Manitoba Grits gain, Tories and NDP in pain
The federal Liberals gained ground in Manitoba as they formed government for a fourth straight time in an election that saw NDP support collapse across the province and country.
Doug Eyolfson defeated Conservative incumbent Marty Morantz to flip Winnipeg West for the Liberals, as NDP incumbent Leila Dance (Elmwood-Transcona) lost her seat, a traditional New Democrat stronghold, to Tory candidate Colin Reynolds seven months after she edged him in a byelection.
'In 2019 when I lost, I vowed that I was going to be back one day, and I never really gave that up,' Eyolfson, an emergency-room doctor, told the Free Press at his campaign party event at the Portage Avenue Holiday Inn. 'I always kept working at this while doing my day job, and I had a feeling that one day it was going to happen again. It was worth every moment.'
JOHN WOODS / FREE PRESS
Liberal candidate Doug Eyolfson greets supporters at the campaign party after winning Winnipeg West, Monday.
He was ahead by 12.5 percentage points with six polls left to report. Morantz congratulated Eyolfson and said he's excited to see what the new iteration of the Conservatives could achieve, but he is done with politics.
Eyolfson will become an MP for the second time, after representing the riding (then known as Charleswood-St. James-Assiniboia-Headingley) from 2015 to 2019 before losing twice to Morantz.
Reynolds, who was about eight percentage points ahead of Dance with all but seven local polling stations reporting results, did not make himself available for an interview before press time.
In a potential upset, Liberal candidate Rebecca Chartrand led NDP incumbent Niki Ashton in Churchill-Keewatinook Aski, another New Democrat stronghold, by 16 percentage points in a rematch from the 2015 election. The candidates were still waiting for results from 66 polling stations.
If the Liberals manage to flip that riding, Winnipeg Centre incumbent Leah Gazan, the urban area's MP since 2019, will be Manitoba's lone NDP representative in the House of Commons.
Leader Jagmeet Singh announced his resignation after a disastrous showing put the NDP in fourth place and on course to lose official party status.
Gazan was ahead of Liberal challenger Rahul Walia by about five percentage points with all but two polling stations reporting.
'This was a hard night for us as the NDP, but here's the thing: We were in the fight of our life in Winnipeg Centre and you know why we won? We won because we believe in human rights at the centre in Winnipeg Centre,' Gazan said.
'We believe that we need people holding the Liberal government to account to fight against corporate greed.'
National projections gave the Liberals a fourth-consecutive mandate, although it was still unclear if it would be a minority or majority government.
MIKAELA MACKENZIE / FREE PRESS
Conservative Kildonan-St. Paul candidate Raquel Dancho speaks to supporters on Monday.
As of press time, the Conservatives were declared victorious or leading in seven of Manitoba's 14 ridings (five rural strongholds and two that include parts of Winnipeg).
The Liberals won or were ahead in six electoral districts (five in Winnipeg). The NDP held one riding — Gazan's — after shedding votes to the Grits and Tories in key battlegrounds.
Prior to the campaign, Pierre Poilievre's Conservatives had seven seats, the Liberals had four and the NDP three.
In Kildonan-St. Paul, Tory incumbent Raquel Dancho was ahead of Liberal candidate Thomas Naaykens by four percentage points, with 35 polls still to report. Both candidates' headquarters were tense as supporters anxiously awaited an official call at about 11:30 p.m.
'Conservatives, we work our butts off to win elections across the country and we're going to keep doing that,' Dancho said at her campaign headquarters. 'If the results hold tight for Kildonan-St. Paul, you're sending a fighter back to Ottawa.'
She said the national result was not what Tory supporters wanted.
'Don't give up hope. It's not over yet,' she said, predicting a minority Liberal government.
Some victorious Liberal candidates expressed relief at the national outcome, after opinion polls suggested the party was headed for a heavy defeat until a recent resurgence thanks, in part, to a change in leadership and U.S. President Donald Trump's tariff and annexation threats.
'There's a great deal of relief and a lot of happy Liberals,' said incumbent Kevin Lamoureux, who was easily re-elected in Winnipeg North. 'Look at where we were three, four months ago. Who would've thought we'd be in government?'
'Just a few months ago, we were not in the best of places, and (Liberal Leader) Mark Carney has done an incredible job of speaking to Canadians,' said incumbent Terry Duguid, who kept his seat in Winnipeg South, a bellwether that has elected an MP from the party that formed government in every election since 1988.
MIKAELA MACKENZIE / FREE PRESS
Liberal candidate Kevin Lamoureux celebrates his Winnipeg North win with family before making a victory speech on, Monday.
'I'm very grateful for Mark Carney's leadership. I'm very grateful for how we turned things around and made this a competitive race. And I'm very optimistic about the future and our ability to deal with Donald Trump and stand up for the interests of Canadians.'
Carney appointed Duguid as Canada's environment and climate change minister eight days before the campaign
Political newcomer Ginette Lavack retained St. Boniface-St. Vital for the Liberals, who've held the riding since 2015. She will replace Dan Vandal, who did not seek re-election.
'We did it, we really did it,' Lavack said at her election-night party at Fort Gibraltar, where she was flanked by supporters, including Vandal.
Lavack said she will be an MP for all people in the riding.
'I know there's real concerns about cost of living, housing, health care, the future of our planet, all of that. I hear you, I see you,' she told a crowd of about 75 people. 'I will collaborate with all levels of government to ensure that our community gets the support and services it deserves.'
Liberal incumbent Ben Carr defended the Winnipeg South Centre seat he first won in a 2023 byelection, following the death of his father, Jim Carr, who was the riding's MP since 2015.
'I'm very proud of the campaign we ran in Winnipeg South Centre,' Carr said. 'It was positive. It was substantive. And it was fuelled by purpose.
'We had contact with tens of thousands of people in the riding and the conversations were very clear: people were worried and wanted strong leadership. And they saw that leadership was reflected in Mark Carney and the team around him. The results have reflected that.'
Conservative incumbents James Bezan (Selkirk-Interlake-Eastman), Ted Falk (Provencher), Branden Leslie (Portage-Lisgar) and Dan Mazier (Riding Mountain) easily were re-elected in Conservative strongholds in rural Manitoba.
BROOK JONES/FREE PRESS
Winnipeg South Liberal candidate Terry Duguid arrives to cheers and applause at his campaign party at Nicolino's in Winnipeg, Monday.
Federal newcomer Grant Jackson won Brandon-Souris for the Tories. He resigned as an MLA to run federally, after Larry Maguire, the riding's MP since 2013, announced he would not seek re-election due to health concerns.
'It's been an interesting and challenging campaign. In all my campaigns we haven't seen the yardsticks and the goal sticks move as often as they have,' Bezan said. 'It seemed like we were pivoting through the whole campaign. The conversations on the doorstep changed a lot from where we started to where we ended.'
The longstanding Tory felt a longer campaign would have worked in favour of his party, giving voters more opportunities to scrutinize Carney.
Bezan maintained support for Poilievre.
'He's an individual who has us within a few seats of having government,' Bezan said.
University of Winnipeg political science Prof. Malcolm Bird said the NDP's collapse in Manitoba sent voters in different directions.
Observers thought the Liberals would benefit most, which was the case in Churchill-Keewatinook Aski, he said.
'That's certainly not what happened in Elmwood-Transcona, where the Tories were able to decisively beat the NDP candidate there,' Bird said.
He said the Conservatives were able to effectively target 'working people' in that riding by campaigning on issues such as the cost of living, housing and taxation.
The Liberals have been in power since 2015, mostly with minority governments propped up by the NDP. The Tories will again serve as the official Opposition.
Ruth Bonneville / Free Press
Liberal candidate Ginette Lavack celebrates her St. Boniface-St. Vital victory with Liberal cabinet member Dan Vandal, Monday.
For months, opinion polls suggested the next election would be a Conservative landslide. While Poilievre enjoyed a double-digit lead, former prime minister Justin Trudeau faced a caucus revolt and announced his resignation Jan. 6.
That, along with Trump's tariff and annexation threats, stoked a Liberal resurgence that wiped out Poilievre's lead.
During Elections
Get campaign news, insight, analysis and commentary delivered to your inbox during Canada's 2025 election.
The momentum continued under Carney, who won a leadership contest March 9 to become prime minister, and then called a snap election March 23.
Polls suggested Carney continued to hold a slight edge over Poilievre in the campaign's final days, while the NDP risked dropping enough seats to lose official party status.
The vote had to be held on or before Oct. 20. Federal law requires an election to be held on the third Monday of October every four years.
— With files from Malak Abas, Scott Billeck, Nicole Buffie, Aaron Epp, Maggie Macintosh, Katie May, Marsha McLeod, Gabrielle Piche and Tyler Searle
chris.kitching@freepress.mb.ca
Chris KitchingReporter
Chris Kitching is a general assignment reporter at the Free Press. He began his newspaper career in 2001, with stops in Winnipeg, Toronto and London, England, along the way. After returning to Winnipeg, he joined the Free Press in 2021, and now covers a little bit of everything for the newspaper. Read more about Chris.
Every piece of reporting Chris produces is reviewed by an editing team before it is posted online or published in print — part of the Free Press's tradition, since 1872, of producing reliable independent journalism. Read more about Free Press's history and mandate, and learn how our newsroom operates.
Our newsroom depends on a growing audience of readers to power our journalism. If you are not a paid reader, please consider becoming a subscriber.
Our newsroom depends on its audience of readers to power our journalism. Thank you for your support.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Montreal Gazette
37 minutes ago
- Montreal Gazette
Kheiriddin: Finally, Canada is making defence a priority
By Damn the torpedoes! The Liberal government is taking aim at defence — and it's about time. This week, Prime Minister Mark Carney announced that Canada will hit the NATO benchmark of two per cent of GDP on defence spending this year, instead of waiting for 2032, deploying an additional $9 billion in 2025-2026. Ever the banker, he's also deploying some accounting manoeuvres, shifting $16 billion from the ledgers of other departments to the defence budget to bring it up to the required amount. But that is in line with the tabulations of other NATO countries — and is something predecessor Justin Trudeau should have done, so that Canada would have appeared to be less of a defence laggard for the last decade. But better late than never — and perhaps, just in time. Carney's announcement comes just ahead of next week's G7 summit he is hosting in Kananaskis, Alta., and a meeting of NATO leaders later this month in The Hague. The change sends a message to U.S. President Donald Trump and EU allies that Canada means business on defence. Together with the government's border security bill announced this week, Carney is paving the way for a trade deal, or at least some relief from tariffs, with the United States. His spending boost will sit well with his recent pledge to join ReArm Europe, in light of upcoming NATO demands that members spend five per cent of GDP in coming years, instead of two. Carney also gets a gold star for actual change. The government will beef up salaries, recruitment and retention of troops, finally acknowledging that new equipment is pointless without skilled personnel. Ottawa will also overhaul the procurement process, a boost for the Canadian defence industry which could offset some of the costs to taxpayers through job creation and revenue. That could also help sell future spending hikes: While polling shows two-thirds of Canadians support spending two per cent on defence, there's not much appetite for five. But as always, a landmine looms on the horizon: in this case, the infamous F-35 program. On Tuesday, Auditor-General Karen Hogan dropped a bombshell. Canada's planned fleet of 88 F-35 jets is now projected to cost nearly 50 per cent more — from $19 billion in 2022 to a staggering $27.7 billion in 2025. And that's before factoring in infrastructure upgrades, weapons and inflation. Hogan's audit was brutal: the Department of National Defence relied on outdated cost estimates, ignored improved data and has no coherent contingency plan in place. Infrastructure to house the jets is running three years behind schedule, with some bases not expected to open until 2031. The RCAF is also short on qualified pilots — something it knew back in 2018, but which for the previous government was presumably not a priority. Canada needs stealth fighters. We don't, however, need another lake of red ink. Instead of sticking with 88 F-35s at $27 billion-plus for the fleet, Canada should look at Sweden's Gripen, Boeing's Super Hornet or a mix of planes. If Carney approves the F-35 as-is, that failure will become the focus, instead of his ambitious plans to rearm. Defence Minister David McGuinty hasn't committed to a review of the project, saying only that he'd ensure that the auditor general's recommendations will be 'fully integrated' into his department. But he should, especially now that Canada is also building stronger ties with Europe, be considering where some of these planes could be sourced. The reality of modern warfare is also changing, pivoting from planes to drones and battlefields to cyberspace. While the proposed spending spree would drop money on both, the trend to smarter spending versus splashing out big shiny toys could help keep costs down. Ukraine has made significant use of $300 drones, recently taking out $100 million Russian bombers in a daring assault. That's the kind of smart thinking Canada's government should copy as it rebuilds our military for the future — one that looks increasingly grim.
Calgary Herald
42 minutes ago
- Calgary Herald
Bell: Premier Smith says Trudeau lives in Carney's camp and that's a problem
Article content Smith says she recognizes 'a real challenge' for Carney in 'climbing down' on some of the nasty laws and regulations the Trudeau Liberal government put in place, nastiness that amounted to an attack on Alberta oil and gas and on Albertans. Article content 'The challenge is he has a lot of people in his caucus who still believe those policies are the right way to go.' Article content Article content Smith is walking on the sunny side of the street. Article content She says Carney 'demonstrated pragmatism' on rolling the consumer carbon tax back to zero. Article content No, he didn't. Article content He knew the consumer carbon tax would kill his chances to be prime minister so he deep-sixed it. Article content Does Carney really think if he doesn't give the Alberta government what it wants it kills his chances to stay on as prime minister? Article content While we wait for the next chapter in The Mystery of the Prime Minister Who Wouldn't Give Straight Answers Smith is working with oilpatch types on a pitch for a pipeline to the west coast. Article content Article content Smith feels strongest about a pipeline to the B.C. port of Prince Rupert and 'some of the American options.' Article content But a pipeline can't get built with Liberal policies making it impossible to get a pipeline built. Article content She mentions nine nasty Liberal brainwaves such as the cap on oil and gas emissions and the tanker ban off the west coast and the so-called No More Pipelines law. Article content 'That's my short list. I have a much longer list of things we need to fix.' Article content The energy crowd erupts in applause. Article content Smith tells Albertans thinking of Alberta independence the province has to 'give it one more shot' to get a new deal for Alberta. Article content As for those wagging their finger and saying separatist talk is hurting investment, Smith fires back. Article content 'As compared to what? Compared to half a trillion dollars worth of investment we lost because of terrible federal policy that scared away investment. Article content 'There could have been pipelines, LNG projects, the Teck Frontier Mine.' Article content
Globe and Mail
an hour ago
- Globe and Mail
The politics of political party data hypocrisy
Imagine if select Canadians could decide which laws applied to them and which didn't, as long as they vowed to follow a set of rules that they had written and made available for public consultation. 'I, John Doe, declare that I am no longer subject to the income tax laws of Canada and instead will abide by my own rules. Rule No. 1: I don't pay taxes.' That, of course, would be anarchy. But it happens to be the way Canada's federal political parties want to operate when it comes to privacy rights: one set of rules for themselves and another for everyone else. This hypocrisy was hidden in plain sight this week when the government tried to pull a fast one by sticking a set of bespoke privacy protection rules for federal parties at the bottom of a bill dealing with the cost of living. There on the last three pages of a 22-page bill about oranges (affordability) was an unexpected and unannounced section about apples (voter data). The proposed changes to the Canada Elections Act would exempt federal political parties and entities acting on their behalfs from all provincial and federal privacy regimes, and create a new one exclusive to them. The changes, which have the support of the Conservatives, put it plainly: a federal party and any company it hires to collect and manage data 'cannot be required to provide access to personal information or provide information relating to personal information under its control or to correct – or receive, adjudicate or annotate requests to correct – personal information or omissions in personal information under its control.' The law would be retroactive to the year 2000 – a crude power flex. The Liberals, the NDP and the Conservatives are appealing a 2024 B.C. Supreme Court ruling that said federal parties are subject to provincial privacy laws and must turn over the voter data they gather if ordered to do so. Passage of the bill will end the court case – a slap in the face of the judiciary. The same legislation would require federal parties to write their own privacy policies and make them public. But the required contents for those policies, as set by the legislation, are laughably slight. The parties will have to name the person responsible for overseeing the policies they write, state what kind of personal information they collect and how they collect it, and reveal what training they provide employees about safeguarding that information. And that's it. This comes nowhere near the demands that the federal government makes on private companies through its much-vaunted 'digital charter.' Under that 2022 law, individuals are supposed to have 'control over what data they are sharing, who is using their personal data and for what purposes, and know that their privacy is protected.' As well, Canadians can 'demand that their information be destroyed' when they withdraw their consent for its collection. No such luck with federal parties, though. And yet these are the same parties that, in 2019, uploaded voter e-mail addresses to Facebook without voters' knowledge. In 2021, the Liberals used facial-recognition software to verify the identities of people voting in nomination races. The parties are constantly scraping up voters' personal information, whether through party memberships, door-to-door campaigning, petitions or other means, and then sharing it to suit their purposes. That data is one of their greatest assets, and they don't want to give it back once they have it, or have anyone other than themselves oversee its collection, use, disclosure, retention and disposal. On the Liberals' part, they are showing a particular indifference to Canadians' privacy that could also be seen this month in the Mark Carney government's plan to allow police to go on warrantless fishing expeditions in people's internet subscriber information. The whole thing is wrong. Canadians should have the right to take their names off party lists, and to be informed of how their personal information is being shared and used by the parties. The parties don't want that, though. At least, not for themselves. Tough rules are for everyone else.
