Democrats need to embrace inclusion over ideological conformity in order to win again
If Democrats want to win back Congress and the White House, we must reclaim what made our party a national force in the first place: our commitment to being a big tent.
For much of modern history, the Democratic Party has thrived by welcoming Americans from a wide range of backgrounds and beliefs. We didn't require agreement on every issue to work together for a common cause—especially on topics like abortion or gun safety, where regional and cultural differences shaped the views of our candidates and voters alike. That flexibility helped us build durable coalitions capable of winning elections from city halls to Congress.
But in recent years, we've moved toward a more rigid and absolutist posture—one that suggests a Democrat must align 100% with every plank of the party platform to earn the label. This "all or nothing" mentality has not only narrowed our reach; it's jeopardized our ability to build the legislative majorities we need to govern.
Take, for example, pro-life Democrats. While they may diverge from national party orthodoxy on reproductive rights, many of these leaders stand with us on issues like affordable healthcare, economic justice, and workers' rights. In a divided electorate, supporting candidates like these can be the difference between holding a legislative chamber—or handing it over to Republicans who oppose our values wholesale.
The same logic applies to gun safety. In rural districts where hunting and gun ownership are embedded in the culture, we shouldn't expect every Democrat to support the same proposals as those from urban centers. We can still advocate for commonsense reforms—background checks, red flag laws, and safe storage—without insisting on litmus tests that alienate potential allies.
As Governor Gretchen Whitmer has said, we need to meet people where they are. That doesn't mean compromising on our values—it means recognizing that no coalition succeeds without some ideological flexibility. Most parliamentary democracies around the world understand this. Majorities are built through negotiation and compromise between parties that may agree on only a few key issues. That's how they keep government functional and extreme ideologies in check.
We should do the same. Because what matters most is not ideological purity—it's the power to govern. It's the ability to pass legislation, confirm judges, invest in communities, and protect our democracy from those who seek to undermine it.
If we want to win again—truly win—we must embrace the complexity of our electorate. We must build a Democratic Party that prizes inclusion over ideological conformity. Only then will we have the strength to meet this moment and the future beyond it.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
CBS News
10 minutes ago
- CBS News
South Florida teen fears for family's future as proposed rule threatens asylum seekers' work permits
A South Florida teenager is voicing concern for his family's future as reports circulate that a possible Trump administration regulation could strip work permits from many asylum seekers. The regulation could affect Venezuelans like his father, who fled political turmoil for a better life in the United States. "He came here to fight for us" Sebastian Latuche, 15, a ninth grader at a South Florida high school, says the potential change is weighing heavily on his family. "It just hurts me seeing him like this, worrying him too much. He came here to fight for us, to give us a better life," Sebastian told CBS News Miami. His father, Javier Latuche, has lived in the U.S. for 11 years after leaving Venezuela, where his business was confiscated by the Maduro regime. Now a small business owner running a real estate agency, Javier said he's deeply unsettled by reports of looming restrictions on work permits for asylum seekers. "I am scared of having my work permit revoked," he said, despite having applied for both Temporary Protected Status (TPS) and asylum. "I haven't been able to sleep, I could not work today, I feel extremely vulnerable," added the father of two, including an eight-year-old U.S. citizen. Sebastian echoed the fear gripping his household. "I'm worried because of the situation. Me, my dad and my mom, where we don't have papers yet." Community leaders warn of mental toll on families Venezuelan and immigrant rights activists gathered Wednesday at the Arepazo, a popular Venezuelan meeting spot in the City of Doral, to voice concerns about the potential policy's emotional toll, particularly on children. "The emotional toll, fear, and legal uncertainty are severely affecting the mental health of thousands of migrant children," said human rights activist Juan Correa Villalonga. Venezuelan activist Helen Villalonga pleaded for compassion. "What did we do to you Donald Trump to deserve this? Many of my people believed in you, trusted you to change Venezuela, not destroy our families." Two officials from the Department of Homeland Security told CBS News that the Trump administration is considering a regulation that would prevent most asylum seekers from obtaining work permits. Though no public announcement has been made, anxiety is spreading throughout immigrant communities. "Who can live in this city or anywhere in the U.S. without a work permit?" said José Antonio Colina of the Venezuelan Political Persecuted Exiles group. In a statement to CBS News, DHS declined to confirm the reports, stating it does not comment on the "deliberate process or possible decision making." However, the department added: "Over the previous years, the Biden administration eviscerated the integrity of America's asylum system. The department is exploring all possible options to protect our national security and increase program integrity." A teen's hope for stability For Sebastian, the immigration debate is not about politics. It's about family. "Now it's just getting a little harder than my parents imagined it to be. They came here for me and my brother."
CNN
17 minutes ago
- CNN
Trump Amid Weak Jobs Report: 'Too Late' Powell Must Lower Rates - Erin Burnett OutFront - Podcast on CNN Audio
Trump Amid Weak Jobs Report: 'Too Late' Powell Must Lower Rates Erin Burnett OutFront 48 mins Trump takes on the Federal Reserve president for bad jobs numbers. Plus, Trump announces to the world that Putin is about to attack Ukraine as revenge for an air assault. Also, a Chinese couple is charged with trying to smuggle a dangerous biological pathogen into the United States, capable of decimating crops and poisoning humans.
Washington Post
17 minutes ago
- Washington Post
Trump proclamation seeks to restrict international students from Harvard
President Donald Trump on Wednesday evening sought to restrict international students and scholars from entering the country to attend, conduct research or teach at Harvard University, further escalating the administration's strong-armed attempts to force change in higher education. The proclamation, 'Enhancing National Security by Addressing Risks at Harvard University,' comes days after a federal judge blocked the administration's attempts to revoke the school's ability to host foreign students and scholars. The administration has said forceful action is needed to address complaints of antisemitism after protests disrupted college campuses during the 2023-2024 academic year over the Israel-Gaza war. The temporary restraining order issued by U.S. District Judge Allison D. Burroughs last week halted a Department of Homeland Security move to revoke Harvard's Student and Exchange Visitor Program certification. The administration alleged that Harvard allowed 'anti-American, pro-terrorist' foreigners 'to harass and physically assault individuals … and obstruct its once-venerable learning environment.' The administration has demanded that Harvard comply with numerous directives it says are aimed at ensuring more forceful action against campus antisemitism, among other concerns. Harvard has contested the actions with two lawsuits challenging the administration's actions as unconstitutional and unlawful, and has said it has and is continuing to take measures to address discrimination on its campus. In response, the Trump administration has taken a number of actions, including announcing that billions of dollars of federal grant funding is under review, terminating research contracts, launching investigations and threatening to revoke the school's tax-exempt status. Harvard has called those actions retaliation for its refusal to relinquish its academic independence. Trump's proclamation says 'it is necessary to restrict the entry of foreign nationals who seek to enter the United States solely or principally to participate in a course of study at Harvard University or in an exchange visitor program hosted by Harvard University,' because entry of those foreign nationals is 'detrimental to the interests of the United States because, in my judgment, Harvard's conduct has rendered it an unsuitable destination for foreign students and researchers.' He said the denial of access would continue until the university shares information the federal government requires 'to safeguard national security and the American public.' DHS had demanded information about foreign students that included known illegal activity or threats against students or faculty. According to the proclamation, Harvard provided data on misconduct by only three students, which 'was so deficient that the DHS could not evaluate whether it should take further actions.' 'Harvard's actions show that it either is not fully reporting its disciplinary records for foreign students or is not seriously policing its foreign students,' Trump's proclamation states. Spokespeople for Harvard did not immediately respond to requests for comment, but the school has said in the past that it responded to DHS requests for information as required by law but was told its responses were insufficient. More than 7,000 international students and scholars are currently at Harvard, and the school is expecting thousands more to arrive for the summer and fall terms. More than a quarter of Harvard students come from other countries, drawn by the university's internationally known reputation and opportunities. U.S. Attorney General Pam Bondi said in a post on social media Wednesday that the Justice Department would 'vigorously defend the President's proclamation suspending the entry of new foreign students at Harvard University based on national security concerns.' This story is developing and will be updated.
