North Yorkshire teachers criticise trust move to extend school day
Teachers at a chain of schools have walked out again in opposition to plans to make the school day longer. Outwood Grange Academies Trust (OGAT) said the move to extend the day by 30 minutes would bring its 28 sites in line with government recommendations.But the National Education Union (NEU) and NASUWT warned the move would add further pressure on teacher workload and impact recruitment. "No-one here wants to be doing this - we'd all rather be in the class with the kids doing what we've spent so much of our time training to do, and something we're so passionate about," said science teacher Tom Fisher.
Centrally-planned lessons covering "life skills" including financial literacy and careers education would take place during an extended morning registration period, OGAT said.However, the unions warned their members would still need additional time to prepare."They keep saying they'll give us resources we can just pick up and use, but no teacher does that," said Mr Fisher, who teaches at Outwood Academy Easingwold, North Yorkshire."It sucks that it has come to this."
As well as in North Yorkshire, walk-outs have been taking place at Outwood Academy sites across the north of England.OGAT schools currently finish at 14:30 BST, with the trust proposing a later finish to comply with the Department for Education's 32.5-hour week policy."Our members and all staff are already under extreme pressure with workload," said Gary McVeigh-Kaye, of the NEU.The North Yorkshire branch secretary said the proposal would "add to the recruitment and retention crisis that we've got in education anyway".Under the original proposals, a full-time teacher with a form group allocated to them would be working "two hours or more extra a week with no increase in pay and no real increase in planning and preparation time", according to NASUWT.Tim Toepritz, national executive member for the union, said the trust had since said teachers could use one form-time period a fortnight for planning, but at some schools that would be "in a block at the end of the year, which is no use".The earlier finish time at Outwood Academy Easingwold "worked" for pupils and parents, as well as bus operators, he added.
English teacher Jess Hesketh said a key issue was the "one size fits all approach to a really broad and diverse family of schools".Outwood Academy Easingwold's rural location made it "rare within the trust", she said."In terms of transport and the demographic of our students and our staff, it faces different challenges."
Alice Cokeham, who also teaches English, said that while teachers were striking during exam season, pupils had been taught the necessary material ahead of the industrial action.She added that pupils would not benefit from an extended school day without more time to socialise."We currently have a 15 minute break in the morning and a 30 minute break for lunch," she explained."In that lunchtime break of 30 minutes, students have to go to the toilet, queue for food, eat their food and also have a bit of fun with their friends."NASUWT representative and science teacher Jeremy Tomlin said: "We already see students are exhausted at the end of the five period day."We think it's going to have a long term impact on student welfare, student health, and also on the retention of teachers."He called for the academy trust to carry out a "proper" consultation with individual schools.
'Constructive dialogue'
A spokesperson for OGAT said the trust had "constructively engaged" with staff and trade unions since October, with changes made during a "genuine consultation".The "small" proposed change would bring the school day length "within the government's recommended bracket", they said.They said strikes would "disrupt children's education, especially as the days the unions have chosen for the strikes are all when students are taking GCSEs, exams they have worked so hard for"."We remain open to constructive dialogue and collaborative working, but we must prioritise our students so they get the best possible education."
Listen to highlights from North Yorkshire on BBC Sounds, catch up with the latest episode of Look North.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Scottish Sun
31 minutes ago
- Scottish Sun
National grooming gang probe ‘must be extended to Scotland'
Click to share on X/Twitter (Opens in new window) Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window) THE national criminal investigation into grooming gangs must be extended to Scotland to avoid a 'missed opportunity', the peer in charge of a damning report into the scandal has said. Baroness Casey's report found victims were failed by cops and officials who were in 'denial' about the rape and abuse of white girls by disproportionately Asian men and called for a major UK-wide criminal probe into the issue. Sign up for Scottish Sun newsletter Sign up 3 Baroness Casey's damning report laid bare how the State was in 'denial' over the rape and abuse of white girls. Credit: PA 3 A national inquiry into grooming gangs has been announced Credit: Getty Asked whether Scotland should be part of it, she said: 'I would be disappointed if the opportunity of the national criminal investigation [was missed]. 'I can move from Scotland to England pretty easily and criminals do, so that would be a missed opportunity.' Sir Keir Starmer bowed to pressure at the weekend and ordered a national inquiry into mass child sex abuse ahead of the publication of Baroness Casey's review. Her devastating report on Monday laid bare how the State was in 'denial' over the rape and abuse of white girls. Dame Louise Casey found perpetrators — disproportionately involving Asian men, many of Pakistani heritage — got away with it because of fears about inflaming community tensions. And the Scottish Tories demanded the public inquiry into the scandal must also be expanded to cover Scotland. Shadow Scottish Secretary Andrew Bowie yesterday/today said: 'Now that the Labour Government has finally bowed to the huge public demand for a national inquiry into the grooming gangs scandal it is essential that it is truly national in scope. 'That means extending the remit to include Scotland, where there have been well-documented cases of gangs responsible for the rape and sexual abuse of young women.' The MP called on Home Secretary Yvette Cooper to work with Nats chiefs on what is covered by the inquiry to all the 'voices of Scottish victims of these vile gangs' to be heard. Mr Bowie added: 'We already know that vulnerable young women were appallingly let down by Labour-run councils, where it appears that partisan political considerations led to the cover-up of the issue. Ethnicity of child sex abuse suspects will be logged after truth about Asian grooming gangs was 'dodged for YEARS' 'It's essential to uncover if sensitivities over the racial make-up of the perpetrators was a factor in the Scottish cases too.' In 2020, it was revealed cops kept secret a huge asylum seeker grooming gang in Glasgow which had at least 44 victims. All the perpetrators were asylum seekers from the Kurdish, Afghani, Egyptian, Moroccan, Turkish, Pakistani or Iraqi communities. Speaking in Westminster, Baroness Casey said it was a 'matter for Scotland to decide' whether to take part. She added: 'Criminals move to wherever they can get their prey. And with the internet, they do that even quicker and easier. I mean, it's an issue internationally, not just between the devolved nations. 'I think it is really important that across certainly Northern Ireland, Scotland, Wales and England, there's some join up around these sorts of issues.' Baroness Casey also urged Scots not to think grooming gangs could not be taking place in Scotland. She said: 'Don't just read this report and think it may not happen to you.' The Home Office was contacted for comment.
Telegraph
an hour ago
- Telegraph
Starmer's platitudes show Britain frozen out of big decisions on Iran
Expressions of concern, calls for de-escalation. As the 20-year crisis over Iran's nuclear ambitions reaches its historic climax, Britain has resorted to a policy of platitudes. Sir Keir Starmer wants no part in Israel's offensive against the Iranian regime and its nuclear plants. He will keep Britain as far away as possible from this campaign, and there is no reason to suppose that his position will change even if American forces were to join the assault, as anonymous US officials have been hinting. That is an entirely defensible position. Israel's bombs could yet achieve nothing but impose a short delay in Iran's quest for a nuclear weapon. The uranium enrichment plant at Natanz has been severely damaged, wrecking thousands of centrifuges, but the second such facility, buried in a mountain at Fordow, seems to have escaped attack so far. If Iran's regime manages to survive the onslaught and then repair the damage in a few months before going for a nuclear weapon as rapidly as possible, then Israel will have failed and Britain's decision to stay out will look entirely sensible. But the campaign may not end that way and, in the meantime, Sir Keir's empty bromides doom Britain to diplomatic irrelevance. There is simply no reason for Iran or Israel – and certainly not the United States – to listen to a word that the Prime Minister or his Government say on this subject. Britain wishes to have nothing to do with the enterprise, and therefore it cannot expect to have any influence over what happens next. That leaves Sir Keir with one deeply traditional goal of British diplomacy: to avoid an open breach with America. Hence the Prime Minister's claims that Donald Trump is fully behind 'de-escalation' and has no intention of joining the military campaign. Having dined with Mr Trump at the G7 summit on Monday, Sir Keir declared: 'There is nothing the president said that suggests he's about to get involved in this conflict.' Alas, straight after the summit, Mr Trump said plenty to suggest exactly that. He declared variously that 'we' have 'total control of the skies over Iran' and 'we' know 'exactly where the so-called 'Supreme Leader' is hiding' and Ayatollah Khamenei's only way out was 'unconditional surrender'. John Healey, the Defence Secretary, claimed heroically that Mr Trump was 'leading the calls for Iran to do a deal ', which is true if your definition of 'calls' includes issuing blood-curdling threats. If America now joins forces with Israel – and if this crisis ends with the total destruction of Iran's nuclear programme and perhaps the downfall of the regime – then Britain will have been a bystander in a moment of epoch-making importance. That is not necessarily a bad thing, but given that British diplomats and politicians have been deeply engaged in the Iran nuclear issue ever since the Natanz plant was first discovered in 2002, it seems strange, after all that effort, to choose irrelevance at the most decisive hour of the saga.
Daily Mail
an hour ago
- Daily Mail
Ban Chinese companies from investing in British water utilities, ministers urged
Ministers are being urged to block Chinese firms from investing in water utilities after they were banned from involvement with the Sizewell C nuclear plant. Environment Secretary Steve Reed has been warned that allowing companies based in China or Hong Kong to buy crucial utilities would be 'negligent'. Energy Secretary Ed Miliband last week banned Chinese investment in the Sizewell C nuclear plant amid growing concerns over the country's involvement in key UK infrastructure. And it followed demands from CKI, which is owned by Hong Kong billionaire Li-Ka-shing and already holds a majority stake in Northumbrian Water, to be allowed to bid for Thames Water. The struggling utility was plunged further into crisis earlier this month after American private equity giant KKR – the Government's preferred bidder – abandoned a £4bn rescue plan. KKR's U-turn – which sources said was due to concerns about the risk of political interference – fuelled fears that taxpayers could be forced to bail out Britain's biggest water company. Environment Secretary Steve Reed has been warned that allowing companies based in China or Hong Kong to buy crucial utilities would be 'negligent' Tory MP Nick Timothy said Chinese companies should not be allowed to invest in Thames Water. In a letter to Reed, seen by the Mail, Timothy said Miliband's decision was 'correct, given the threat posed by China to the UK and the wider west'. He said: 'It would be negligent to hand over yet more of our critical national infrastructure on top of China's already extensive footprint. 'In light of the Government's ban on Chinese investment in nuclear power, will you impose a similar ban on further Chinese investment in the water sector?' Companies in mainland China 'are under various obligations to the Chinese state, such as requirements to support, assist and cooperate with national intelligence efforts', he said. He argued that those based in Hong Kong 'also pose a serious risk, since they are now subject to authoritarian National Security Laws which have increased Beijing's reach into the territory'.
