New schemes to ease flow of veterinary medicines into Northern Ireland
The Government has announced two schemes designed to ease the flow of veterinary medicines from Great Britain into Northern Ireland when a post-Brexit grace period expires at the end of the year.
EU rules on the medicines will apply in Northern Ireland from January 1, which will place restrictions on the supply of products from the rest of the UK, with GB suppliers needing to make adaptations to continue to sell into the region.
The changes have raised concerns among the veterinary profession that some critical products that vets traditionally source from across the Irish Sea will no longer be available.
Government officials have undertaken 18 months of extensive research with the pharmaceutical industry to identify issues, and determined that the problem will not be as significant as some initial predictions, with only a small number of critical medicines – where no alternative is available – being discontinued in Northern Ireland.
The Government is introducing two schemes to ensure vets can continue to access these medicines from GB once the grace period ends.
The details were outlined in a policy paper published by Northern Ireland Secretary Hilary Benn on Thursday.
The Veterinary Medicines Internal Market Scheme pledges to streamline the process of securing the restricted medicines from GB. While vets will be asked to consider if a similar product is available in the EU, they will be able to proceed with purchasing it from GB if they determine the cost or time taken to import it from Europe would be prohibitive.
Vets will also be able to pre-emptively secure the medicines so they have stock at hand when required. The requirement for a special import certificate to move the medicines from GB to NI will also be removed.
The second initiative, the Veterinary Medicines Health Situation Scheme, is being set up to monitor the industry to identify potential discontinuation issues as they emerge and ensure a supply of alternative medicines are made available.
While the schemes have not been designed in conjunction with the EU, the Government insists the initiatives will be in full compliance with EU law.
Mr Benn outlined the plans in a written ministerial statement. He said ensuring the supply of veterinary medicines to Northern Ireland was of 'critical importance'.
'To that end we have seen significant progress as large sections of the pharmaceutical industry have taken and are taking the steps needed to continue to supply veterinary medicines to Northern Ireland,' he said.
'This means that in the vast majority of cases, vets, farmers and pet owners will continue to have access to the medicines they need. But I recognise that even a small disruption could cause real difficulties, and that there are understandable concerns in those limited areas where supply may be disrupted and there are no alternative products authorised or available in Northern Ireland.
'Therefore, the Government is taking further measures to ensure access to veterinary medicines in such cases, as set out in the paper.'
Mr Benn added: 'The combination of progress to date on the adaptation by industry and the measures set out in the paper means that the Government is confident that Northern Ireland will continue to enjoy access to the veterinary medicines necessary to protect the health and welfare of animals, and the livelihoods of farmers and veterinary surgeons.
'Further guidance will be issued in due course and we will continue to monitor emerging risks to animal health and veterinary medicine availability. Intensive engagement will continue through 2025 and beyond to address any gaps.
'Where they have yet to do so, we are encouraging the pharmaceutical industry to make any necessary changes as soon as possible.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Times
16 minutes ago
- Times
A fall in the street shows me London's really not so mean
T he other day I had a nasty fall, and I'm glad I did, because it has restored my wavering faith in human nature. I had started to think of London as I did of New York, where I lived in the 1980s: a crime-ridden city where passers-by might step over someone who had collapsed in the street, giving them a casual kick en route. Well, my experience has reversed my paranoia by demonstrating the very opposite. Yes, I fell flat on my face at the traffic lights near my Fulham home and, being 86 and none too robust, couldn't get up. So for a few seconds I lay there, looking like a half-squashed beetle and dizzily wondering if I still had a nose. But suddenly I was surrounded by eight, nine people, among them two of my near-neighbours, Krista and Floyd, but the rest complete strangers. And all wanted to help and did. They brought paper towels, wipes, water, offers to drive me to A&E and/or call 999, a mobile connected to paramedics, even a chair on to which I was lifted and on which I perched while they diverted the traffic, and Maury, an orthopaedic nurse from Kingston, dabbed my forehead and soothed what was behind it. Then they insisted on helping me home. I could hardly believe it. Such concern, consideration and kindness! In London! Being as bloody of mind as of face I'd refused to go directly to hospital but my wife dragged me to Charing Cross, where I was inspected, pronounced OK, bandaged, warned I'd have a blemish I secretly plan to pass off as a duelling scar, and left feeling thoroughly grateful. So when I got home I wrote a post on our local social medium, Nextdoor, which is usually full of tales of burglaries, stolen cars, muggings and so on. But I wanted to thank my helpers and share my appreciation of their unsolicited altruism. Well, at last count I'd received 338 'likes'. My story and my conclusions have touched some collective nerve. That got me thinking. Could London be suffering a post-pandemic attack of niceness? As another small indication, I remembered that since I got a walking stick never, ever has someone failed to offer me their seat on the Tube. I may now look like Lazarus as they began to prepare him for burial, or a ghoul who has got the date of Halloween wrong, but that should pass. What won't is my belief that, in dark times, there's goodness around. Benedict Nightingale was the Times chief theatre critic 1990-2010
BBC News
34 minutes ago
- BBC News
Oliver McGowan's bereaved parents praise 'milestone' NHS update
The parents of a teenager with special needs who died after being prescribed an anti-psychotic drug have hailed the publication of new NHS guidance as a "significant milestone".Oliver McGowan, 18, who was autistic and had epilepsy, was being treated for a seizure when he was given olanzapine to sedate him. He died in intensive care 17 days later after a rare side effect caused his brain to swell.A report in 2020 found his death was "potentially avoidable", with his parents Paula and Tom McGowan, from near Bristol, blaming the "ignorance" of couple said they hoped the new Oliver McGowan Code of Practice would bring "meaningful change". After the drug was administered, Oliver's temperature rose and he showed signs of neuroleptic malignant medication was stopped on 28 October 2016 and a CT scan two days later showed he had sustained a serious brain injury. He died on 11 November.A review into Oliver's death concluded there had been a "general lack of understanding and acknowledgement of Oliver's autism and how Oliver presented himself when in seizure". His parents have campaigned since his death for improvements in the system, and on Thursday the government published new guidance it said would ensure safer, more personalised care for people with a learning disability and autistic and Mrs McGowan said: "The publication of the code of practice marks a deeply emotional and significant milestone for us and will ensure Oliver's legacy will continue to make a difference by safeguarding people with a learning disability and autistic individuals from the same preventable failings that he tragically endured."They added: "This is a true example of what meaningful change looks like - giving a voice to those who are not always seen or heard." The government said training would be backed by funding as part of the Learning and Development Support Scheme for adult social care this minister Stephen Kinnock praised the McGowans' "incredible campaign", adding: "This government recognises the appalling health inequalities faced by people with a learning disability and autistic people."Everyone deserves to receive high-quality, empathetic and dignified care but this cannot be achieved if staff do not have the right training." Jackie O'Sullivan, of disability charity Mencap, said the new guidance has the potential "to transform care for people with a learning disability".She added: "Whilst we have seen improvements in recent years, the life expectancy of people with a learning disability is still a shocking 23 years less than everyone else and people die of conditions which are entirely treatable."
The Independent
an hour ago
- The Independent
Moment of truth for the assisted dying bill: all you need to know
Kim Leadbeater, the Labour MP who came top in the private members' bill ballot last year, and was therefore given a chance of getting her own law onto the statute book, is 'confident' that her Terminally Ill Adults (End of Life) Bill will complete its Commons stages on Friday. The bill has been through an arduous and often bad-tempered journey since MPs voted to give it the go-ahead in principle in November by 330 votes to 275, a majority of 55. It was debated by a committee of MPs in 29 sittings between January and March. The committee considered 500 amendments and about one-third were agreed. The bill came back to the Commons last Friday, when further amendments were debated. Tomorrow will be its last day in the Commons, when more amendments will be debated and a final vote held. If it passes, it will then go to the House of Lords. How has the bill been amended? The main change is that, instead of a court having to approve a request, supported by two doctors, for an assisted death, it will be decided by a panel consisting of a lawyer, a consultant psychiatrist and a social worker. Other amendments include: • requiring the doctors assessing assisted dying requests to have undertaken detailed training on domestic abuse, including coercive control and financial abuse; • making independent advocates available for those who 'may experience substantial difficulty in understanding the processes or information relevant' to the assisted dying process; and • increasing the commencement period from two years to four years in England, meaning that the majority of the bill's provisions must be implemented within four years of the bill becoming law. Is the bill going to pass? Almost certainly. The majority of 55 in November was larger than expected, and although some MPs have changed their minds since then, it seems unlikely that there are 28 of them – the number required to change the outcome. Indeed, some of those changing their minds have gone from abstaining last time to supporting the bill, saying that they are now satisfied with the safeguards in the bill. However, it is MPs switching from support or a neutral position to opposition who tend to attract the most attention. Four Labour MPs who supported the bill in November but who will vote against it tomorrow have written to their colleagues urging them to do the same. 'This is not a normal bill,' they write. 'It fundamentally alters the relationship between doctor and patient. It strips power away from parliament and concentrates it in the hands of future health secretaries.' They conclude: 'The bill before us simply does not do enough to safeguard people who may want to choose to live.' The opposition from outside parliament has been forceful. Some MPs are particularly disconcerted by the Royal College of Psychiatrists, which continues to oppose the bill. Although it says it is not opposed to the principle of assisted dying, it is worried about the implications for mental health and says that there are not enough consultant psychiatrists to sit on the expert panels. Even so, Leadbeater's confidence appears to be justified. Where do cabinet ministers stand? Assisted dying is an issue of conscience, and so by convention, the government has allowed a free vote. The government does not have a view on the issue, and collective ministerial responsibility does not apply. That means that some ministers will vote in favour and some against. Seven ministers who attend cabinet are opposed to the bill: Darren Jones, David Lammy, Shabana Mahmood, Bridget Phillipson, Angela Rayner, Jonathan Reynolds and Wes Streeting. Streeting has changed his mind: he said last year that the poor state of NHS palliative care meant that he could not support the bill. All the rest support the bill, including the prime minister, who reaffirmed his support this week – apart from Ian Murray, the Scottish secretary, who will not vote on the grounds that the issue is devolved. The Scottish parliament voted for a similar bill at its first stage last month.
