
Ethics in Medical School: A Q&A With Dr Holland Kaplan
Holland Kaplan, MD, is an assistant professor in the Center for Medical Ethics and Health Policy and the Section of General Internal Medicine at Baylor College of Medicine in Houston. In this Q&A with Medscape Medical News , Kaplan discussed critical gaps in medical ethics education, challenges in teaching ethical reasoning, and how the field has evolved in response to recent developments in healthcare. The interview has been edited for length and clarity.
In your experience, what is the most important ethical issue that often gets overlooked in medical school curricula — and why does it matter in practice?
Holland Kaplan, MD
I think the most important ethical skill that is underemphasized or inadequately taught in medical school is being able to conduct thorough assessments of patients' decision-making capacity. When physicians lack this ability, they are dependent on other physicians to make this assessment and may over- or under-involve patients in their own decision-making.
What's one ethical gray area that students are often surprised by in clinical training? How do you guide them through it?
A topic that students find consistently challenging is the concept that it is often ethically appropriate and in line with principles of shared decision-making for a physician to make a medical recommendation to a patient. Our culture of clinical practice has become focused on respecting autonomy sometimes to a fault.
I have observed medical students and residents presenting patients with complex clinical options for advanced conditions without providing any guidance to the patient on how to choose between these options — the 'menu' approach. While patients sometimes do want and need to make completely independent medical decisions without physician guidance, more often than not it is appropriate for a physician to guide a patient through the decision-making process and make a medical recommendation based on the patient's values and the clinical situation.
What role should ethics play in preparing future physicians to address health disparities and systemic injustice?
Ethics education plays a central role in enabling future physicians to address health disparities and systemic injustice. A critical concept taught in medical school and in ethics courses is the importance of patient-centered care — care that respects the rights and preferences of patients to the extent possible. Often, one of the first hints that care is unjust or unequal is when individual patients' rights and preferences are not being fully respected. Ethics education provides a framework and language for articulating how these injustices and inequities take place at a systemic level and how they can be addressed.
How do you evaluate whether a student has developed good ethical reasoning — not just memorized principles?
Assessing whether a student has developed sound ethical reasoning is quite challenging. I find that the best way to assess students' ethical reasoning is through a dialogue in the clinical setting when they are taking care of patients. This can be done by asking questions about rote ethics knowledge, then asking the student to apply that knowledge to their patient's case, and then asking probing questions about contingency scenarios. It can also be helpful to ask students how they would navigate specific aspects of challenging conversations with patients or families, as this often involves demonstrating the ability to elicit values.
How has the teaching of medical ethics changed in recent years?
The main way we've seen ethics education change is that the pass or fail grading and optional lectures have decreased student accountability to learn the material. While most students still engage meaningfully with the material, it has become more challenging to ensure that every student has achieved a bare minimum degree of competence in ethics during their medical education. Artificial intelligence has also made it more difficult to assess ethical reasoning via assigned essays.
If you could add one ethical topic to every med school curriculum that's currently underrepresented, what would it be and why?
It would be education on the concept of 'dual loyalties.' Physicians experience dual loyalties when their allegiance is strongly pulled toward something or someone other than their patient. There are settings where this is more likely to occur, such as when physicians practice in prisons or in the military. However, physicians' loyalty in day-to-day practice can be pulled toward institutional policies, length-of-stay metrics, managed care organizations, and so forth. Medical students are not typically taught about this concept or how to navigate it.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Senate GOP Restores Medicaid Cuts to Trump Tax Package
(Bloomberg) -- Senate Republicans restored major Medicaid cuts to Donald Trump's signature economic legislation, re-fashioning a key provision to overcome a procedural obstacle. Philadelphia Transit System Votes to Cut Service by 45%, Hike Fares Squeezed by Crowds, the Roads of Central Park Are Being Reimagined Sprawl Is Still Not the Answer Mapping the Architectural History of New York's Chinatown Sao Paulo Pushes Out Favela Residents, Drug Users to Revive Its City Center Spending cuts to the health insurance program for the poor and disabled partially offset revenue losses from tax cuts in the measure and are a crucial demand of GOP fiscal conservatives. The revision helps Republicans shore up the spending cuts they need to fund the bill, but it could also alienate three crucial senators — Susan Collins of Maine, Lisa Murkowski of Alaska and Thom Tillis of North Carolina — who have been pushing to scale back the Medicaid cuts. Senate Republican Leader John Thune is trying to navigate competing demands from conservatives and moderates as he rushes to pass the massive tax and spending package to meet a July 4 deadline Trump has set for congressional approval. The Senate's legislative rules-keeper had judged a series of key health care provisions in the legislation ineligible for a special procedure Republicans are using to bypass the Senate's normal process so they can avoid making concessions to Democrats. That earlier decision swept aside $250 billion in spending cuts fiscal conservatives had sought. But Senate Parliamentarian Elizabeth MacDonough ruled acceptable a revised provision that would limit states' ability to tax health care providers to help fund Medicaid, Senate Budget Committee Democrats said in an email on Sunday. It wasn't immediately clear how much budget savings the new version would produce. The Congressional Budget Office has estimated that the legislation could lead to millions of people losing health coverage. The scorekeeper found that an earlier iteration of the Senate bill would lead to 11.8 million people losing health benefits by the end of the decade. Earlier: Trump Tax Bill Hits $250 Billion Health-Care Snag in Senate The revised provision is likely bad news for HCA Healthcare Inc. and Tenet Healthcare Corp., as hospitals are again facing potential cuts to Medicaid funding. States often use the provider taxes, within some already existing rules, to draw down federal funding and increase payments to facilities like hospitals. The House version of the provider tax provision, which is less aggressive than the Senate's draft, would have saved the federal government $89 billion over a decade, according to congressional budget analysts. Alaska, Biden Rules The Senate's rules-keeper also nixed measures that would've boosted some hospital outpatient payments and Medicaid federal matching rates for Alaska and Hawaii, according to Democrats on the Budget Committee. The measures had been included as Thune sought to win over support, including from Alaska's Murkowski, who eventually helped advance the legislation after expressing hesitations. The parliamentarian also said provisions aimed at blocking efforts to streamline federal health care enrollment and a Biden-era nursing home minimum staffing requirement weren't in compliance with chamber rules. That could threaten billions in savings for the tax bill. The Congressional Budget Office, when considering a similar House-passed measure aimed at blocking implementation the enrollment regulations until 2035, estimated $167 billion in savings over the next decade, while placing a moratorium on the nursing home staffing rule would save $23 billion. The Senate version of the legislation, the centerpiece of Trump's economic agenda, makes permanent individual and business tax breaks enacted in 2017, while adding temporary new breaks for tipped and overtime workers, seniors and car-buyers. The bill would add hundreds of billions of dollars in new spending for the military, border patrol and immigration enforcement. To partly pay for the revenue losses, the bill reduces spending on Medicaid, food assistance for low-income Americans and financial aid to college students. (Updates with additional details on parliamentarian rulings in paragraphs 13-15.) America's Top Consumer-Sentiment Economist Is Worried How to Steal a House Inside Gap's Last-Ditch, Tariff-Addled Turnaround Push Luxury Counterfeiters Keep Outsmarting the Makers of $10,000 Handbags Apple Test-Drives Big-Screen Movie Strategy With F1 ©2025 Bloomberg L.P.


Washington Post
2 hours ago
- Washington Post
Hall of Fame horse trainer D. Wayne Lukas, a winner of 15 Triple Crown races, dies at 89
D. Wayne Lukas, the Hall of Famer who became one of the most accomplished trainers in the history of horse racing and a face of the sport for decades, has died. He was 89. His family said Sunday that Lukas died Saturday night at his Louisville, Kentucky, home. Lukas had been hospitalized with a severe MRSA blood infection that caused significant damage to his heart and digestive system and worsened pre-existing chronic conditions.


WebMD
3 hours ago
- WebMD
Dating with Bipolar Disorder
Being honest about your mental health can have a really positive impact on your life and the lives of those around you. In my personal experience, the more I've opened up about my bipolar disorder and the struggles that come with it, the better I feel. There's no denying the stigma that still exists around mental illness, but I've found that the best way to combat the related misconceptions is to talk about it. For me, this is especially true in my dating life. I can't remember a time when I haven't made some mention of mental health or my own journey with it once I began dating someone. It's not that I detail my recent hypomanic episode or list out the prescriptions I take, but I do find it helpful and pretty freeing to be transparent about my condition. Doing so gives me the opportunity to give the person I'm seeing more insight into who I am and how I experience the world, to answer questions, and connect with them on an emotional level. It also helps me to suss out how they might handle it as a potential romantic partner. I've been very lucky to have dated partners who were both empathetic and open-minded about my having bipolar disorder. Some have even intervened during an episode, a panic attack, or made sure to text me each day as a reminder to take my medication when I struggled to stay consistent. Not only did these things make me feel reassured and cared for, but they also reaffirmed to me how beneficial it is to communicate about my condition and how it is impacting me. Based on what previous partners have told me, it isn't always easy to love someone who has bipolar disorder. When I first received my diagnosis, it wasn't just my life that was changed: the community of people in my life were impacted, too. This is especially true in the case of spending time or living with a romantic partner. They often have the most intimate connection with you, meaning that they see every facet of who you are up close. Although it was hard for him to admit (and hard for me to process), an ex of mine told me that my hypomanic episodes sometimes scared him. He knew me well enough to recognize when my behavior changed because of hypomania, and while he was proactive about caring for me in those moments, it still affected him emotionally. Rather than getting defensive or taking what he said to heart, I tried to use that conversation as a learning moment. Taking responsibility for my own mental health isn't just for my own benefit. It is also necessary and the least I can do for the people who love and support me. Dating itself isn't always simple. At times, I find that I don't really even enjoy the process of meeting new people on dates. That said, if you — like me — would enjoy having a romantic partnership one day, being open about your mental health is one of the best practices that can lead to a healthy, strong relationship. There is so much strength in vulnerability, so sharing that part of your life with someone you care about is just another way to flex your emotional health 'muscle.'