Mind boggling ... experts turn blind eye to tragedy in Gaza
Ehud Olmert, former Israeli Prime Minister (2006–2009), wrote in an article published in Haaretz, 'What we are doing in Gaza is a war of destruction, indiscriminate killing, and crimes against civilians, all carried out as a result of a government policy dictated by malice, and a lack of sense of responsibility. Yes, we are committing 'war crimes.'
How can Netanyahu openly say that Gaza must be starved and that two million people should be deprived of basic human needs? Yes, there are 'terrorists', and we must fight them, but what the government is doing is not a war on Hamas. Rather, it increasingly looks like a political war waged by a prime minister and a group of thugs representing the Israeli government.'
Israeli Jewish historian and intellectual Ilan Pappe asked, 'Why do intellectuals become fools when they defend Israel? It is surprising to see senior academics, politicians, and journalists continue to support the current Israeli government. These are highly educated, knowledgeable people on virtually every global issue, and we respect their expertise and perspectives. Yet, when it comes to Israel, we are forced to ask - How can some of the most capable and informed among them be so blind as to uncritically echo the Israeli narrative, without criticism or questioning, despite the critical thinking they apply elsewhere? This phenomenon demands serious investigation. We call it moral stupidity. It is unbelievable and utterly foolish. 'The Germans are particularly notable in this regard. I don't know if anyone has truly engaged with German intellectuals about why they still back Israel. It is deeply embarrassing and calls for careful analysis and understanding. It's as if they are willing to humiliate themselves while believing they are intellectuals, researchers, and journalists, yet they choose to appease a state that commits daily aggression against other people.'
In a powerful speech to the Security Council about the situation in Gaza, American trauma surgeon Dr. Feroz Sidhwa shared his firsthand experience witnessing the severe impact on Gaza's healthcare system during his medical missions to Khan Yunis. He said, 'I am not here as a policymaker, but as a doctor who has seen the destruction of healthcare infrastructure, the targeting of medical personnel, and the suffering of an entire community.' Dr. Sidhwa described performing surgeries under extremely difficult conditions, including operating on unsanitary floors without adequate anesthesia, and treating children suffering from preventable conditions due to restricted access to medical supplies. He also recounted caring for pregnant women with severe injuries.
Dr. Sidhwa revealed that 83 percent of American medical personnel in Gaza reported treating children with gunshot wounds to the head or chest. 'This is not a failure of the system. It has been systematically dismantled through violations of international law,' he stated. He also condemned the man-made famine that is now claiming more civilian lives than the bombs. His testimony culminated in the March 18 mass casualty incident at Nasser Hospital, where 221 wounded had arrived one morning. Ninety of them were found dead on arrival, nearly half of them children, killed by an assault overwhelming any besieged healthcare system. Parents identified their children's remains by their clothing. Highlighting the psychological toll of the conflict, he said, 'Nearly half of Gaza's children are now suicidal, some asking, 'Why didn't I die with my family?'' Dr. Sidhwa appealed to the Security Council to implement seven urgent measures, including an arms embargo, condemning their inaction as 'evidence of the collapse of the global conscience' while Gaza's last doctors and a generation of Palestinians face annihilation. He concluded his testimony with a powerful statement - 'You cannot claim ignorance when children no longer want to live.' And yet, after all this, a controversial Kuwaiti writer called on Palestinians to surrender ... to their fate.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Kuwait Times
5 hours ago
- Kuwait Times
Zionists hit Syria after projectiles fired, hold Al-Sharaa responsible
Zionists hit Syria after projectiles fired, hold Al-Sharaa responsible Violence coincides with efforts to ease tensions CAIRO: Zionist entity has carried out its first airstrikes in Syria in nearly a month, saying it hit weapons belonging to the government in retaliation for the firing of two projectiles towards Zionist entity and holding interim President Ahmed Al-Sharaa responsible. Damascus said Zionist airstrikes caused 'heavy human and material losses', reiterating that Syria does not pose a threat to any regional party and stressing the need to end the presence of armed groups and establish state control in the south. Zionist entity had not struck Syria since early May - a month marked by US President Donald Trump's meeting with Sharaa, the lifting of US sanctions, and direct Syrian-Zionist contacts to calm tensions, as reported by Reuters last week. Describing its new rulers as jihadists, Zionist entity has bombed Syria frequently this year. Zionist entity has also moved troops into areas of the southwest, where it has said it won't allow the new government's security forces to deploy. The projectiles Zionist entity reported fired from Syria were the first since longtime Syrian ruler Bashar Al-Assad was toppled. The military said the two projectiles fell in open areas. Defense Minister I Katz said he held the Syrian president 'directly responsible for any threat and fire toward the Zionist entity'. A Syrian foreign ministry statement said the accuracy of the reports of shelling towards Zionist entity had not yet been verified. 'We believe that there are many parties that may seek to destabilize the region to achieve their own interests,' the Syrian foreign ministry added, as reported by the state news agency. A Syrian official told Reuters such parties included 'remnants of Assad-era militias linked to Iran, which have long been active in the Quneitra area' and have 'a vested interest in provoking retaliation as a means of escalating tensions and undermining current stabilization efforts'. Several Arab and Palestinian media outlets circulated a claim of responsibility from a little-known group named 'Martyr Muhammad Deif Brigades,' an apparent reference to Hamas' military leader who was killed in an airstrike in 2024. Reuters could not independently verify the statement. The Syrian state news agency and security sources reported strikes targeting sites in the Damascus countryside and Quneitra and Daraa provinces. Local residents contacted by Reuters said shelling targeted agricultural areas in the Wadi Yarmouk region. They described increased tensions in recent weeks, including reported incursions into villages, where residents have reportedly been barred from sowing their crops. A Zionist airstrike also hit a former Syrian army base near the city of Izraa, a Syrian source said. Zionist entity has said its goals in Syria include protecting the Druze, a religious minority with followers in both countries. Zionist entity, which has occupied the Syrian Golan Heights since the 1967 Middle East war, bombed Syria frequently during the last decade of Assad's rule, targeting the sway of his Iranian allies. The newly-appointed US envoy to Syria said last week he believed peace between Syria and Zionist entity was achievable. Around the same time that Zionist entity reported the projectiles from Syria, the military said it intercepted a missile from Yemen. Yemen's Iran-aligned Houthis said they targeted Jaffa with a ballistic missile. The group says it has been launching attacks against Zionist entity in support of Palestinians during the war in Gaza. — Reuters
Arab Times
8 hours ago
- Arab Times
U.S. Embassy in Kuwait Maintains Full Operations Amid Regional Adjustments
KUWAIT CITY, June 11: The U.S. Embassy in Kuwait has confirmed that there have been no changes to the status of its employees, emphasizing that the embassy continues to operate as usual and at full capacity. In an official statement, the embassy reiterated the U.S. administration's commitment (under President Donald Trump)to ensuring the safety of American citizens both at home and abroad. As part of this ongoing commitment, the staffing levels at all U.S. embassies are subject to regular review. The administration noted that, following recent security assessments, a decision was made to reduce the number of diplomatic personnel at the U.S. mission in Iraq.
Arab Times
9 hours ago
- Arab Times
U.S. to Partially Evacuate Embassy in Bahrain, Kuwait, Iraq
WASHINGTON, June 11: The United States is preparing a partial evacuation of its embassy in Baghdad and has authorized the voluntary departure of military dependents from several locations across the Middle East, according to U.S. and Iraqi sources. The move comes in response to escalating security concerns in the region, though officials did not specify the exact nature of the threats. The U.S. State Department has yet to issue a formal comment, but reports of the impending evacuation have already impacted global markets, pushing oil prices higher. Brent crude rose by $3, reaching $69.18 per barrel following the news. President Joe Biden has recently expressed frustration over faltering negotiations with Iran regarding its nuclear program. On Wednesday, he said he was increasingly doubtful that Tehran would agree to cease uranium enrichment — a central U.S. demand in the talks. Meanwhile, Iranian Defense Minister Aziz Nasirzadeh warned that Iran would retaliate against American military bases in the region if talks collapsed and U.S. forces launched any attacks. The United States maintains a significant military footprint in Iraq, Kuwait, Qatar, Bahrain, and the United Arab Emirates. U.S. Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth has authorized the voluntary departure of military family members from installations across the region. One U.S. official noted that the directive particularly affects dependents stationed in Bahrain, home to a large concentration of American personnel. 'The State Department is preparing an ordered departure of U.S. personnel from the Baghdad embassy,' a senior official confirmed. 'While the plan is to conduct the evacuation through commercial channels, U.S. military support is available if needed.' An Iraqi foreign ministry official confirmed the move, describing it as a 'partial evacuation' driven by "potential security concerns related to regional tensions." Despite the developments in Iraq, another U.S. official stated that operations at Al Udeid Air Base in Qatar — the largest American military base in the region — remain unaffected. No evacuation orders have been issued for embassy staff or their families in Qatar, and the mission continues to operate normally. Wider Security Implications The evacuation news comes amid growing unease over maritime security. Earlier in the day, the United Kingdom's maritime security agency issued an alert, warning that heightened tensions in the Middle East could spark military confrontations affecting major shipping lanes. It advised caution for vessels transiting the Gulf, Gulf of Oman, and Strait of Hormuz — all strategic waterways bordering Iran. Iraq finds itself in a delicate position, maintaining close ties with both Washington and Tehran. The country hosts around 2,500 U.S. troops and also includes powerful Iran-backed militias within its broader security apparatus. Tensions in Iraq have steadily intensified since the outbreak of the Israel-Gaza conflict in October 2023. Iran-aligned militant groups in Iraq have carried out repeated attacks on U.S. forces, further straining the already volatile security environment.
