of urgency on both sides. Such a deal would give Australian producers uninhibited access to the EU – 27 member states with a combined population of half a billion. But agriculture is a politically charged issue for many in the bloc, with farmers fearing increased competition and regions claiming exclusivity on the names of certain products, such as feta and prosecco. These so-called geographical indicators were central to derailing previous free trade talks at the end of 2023. NewsWire understands agriculture was presented as a must-have during negotiations on the sidelines of a major trade summit in Paris. Trade Minister Don Farrell, who is spearheading the talks, said a deal would 'deliver benefits across every sector of the Australian economy'. 'This is a once-in-a-generation opportunity to secure access to the world's largest single market and deepen ties with a vital economic partner,' Senator Farrell said. 'A trade agreement with the EU isn't just about boosting exports, it's about building economic resilience in a rapidly changing global environment. 'A trade deal with the EU would deliver benefits across every sector of the Australian economy. 'It would drive investment, strengthen supply chains, boost innovation, deepen education ties, lower costs for Australian consumers and business, and create a wealth of export opportunities. 'Both Australia and the EU recognise that now is the time to strengthen our economic partnership, and we're working through the remaining issues to try and finalise the deal.' Anthony Albanese also met with EU leaders, including Ursula von der Leyen, when he was in Rome last month for Pope Leo XIV's inauguration. The Prime Minister raised trade negotiations with the EU Commission president, who said 'Australia and Europe are reliable partners'. 'We are predictable, we share the same values as you just said, so we can offer to each other stability and we're very grateful for that,' Ms von der Leyen told reporters at the time. 'And this is the reason also that we do not only see you as a trading partner, but we see you as a strategic partner, and we would very much like to broaden this strategic partnership.' The impetus for getting a deal across the line has been fuelled by Donald Trump's tariffs. Australia and the EU, both key US allies, have been included in baseline blanket 10 per cent levies on foreign imports as well the 50 per cent duties on steel and aluminium. The US President doubled the steel and aluminium imposts on Wednesday, drawing ire from other Western governments. A Department of Foreign Affairs and Trade spokesperson said DFAT was 'engaging with industry and assessing the potential impact of the increased tariffs'. 'We continue to advocate for Australian trade with the US and put forward our strong case to be exempt from these tariffs,' they told NewsWire. Senator Farrell said the tariffs were 'unjustified'. 'Australia's position has been consistent and clear,' he said. 'These tariffs are unjustified and not the act of a friend. 'They are an act of economic self-harm that will only hurt consumers and businesses who rely on free and fair trade. 'We will continue to engage and advocate strongly for the removal of the tariffs.' Senator Farrell also met with his US counterpart in Paris.
Sydney Morning Herald
a day ago
- Sydney Morning Herald
Trump flags Russian retaliation, plays down peace talks after Putin call
On Wednesday, shortly before Trump posted about his call with Putin, Zelensky said he was ready to meet with Putin, as well as Trump and Turkish President Recep Tayyip Erdogan, to discuss a potential memorandum – as opposed to what he characterised as a Russian 'ultimatum' for a ceasefire issued on Monday (Tuesday AEST). 'Russians are behaving like thimble-riggers. They do not want deescalation or an end to the war. They pretend to be constructive, but their games are only aimed at delaying US sanctions,' Zelensky said in a statement on X. He proposed a meeting starting as soon as Monday, at any workable location, and a concurrent ceasefire, and said he would be grateful if Trump supported the idea. 'When we meet it will become clear if there is will for deescalation. If no, the ceasefire will end on the same day,' Zelensky said. Putin, however, showed no willingness to meet with Zelensky, expressing anger Wednesday about what he said were Ukraine's recent 'terrorist acts' on Russian rail lines in the Kursk and Bryansk regions on the countries' border. 'How can any such meetings be conducted in such circumstances? What shall we talk about?' Putin asked in a video call with top Russian officials. Trump gave no explicit indication in the account of his phone call with Putin as to whether they had discussed such a meeting, or a similar initiative. Their conversation came as Congress grows increasingly impatient to impose additional sanctions on Russia, including 500 per cent tariffs on US trading partners who buy Russian oil. Legislation to that effect has the support of at least 82 members of the 100-seat US Senate. Loading A Ukrainian delegation was due to meet senators on Wednesday, local time, to discuss the sanctions bill. 'It's a pivotal moment in Ukraine and crunch time for the Senate on this bill,' Democratic senator and bill co-sponsor Richard Blumenthal told Politico. Eddie Fishman, a senior research scholar at Columbia University's School of International Affairs, argued in a new essay for Foreign Affairs that Trump's Russia policy was 'at a dead end' and it was time to pull the trigger on sanctions. Rather than extreme tariffs on third countries, Fishman proposed sanctions enabling them to gradually reduce imports of Russian oil and pay the money into escrow accounts that could only be used for humanitarian goods. This was based on a sanctions regime Barack Obama used against Iran.
The Age
a day ago
- The Age
Trump flags Russian retaliation, plays down peace talks after Putin call
On Wednesday, shortly before Trump posted about his call with Putin, Zelensky said he was ready to meet with Putin, as well as Trump and Turkish President Recep Tayyip Erdogan, to discuss a potential memorandum – as opposed to what he characterised as a Russian 'ultimatum' for a ceasefire issued on Monday (Tuesday AEST). 'Russians are behaving like thimble-riggers. They do not want deescalation or an end to the war. They pretend to be constructive, but their games are only aimed at delaying US sanctions,' Zelensky said in a statement on X. He proposed a meeting starting as soon as Monday, at any workable location, and a concurrent ceasefire, and said he would be grateful if Trump supported the idea. 'When we meet it will become clear if there is will for deescalation. If no, the ceasefire will end on the same day,' Zelensky said. Putin, however, showed no willingness to meet with Zelensky, expressing anger Wednesday about what he said were Ukraine's recent 'terrorist acts' on Russian rail lines in the Kursk and Bryansk regions on the countries' border. 'How can any such meetings be conducted in such circumstances? What shall we talk about?' Putin asked in a video call with top Russian officials. Trump gave no explicit indication in the account of his phone call with Putin as to whether they had discussed such a meeting, or a similar initiative. Their conversation came as Congress grows increasingly impatient to impose additional sanctions on Russia, including 500 per cent tariffs on US trading partners who buy Russian oil. Legislation to that effect has the support of at least 82 members of the 100-seat US Senate. Loading A Ukrainian delegation was due to meet senators on Wednesday, local time, to discuss the sanctions bill. 'It's a pivotal moment in Ukraine and crunch time for the Senate on this bill,' Democratic senator and bill co-sponsor Richard Blumenthal told Politico. Eddie Fishman, a senior research scholar at Columbia University's School of International Affairs, argued in a new essay for Foreign Affairs that Trump's Russia policy was 'at a dead end' and it was time to pull the trigger on sanctions. Rather than extreme tariffs on third countries, Fishman proposed sanctions enabling them to gradually reduce imports of Russian oil and pay the money into escrow accounts that could only be used for humanitarian goods. This was based on a sanctions regime Barack Obama used against Iran.
