Florida Democrats file bills to ban using state funds on ballot measures
Signs for and against the state constitutional amendment have become a common sight throughout Kansas this summer. Credit: (Tim Carpenter/Kansas Reflector). Courtesy of the Kansas Reflector.
In an effort to thwart the proposed constitutional amendments that would have legalized recreational cannabis and protect abortion rights last year, state agencies in Gov. Ron DeSantis' administration ended up spending tens of millions of taxpayer dollars on public service announcements to campaign against those measures.
That's despite the fact there are already laws on the books in Florida that ban state employees and agency heads from using their official authority to influence or interfere in elections.
Nevertheless, if state employees and the agencies they work for are found to be doing that in the future, they would face serious sanctions, including potentially being removed from their job and having their agency's funding reduced under a bill (HB 727) filed by Tampa Bay area Democrat Rep. Michele Rayner on Wednesday.
Her measure, titled the 'Public Resource Election Neutrality Act,' would ban any state department or agency from producing, disseminating, or funding any public service announcement (PSA) related to a statewide ballot initiative. The Florida Commission on Ethics 'may' investigate complaints of violations of the law. All state agencies would also have to maintain records of PSAs produced or funded during the 12 months preceding a general election and make the records available to the public.
Meanwhile, another bill (SB 860), labeled the 'Broadcast Freedom Protection Act' by Democratic Sen. Carlos Guillermo Smith, was also introduced on Wednesday. Under his proposal, any elected or appointed state official found to be interfering with broadcasters' decisions to air political campaign advertisements, 'particularly those related to statewide ballot initiatives,' would face third degree felony charges. They also could be removed from office and permanently disqualified from holding any subsequent elected or appointed office. The legislation also allows the Florida Commission on Ethics to investigate complaints alleging the law's been broken.
The bills come after DeSantis was criticized last year for using taxpayer dollars to campaign against the cannabis ballot initiative, Amendment 3, and the abortion proposal, Amendment 4. Both measures ultimately received more than 50% support from the voters, but less than the 60% threshold required for passage.
SUBSCRIBE: GET THE MORNING HEADLINES DELIVERED TO YOUR INBOX
Smart & Safe Florida, the advocacy group advocating for Amendment 3, claimed that the state government had spent $50 million in taxpayer dollars to campaign against the proposal.
The Miami Herald reported that the Department of Children and Families had spent $4 million to pay a marketing agency for an 'advertising campaign aimed at educating Floridian families and youth about the dangers of marijuana, opioid, and drug use.' Though the ads never explicitly mentioned Amendment 3, those ads aired last September, as the campaign for the measure was receiving heavy news coverage.
The DeSantis administration did not stop there, though.
The Florida Department of Health went as far as threatening legal action against TV stations that aired ads in support of Amendment 4 and was taken to court over its actions. A federal judge ruled in that specific case that the state was 'trampling' on free speech rights and blocked the agency from continuing to threaten broadcasters.
The Agency for Health Care Administration (AHCA) also created a website whose homepage included language stating that 'Amendment 4 Threatens Women's Safety.' Democrats unsuccessfully demanded that it be removed.
Later South Florida Democratic Sen. Jason Pizzo filed a lawsuit alleging that the Florida Department of Transportation improperly spent state money to oppose Amendment 4 last fall, but a Leon County Circuit Court Judge dismissed the lawsuit.
The agencies actions weren't just criticized by Democrats.
'No matter where you stand on this issue, this is still a democracy. We do not spend taxpayer dollars in advance of a political issue,' Sarasota Republican state Sen. Joe Gruters said on a Zoom conference in October. 'Tax dollars are meant to be spent on our police, schools, roads, and other public programs that make our state great, not political agendas.'
Meanwhile, DeSantis appears intent on pushing legislation that would make it harder for citizen-led initiatives to get on the statewide ballot by placing restrictions on how the signature petition process works.
The Florida Department of State produced a report last fall alleging that the group behind Amendment 4, Floridians Protecting Freedom, was guilty of 'widespread election fraud,' and was slapped with a $328,000 fine that the group ultimately paid.
'The petition fraud, and making sure that that is reformed so that this process doesn't run amok, is something that's very important,' DeSantis said at a press conference in Tallahassee on Wednesday. 'I absolutely think you'll see the speaker and the president of the senate work towards enacting really strong reforms in that respect, I do think that that's something that's very important. We gotta get that done.'
Meanwhile, Smith also filed a bill on Wednesday that would reduce the threshold to pass constitutional amendments in Florida from 60% to 50%
SUPPORT: YOU MAKE OUR WORK POSSIBLE
.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


USA Today
16 minutes ago
- USA Today
Trump administration must restore AmeriCorps programs in 24 states, judge rules
Trump administration must restore AmeriCorps programs in 24 states, judge rules The judge's ruling applied only to Democratic-led states who sued in April to challenge what they said was Trump's unlawful dismantling of AmeriCorps. Show Caption Hide Caption Fired USAID employees applauded leaving DC office for last time Demonstrators outside the USAID offices in Washington, D.C., broke into applause as fired employees returned to pick up their belongings. June 5 (Reuters) - A federal judge ordered the Trump administration on June 5 to restore programs funded by AmeriCorps grants in 24 Democratic-led states but declined to bar the federal agency for national service and volunteering from cutting the bulk of its workforce. U.S. District Judge Deborah Boardman in Baltimore issued an injunction requiring the administration to reinstate millions of dollars in grants in those states and the District of Columbia and ordered the administration to restore thousands of volunteer service workers the administration had sent home. Her ruling applied only to the Democratic-led states who sued in April to challenge what they said was an unlawful dismantling of AmeriCorps by Republican President Donald Trump's administration. More: What is AmeriCorps? What to know about the latest organization impacted by DOGE cuts Maryland Attorney General Anthony Brown, a Democrat who helped lead the litigation, in a statement said the ruling safeguards services communities rely on to educate students, preserve parks and care for the elderly from "unlawful and reckless cuts." AmeriCorps did not respond to requests for comment. A White House spokesperson in a statement said Trump "has the right to restore accountability to the entire executive branch, and this will not be the final say on the matter." AmeriCorps' grants fund local and national organizations that offer community services related to education, disaster preparedness, conservation and more. It sends more than 200,000 volunteers out nationally as part of its programs. The states sued after the administration terminated over 1,000 grants and placed 85% of AmeriCorps' staff on administrative leave with the intent to terminate them effective June 24 as part of a push by Trump and the Department of Government Efficiency to shrink the federal government. The cuts impacted $396.5 million in federal funding for AmeriCorps programs and tens of thousands of volunteers nationally. The agency has a roughly $1 billion budget and had more than 500 employees when Trump took office. Democratic state attorneys general argued Trump lacks the authority under the U.S. Constitution to gut AmeriCorps, which was created by Congress, and that the agency failed to follow proper procedures before altering program services. Boardman, an appointee of Democratic President Joe Biden, partially agreed, saying AmeriCorps failed to engage in notice-and-comment rulemaking before making major changes. "Because the agency did not provide notice and an opportunity to comment before it made significant changes to service delivery, the States were unable to voice their concerns about these changes," she wrote. But Boardman said the states lacked standing to block the mass job cuts, saying an anticipated delay in their grant applications being reviewed due to reduced staff was not sufficient grounds.


Boston Globe
26 minutes ago
- Boston Globe
R.I. House poised to pass ban on assault-style weapons
Senator Louis P. DiPalma, a Middletown Democrat who introduced the Senate version of the bill, said, 'We are working to get it over the goal line.' Advertisement He said 24 of the Senate's current 37 members are cosponsors of the legislation. And he noted that a Get Rhode Map A weekday briefing from veteran Rhode Island reporters, focused on the things that matter most in the Ocean State. Enter Email Sign Up 'The majority of Rhode Islanders support it and the majority of senators support it,' DiPalma said. 'It's going to happen in Rhode lsland. We need to make it happen now, before any incident occurs.' But Republican legislators and some Democrats oppose the legislation. Earlier this week, House Minority Whip David J. Place, a Burrillville Republican, voted against the bill when it came before the House Judiciary Committee. Advertisement 'There's a famous saying: Those that desire security at the expense of liberty wind up with neither,' Place said. 'Prohibition doesn't stop anybody from doing anything. Prohibition just makes us feel safe.' Place predicted that prosecutors would use the bill to 'stack charges' against those accused of crimes involving guns. 'The liberty I speak of is: When it's all said and done, no one that looks like me is going to be sent to jail for this bill,' he said. 'Unless I fire on somebody who comes to my door, that's the only circumstance for someone who looks like me is going to be charged for this bill.' Rhode Island Republican Party Chairman Joe Powers issued a statement blasting the House Judiciary Committee for voting 12 to 6 for the bill, which he described 'a blatant attack on the Constitution and an alarming escalation in the erosion of individual liberties.' 'This isn't about guns — it's about rights. Your rights,' Powers said. 'As a citizen of Rhode Island and the United States of America, you are guaranteed certain freedoms that no governor, no legislator, and certainly no radical political movement has the authority to revoke.' But Melissa Carden, executive director the Rhode Island Coalition Against Gun Violence, said 39 of the 75 House members are cosponsors of the bill to ban assault-style weapons 'I am very confident,' Carden said Thursday morning. 'We know we have the votes on the floor in both chambers. This is really a historic day.' She noted it's 'fitting' and 'meaningful' that the vote comes one day before Advertisement Carden said believes Lawson will find a way to bring the legislation to the Senate floor for a vote. 'She is a gun safety champion,' he said. 'We have no reason to doubt her ability to get this done. We have confidence she will get it done.' Ten states, including Massachusetts and Connecticut, and the District of Columbia now ban assault-style weapons. The Rhode Island Anyone convicted of violating the ban would face criminal penalties, including fines of up to $10,000 and/or prison sentences of up to 10 years. The bill would provide exemptions for current and retired law enforcement officers, and anyone who lawfully possesses an assault weapon when the ban would take effect on July 1, 2026. Edward Fitzpatrick can be reached at


Fox News
28 minutes ago
- Fox News
'Sick puppy' Tim Walz should never have been on Dems' 2024 ticket, Trump says
President Donald Trump called Minnesota Gov. Tim Walz a "sick puppy" who should not have landed on the Democrats' 2024 presidential ticket. "He's a sick puppy, that guy, that poor guy. I feel sorry for him," Trump said Thursday from the Oval Office while meeting with German Chancellor Friedrich Merz. "But, they made a bad choice with him." Trump's comments followed a reporter asking Trump about his relationship with Elon Musk after the former Department of Government Efficiency chief repeatedly assailed the "big beautiful bill," the sweeping legislation that will fund the Trump administration's agenda and touted by the president as key legislation that demands GOP unity for passage. Musk was a key ally of Trump's during the campaign cycle, holding rallies in the top seven battleground states to rally support, including in Pennsylvania. Trump remarked that the Democrat Party should have tapped Pennsylvania Gov. Josh Shapiro to join former Vice President Kamala Harris as her running mate on the presidential ticket, but instead chose Walz. "Elon endorsed me very strongly. He actually went up and campaigned for me. I think I would have won. Susie would say I would have won Pennsylvania easily anyway, even if the governor had the real governor, not the governor, for a Minnesota," Trump said before calling Walz a "sick puppy." "But if you picked Shapiro or anybody else, I spoke to him recently about his, you know, his house being set on fire, which was terrible. But if they picked him, I would have won Pennsylvania," he added, referring to how Shapiro's home was targeted by arson while his family slept back in April. Walz joined Harris on the Democrat ticket in August 2024, just days after President Joe Biden dropped out of the race in July 2024 amid mounting concerns over his mental acuity, giving way to Harris at the top of the ticket. The Harris campaign had just more than 100 days between Biden dropping out and rallying support for the Harris-Walz ticket before Election Day on Nov. 5. After the election, Walz revealed he would run for president in 2028 if the opportunity presented itself. "Well, I had a friend tell me, 'Never turn down a job you haven't been offered,'" Walz told the New Yorker in March when asked if he would run for president. "If I think I could offer something ... I would certainly consider that," he said. "I'm also, though, not arrogant enough to believe there's a lot of people that can do this." He said that under the correct circumstances and if he had the right "skill set" for the 2028 race, "I'll do it." "You might do it?" the New Yorker asked. "I'll do whatever it takes," Walz said. "I certainly wouldn't be arrogant enough to think that it needs to be me."