
Herbert Gans, leading sociologist and media analyst, dies at 97
NEW YORK: Herbert Gans, a groundbreaking sociologist and media analyst who advocated for greater diversity and public participation in everything from the suburbs and the arts to the voices that shape the news, died Monday at age 97.
His death was confirmed by his son, David Gans, who said he died at his Manhattan home after a lengthy illness.
Author of such influential works as 'The Urban Villagers' and 'The Levittowners,' Herbert Gans was a refugee from Nazi Germany who liked to say he viewed his adopted country through the eyes of an outsider. He called himself a 'participant-observer,' combining research and direct experience and lending crucial perspective on municipal planning, attitudes toward race and poverty, mass communication and cultural tastes.
A professor emeritus at Columbia University and former president of the American Sociological Association, he believed in making scholarly work accessible, and was a popular commentator and prolific essay writer. He served on the committee that prepared the Kerner Report, the 1968 government study that warned the country was 'moving toward two societies, one Black, one white — separate and unequal.' In 1964, he testified on behalf of Lenny Bruce when the comedian was on trial for obscenity.
Prolific writer and 'participant observer'
Gans wrote often about the local impact of government policy. In 'The Urban Villagers,' released in 1962, he chronicled (and lived in) a blue-collar Italian-American section of Boston's West End that would soon be torn down in favor of more expensive housing. The sociologist Nathan Glazer would praise the book's critique of 'urban renewal' and detailed portrait of those displaced for describing 'truthfully and without damaging preconceptions a part of American reality.'
'The Levittowners,' published in 1967, countered the prevalent feeling of the time that suburbs bred conformity and despair. Gans lived for two years in a New Jersey suburb designed by William Levitt, whose 'Levittowns' helped define the modern bedroom community. Gans didn't dispute that boredom and homogeneity existed in the suburbs, but concluded that most of the residents were satisfied; the suburbs were less likely to change the people who moved there than to provide what they had been looking for.
'I should like to emphasize once more that whatever its imperfections, Levittown is a good place to live,' Gans wrote. '(T)he most urgent priority is to make the benefits of suburban living available to the poor and nonwhite families, now condemned to slum ghettos, who want to give their children and themselves a better life beyond the city limits.'
Gans' 'Deciding What's News,' which came out in 1979, was a snapshot of the peak of print journalism and network power. Focusing on the evening broadcasts of NBC and CBS and the news magazines Time and Newsweek, he spent extensive time with reporters in the 1960s and '70s and noted what they covered, what they didn't cover and the thinking behind their choices, whether the pressures of executives, concerns about objectivity or changes in public concerns.
He found the newsgathering process to be honest and well intended. But Gans worried that organizations were more invested in stability and the status quo than in fully informing the public, with journalists drawing upon familiar sources in government and business and spending much of their private time with those of their social class. As a solution, Gans proposed 'Multiperspectivism,' allowing everyone from radical leftists to religious fundamentalists to express their views.
'For those who feel, as I do, that the interests of diverse groups have priority over the needs of nation and society, multiperspectival news and some decentralization of the national media are preferable,' he wrote. 'It would be a good deal more effective if it coincided with widespread public demand for greater popular representation in the economy and the polity.'
Gans' other books included 'Middle American Individualism,' 'The War Against the Poor' and 'People, Plans and Policies.' In 'Imagining America in 2033,' published in 2009, he outlined his hopes for a 'fairer economy, a more democratic polity, and institutions that cater to a greater extent to the people they are supposed to serve.'
A strong belief in the importance of diversity.
Born in Cologne, Germany to middle-class Jewish parents, Gans and has family fled the Nazis in 1939, moving first to England and settling in Chicago in 1940. Gans became a naturalized citizen in 1945 and served in the Army in 1945-46. He had already liked reading sociology in high school and studied it as an undergraduate at the University of Chicago, where he became close to such faculty members as the social scientist Martin Meyerson and David Reisman, the future author of 'The Lonely Crowd,' the classic portrait of social anxiety in 1950s America. Gans received a master's in sociology from the University of Chicago and a Ph.D., in 1957, from the University of Pennsylvania.
He taught at the University of Pennsylvania and Teachers College before joining Columbia in 1971 and remaining until 2007. He also worked in local government, as an assistant planner for the Chicago Housing Authority, and at the federal level with the predecessor to the Department of Housing and Urban Development. He was married twice, most recently to Louise Gruner.
Gans was a highly educated, liberal Democrat whose belief in diversity meant he resisted imposing his tastes, whether upon his neighbors in Levittown or upon his readers. In the 1974 book 'Popular Culture and High Culture,' he disputed the idea that so-called elite tastes were superior to those of the masses and criticized scholars who followed 'their own standard of the good life.'
He wrote, 'all people have a right to the culture they prefer, regardless of whether it is high or popular. The book is thus an argument for cultural democracy and an argument against the idea that only the cultural expert knows what is good for people and for society.'
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Time of India
an hour ago
- Time of India
Strawberry Moon 2025: When and where to watch the full moon in India and the US
Ever looked up at a so-called Strawberry Moon and wondered if the moon is about to serve fruity pink vibes? Hate to break it to you, it is not turning pink or red or berry-hued. But what it is doing in 2025 is something astronomers and astro-nerds are buzzing about. The June full moon, adorably nicknamed the Strawberry Moon, is rooted in Native American culture. Tribes linked this moon phase with the ripening of wild strawberries, hence the name. Cute, right? But this year's Strawberry Moon is not just a pretty name. It is serving once-in-a-generation realness. What makes Strawberry Moon 2025 so special? This year, the Strawberry Moon is showing off. Thanks to a rare celestial event called a major lunar standstill, the full moon in June 2025 will sit super low in the sky — the lowest it has been in nearly 20 years. Basically, the moon will hug the horizon, appear huge, and glow with a golden-orange filter courtesy of the Earth's atmosphere. In case you are wondering, the next time this low-sky drama returns is 2043. So yes, this is your moment. Strawberry Moon 2025 date and time in India In India, mark your calendars for Wednesday, June 11, 2025 at 5:30 AM IST — that is when the Strawberry Moon hits its peak. But the real aesthetic? That will happen the night before. Step out on Tuesday, June 10, 2025, right after sunset (between 7:15 PM and 8:00 PM IST) and look southeast. Golden hour meets golden moon — it is the ultimate vibe. How and when to see it in the US American moon lovers, your cosmic call time is Tuesday evening, June 10, 2025, just after sunset. The peak happens at 3:44 AM EDT on June 11, but the visual drama unfolds earlier in the night. Whether you are in New York at around 8:30 PM EDT or chilling in LA at 8:00 PM PDT, the southeastern sky is your best bet for moon magic. Other names for the June full moon Besides the ultra-Instagrammable 'Strawberry Moon,' June's lunar diva is also called the Blooming Moon, Green Corn Moon, Hoer Moon, Egg Laying Moon, and even the Hatching Moon. No matter what you call it, this low-hanging lunar glow is serving once-in-two-decades glory.


Time of India
an hour ago
- Time of India
The Oldest, Most Enduring Relationship
If you're guessing that the world's oldest, most enduring relationship is the one with your mother, you are absolutely right - Mother Earth . The human-environment interface begins the moment you are born and continues till you die and perhaps even after death as your remains - whether buried or reduced to ashes - are returned to earth and get regenerated. Tired of too many ads? go ad free now Is this a positive, loving relationship or one that is troubled, fraught with contradictions and exploitation? It is both. And it is a powerful one. Media platforms carpet bomb doom news of environmental degradation due to human activity and greed. Everything is now polluted; species are going extinct, potable water is in short supply, glaciers are melting, sea levels are rising, the dhobi list is very long. But here is another view that echoes a completely different sentiment, that humanity does not merely destroy nature, we have also enhanced it. So reports ecology and archaeology scholar Stefani Crabtree in the Temple Foundation's newsletter, saying that when we call an ecosystem as being pristine, untouched by humans, we could be wrong. The truth is, when human beings ventured out of Africa and into different parts of the world, we populated every possible ecosystem on earth - some places early on and others, much later. She writes, "There is no ecosystem on earth today that is not shaped by human presence." Human presence has not always had a negative effect. Like other fauna and flora, we, too, are an intrinsic part of nature. Nature created us. To leave humans out of nature in order to conserve it, can be misleading, even harmful. "As European-American pioneers moved west, they often encountered seemingly uninhabited landscapes. What they didn't see were the effects of disease, displacement and forced relocation that had reduced or removed indigenous population from those lands. Tired of too many ads? go ad free now The prairies they crossed were not untouched, they were actively managed landscapes, shaped by millennia of indigenous stewardship ," says Crabtree. In the Great Plains, when settlers noticed forests creeping into former prairie lands, they were witnessing the ecological consequences of a disrupted human-environment relationship . Indigenous peoples had long used controlled burning to maintain grasslands, promoting biodiversity and reducing wildfire risk. Crabtree points out that without these traditional practices, the ecosystem began to shift, losing its fire-dependent species and becoming less resilient to environmental stress. Yes, humans have been disrupting ecosystems, but they have also played a part in shaping the natural world as stewards and enablers. The use of fire not only helped humans settle down but also created grasslands and savannahs for grazing animals and growth of new plant species. There are other species besides humans who have been altering the environment for good purposes. Like beavers who build dams and ponds, helping recharge groundwater and controlling floods. Like birds, bees and butterflies, humans too aid in seed dispersal, biodiversity propagation, soil regeneration, and domestication of animals for tilling the soil, keeping predator populations in check. The negative impact seems to have overtaken the positive ones; we need to re-establish a healthy relationship that will allow all of us to grow and regenerate without stepping on one another's toes. " Ecological engineering is not a one-way path to destruction; it could also be a foundation for abundances," points out Crabtree. People could be catalysts for ecological health , and not just agents of extraction. Authored by: Narayani Ganesh ganeshnarayani@ Why Arjun Was Chosen: The Untold Secret of Bhagavad Gita Chapter 4, Verse 3


Mint
4 hours ago
- Mint
A flawed attempt at delivering Gaza aid led to a wave of deaths
Israeli army officers and American military contractors looked on from their joint operations center late last month with concern. A new attempt to hand out food and other aid to thousands of hungry people in Gaza had just launched, and it was about to be overwhelmed. A crowd surged through the newly constructed gates at the site in Rafah. Chaos and looting quickly followed. Some 40 American contractors working for a private security company retreated. Outside the distribution center, Israeli troops opened fire to warn off the crowds. It was the beginning of a cycle of dysfunction and violence that would play out repeatedly over the following days, derailing the latest attempt to get food into the hands of the people who most need it. The events of May 27 exposed how the Israeli military and the new nongovernment group it is working with, the Gaza Humanitarian Foundation, were unprepared to deal with wide-scale hunger and desperation in the enclave after a year and a half of war. An Israeli military official said the American contractors made a mistake by withdrawing and allowing the Rafah site to be destroyed. It hasn't reopened since. A spokesperson from Safe Reach Solutions, a private U.S. company contracted by GHF to secure the aid, said that the retreat followed a protocol designed to safeguard lives. SRS is responsible for securing the aid sites, while the military secures the surrounding area, where the shootings have taken place. Both sides have complained privately of coordination problems. Two weeks on, the organizers still haven't fully figured out how to make the initiative work. At least five times last week, Israeli forces fired toward Gazans as they were heading to distribution sites, saying some people had deviated from an approved route and continued to approach troops. Gazan authorities say more than 100 Palestinians have been killed while trying to access aid. The Israeli military official said the military and the Americans are making improvements as they learn what works on the ground. Coordination and work with the American contractors is improving, the official said. The aid effort is run by the newly formed GHF, a foundation incorporated in Delaware in February. GHF came to the project without a lot of knowledge about Gaza, according to people familiar with the plan. It is currently led by Evangelical leader Johnnie Moore, a former Trump campaign adviser. GHF and SRS work closely together with the Israeli military in a handful of joint operation centers in southern Israel staffed by dozens of people at a time. The military shares intelligence with the Americans including details of military operations in the vicinity of the aid sites. The military and GHF had prepared for smaller crowds than the tens of thousands who have come to the sites, said an Israeli military officer involved in the aid effort. The officer said this expectation was based on Hamas's opposition to the aid plan and the distribution site's distance from al-Mawasi, a tent encampment housing much of Gaza's displaced population. GHF initially planned to open three sites in southern Gaza and one in central Gaza. SRS stationed a few dozen people at each location including local Gazans to distribute the aid. It wasn't enough—the food has run out quickly and there is often chaotic overcrowding at sites. On some days, only one of the four hubs has been operating. And when some sites do open, they usually do so for a limited period, sometimes for 45 minutes in total, before closing when supplies run out. Gazans who have visited aid sites in the past two weeks say they often try to arrive early at the sites to ensure they get aid before it runs out, even though it isn't permitted. The Israeli military, GHF and SRS said they had anticipated the size of the large crowds at the sites correctly. 'We knew the need was overwhelming, and we prepared accordingly, expecting turnout beyond what we could service," a spokesperson for SRS said. Gazans describe chaotic scenes at aid sites, with violence sometimes breaking out over who gets food. An initial plan to employ biometric specialists conducting facial recognition screenings was dropped for the moment as it has proved unfeasible given the large crowds, said one person involved in the operation. GHF has said it is working to improve its effectiveness. It is piloting a program that will distribute aid directly to communities, rather than making Gazans travel to one of its distribution centers. It is also aiming to open more distribution sites and has created a special lane for accessing aid for women and children. To date, the group says it has distributed approximately 232,800 boxes of aid. In recent weeks, hundreds of American contractors, many of them former special forces, have arrived in Israel. They are receiving around $1,000 a day, including on days off, according to people familiar with the matter. They are housed in several hotels in southern Israel, many sporting arm and leg tattoos, baseball caps and sunglasses. At a hotel in the city of Ashkelon in southern Israel last week, some contractors could be seen carrying mini fridges and rice cookers to their rooms. Gazans complain of poor communication from GHF and the Israeli military. Operating hours are often changed and announced at the last minute on GHF's Facebook page, which launched on May 28. In comments on the Facebook page and an official GHF WhatsApp group, Gazans criticize the unfairness of the distribution method, discuss looting by thieves and say they are confused by opening hours. 'Credibility is 0%. This morning you said Netzarim at 6 a.m. Then at 4:30 you said distribution was over," reads one of two dozen angry comments in Arabic on GHF's Facebook page on Monday. 'At times they tell us to return, and that there will be no aid today. And then two hours later they open," said Abdullah Jouda, 24, who has visited aid sites in Rafah in recent days. He said he was fired on as he made his way to an aid site in Rafah on June 1 and watched a person next to him die. Internal wrangling has been a problem, too. GHF's chief executive stepped down on the day it was supposed to launch, saying he couldn't abandon the humanitarian community's principles of neutrality, impartiality and independence. Boston Consulting Group, which had helped advise on the plan, said last week that it was cutting ties with the initiative and fired two partners after an internal investigation, saying they carried out unauthorized work. Humanitarian groups have refused to join the initiative, saying it puts Palestinians in too much danger by requiring them to travel through a war zone for food and that Israeli military presence near aid sites is dangerous. Other problems abound. GHF says Hamas has threatened Gazans on the ground who collaborate with the initiative. Israel says efforts by Hamas to disrupt the plan show how Israel is successfully cutting off the ability of the U.S. designated terrorist group to steal aid and sell it to fund its war effort. Hamas denies it steals aid. The military contractors have at times grown frustrated. SRS was initially hired by the U.S. and Qatar to guard an Israeli-constructed corridor in Gaza called Netzarim during a cease-fire starting in January. But staff contracts weren't extended as expected after Israel resumed fighting in the enclave in mid-March. This left the company in limbo for weeks, leading many hires to return to the U.S., according to one SRS hire. By the time SRS learned in the spring that a new contract would start, this time with GHF, they only had a few weeks to hire enough people for the operation, according to the SRS hire. The company had to work fast and launched a LinkedIn hiring campaign for roles such as 'video analyst." More than 20 countries as well as the European Union and United Nations have criticized the aid plan, saying it unnecessarily puts civilians at risk. Food and humanitarian goods had entered Gaza since the start of the war via aid groups and the United Nations, which delivered to hundreds of distribution centers throughout the enclave. The Israeli government has repeatedly denounced Hamas for looting U.N. aid shipments, but the U.N. denies the claims. On the ground in Gaza, meanwhile, many Palestinians are torn between their desperation for food and their concern for their safety as they make their way to distribution sites. Samaher Abu Audeh, 40, says she worries each morning when her husband, Issa, leaves their tent in al-Mawasi and heads to a distribution center in Rafah. She sometimes asks him not to go, but he insists as he must feed their five children. On Monday morning she prayed again he would return safely. 'May God ease his way and bring him back safely today," she said. 'Maybe he'll bring flour, so I can bake for the kids. Hunger is killing them." Write to Anat Peled at