Former Dolton Mayor Tiffany Henyard does not have document demanded in FOIA lawsuit, attorney says
Attorneys for former Dolton Mayor Tiffany Henyard say they will file an affidavit explaining she does not have records required as part of an ongoing lawsuit.
Henyard was required to appear in court Friday at the Daley Center in Chicago to produce documents requested last year by the nonprofit Edgar County Watchdogs that are public via the Freedom of Information Act. Cook County Judge Kate Moreland filed an order holding her in contempt May 23 for repeated violations of court orders.
Though Henyard was called to testify, Henyard's attorney, Beau Brindley, told Moreland she would not take the stand due to an ongoing federal investigation into possible misconduct during her tenure as Dolton's mayor. Brindley confirmed after the hearing he is representing Henyard in the federal investigation.
'She does not have these documents,' Brindley said. 'The one document they're asking for, she doesn't remember what it is. She doesn't possess it.'
The Edgar County Watchdogs sued Dolton in February 2024 after failing to receive documents requested the month prior. The lawsuit claims the groups made two separate requests Jan. 5, 2024, neither of which received a response from Henyard's office.
Attorneys for the Edgar County Watchdogs said Friday the village helped fulfill the first request, copies of all credit card statements since Oct. 1, 2023. However, they still not received copy of a document Henyard showed at a January public meeting while stating trustees canceled the credit card, stating the document was proof.
'We don't believe that someone can just burn a piece of paper or get rid of … the document, and the Watchdogs aren't going to stop until they get it,' attorney Edward Coach Winehouse said after the hearing.
Judge Moreland affirmed Friday that Henyard would be fined $1,000 per day as of May 30 until she produced the records responsive to the group's request or filed the affidavit. Brindley said the affidavit would be filed by Monday.
After the hearing, Brindley told the Daily Southtown the case represents a 'pretty unfair focus on Mayor Henyard, who has been out of office for awhile now.'
'This is about one piece of paper at a board meeting that she had like a year ago, and they seem to suggest that she's going to still have it,' Brindley said. 'She doesn't even know what it is, and the fact that they've gone to all this trouble and a contempt hearing and everything else is just silly.'
Edgar County Watchdogs claim in the lawsuit the only response to their Jan. 5 FOIA requests came from Village Clerk Alison Key, informing them the village administrator at the time, Keith Freeman, instructed staff not to reply to requests that she entered.
'Hopefully, you will get what you are requesting,' Key wrote the day the request was received.
Henyard's tenure as mayor, which ended last month, showed a pattern of ignored or denied public records requests.
The Daily Southtown reported last year the Illinois attorney general's office received more than 50 related complaints between January 2021 and April 2024 regarding ignored or denied FOIA requests. The attorney general's office also received more than 30 similar complaints from Thornton Township from January 2022 and August 2024, when Henyard was supervisor.
The Daily Southtown sought records from Dolton in May 2023, and followed up again in August of that year. While the Freedom of Information Act requests were acknowledged as received, there was no response.
In May 2024, lawyers for the Daily Southtown sent a letter to Dolton officials, including Henyard, outlining the lack of response and requesting the village adhere to the law and turn over records. It too was ignored.
In February 2024, the attorney general's office issued a binding opinion ordering Dolton to produce records requested by WGN. The village did not, and WGN eventually won a court ruling demanding the documents be turned over.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
7 hours ago
- Yahoo
Homeland Security, Denver Public Schools ‘mutually agree' to dismiss lawsuit
DENVER (KDVR) — Denver Public Schools' lawsuit filed against the Department of Homeland Security in February has been dismissed without prejudice, according to the district. In a press release, DPS said that two parties 'mutually agreed to dismiss the lawsuit' on Monday. The suit sought to stop Homeland Security's revocation of schools as a sensitive location, preventing immigration enforcement actions. One taken to hospital, dog dead after house fire in Parker The suit was in response to a press release from Homeland Security announcing several policies had been rescinded, including guidelines for Immigration and Customs Enforcement agents' enforcement actions that restricted immigration actions at 'sensitive locations,' which included schools, churches and hospitals. The announcement did not include details of the new policy. DPS sought to have the new policy's language released through the lawsuit, and in March, a judge did not grant the school district's request for a temporary restraining order on the matter, 'which would have prohibited DHS' enforcement under the purportedly revised policy,' the district wrote in a press release. The district said Homeland Security released the guidance requested in the district's Freedom of Information Act claim in oral arguments for the case, resulting in DHS publishing the 'new' policy, 'and admitted that the policy had not been fundamentally changed from the previous version,' DPS stated Tuesday. 'This was another significant victory for DPS and school districts nationwide, as the Department of Homeland Security admitted in federal court that the policy had not been changed in a meaningful way and that schools remained protected as sensitive locations. This fact was not previously known,' DPS said in a press release. Colorado senators introduce bill to limit immigration arrests at sensitive locations The suit can be refiled should any immigration enforcement action be made on school property or near a school. DPS also noted that it was represented pro bono, thus not incurring any costs for the lawsuit. 'In DPS, we strive to provide safe and welcoming environments for ALL of our students,' the district's message stated. 'Those words are not hollow, but rather, carefully selected. Students cannot learn unless they feel safe and welcome in our schools. We owe that to them.' The district said it would not hesitate to renew its legal battle should circumstances change. Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Yahoo
12 hours ago
- Yahoo
Mayor Wu seeks transparency on ICE arrests, ‘secret police tactics'
As widespread reports of immigration enforcement officers making arrests wearing masks and refusing to provide information about detainees spread fear in immigrant communities, Boston is trying to get more transparency from the federal government about these operations. In an executive order signed Tuesday morning, Mayor Michelle Wu committed to sending regular Freedom of Information Act requests to the U.S. Department of Homeland Security seeking information on who Immigration and Customs Enforcement officers are arresting, why and where they are being taken. At a news conference Tuesday, Wu accused ICE of using 'secret police tactics,' wearing masks, not identifying themselves and refusing to share information about people who have been detained. Read more: Why do ICE agents wear masks? 'In Boston, our officers wear badges. They do not routinely wear masks. ... It is our responsibility to make sure that communication between our residents and the city of Boston in every manner is designed to boost trust and boost collaboration,' Wu said. 'We expect the same standards from law enforcement operating in the city, no matter what agency they are from.' The mayor said she did not know how many people had been arrested by ICE in Boston since President Donald Trump took office in January. Though the federal government has made claims about how many people have been arrested, Wu said she had no way to verify those numbers, who is included in the count and how many are from Boston versus other communities. The executive order also requires city officials to be in close communication with consular offices of other countries in Boston, which are frequently a source of information for immigrant residents. Community activists who spoke at Tuesday's news conference said the executive order would help families of people who have been arrested by ICE. Lenita Reason, executive director of the Brazilian Worker Center, shared the story of a father who was arrested by ICE and brought to Texas two weeks ago, saying his wife only knew where her husband was being held because the community worked together to help her hire an attorney. While Wu had said the executive order was one small thing the city was doing to help immigrants, Reason said that for her community, it was 'huge.' 'We don't want to be waiting two weeks, three weeks, to find out where our fathers and mothers, members of our community, are,' she said. Because the city does not have power over the federal government, the executive order does not necessarily mean that ICE will cooperate with the city's requests. However, under the Freedom of Information Act, a federal law, government agencies are required to provide public records that are requested. If they ignore or refuse the request, the requester can appeal or sue to potentially have the court force the agency to fulfill the request. There are exemptions to records that must be provided under FOIA, including law enforcement records that could jeopardize an investigation if they are made public. 'The city government cannot overrule what they're doing, but it's still important to tell the truth, and it's still important to be clear about what we expect from our federal government,' Wu said. Last week, the mayor faced blowback from U.S. Attorney for Massachusetts Leah Foley, who accused Wu of spreading 'false narratives' when she referred to ICE agents as 'secret police' at another event. Wu also announced Tuesday that Boston had won a victory over the Trump administration in court last week. The city sued the federal government last month after Trump officials cancelled $48 million in previously awarded funding to combat homelessness, and on Friday, Wu said, a judge sided with the city, saying Boston was entitled to the grants. Can Trump deploy the National Guard to stop protests? Here's what the law says What Gov. Newsom said after an Ala. senator called LA 'a third world country' Mass. labor groups rally against ICE arrest of California union leader 'It won't end well for Trump' if he does this amid LA protests, ex-GOP rep says Markey: Trump using National Guard in LA to distract from big cuts in 'Big Beautiful Bill' Read the original article on MassLive.
Yahoo
15 hours ago
- Yahoo
Fort Smith human resources director retires amid internal auditor hiring controversy
FORT SMITH, Ark. (KNWA/KFTA) — The human resources director for Fort Smith, who has been recently involved in a controversy regarding the hiring and subsequent dismissal of an internal auditor, has retired. Rick Lolley has served as the city's Chief Human Resources Officer since 2018. The city announced on Saturday that Lolley's retirement was effective immediately. 'Rick Lolley has demonstrated considerable experience and instilled a level of professionalism in the city's Human Resources Department over his seven years as its department head,' Acting City Administrator Jeff Dingman said in a news release. 'I wish Rick well as he moves on.' The announcement comes after the Board of Directors voted to hire Rebecca Cowan as internal auditor on April 22. Two days later, the board changed course after it was revealed that Cowan faced a felony stalking charge. Fort Smith-based attorneys Joey McCutchen and Stephen Napurano filed the lawsuit against the city on May 2 after claiming Fort Smith failed to provide all public records related to the hiring of Cowan. The City of Fort Smith told Talk Business & Politics, 'Human Resources produced the background check and relayed the information to Administration per City protocol.' Judge rules City of Fort Smith violated Freedom of Information Act following failed hire Acting City Administrator Jeff Dingman, in an email to McCutchen, said, 'The background check information was delivered in hard copy. That record no longer exists. The Chief Human Resources Officer does not have a copy of the packet that was delivered. There is no hard copy.' An email from Dingman, not included in the city's FOIA response, was later obtained directly from a board member, according to the lawsuit. This email stated that Dingman 'did not believe a background check was performed.' The lawsuit also alleged the city failed to respond in a timely manner and may have withheld or destroyed public records. On June 3, the judge assigned to the lawsuit ruled in favor of McCutchen and Napurano during a hearing. An order, officially filed on June 5, said 'The Defendants' failure to timely respond, thefailure to provide clearly responsive records, the absence of any valid extension or waiver, and the troubling lack of transparency regarding the missing background check' were reasons as to why the city was ruled to have violated the Arkansas Freedom of Information Act. 'The Court is troubled by the timeline of events, the lack of transparency demonstrated by the City of Fort Smith and City Administrator Jeff Dingman, and by the missing background check which, according to the testimony, was provided by Mr. Rick Lolley to Mr. Jeff Dingman but was neither preserved nor produced in response to the FOIA request,' the judge said in the order. Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
