Senedd debate on Labour Welsh Government's record
Rhun ap Iorwerth accused Labour of failing to stand up for Wales and live up to promises made at the start of this Senedd term.
The Plaid Cymru leader told the Senedd: 'Everywhere you look – whether it's the NHS, our economy, schools or society more broadly – the situation is worse now.
But others accused Plaid Cymru of 'gesture politics' after 'propping up' the Labour Welsh Government for most of the past four years.
Leading the debate on a Plaid Cymru motion on May 7, exactly one year before the next election, Mr ap Iorwerth directed his ire at the 'disgraceful' legacy left by the Tories.
He said: 'It's no wonder they suffered a slaughter electorally in Wales last summer and the opinion polls for the Senedd election suggest they are increasingly irrelevant.
'But the excuses are far harder to bear now the Labour party is in government in Westminster, something that was pledged time and time again by Labour members for years prior to the election would lead to change for the better.'
The former broadcast journalist criticised UK Government decisions to slash the welfare budget and restrict winter fuel allowance – 'cuts even George Osborne would wince about'.
Paul Davies argued Plaid Cymru should be held accountable for the Welsh Government's record due to the now-collapsed cooperation agreement between the two.
Jane Dodds, Welsh Liberal Democrat leader and the party's sole Senedd member, also pointed out that Plaid Cymru had a seat at the table as part of the three-year budget deal.
She said: 'You've helped to steer the ship and you don't get to act surprised about the destination when you have actually been holding the map.'
Ms Dodds, who struck a £100m deal with ministers to pass the latest Welsh budget, urged Plaid Cymru to take ownership of achievements such as free school meals.
Senedd members voted 35-11 against the Plaid Cymru motion. Conservative and Labour amendments also fell. With the final vote deadlocked at 23-23, deputy speaker Dai Rees used his casting vote against the Welsh Government's amendment in line with convention.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Telegraph
38 minutes ago
- Telegraph
Terrorism the only issue Starmer handling well, poll finds
Terrorism is the only issue that British people think Sir Keir Starmer is handling well, new polling suggests. In a damning audit of Labour's first year in office, voters gave the Government bad marks on 14 out of 15 key policy areas, from taxation to immigration. The YouGov survey, conducted over the past month, makes grim reading for the Prime Minister, who has struggled with plummeting approval ratings since entering No 10. It indicates the scale of the challenge he faces to win back the public's trust amid the rise of Reform UK, with Labour still reeling from disastrous results at last month's local elections. Asked how the Government was faring in 15 key policy areas, voters indicated that terrorism was the only one they thought Sir Keir was handling well, with a net score of +3. The 14 other issues all received net negative ratings, with immigration the lowest at -60, followed closely by taxation on -58 and welfare on -53. Sir Keir also got bad marks on the economy, with a net score of -52, as well as housing, the NHS, crime, inflation, unemployment, Brexit, the environment, education, transport and defence. The survey, published on Thursday, was conducted between May 3 and June 2, using a representative sample of 8,538 British people. It will come as a blow to the Prime Minister before the spending review next week, at which the Chancellor is expected to unveil cuts to day-to-day spending to keep within her self-imposed fiscal rules. The positive feedback on Labour's handling of terrorism will be encouraging for the Government, suggesting Sir Keir is broadly trusted to keep the country safe. But the lack of confidence in the Prime Minister's ability to tackle the small boats crisis will concern No 10 as Reform storms ahead in the opinion polls. A similarly dire score on welfare suggests Sir Keir has work to do to win back Labour's traditional supporters on the Left, many of whom were dismayed by his sweeping cuts to benefits earlier this year. No 11 will also be disappointed by the lack of faith in Labour's ability to handle the economy, despite Rachel Reeves's attempt to put fiscal responsibility front and centre of her plans. Sir Keir declared Reform his main opposition last month, setting him up for a battle with Nigel Farage on highly charged issues such as migration and net zero. Meanwhile, the Reform leader parked his tanks on Labour's lawn by promising to reverse the cut to winter fuel payments for pensioners in full and lift the two-child benefit cap. The YouGov poll found that nearly three-quarters of voters thought Sir Keir was doing 'very badly' or 'fairly badly' on immigration, compared to just 13 per cent who thought he was doing well. Labour has been accused of losing control of Britain's borders after close to 1,200 small boat migrants crossed the Channel in a single day.
The National
an hour ago
- The National
BBC Debate Night branded 'farce' as formal complaint made over 'bias'
It comes after there were no representatives from the Scottish Greens on a 'Glasgow Special' episode of Debate Night on Wednesday evening. Instead, the show – on the eve of the crucial Hamilton, Larkhall and Stonehouse by-election – featured the SNP's Glasgow Council leader Susan Aitken, Scottish Tory MSP Annie Wells, artist David Eustace as well as both Scottish Labour MSP Paul Sweeney and Labour peer Willie Haughey. This led to some anger, including an SNP source telling The National that Debate Night appears to have 'thrown the BBC's proposed guidance on balance out of the window' by including two Labour representatives. But now, the Glasgow Greens have also branded the panel makeup as a 'farce', highlighting that their party are 'by some distance' the third largest in Glasgow in terms of the number of councillors and vote share in last year's General Election. READ MORE: Increasing UK defence spending is just about the worst way to support jobs The Scottish Greens have 11 councillors on Glasgow City Council compared with just one Tory, for example. Now, they have made a formal complaint to the BBC. Glasgow Greens councillor Anthony Carroll (below) said that it was clear the BBC are balancing only between the 'parties of the past'. (Image: Supplied) 'For the Conservatives to have a representative while they can barely hold on to any deposits in Glasgow any more, while the Greens - who surged to third place across the city - are ignored once again by the BBC, shows just how out of touch they are with the electorate,' he said. Carroll, who is also the party's democracy spokesperson, added: 'I urge the BBC to address this in any future political broadcasts and avoid another farce. To not is a disservice not just to the BBC, but to the growing number of voters who are clearly not being represented in their political debate broadcasting shows.' Councillor Jon Molyneux, who is Glasgow' Green group co-leader, added: 'Green representatives are significantly shaping the future of Glasgow, whether that's by working to end rip off rents, by making our streets and public spaces safer, or by delivering new powers, like the Visitor Levy, which can raise tens of millions more for local services.' He added: 'It's a shame - but perhaps not a surprise - that the BBC won't platform Green voices which challenge the status quo, but is happy to conceal the well-documented political affiliation of an unelected Labour Lord.'
The Independent
an hour ago
- The Independent
‘Out of control' Zelensky scuppering chances of Ukraine peace, Parliament told
Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky is 'out of control' and has jeopardised progress towards peace with Russia, it has been claimed in Parliament. The accusation was levelled by Labour former MP Lord Campbell-Savours, who argued Mr Zelensky had been 'allowed to run amok' with his country's weekend drone attack on Russian airfields and in doing so 'scuppered' the chances of reaching a truce in the deadly conflict. However, the peer's controversial view was rejected outright by foreign minister Baroness Chapman of Darlington, who said she 'profoundly' disagreed and repeated the UK Government's staunch support for Kyiv. She pointed out it was Russia's leader Vladimir Putin who could end the war, which he had triggered by his full-scale invasion in 2022. US President Donald Trump said this week Mr Putin had told him 'very strongly' in a phone call that he would respond to Ukraine's daring drone attack on Russian air bases. Ukraine's Security Service claim the attack, dubbed operation Spider Web, destroyed or damaged 41 Russian aircraft, including strategic bombers. At the same time, Russia has continued to carry out strikes across Ukraine, including the targeting of residential areas. Mr Zelensky, who has accepted a US ceasefire proposal and offered to meet Mr Putin in an attempt to break the stalemate in negotiations, wants more international sanctions on Russia to force it to accept a settlement. But Mr Putin has shown no willingness to meet Mr Zelensky and has indicated no readiness to compromise. US-led diplomatic efforts to end the long-running war have so far failed to make any significant progress. Raising the issue in Parliament, Lord Campbell-Savours said: 'Whilst recognising the sheer bravado of those who executed operation Spider Web, we have to accept that action has undermined Trump's wider initiative, jeopardised his offer on the provision of security guarantees, and hardened Russia's attitude on conflict resolution. 'How can we ever secure a settlement and avoid substantial defence costs being imposed on European taxpayers, if Zelensky is allowed to run amok with unilateral actions, therefore scuppering any prospect of an early settlement. 'Why can't we, with our long experience in diplomacy, think out of the box and engage with Trump's people in discussions with Russia over measures to end this war. 'We can't rely on Zelensky. He's out of control.' Responding, Lady Chapman said: 'Not for the first time do I profoundly disagree with him. 'We have a long-standing commitment, which will remain as long as it takes, to stand alongside Ukraine. 'Ukraine's security is our security. We have a responsibility and a duty to the people of Ukraine. 'The events that he refers to I completely reject his analysis of this, as do my colleagues in the Ministry of Defence.' She added: 'President Trump wants to see peace. We want to see peace. President Zelensky has agreed to a ceasefire. 'The person who could achieve that ceasefire, who could bring peace to Ukraine, who could see the children return to their homes, is President Putin.' Her Tory counterpart Lord Callanan said: 'I completely agree with the minister's sentiments. 'I think Lord Campbell-Savours is absolutely wrong, and all of us who are strong supporters of Ukraine were greatly encouraged by the recent audacious attack on the Russian airfields, in which nobody was killed by the way, it was just equipment that was damaged. 'But to secure Ukrainian sovereignty in the longer term, it is vital that Ukraine possesses armed forces which have a strong strategic and tactical advantage in the region. 'So could the minister please update the House on the steps that the Government is taking to support the Ukrainian military, to ensure that it has troops which are well trained, well equipped in the longer term to our high standards to help deter further Russian aggression?' Lady Chapman pointed out the UK had committed £3 billion a year for as long as Ukraine needed it and also signed a '100-year' pact, which formalised economic and military support provided by Britain. She also highlighted UK efforts to establish a peacekeeping mission that would enforce a possible future ceasefire in Ukraine, a so-called coalition of the willing. Former defence chief Lord Stirrup, who led the Armed Forces from 2006 to 2010, said: ''Has the minister noticed any reticence or reluctance on the part of President Putin to killing Ukrainian civilians while so-called peace talks continue? 'And has she identified any actions at all on the part of the American administration to try and compel President Putin down that path of reticence?' Lady Chapman said: 'I have not noticed any reticence on behalf of the Russian leader in that regard. 'We talk frequently and in great detail about how we work together with our friends and allies, including the United States, to bring about peace.'
