logo
Defiant, argumentative and tearful: STEPHEN GIBBS details how Joel Cauchi's psychiatrist squirmed in the spotlight as she was finally grilled over his deadly rampage

Defiant, argumentative and tearful: STEPHEN GIBBS details how Joel Cauchi's psychiatrist squirmed in the spotlight as she was finally grilled over his deadly rampage

Daily Mail​14-05-2025

Joel Cauchi's psychiatrist went from argumentative to defiant before finally admitting she was wrong as her treatment of the Bondi Junction mass killer was again put under the spotlight on Wednesday.
Dr A - who cannot be identified for legal reasons - returned to the witness box in the State Coroners Court at Lidcombe where she repeatedly clashed with Sue Chrysanthou, SC, the barrister representing three of the families of Cauchi's victims.
It followed Dr A's statement on Tuesday where she said Cauchi's rampage stemmed from 'sexual frustration, pornography and hatred towards women' rather than his psychotic state.
Although Dr A withdrew her statement after conceding she had indulged in 'conjecture and speculation', she remained defiant on Wednesday.
At one point, Dr A told Chrysanthou, 'I don't think you have any degree in medicine', while being quizzed about Cauchi's mental health.
At another, Dr A objected to a question from Chrysanthou about Cauchi's schizophrenia by saying: 'That's not true, I have to educate you.'
Chyrsanthou: 'I don't want to be educated. I just want you to answer the question.'
By the time the psychiatrist was due to face re-examination by Peggy Dwyer, senior counsel assisting the coroner, Dr A, who took Cauchi off all anti-psychotic medications because he didn't like the side effects but remains adamant that she committed no errors in her treatment, was in tears and could not go on.
The lunch break was taken early so she could compose herself.
State Coroner Teresa O'Sullivan is investigating the shopping centre massacre on April 13 last year when 40-year-old knifeman Cauchi killed five women and one man.
The carnage ended only when Inspector Amy Scott arrived on the scene and shot Cauchi dead.
Those killed by Cauchi were shoppers Dawn Singleton, 25, Jade Young, 47, Yixuan Cheng, 27, Ashlee Good, 38, Pakria Darchia, 55 and security guard Faraz Tahir, 30.
The inquiry has previously heard that Cauchi was 'floridly psychotic' but Dr A, who treated him for eight years until 2020, rejected that assessment on Tuesday and denied she had failed in his care.
Dwyer: 'What would you say to the suggestion that you refuse to accept that Joel was psychotic on the 13th of April because you don't want to accept yourself the failings in your care of Joel?'
Dr A: 'I did not fail in the care of Joel. I refuse - I have no error on my behalf.'
On Wednesday, Dr A continued to deny any failings, having helped wean Cauchi off his anti-psychotic medication by July 2019.
Dr A's first day giving evidence had featured heated testimony during which she became irritated with Dr Dwyer's line of questioning, telling her to 'move on'.
She began her second stint in the witness box by apologising for her behaviour the previous day, admitting she had been 'short at times' with Dwyer during her testimony.
'That's because I am suffering from acute pain and on medication,' she said
Cauchi, who grew up in Toowoomba on Queensland's Darling Downs, had been diagnosed with schizophrenia as a teen and had been successfully treated for more than two decades.
Dr A gradually eased Cauchi off the two antipsychotic drugs he was taking - aripiprazole and clozapine.
After Cauchi ceased taking the drugs, his mother Michele contacted the psychiatrist's private clinic seven times raising concerns about possible signs of relapse.
Those signs included him leaving notes around their home about Satanic control, experiencing extreme obsessive-compulsive disorder and poor sleep.
Dr A previously told the court Cauchi had never been psychotic after he stopped taking aripiprazole and clozapine.
She believed he had first-episode schizophrenia, rather than chronic schizophrenia, because he had remained symptom-free while medicated.
In early 2020, near the start of the COVID-19 pandemic, Cauchi moved to Brisbane when he was completely cut off from psychiatric care.
Having discharging Cauchi to his Toowoomba general practitioner after he relocated to Brisbane, Dr A said there was nothing she could do to follow up his care.
Dwyer suggested on Tuesday that Dr A could have made a phone call.
'You could have done that, you just couldn't charge for it,' she said.
Dr A accepted she could have done that.
On Tuesday, Dr A had also said Cauchi could not have organised the stabbing spree if he was experiencing symptoms of schizophrenia.
'It might have been to do with frustration, sexual frustration, pornography and hatred towards women,' she said.
'That is my opinion.'
At the start of the inquest, the office in charge of the police investigation, Detective Chief Inspector Andrew Marks, said Cauchi did not appear to have been targeting women.
Chrysanthou, who is looking after the interests of the Singleton, Young and Good families, told Dr A on Wednesday her claims about Cauchi's mental state at the time of the attack had shocked and distressed her clients and was 'contrary to all the expert evidence'.
Dr A withdrew her earlier statement.
'It was conjecture on my part and I should not have said what I said,' she added.
Dr A saw no link between discovering in November 2019 that Cauchi had become obsessed with sex and watching pornography five months after he had stopped taking medication.
'I didn't see any connection between the two, I thought it was a new phenomenon,' Dr A said.
Dr A had not believed Cauchi was paranoid when he expressed concern about having contracted HIV after what she called a 'dangerous sexual encounter' with a prostitute.
'It was a reality-based fear,' she said.
When Dr A queried the relevance of another of Chyrsanthou's questions the barrister responded: 'Don't worry about the relevance of my questions, just answer them.'
Dr A told the court Cauchi had never shown an interest in knives or given her reason to think he might be contemplating violent acts.
After Chrysanthou's cross-examination of Dr A it was the turn of Ragni Mathur, SC, the barrister representing a general practitioner who had treated Cauchi.
While working through the psychiatrist's contact with that physician, Mathur felt obliged to tell her, 'take a breath', 'pause, pause', and 'Doctor, take a breath'.
'I was satisfied that I did the right thing,' Dr A said at the end of Mathur's questions.
Dr A's own barrister, Mark Lynch, had his client explain to the court she was never in a position to make Cauchi take medication if he did not want it.
'It's almost the patient's choice,' she said.
'We can't force them.'
Dr A said during her eight years treating Cauchi he had never showed any symptoms of psychosis or signs of being a risk to himself or anyone else.
Between December 2015 and February 2020 she had 47 appointments with Cauchi, other psychiatrists had seen him six times, and psychiatric nurses saw him on 77 occasions.
Dr A told Lynch she had never been asked to give evidence in a court or tribunal until called to this inquest.
Asked if she was doing her utmost to the tell the truth, she said: 'In here, definitely, definitely.'
It was after Lynch had finished with his client that Dr A broke down in tears.
When she resumed giving evidence following lunch it was under Dwyer's re-examination.
After a more than a day and a half of giving evidence, Dr A was asked by Dwyer if she was now prepared to defer to the opinion of experts that Cauchi was psychotic when he killed seven strangers.
After a long pause, Dr A finally said 'yes'.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Insane $100,000 trail of destruction left behind after driver allegedly leads police on wild pursuit
Insane $100,000 trail of destruction left behind after driver allegedly leads police on wild pursuit

Daily Mail​

timean hour ago

  • Daily Mail​

Insane $100,000 trail of destruction left behind after driver allegedly leads police on wild pursuit

A driver has faced court after allegedly ramming shopfronts and causing $100,000 worth of damage during a meth-fuelled rampage that ended after a police pursuit. Daniel Young, a 47-year-old from Rosemeadow, fronted Downing Local Court on Wednesday following the alleged pursuit from Campbelltown, southwest Sydney, to Sydney International Airport, in the city's inner-south. NSW Police allege Young mounted the footpath on Queen Street, Cambelltown, in a Ford ute at about 1.50am on Wednesday. Officers saw the ute enter the carpark of Campbelltown Police Station a short time later, but the driver took off. Police attempted to stop the ute when it returned to Queen Street and a pursuit was initiated when it failed to pull over. Young allegedly sped down the Hume Highway and M5 Motorway for 50km until he reached the airport in Mascot. 'The vehicle has then allegedly entered a restricted Sydney International Airport area controlled by a boom gate before the driver allegedly rammed the gate - causing significant damage,' NSW Police said in a statement. 'The vehicle stopped and the driver was arrested by officers attached to Highway Patrol - assisted by the dog squad. 'He was subject to a roadside drug test, allegedly returning a positive detection to methamphetamine.' Methamphetamine was also allegedly found inside Young's phone. Young was taken to Mascot Police Station and underwent a secondary oral fluid test, which has been sent for further testing. He fronted court later on Wednesday where he was charged with police pursuit - not stop - drive dangerously, enter/remain on major facility cause damage to facility, exceed speed greater than 45 km/h, destroy or damage property greater than $15000, possess prohibited drug, and breach of bail. It's understood about 20 stores were damaged in Campbelltown with the bill expected tor each $100,000. Hannah Moy, owner of the newly-opened Enchanted Trove, shared photos of her damaged store and asked customers to be patient as online orders may be delayed. 'I will handle this with humour, but please send love because we are pretty gutted,' she wrote. Eat Shop Love also sustained massive damage to its storefront after its owners had recently repaired its glass doors following a robbery last week. Young's lawyer, Tia Marlo, sought bail for her client. She argued he had a limited criminal history and needed urgent rehabilitation for an alleged drug addiction. The application was denied with the magistrate noting Young was already on bail at the time of the alleged offence and allegedly cam close to driving on airport grounds. Young is expected to return to court on June 17.

Federal watchdog finds ‘no corruption' in $2.4m settlement to Brittany Higgins following alleged rape
Federal watchdog finds ‘no corruption' in $2.4m settlement to Brittany Higgins following alleged rape

The Guardian

time2 hours ago

  • The Guardian

Federal watchdog finds ‘no corruption' in $2.4m settlement to Brittany Higgins following alleged rape

The federal anti-corruption watchdog has found there was 'no corruption issue' regarding the $2.4m settlement paid to Brittany Higgins following her alleged rape within Parliament House. The National Anti-Corruption Commission released the findings of its preliminary investigation into the matter on Thursday, concluding there was 'no inappropriate intervention' by the Labor government. In December 2022, Higgins signed a deed of settlement with the commonwealth when Labor's Mark Dreyfus was the attorney general. The former Liberal senator Linda Reynolds later accused Dreyfus of 'seeking to silence' her for not allowing her to defend herself against Higgins' claims. The Nacc found there was 'no material difference' in legal advice received by the former Coalition government before the May 2022 election and advice subsequently received by the newly elected Albanese government. The Nacc concluded: 'There was no inappropriate intervention in the process by or on behalf of any minister. The then attorney general approved the settlement in accordance with the departmental advice.' 'There is no evidence that the settlement process, including the legal advice provided, who was present at the mediation, or the amount, was subject to any improper influence by any Commonwealth public official,' the anti-corruption watchdog said in a statement. 'To the contrary, the evidence obtained reflected a process that was based on independent external legal advice, without any inappropriate intervention by any minister of either government. There is therefore no corruption issue.' Guardian Australia reported in September 2024 that Reynolds had referred the matter to the Nacc in October 2023 and was provided commonwealth assistance to fund the referral. The deed, released during Lehrmann's failed defamation case in December 2023, compensated Higgins for her loss of earning capacity, legal costs, medical expenses, domestic assistance and '$400,000 for hurt, distress and humiliation'. As part of Higgins' claim, she alleged the commonwealth had breached its duty of care because Reynolds and her staff mishandled the matter and did not adequately support her. The Nacc's finding comes as the WA supreme court prepares its judgment on Reynolds' defamation case against Higgins over a series of social media posts, published in July 2023, which the former minister claims damaged her reputation. In court in August 2024, Reynolds accused Dreyfus of 'seeking to silence' her. Sign up to Morning Mail Our Australian morning briefing breaks down the key stories of the day, telling you what's happening and why it matters after newsletter promotion She said the claims that she had not given Higgins adequate support after her alleged rape in March 2019 were 'utterly defendable'. 'My defence was to be no defence … I was outraged.' Reynolds is separately suing the commonwealth over Higgins' settlement for taking over her defence in the mediation, which she publicly claimed amounted to 'egregious conduct'. Higgins alleged that she was raped by Bruce Lehrmann in the ministerial suite of the then defence minister, Reynolds, in 2019. The accusation spawned more than a dozen legal cases. In a criminal trial in 2022, Lehrmann pleaded not guilty to one charge of sexual intercourse without consent, denying that any sexual activity occurred. The trial was aborted after a juror obtained information outside the evidence presented in court and, in December of that year, prosecutors dropped charges against him for the alleged rape of Higgins, saying a retrial would pose an 'unacceptable risk' to her health. A federal court judge overseeing a defamation case launched by Lehrmann against Network Ten found in 2024 that Higgins was, on the balance of probabilities, raped by Lehrmann in the office. Lehrmann is appealing that verdict.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store