
Support ‘Made In America' Businesses—Don't Undermine Them
Suzanne Lerner is co-founder and CEO of Michael Stars, an L.A.-based fashion & lifestyle brand and Certified B Corporation founded in 1986.
The ability to build something meaningful, something that creates opportunity for others, is why people say, 'only in America.' I still lead the contemporary fashion and lifestyle brand I co-founded with my late husband, Michael, and I'm proud that our company is an 'only in America' story.
My husband was an immigrant from South Africa who wanted the freedom to create and build his own path. As a woman in the fashion industry, I found the doors to advancement closed. So, I built my own businesses, eventually partnering with Michael to grow Michael Stars.
When policymakers talk about tariffs as 'short-term pain for long-term gain,' I wonder—have they ever run a small or medium-sized enterprise (SME)? Do they understand what it takes to be a 'made in the U.S.A.' company—let alone one that has kept production in the U.S. for the past 40 years?
I'm no trade policy expert, but I do know business. Since 1986, we've produced most of our clothing in Los Angeles—cutting, sewing and knitting from yarn and cotton sourced in the U.S. Some specialty yarns and fabrics we must import—not by choice, but because they're no longer available domestically.
Proposed tariffs will raise costs on imported materials, creating a ripple effect: higher production costs leading to higher prices for consumers. That leaves businesses with two bad options: absorb the extra costs or raise prices without adding real value for customers.
Like many purpose-driven companies, we price our products intentionally, reflecting the quality that comes with local production and ensuring that customers know they're getting real value. Tariffs disrupt that balance, forcing price increases unrelated to product value. We don't want to raise our prices just to offset the effects of poor trade policy—we want people to buy our clothing because what we make is worth it.
When Michael and I started our company, we chose to produce in the U.S. because we believed (and still do) in American values—quality, community and opportunity. Over the years, we were advised to 'move everything offshore'—that manufacturing in America was a mistake.
We refused. We've seen what happens when businesses prioritize short-term cost-cutting over long-term impact. That approach has ruined many fashion brands that were once known for quality. Today, we can see the effects of that approach—fast fashion filling landfills, closing of American mills and loss of skilled workers. Recent reports say that America is down to its last 100 cotton mills.
Tariffs are supposed to support American businesses. But if that's the case, why do companies that have put America first in manufacturing and sourcing for decades feel like they could be caught in the crossfire of what The Wall Street Journal called the 'dumbest trade war in history'?
Jay Timmons, CEO of the National Association of Manufacturers, notes that, 'A 25% tariff on Canada and Mexico threatens to upend the very supply chains that have made U.S. manufacturing more competitive globally.' The ripple effects extend beyond manufacturers to consumers.
The National Retail Federation estimates tariffs could strip $46 to $78 billion from consumer spending each year the tariffs are in place. Tariffs are projected to add 0.5 percentage points to inflation.
If policymakers want to support 'made in the USA' companies, they have to collaborate with SME leaders on real solutions. That means investing in manufacturing infrastructure and targeting unfair competition—not making it more expensive for American businesses to operate.
Now is the time for business leaders to speak out. Here are some ways to take action:
• Educate your customers: Help them understand how tariffs impact pricing and business operations. Use social media and direct communication to explain why American-made goods deserve consumer support.
• Engage with policymakers: Call your representatives and demand policies that truly support U.S. manufacturers.
• Explore industry coalitions: If you're in fashion, organizations such as the National Retail Federation, the American Apparel & Footwear Association, United States Fashion Industry Association and Made in LA can help amplify your voice. (Disclosure: My company joined Made in LA.)
• Strengthen domestic supply chains: Seek partnerships with local suppliers where possible. It won't happen overnight, but you can start now.
• Share your perspective: Write op-eds, speak at industry events and use your platform to push for fair trade policies.
As the shift to offshore production in fashion intensified, I remember being repeatedly told that customers didn't care where their fashion was produced. But they do. We see it firsthand. Customers tell us they come for the style but stay for the quality and for the values we represent.
'Only in America' has always meant the freedom to build something of your own. But that freedom doesn't end at starting a business—it must include the ability to grow and sustain it. If we want to honor that ethos, trade policy must strengthen—not weaken—the businesses already investing in this country.
Because if 'Only in America' means anything, it should mean that businesses that build here can thrive here.
Forbes Business Council is the foremost growth and networking organization for business owners and leaders. Do I qualify?
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Forbes
12 minutes ago
- Forbes
Gas Prices Are Under $3 In Half Of U.S. States—Here's Why That Likely Won't Last
The average price for a gallon of regular gas has dropped below $3 in 25 states as of Sunday, though the escalating conflict between Israel and Iran in the Middle East could soon lead to higher prices, some industry analysts say. Israel launched attacks on Iran last week, raising concerns among investors about disruptions to the ... More global oil trade. American drivers are paying about $3.13 for a gallon of gas on average as of Sunday, with prices below $3 in 25 states, including the lowest per-gallon average of $2.66 in Mississippi, according to AAA data. Oil prices rose last Friday after Israel attacked Iran: The West Texas Intermediate, a national benchmark for crude oil, surged by more than 7.2% to $72.98 per barrel while the global benchmark, Brent Crude, rose by 7% to $74.23 per barrel. Patrick de Haan, GasBuddy's head petroleum analyst, said he expects national gas prices to increase between five and 15 cents 'over the next week or two' in response to rising oil prices and Israel's conflict with Iran, after earlier estimating an increase by as much as 25 cents per gallon. Oil prices could rise even farther if Israel and Iran's conflict escalates, Ramanan Krishnamoorti, a petroleum engineer professor at the University of Houston, told ABC News, suggesting oil prices could substantially spike (up to $120 per barrel) if Iran's oil infrastructure is damaged. If oil prices reached $120 per barrel, gas prices could increase to around $5.13 per gallon, Krishnamoorti said. States in the western U.S. have the most expensive gas on average, according to AAA. California ranks highest, with an average price of $4.65 per gallon, followed by Hawaii ($4.47), Washington ($4.37) and Oregon ($3.98). Richard Joswick, head of near-term oil analysis at S&P Global Commodity Insights, said in an investor note Friday that an increase in gas prices likely won't last long. A spike in gas prices after Israel and Iran last traded strikes in October 2024 was short-lived, Joswick said, though he noted the conflict at the time did not significantly escalate 'and had no impact on oil supply.' 'We're ready to act,' Fatih Birol, executive director of the International Energy Agency, wrote Friday, adding the organization is 'actively monitoring' the Iran-Israel conflict and has over 1.2 billion barrels of emergency oil in stockpiles. OPEC+ opposed Birol's statement, writing on X it 'raises false alarms and projects a sense of market fear through repeating the unnecessary need to potentially use oil emergency stocks.' About one-fifth of the world's oil supply passes through the Strait of Hormuz between Oman and Iran, according to U.S. Energy Information Administration data from 2023. Gas prices have fluctuated in the U.S. as tensions have escalated in the Middle East over the last year. Israel's war with Hamas, Russia's invasion of Ukraine and Israel's latest attacks on Iran have factored into a spike in oil prices. It's unclear whether Israel's conflict with Iran will deescalate soon, despite President Donald Trump signaling both countries 'should make a deal, and will make a deal.' Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu has suggested Israel's military campaign would intensify, following reports that Israel had targeted Iran's oil and gas industry for the first time, though it's unclear whether the attacks have disrupted oil production or infrastructure.

Wall Street Journal
15 minutes ago
- Wall Street Journal
Trump's Good Deportation Exceptions
Good news on the mass deportation front: President Trump has listened to alarms from farmers and others and offered a reprieve from immigration raids for the agriculture and hospitality industries. We wrote Saturday about the contradictory social-media messages the President was sending last week on deportations. And now we know why. He has instructed the Department of Homeland Security to ease up on deportations on businesses that rely heavily on migrant labor and can't easily find American citizens to fill in.


New York Post
an hour ago
- New York Post
The growing case for rate cuts, federal cuts won't gut health care and other commentary
Fed watch: The Growing Case for Rate Cuts 'President Trump's tariffs present the Federal Reserve with two conflicting challenges,' observes The Wall Street Journal's Greg Ip. Tariffs 'raise prices, which weakens the case for cutting interest rates' but also 'sap confidence and demand, which strengthens the case.' So far, 'the Fed has focused on the first risk, keeping its interest rate target between 4.25% and 4.5% since December. It might soon have to pivot to the second': 'Evidence is accumulating that inflation, despite tariffs, has been milder than feared, while the labor market might be deteriorating.' Unemployment 'has risen every month since January, by a quarter percentage point in all.' A 'restrictive stance' on interest rates 'make sense so long as inflation is all the Fed has to worry about. It no longer is.' Eye on NY: Federal Cuts Won't Gut Health Care 'New York's health-care industry stands to lose billions of dollars in federal funding' under the GOP federal budget bill, notes the Empire Center's Bill Hammond, yet that wouldn't 'be enough to 'decimate' or 'gut' New York's health care system,' as Gov. Hochul has claimed. 'The House budget would reduce federal health-care aid by $10.1 billion while obliging the state to spend an additional $3.3 billion,' a state Health Department analysis finds — yet federal aid 'would still be higher than it was in 2023.' Cut the state's Medicaid enrollment by 1.2 million, and New York 'would still be providing free coverage to about 36 percent of its population' — still '12 points higher than the national average.' Republican: Don't Let Judges Help China Steal Tech The Patent Trial and Appeal Board is 'effectively allowing a Chinese firm to keep stealing an American semiconductor technology,' warns Rep. Nathaniel Moran at The Hill. The judges on the board 'just sided with Innoscience, a Chinese firm' accused of 'stealing patented technology and selling knockoff chips' from Cali company Efficient Power Conversion. 'After a 16-month investigation,' the US International Trade Commission 'found that Innoscience had indeed stolen the technology.' Yet Innoscience separately the patent board to invalidate Efficient Power Conversion's patent. 'The Trump administration has the authority to overrule' the board's 'dangerous decision' and 'should do so immediately,' but also 'implement broader reforms' to stop 'rogue administrative judges from helping Chinese companies pilfer US intellectual property in the future.' Democrats: San Francisco Shows the Way 'In the most famously liberal city in America, voters are no longer satisfied with symbolism or purity tests — they want results,' cheer Nancy Tung & Eric Kingsbury at Real Clear Politics. San Francisco voters 'still support Democratic principles, but they are demanding leaders who deliver.' In elections since 2022 through the rise of 'outsider' Mayor Daniel Lurie, voters are supporting a 'New Pragmatism' that's 'reshaping' how the Democratic Party 'governs and earns trust.' In other parts of the country, when 'voters asked for outcomes,' the party 'gave them process and vibes.' To win back voters, Dems 'need to be practical, not performative.' New Pragmatism is about 'solving problems, using power, and being honest about what is broken and what can be fixed.' If Democrats 'want to win again, they should start paying attention' to what voters want. Media watch: Don't Follow the Money? The media can 'no longer be trusted to tell anything like the truth,' blasts the Issues & Insights editorial board. 'The FBI is investigating the financial ties behind' the LA riots, but 'the mainstream press could care less,' fearing the facts might 'implicate Democrats or upset the left's agenda.' The Post has reported how the 'Party for Socialism and Liberation, which has ties to the Chinese Communist Party, is said to be behind some of the protests,' but other outlets remain mute. 'If you want to uncover corruption, find out where the money is coming from and where it is going. At least it used to be. Today? Not so much.' — Compiled by The Post Editorial Board