logo
Outshone By China, Can Europe Make A Solar Comeback Before It's Too Late?

Outshone By China, Can Europe Make A Solar Comeback Before It's Too Late?

Forbes28-05-2025

Javier Sanz Rodriguez, Thematic Leader at European Commission backed InnoEnergy
Once a global pioneer in solar technology, Europe now finds itself in a race against time to reclaim a foothold in an industry it helped to create. While China's dominance of solar manufacturing is undisputed, a growing chorus of investors, innovators, and policymakers believes Europe can still rebound—if it acts decisively.
'It's not just about competitiveness anymore—it's about sovereignty,' says Javier Sanz Rodriguez, Thematic Leader for Renewable Energies at InnoEnergy, a cleantech investor backed by the European Commission. InnoEnergy has helped build four industrial unicorns and is currently mobilising €160 billion in cleantech investment by 2030. It is the launchpad behind ventures such as H2 Green Steel and Northvolt, and is now betting big on reviving sovereignty of Europe's solar ecosystem.
Europe's fall from solar manufacturing grace wasn't due to a lack of innovation. 'Europe was leading because market demand and technology leadership coincided,' Sanz explains. 'But when demand outpaced domestic supply, China became the easy solution.'
From Berlin, Felix Krause, Managing Partner at Vireo Ventures, offers a complementary view: 'Indeed, Europe was once a leader in solar manufacturing,' he says. 'However, continuous reliance on cheap fossil fuels from countries like Russia, a lack of cohesive industrial strategy, and fragmented policies hindered Europe's ability to maintain its competitive edge.'
In contrast, China charted a deliberate industrial course, pouring more than $50 billion into scaling its solar PV capacity—ten times more than all EU countries combined. It vertically integrated its supply chains, slashed costs through massive economies of scale, and captured the market.
'This allowed China to rapidly scale production and drive down costs, effectively outpacing European manufacturers,' Krause adds.
TOPSHOT - A view shows photovoltaic solar pannels at the power plant in La Colle des Mees, Alpes de ... More Haute Provence, southeastern France, on April 17, 2019. - The 112,000 solar panels cover an area of 200 hectares with a total capacity of 100MW. (Photo by GERARD JULIEN / AFP) (Photo credit should read GERARD JULIEN/AFP via Getty Images)
The urgency to act, both Sanz and Krause agree, stems from more than just market logic. It's about resilience and autonomy in an era of geopolitical volatility.
'In the current political climate, Europe must urgently strengthen its energy resilience,' says Krause. 'Historically, we relied heavily on oil and gas imports, but these sources have proven to be unreliable and geopolitically risky. Now, the focus must shift to establishing independent energy production as the basis for democracy, independence and freedom.'
Sanz echoes the sentiment. 'If we don't act now, we risk losing not just our competitiveness, but our ability to meet climate goals on our own terms.'
The good news? Europe still leads in early-stage innovation. Startups like NexWafe are rewriting the rules of solar wafer manufacturing with processes that are not just more efficient, but more sustainable.
'NexWafe introduces a new approach to silicon wafer production,' says Sanz. 'Their epitaxial process eliminates energy-intensive steps, cuts energy consumption by 40%, reduces silicon waste by 90%, and lowers CO₂ emissions by up to 70%.'
It's a breakthrough that could significantly reduce costs and restore a competitive edge to European manufacturers. But innovation alone isn't enough. Europe must scale these technologies, fast.
Circularity is another frontier where Europe can lead, especially with its unique mix of strong climate regulation, early-stage innovation, and largescale market demand. The EU's Waste Electrical and Electronic Equipment, WEEE, Directive, for example, mandates responsible recycling of electronic waste, including solar panels. This is creating new opportunities to extract and reuse valuable raw materials, lessening Europe's reliance on external sources.
One company, ROSI, is turning this mandate into industrial capacity. With facilities in France and expansion plans in Germany and Spain, ROSI is recovering high-purity materials like polysilicon from decommissioned panels and production waste.
'These materials can be reintegrated into the value chain,' Sanz explains. 'This is about more than sustainability—it's about supply chain resilience.'
To scale up manufacturing and compete with Asia's giants, Europe needs to pool resources and expertise. Both Sanz and Krause agree that strategic joint ventures and cross-border collaborations are vital.
'Joint ventures enable rapid scale-up and transfer of industrial know-how,' Sanz says. 'They can rebuild capacity quickly, especially in critical upstream components like ingots and wafers.'
Krause is blunt about what's missing: 'If Europe genuinely wants to rebuild its solar industry, it must focus on emerging technologies and new materials rather than attempting to compete directly with the massive economies of scale established in Asia.'
But he sees promise—if the EU can get its act together. 'We need a coordinated European strategy that prioritises investment in research, scales these technologies to market, and fosters long-term industrial partnerships.'
Felix Krause, Managing Partner at Vireo Ventures
When asked what one policy could unlock real momentum, Krause is unequivocal: 'I would implement a clear mandate from the European Commission to transition to 100% renewable energies by 2040.'
Such a commitment, he says, 'would send a strong signal to the market, unlock substantial capital, and attract a massive inflow of talent, companies, and businesses.'
Sanz, meanwhile, believes smarter foreign investment rules could be transformative. 'Reshape the EU's FDI screening policy into a strategic industrial tool,' he says. 'Let it enable the right kind of industrial partnerships while preserving EU control. Full reshoring isn't realistic, but strategic reinvestment is essential.'
He also supports rapid implementation of the Net Zero Industry Act, along with EU-wide procurement policies that favour 'EU-made' technologies. 'Italy and Austria are already offering tax incentives for European-made products. Now we need a continental strategy.'
At InnoEnergy, investment isn't just about ROI—it's about systemic impact. 'We look for projects that reduce emissions and create quality jobs in Europe,' Sanz says.
Beyond capital, the firm provides hands-on support—market access, governance, industrial expertise—to help projects reach scale. 'We're building companies like Verkor, GravitHy, Holosolis, and now SUNWAFE, which will produce ingots and wafers in Spain.'
For Sanz, it's a journey rooted in pragmatism. 'Cross one bridge after another,' he says. 'That mindset helps me focus on solving what's in front of me, rather than getting distracted by what's down the road.'
His proudest recent achievement? The launch of SUNWAFE. 'It's one of those moments that give you the sense of having a real impact.'
With the right mix of ambition, coordination, and investment, both Sanz and Krause believe Europe can still turn the tide.
'This is not just about technology,' says Krause. 'It's about building the foundations of a future that's democratic, independent, and sustainable.'
And with experts continuing to sound the alarm bells for climate change as a cascading crisis, the time to act is now.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Trump admin officials blast LA Mayor Karen Bass' response to ICE raids — as cops clash with violent protesters
Trump admin officials blast LA Mayor Karen Bass' response to ICE raids — as cops clash with violent protesters

New York Post

timean hour ago

  • New York Post

Trump admin officials blast LA Mayor Karen Bass' response to ICE raids — as cops clash with violent protesters

Several Trump administration officials fired back at Los Angeles Mayor Karen Bass Friday after she pledged to oppose federal efforts to nab illegal immigrants — as cops in her city had to use flash bangs to disperse the violent mob of protesters who descended on the arrest sites. 'We will not stand for this,' Bass said in a statement released after federal immigration authorities arrested 44 people in raids across Los Angeles. 'I am deeply angered by what has taken place,' the Democrat mayor fumed, noting that her office 'is in close coordination with immigrant rights community organizations.' Advertisement 4 Bass slammed the Los Angeles immigration enforcement raids in a social media post. AFP via Getty Images White House deputy chief of staff Stephen Miller quickly dismissed Bass' declaration. 'You have no say in this at all,' Miller shot back on social media. Advertisement 'Federal law is supreme and federal law will be enforced,' he noted on X. Miller was one of several Trump administration officials that took issue with Bass' statements. 'They're Illegals. Not 'immigrants.' One just tried to burn Americans alive in Boulder,' White House adviser Sebastian Gorka wrote on X, referring to Colorado terror suspect Mohamed Soliman. The Egyptian national overstayed his tourist visa before allegedly firebombing a peaceful march for Israeli hostages still held by Hamas on Sunday in a heinous antisemitic attack. Advertisement 'If you're aiding and abetting them you're a criminal too,' Gorka said in response to the LA mayor's comments. 'Are you ready to be treated as a criminal? 'Because we are ready to treat you as one if you commit a crime,' he warned. 4 Miller noted that Bass has 'no say' in federal immigration enforcement. Chris Kleponis – CNP / MEGA 4 Miller was one of several Trump administration officials who reacted strongly to Bass' statement on the ICE raids. Stephen Miller, /X Advertisement Justice Department official Harmeet K. Dhillon was stunned by Bass' understanding of the law. 'It's amazing the number of elected officials who don't grasp the basics of federalism, or federal sovereignty over immigration issues, or the First Amendment,' Dhillon tweeted. The Los Angeles immigration raids sparked protests at the arrest sites, and at least one person was taken into custody for allegedly obstructing federal law enforcement. 'Federal agents were executing a lawful judicial warrant at a LA worksite this morning when David Huerta deliberately obstructed their access by blocking their vehicle,' US Attorney Bill Essayli said in a statement. 'He was arrested for interfering with federal officers and will face arraignment in federal court on Monday.' 'Let me be clear: I don't care who you are — if you impede federal agents, you will be arrested and prosecuted.' Huerta is president of the California branch of the influential Service Employees International Union. 4 The raids sparked protests in Los Angeles. AP Department of Homeland Security spokeswoman Tricia McLaughlin decried the city's response to protesters' clashes with federal agents – which escalated hours after the raids. Advertisement 'Assaulting ICE enforcement officers, slashing tires, defacing buildings. 800 protestors have surrounded and breached the first layer of a federal law enforcement building in LA,' McLaughlin wrote on X. '@LAPD has not responded.' 'This violence against @ICEgov must stop.' Richard Grenell, President Trump's envoy for special missions, blamed Bass for the unrest. 'Karen Bass whipped all of this up. She attacked the rule of law. She undermined democracy,' Grenell wrote on X, sharing images of protesters attempting to block federal law enforcement vehicles. Advertisement 'The @MayorOfLA is creating chaos in LA,' he fumed. With Post wires

‘They are in shock': Indian students fear Trump has ended their American dream
‘They are in shock': Indian students fear Trump has ended their American dream

Yahoo

time3 hours ago

  • Yahoo

‘They are in shock': Indian students fear Trump has ended their American dream

For weeks, Subash Devatwal's phone has not stopped ringing. Some of the calls have been from distressed students, at other times it is their panicked parents, but all have the same question – is their dream of studying in the US still possible? Devatwal runs an education consultancy in Ahmedabad, the main city in the Indian state of Gujarat. It is one of thousands of such organisations that exist across the country, helping Indian students achieve what many consider to be the ultimate symbol of success: getting into an American university. It has long been a booming business for Devatwal. Families in India will often invest their entire life savings to send their children to study in the US and last year there were more than 330,000 Indians enrolled at American universities, more than any other foreign nationality, overtaking Chinese students in numbers for the first time in years. But this year the situation looks drastically different. As Donald Trump's administration has taken aim at international students – first implementing draconian screening measures over political views and then last week ordering all US embassies globally to indefinitely pause all student visa interviews – many Indian students and their families have been left in limbo. Trump's unilateral decision to block Harvard University from admitting international students, which was later blocked by the courts, also caused widespread panic and stoked fears that foreign students at other universities could get caught in the president's crosshairs. 'The students are in shock. Most of them spend several years preparing to study in the US,' said Devatwal. He said many of his clients were now hesitant to pursue a US degree, given the high levels of turmoil and uncertainty following the Trump administration's new policies. Indian students can expect to pay between $40,000 to $80,000 (£29,500 to £59,000) a year on tuition alone to study in the US. In previous years, Devatwal's organisation sent more than 100 students to American universities but this year he said the number had dropped to about 10. Instead, families were shifting their focus to the UK and other European countries. A recent analysis by the Hindu newspaper estimated a 28% drop in Indian students going to the US in 2025. 'Families contribute their savings, take out loans from banks and borrow from relatives, all in the hope that the student will secure a good job abroad, repay the debt, and build a promising future,' said Devatwal. 'In such uncertain circumstances, parents are understandably reluctant to let their children take such a risky path.' Brijesh Patel, 50, a textile trader in Surat, Gujarat, said he had been saving money for over a decade to make sure his son could go to a US university, including selling his wife's jewellery and borrowing money from relatives. 'Everyone in the family wanted our son to go to the US for his studies and make something good of his life,' said Patel. His 21-year-old son, who he asked not to be named for fear of retribution by the US authorities, had secured a place at two American universities for his master's degree and Patel had already paid 700,000 rupees (£6,000) to consultancies who helped with the applications. But amid the turmoil under Trump, Patel said his son was being advised not to even apply for his student visa, due to the uncertainty and high probability of rejection. 'We simply can't take that risk. If our son goes now and something goes wrong, we won't be able to save that kind of money again,' he said. However, Patel said he was not willing to give up on the family dream just yet. 'I am an optimist, and my son is willing to wait a year,' he said. 'We're hoping that things improve by then. It's not just my son who will be living the American dream, it's all of us: my wife, our relatives and our neighbours. I've struggled my whole life – I don't want my son to face the same struggles here in India.' The fear among prospective and current students was palpable. Several Indian students studying in the US declined to speak to the Guardian, fearing it could jeopardise their visas. In India, a student selected in December to be one of this year's Fulbright-Nehru doctoral fellows – a highly competitive scholarship that pays for the brightest students to study abroad at US universities as part of their PhD thesis – said the applications of their entire cohort had recently been demoted back to 'semi-finalists'. The student, who asked to remain anonymous over fears it would affect their application, said they had invitation letters from top Ivy League universities for the fellowship, which is considered one of the most prestigious scholarships in the US, but now everything was up in the air. 'We are supposed to start in October and our orientation was scheduled for May, all the flights and hotels were even booked, but then it all got cancelled. Now we've been informed all our applications are under review by the Trump administration,' said the student. They said it had caused 'huge panic and anxiety' among those accepted. 'I know a lot of people are going back through their social media, deleting things and doing a lot of self-censoring.' Piyush Bhartiya, a co-founder of the educational technology company AdmitKard, said many parents who had been set on sending their children to the US were rethinking their plans. He cited one example of a student who had been admitted to New York University for the coming year but was instead planning to go to the London School of Economics after the US visa interviews were paused. Bhartiya said Indian students primarily went to the US to study Stem subjects – science, technology, engineering and maths – and so the focus had shifted to other countries strong in these areas. 'Germany is the main country where students are shifting to for Stem subjects,' he said. 'Other countries like Ireland, France, the Netherlands, which are also gaining substantial interest in the students. At the undergraduate level, the Middle East has also seen a lot of gain in interest given parents feel that it is close by and safer and given the current political environment they may want their kids closer to the home.' Among the Indian students forced to abandon their plans is Nihar Gokhale, 36. He had a fully funded offer for a PhD at a private university in Massachusetts, but recently received a letter saying the funding was being withdrawn, as the university faced issues under the Trump administration. 'It was quite shocking. I spoke to people at the university, and they admitted it was an exceptional situation for them too,' said Gokhale. Without the funding, the US was financially 'out of the question' and he said he had an offer from the UK he now intended to take up. 'For at least the next three or four years, I'm not considering the US at all,' he said. • This article was amended on 4 June 2025 to correct a conversion error. An earlier version said that 700,000 rupees was £68,000 instead of saying £6,000.

Hegseth says Nato allies ‘very close' to raising defence spending target to 5%
Hegseth says Nato allies ‘very close' to raising defence spending target to 5%

Yahoo

time3 hours ago

  • Yahoo

Hegseth says Nato allies ‘very close' to raising defence spending target to 5%

The US defence secretary, Pete Hegseth, said Nato allies were 'very close, almost near consensus' to an agreement to significantly raise targets for defence spending to 5% of GDP in the next decade. The Trump administration official indicated he expected the increased target to be agreed at a summit in The Hague later this month – and confirmed that the headline figure was to be split into two parts. 'This alliance, in a matter of weeks, will be committing to 5%: 3.5% in hard military and 1.5% in infrastructure and defence-related activities. That combination constitutes a real commitment,' he said. Hegseth was speaking at a press conference at Nato headquarters in Brussels after the morning session of an all-day meeting of defence ministers from the 32-country transatlantic military alliance. 'I'm very encouraged by what we heard in there,' Hegseth told reporters. 'Countries in there are well exceeding 2% and we think very close, almost near consensus, on a 5% commitment to Nato.' Nato's current target level for military spending, agreed at a summit in Cardiff in 2014, is 2% of GDP, but Donald Trump has repeatedly claimed that European allies and Canada do not spend enough compared with the US. In an attempt to avoid Trump wrecking the first Nato summit of his second term, the alliance's new secretary general, Mark Rutte, proposed a 3.5% plus 1.5% target, though there is some ambiguity about the target date. Initial reports suggested that Rutte wanted allies to hit the target from 2032, though earlier this week British sources suggested the date could be 2035. Sweden's defence minister said he would like to see the target hit by 2030. Only Poland currently exceeds the 3.5% target for hard military spending at 4.32%, according to Nato figures, while the US defence budget, the largest in the alliance, amounts to 3.4% of GDP, at $967bn (£711bn). The UK spends 2.33% of GDP on its military, but has pledged to increase that to 2.5% by 2027 and to 3% some time in the next parliament. Earlier this week the prime minister, Keir Starmer, declined to set a firm date for the UK achieving 3% as he unveiled a strategic defence review. Related: Why is defence such a hard sell? The same reason Starmer is struggling in the polls | Martin Kettle Rutte will visit London on Monday to meet Starmer before the summit. Downing Street said the prime minister and the secretary general would 'talk about how we ensure all allies step up their defence spending now in order to respond to the threats that we face now'. Germany's defence minister, Boris Pistorius, said Berlin would need up to 60,000 additional troops to meet new Nato targets for weapons and personnel. 'We are stepping up to our responsibility as Europe's largest economy,' the minister said on Thursday. Germany, which currently spends 2.12% of GDP on defence, had been singled out by Trump as a laggard in spending, though until Russia's full-scale invasion of Ukraine, Berlin had been reluctant to be a leader in European military spending, partly due to the memories of the militarism of the second world war.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store