logo
Byron Allen Reaches Settlement in $10 Billion Lawsuit Against McDonald's Over TV Advertising

Byron Allen Reaches Settlement in $10 Billion Lawsuit Against McDonald's Over TV Advertising

Yahoo15 hours ago

Allen Media Group chief Byron Allen has reached a settlement in the $10 billion lawsuit that he filed in 2021 alleging the fast food giant discriminated against Black-owned media companies in its TV advertising expenditures.
Terms of the settlement were not disclosed. The deal averts a trial that had been scheduled to begin in federal court in Los Angeles next month. The sides announced the agreement in a joint statement issued late Friday.
More from Variety
'Comics Unleashed' Returns to CBS Late-Night Schedule Following 'Midnight' Cancellation
Facing Backlash Over Firing Its Meteorologists, Allen Media Group Learns an Important Lesson: Take the 'Local' Out of Local TV At Your Own Peril
Federal Judge Says Byron Allen's $10 Billion Lawsuit Against McDonald's Can Proceed to Trial
'We are pleased that Mr. Allen has come to appreciate McDonald's unwavering commitment to inclusion, and has agreed to refocus his energies on a mutually beneficial commercial arrangement that is consistent with other McDonald's supplier relationships,' McDonald's USA said in a statement. 'Our company's unique three-legged stool model relies on mutual respect, and we look forward to ESN's contributions to the betterment of our system.'
Allen's suit hinged on his assertion that McDonald's habit of buying ad time on media outlets that target Black viewers was discriminatory because those purchases were made from a budget set aside for what the complaint described as 'the African American tier' of outlets. Allen's suit argued that the practice was damaging to Black media owners because that tier had more limited dollars available than the general tier that the company used for reaching broad-based audiences on the largest networks and platforms.
The suit was filed by Allen Media Group's Entertainment Studios and Weather Group units.
'We are pleased to find a resolution that maintains our business relationship,' Allen said. 'During the course of this litigation, many of our preconceptions have been clarified, and we acknowledge McDonald's commitment to investing in Black-owned media properties and increasing access to opportunity. Our differences are behind us, and we look forward to working together.'
More to come
Best of Variety
New Movies Out Now in Theaters: What to See This Week
'Harry Potter' TV Show Cast Guide: Who's Who in Hogwarts?
25 Hollywood Legends Who Deserve an Honorary Oscar

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Suns Seeking a Timberwolves-Friendly Return for Kevin Durant…
Suns Seeking a Timberwolves-Friendly Return for Kevin Durant…

Yahoo

time2 hours ago

  • Yahoo

Suns Seeking a Timberwolves-Friendly Return for Kevin Durant…

The Minnesota Timberwolves fell one round short of the NBA Finals for the second-straight season, leaving the new Lore + A-Rod ownership group — which is set to seize control of the organization later this month — with some early soul searching during their first offseason running the team. Already deep into the luxury tax, the Wolves' $92 million tax bill ( comes in as the second-highest of any NBA team for the 2024-25 season. If Marc Lore and his bevy of minority billionaire investors, assuming they get the necessary number of votes needed later this month when the NBA Board of Governors meet. Phoenix Suns trying to escape insane luxury tax penalties with KD trade Minnesota's future tax outlook, however, is more promising, after they traded Karl-Anthony Towns right before training camp last offseason (more on that below). That's the same type of move the Phoenix Suns need to make this year. Advertisement The Ishbia-owned Suns need to save themselves from entering a luxury tax hell that, not only netted them the league's highest tax bill in 2024-25, at a whopping $152 million, but also has Phoenix scheduled to pay an even higher $165 million in 2025-26. Credit: Joe Camporeale-Imagn Images Phoenix's most likely trade candidate — who could bring back even more than what he is worth (given his age), is 36-year-old superstar and 10x All-NBA selection — is Kevin Durant. The 17-year veteran put up another standard year last season, posting 26.6 points, 6 rebounds and 4.2 assists in 62 games. The Suns are trying to keep it cool, claiming there is a world in which they hold onto KD, but they aren't fooling anyone. At this point, it kind of feels like a Kevin Durant trade is as likely as daily ESPN shows like First Take spending an hour every day on some big city topic nobody cares about. Minnesota Timberwolves continue rise as favorite to land Kevin Durant Questions regarding KD trade rumors usually center around when a deal will go down and which partner the Suns + KD will ultimately choose to do business with, less about whether Phoenix will actually deal him. Advertisement Sportsbooks aren't as sure. DraftKings has the odds to roster Durant for game one of the 2025-26 season as a virtual three-way tie between the Rockets (+280), the Timberwolves (+350) and the Suns (+350). But whether you believe he'll eventually be traded or not, there is no doubt the Phoenix Suns are having active discussions trying to trade him right now. Then on Tuesday, a report out of Hardwood Paroxysm — a popular site written on and operated by popular NBA reporter Matt Moore — released details on what the Suns are looking for, in those talks. And let's just say… Moore has no cold water to dump on Minnesota Timberwolves fans hoping their team will trade for Kevin Durant this offseason… The Suns have indicated to teams that center is at a premium for them in any KD talks. He might stick around, but their biggest interest is in solving the center position, which has been a disaster since moving on from Ayton. Matt Moore – Hardwood Paroxysm Well, well, well… do the Minnesota Timberwolves have what the Phoenix Suns are looking for, or what? I can't imagine Connelly and Finch sending Naz Reid out in a deal, but he certainly qualifies as a big man. So would Julius Randle and Rudy Gobert. In other words, the Suns have a buffet of bigs to choose from in Minnesota. Related: The Minnesota Timberwolves are Stuck with Tim Connelly Of course, there is a reason why the Rockets have the highest odds to land Kevin Durant. They have younger, and arguably higher upside big men, in 6'11' center Alperen Sengun, who averaged 19.1 points and 10.3 rebounds per game last season, along with 6'10' PF Jabari Smith Jr (12.2 ppg, 7.0 rpg) and 6'8″ F Tari Eason (12 ppg, 6.4 reb). Where will Kevin Durant end up and how can the Timberwolves afford him? Recently, reported that the Minnesota Timberwolves planned to continue their pursuit of Durant this offseason, and that arguably the best jump shooter from inside the three point line in basketball history is indeed interested in playing with his mentee, Anthony Edwards, and the Wolves too. Advertisement Others have reported extensive talks between the Rockets and Suns too. In other words, there is a lot of work left to do before we know more about where Kevin Durant will wind up this offseason. But if we learned anything last year, it's that president of basketball operations Tim Connelly — who verbally committed to staying with the Minnesota Timberwolves long term on Monday — is open to lifting and lowering the Wolves' future luxury tax burden, depending on what he feels is best. By unloading Karl-Anthony Towns on the New York Knicks, just before the start of the 2024-25 NBA regular season, in exchange for Julius Randle, Donte DiVincenzo and a 1st round draft pick, Connelly not only saved about $10 million in tax payments for Lore and A-Rod this year, but that trade also sent their 2025-26 projected luxury tax payments plummeting to No. 8 in the NBA. Advertisement Related: Karl Anthony Towns' New Teammates Turn on Him After Playoff Exit As of today, Minnesota sits just over $4 million above the tax threshold for next season. projections include the opt-in amounts on players who could choose to opt-out, like Julius Randle's $30.9 million and Naz Reid's $15 million, the latter of which is expected to opt-out and then sign back on a much larger deal. It won't be easy to fit Durant into their plans, and it won't be cheap either. But without a doubt, Tim Connelly could find a way to get it done, if given a legitimate opportunity. Related Headlines

Five Years After George Floyd: Can Fashion Still Stand for Something?
Five Years After George Floyd: Can Fashion Still Stand for Something?

Business of Fashion

time8 hours ago

  • Business of Fashion

Five Years After George Floyd: Can Fashion Still Stand for Something?

In June, a new nonprofit, The Jewelry Edit Foundation, convened a group of industry leaders — including executives from Coach, Tiffany & Co. and Hermès — for a 'Lunch With Purpose.' The agenda: support underrepresented designers through year-round programming with a heavy focus on diversity, equity and inclusion, as well as sustainability. The Jewelry Edit Foundation has its roots in a retail platform of the same name (with a similar values-driven emphasis) founded by the designer Rosena Sammi in 2020, when fashion's promise to stand for something was at its loudest and most urgent. But in the second Trump administration, organisations that put DEI front and centre are increasingly rare, and groups with public backing from major corporations are even rarer. Sammi says the need to plow ahead now is more critical than it has ever been. ADVERTISEMENT 'I want to be surrounded by people brave enough to take action — not stand by on the sidelines,' she said. The Jewelry Edit founder Rosena Sammi hosts a "Lunch With Purpose," attended by high-profile leaders in the fashion and jewellery industry. (Courtesy/Courtesy) Many companies that founded DEI departments and backed organisations that support minority designers and entrepreneurs have quietly – and not so quietly – dismantled those efforts in the face of a conservative backlash. Dozens of Black-owned fashion and beauty brands that benefitted from increased attention after 2020 have shuttered, starved of capital and lacking the resources to weather economic headwinds. The pressure to keep silent was on display last week, as protests erupted in California after immigration enforcement agents arrested dozens of day labourers, including garment workers. While a handful of celebrities, including singer and rapper Doechii and Kim Kardashian spoke out, few large brands did. There was certainly nothing resembling the black square campaign of 2020 — a highly visible, if much-criticised, show of solidarity that saw brands from Chanel and Gucci to Levi's and Gap participate. Still, some of the energy sparked in 2020 hasn't disappeared. In a few cases, it's intensified. Felita Harris, a former Donna Karan executive who co-founded RAISEFashion in 2020 to support independent BIPOC designers, says there's upside in staying the course. The nonprofit in May hosted its latest 'master class' for emerging Black designers, this time on profitable growth, and partnered with Ferrara Manufacturing on a June 12 fundraiser to help underrepresented founders scale. Its latest grants are helping several Black-owned labels stay afloat, and alumni have landed roles at Louis Vuitton, Bloomingdale's and other major companies. 'I see the potential every day in [our master] classes — being able to make introductions, to stop the gatekeeping,' Harris said. Felita Harris, a former Donna Karan executive, co-founded RAISEFashion in 2020 and is doubling down on its mission to support BIPOC designers. (Courtesy/Courtesy) A few companies have kept up their pre-2024 approach to politics. Outdoor retailer REI and beauty brand Lush Cosmetics have recently doubled down on their DEI commitments — with Lush even using the acronym in product names and marketing. Designer Willy Chavarria in April partnered with the American Civil Liberties Union to launch Creatives for Freedom, which takes on issues like immigrant rights. So why have some brands and creatives continued to press forward when so many others have pulled back? ADVERTISEMENT The motivation is a combination of mission and margin — rooted in the belief that fashion can be a cultural force on issues like race, gender, and immigration, and that marginalised creatives drive the innovation and relevance the industry needs to grow with a new generation of consumers. 'Our business has always been rooted in mission and values. To stray from that now — or ever — would be antithetical to who we are,' said Nicole Lacasse, senior manager of brand and customer REDI (or racial equity, diversity and inclusion) at REI. 'We have seen firsthand the business results. This is right for our business.' For companies caught in the middle — eager to engage but wary of political blowback from a divided customer base — the path forward can feel murky. But it's not impossible. And some brands say the rewards for staying the course are becoming apparent. Backlash to the Backlash The surge in anti-DEI sentiment — from Trump's vow to 'end the tyranny' of DEI to a wave of executive orders earlier this year — has introduced real, or at least perceived, risks for fashion and beauty brands. Earlier this year, many brands determined that staying quiet was the most prudent course of action. But the anti-DEI backlash is generating its own backlash. Target — once praised for its swift response in the wake of Floyd's murder in its home city of Minneapolis — backed off its diversity commitments within hours of Donald Trump's inauguration. The URL that once led to a 2020 statement by chief executive Brian Cornell about 'a community in pain' now returns a 404 error. Foot traffic has declined in each of the four months since Target changed its policies, according to In May, Cornell told investors that year-over-year sales were down partly due to the fallout. Meanwhile, plenty of retailers have plowed ahead with their existing DEI policies, sometimes under new names, without facing a backlash from Trump or consumers. The key is to move past the 2020-era reflex to turn everything into a marketing play, experts say. ADVERTISEMENT Lush keeps its internal DEI work mostly under the radar, even as it renamed three of its bestselling bath bombs 'diversity,' 'equity' and 'inclusion' in January. That's because, while the brand is known for its activist campaigns, when it comes to its culture and workforce, 'you should take care of your own house before talking about it externally,' said Amanda Lee Sipenock Fisher, the company's head of DEI and belonging. Lush's cheekily named soaps are a natural way 'to enter the conversation with our products,' Sipenock Fisher said. But it works best when paired with substantive work behind the scenes. 'When you have a DEI programme that first and foremost serves your people, you are tuning in directly to employee engagement,' Sipenock Fisher. 'And we know that employee engagement is an incredible KPI. It is a driver of successful businesses.' Lush's "diversity" bath bomb. (Courtesy/Courtesy) That dual track approach is getting more challenging as the Trump administration puts corporate DEI initiatives under the microscope. 'I've never seen this much external interest in our work,' she said. 'Seeing [DEI] being threatened, rolled back, quieted — that was a moment for employees, consumers and companies to say, 'Wait, there is backlash to the silence.'' Retailers with the most successful DEI programmes today tend to be the ones that were thinking about the topic before 2020. REI formally embedded inclusion into its business strategy nearly two decades ago, Lacasse said. Its partnerships with groups like Outdoor Afro, Black Girls RUN!, and Latino Outdoors are part of a broader strategy that includes investing in inclusive sizing, colour palettes and gender-neutral designs — products that have become some of the company's top performers, Lacasse said. 'This is really about continuity of our brand commitment, our purpose and trust building,' she said. 'We do really believe that when we show up consistently over time, when we centre the voices of our communities and we make equity a shared responsibility, we can really strengthen our position as a brand.' Fashion as a Cultural Force Even as brands face pressure to retreat, fashion's most public-facing moments — red carpets, runways, and campaigns — remain powerful, if inconsistent, signals of inclusion. But 'visibility doesn't equal viability,' Harris pointed out. In other words, fashion has become known for splashy displays of support — like buzzy shows or red-carpet moments featuring BIPOC designers — that often fail to translate into lasting commercial success, like shelf space, wholesale deals or infrastructure investment, Harris said. The Met Gala in May offered mainstream exposure to Black creatives, with LaQuan Smith, Grace Wales Bonner, Ozwald Boateng and Sergio Hudson delivering standout red carpet moments. The spotlight on the Black dandy — a fluid term celebrating expressive, often ostentatious style — landed like a quiet protest in a politically fraught climate. Teyana Taylor, Colman Domingo and Lewis Hamilton at the 2025 Met Gala. (Getty Images) 'The Met Gala shows fashion's power to inspire the masses,' Chavarria said in an email. 'However, that must live beyond the one event and we should use that momentum to elevate voices.' The industry has repeatedly failed to turn these cultural flashes into lasting structural change — whether through sustained investment, leadership opportunities, or shelf space. With a few high-profile exceptions, including Pharrell Williams at Louis Vuitton and Olivier Rousteing at Balmain, designers of colour remain rare in top creative roles. These designers not only continue to be locked out of these top roles — they're also expected to lead the charge for change, often while navigating the very systemic barriers that hinder their progress. Designer Willy Chavarria walks the runway during his Ready to Wear Spring/Summer 2025 fashion show. (Getty Images) 'I don't want Willie [Chavarria] to be the only one who's doing this work, and I also don't want it to always be the person who is in the marginalised community who feels that they have to be the one doing this work,' said Jessica Weitz, national director of artist and entertainment engagement at ACLU. 'There's no question that this industry could not exist without a diverse workplace ... and a diverse group of people who are in the business of buying fashion.' Fashion's influence — its soft power to shape culture and drive progress — has dulled, insiders say, not for lack of rhetoric, but for lack of follow-through. 'Maybe the world is looking at fashion in the same way we [experience it], which is, can fashion be trusted?' said Harris. 'Can it really deliver what it promises? Because how can fashion call for democracy when designers are going out of business? When there's such a lack of Black leadership at the top?' Still, designers like Chavarria say there's power in holding the industry accountable to the ideals it promotes. 'Fashion has always been political, and now it's becoming urgent,' Chavarria said. 'It is a way to resist. Now more than ever, fashion must stand with the communities that have always used it to speak out and be heard.'

Byron Allen Reaches Settlement With McDonald's In Lawsuit Claiming Racial Bias In Advertising
Byron Allen Reaches Settlement With McDonald's In Lawsuit Claiming Racial Bias In Advertising

Yahoo

time11 hours ago

  • Yahoo

Byron Allen Reaches Settlement With McDonald's In Lawsuit Claiming Racial Bias In Advertising

Byron Allen's Entertainment Studios and The Weather Group have reached a settlement with McDonald's in a lawsuit over the fast food giant's alleged lack of support for Black-owned media companies. McDonald's defeated the complaint in 2024 in the U.S. District Court for the Central District of California, but Allen appealed. The parties announced the settlement Friday, though no financial details were disclosed. More from Deadline Paramount Says Abrupt Dismissal Of Longtime Media Agencies WPP Media And Horizon Was Driven In Part By Push For "Greater Efficiency" - Update AMC Says New NCM Preshow Ads Don't "Negatively Influence Moviegoing Habits" Tastes Great, Less Filling? Report On Meta Plan For Cheaper, Fully AI-Made Ads Boosts Tech Giant's Stock As Media Agency Shares Slump Under the settlement, McDonald's will still buy ads from ESN, which controls a range of broadcast and streaming properties, 'in a manner that aligns with its advertising strategy and commercial objectives,' a press release said. and ESN will dismiss its lawsuit against McDonald's The fast food company is not admitting any wrongdoing and the press release affirmed that the ads sold will be priced at market value. 'We are pleased that Mr. Allen has come to appreciate McDonald's unwavering commitment to inclusion, and has agreed to refocus his energies on a mutually beneficial commercial arrangement that is consistent with other McDonald's supplier relationships,' McDonald's said in a statement. 'Our company's unique three-legged stool model relies on mutual respect, and we look forward to ESN's contributions to the betterment of our system.' The presumed injection of capital into Allen's companies comes as they face the same pressures hitting all media companies due to cord-cutting and declines in advertising. He recently enlisted Moelis & Co. to explore a sale of his local TV stations. 'We are pleased to find a resolution that maintains our business relationship,' ESN and The Weather Co. said. 'During the course of this litigation, many of our preconceptions have been clarified, and we acknowledge McDonald's commitment to investing in Black-owned media properties and increasing access to opportunity. Our differences are behind us, and we look forward to working together.' Best of Deadline 2025 TV Series Renewals: Photo Gallery 2025 TV Cancellations: Photo Gallery 2025-26 Awards Season Calendar: Dates For Tonys, Emmys, Oscars & More

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store