logo
Stonewall's hour of reckoning has finally arrived

Stonewall's hour of reckoning has finally arrived

Yahoo17-04-2025

For decades, influential charity Stonewall was widely regarded as a champion for equal rights – winning over the most powerful businesses and politicians.
Its influence was such that hundreds of Britain's largest organisations battled for top spot on its flagship equality leader board, handing millions of pounds to the charity in the process.
But much has changed. The 36-year-old organisation now facing a crisis that has prompted even one of its founders to turn against it.
In the wake of Wednesday's Supreme Court ruling that only biological women are women, Simon Fanshawe urged bosses to abandon Stonewall, which has long championed trans rights.
'Employers can now take advice from the highest court in the land rather than from Stonewall and other lobby groups,' says Fanshawe, who was one of six activists to help set up the organisation.
'Previously, in trying to become a Stonewall 'Diversity Champion', businesses have often gone beyond the law.
'I would say that businesses should now ignore Stonewall, focus on the judgment, and that way be absolutely clear that their policies are in line with the Equality Act.
'Businesses have been thinking they've been doing the right thing, and it transpires they haven't. They should stop listening to lobby groups.'
Scrutiny of Stonewall has been building for years, even garnering disapproval from former supporter Sir Stephen Fry, who in December branded its trans activism 'nonsensical' and warned it has 'got stuck in a terrible, terrible quagmire'.
In particular, critics have argued that Stonewall was using corporate schemes to stifle free speech.
One HR veteran, whose company is not involved with Stonewall, believes too many bosses leant on the charity out of fear of 'holding a different position to other organisations'.
'I'm surprised that any major organisation still has a relationship with them. That's not because they haven't done good things in the past, but they're driving a political agenda with a small P,' they say.
'From a business point of view, people will now be taking stock and saying, 'Hang on a second, the highest court has made a decision [on the legal definition of a woman] and this organisation is disagreeing – do we want to be aligned with an organisation which is taking that stance?''
They added that HR leaders who disagree with the Supreme Court need to ask themselves how they've been running their businesses.
'If you don't believe the law trumps all, then you've essentially been running your business based on an agenda, not on the law,' the HR boss said.
UK-based chief executives and HR heads have been seeking discreet advice over groups such as Stonewall for months, concerned they may have been led astray.
Fanshawe also argued last year that there had been a shift in attitude, with companies saying to themselves: 'Actually, I'm not convinced that a high-street retailer should take a position on anti-conversion therapy.'
However, the HR veteran – who did not want to be named – points out how much Stonewall itself has changed, claiming they were previously 'giving good, strong quality guidance on how you become more inclusive as an employer'.
'What's changed is that they started to say, 'Unless you adopt these positions, you won't progress in our index or rankings.'
'That's legitimate. But it's also legitimate for organisations to say, 'I don't want to do that, so I'm going to step outside of this.''
Concerns over Stonewall in corporate circles have also been growing increasingly prominent in recent year, as some of its most controversial advice came to light.
For example, the charity reportedly told employers to use 'parent who has given birth' instead of the word mother, while it also questioned whether private health insurance covered transition-related treatments.
The Welsh Government, which appeared high on Stonewall's ranking in 2020, deleted the term 'mother' from its maternity policy in 2019.
Stonewall has since watered down its policies, admitting last year that 'mother' is a 'powerful and important word'.
However, for many bosses, the damage was already done. Even before the latest Supreme Court ruling, tensions were rising.
In 2022, Stonewall was criticised for suggesting that nurseries were not doing enough to help children as young as two 'recognise their trans identity', while last year its support of puberty blockers came under fire following a major review by paediatrician Dr Hilary Cass.
The review, which warned there was a lack of established medical evidence for the use of puberty blockers for children, triggered a petition calling for Stonewall's former chief, who advised schools to 'shred' a research pack highlighting the dangers of the treatment, to lose her peerage.
Yet Stonewall itself acknowledges that change may be on the cards, particularly in light of the latest Supreme Court decision.
A spokesman for the charity said that many organisations, including Stonewall, will be reviewing their policies and guidance. 'Stonewall regularly reviews its guidance and works with legal experts to ensure that it reflects the latest legal developments – we will continue to do so,' the spokesman said.
As for employers, they will hope that the latest ruling will finally put to bed the issue of Stonewall, and end what some claim has been a 'horrible' debate.
'The decision recognises that women now means biological women. So women are going to be protected in terms of having their spaces,' says Emilie Cole, the founding partner of law firm Cole Khan.
'We're no longer going to have the Pandora's box of endless debate as to what actually legally constitutes a woman.
'Essentially, this has been a really horrible area. It's been so hard fought on both sides of the spectrum, but this judgment is welcomed because this has obviously got real-world consequences for people working in businesses, and clarity in this area is welcomed.'
However, others are not as conciliatory. As one barrister puts it: 'Those who follow Stonewall should stop doing so immediately and seek counsel elsewhere.
'You have been led up the garden path and now have a huge task untangling the mess.'
Broaden your horizons with award-winning British journalism. Try The Telegraph free for 1 month with unlimited access to our award-winning website, exclusive app, money-saving offers and more.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Upcoming Stock Splits This Week (June 9 to June 13)
Upcoming Stock Splits This Week (June 9 to June 13)

Business Insider

time25 minutes ago

  • Business Insider

Upcoming Stock Splits This Week (June 9 to June 13)

These are the upcoming stock splits for the week of June 9 to June 13, based on TipRanks' Stock Splits Calendar. A stock split is a corporate maneuver that increases the number of shares outstanding by issuing more shares to existing holders, all while keeping the company's total market value unchanged. This lowers the price per share, often making the stock more affordable and potentially more appealing to retail investors. Confident Investing Starts Here: In contrast, a reverse stock split reduces the number of shares by consolidating them, which raises the price per share without affecting the company's valuation. Companies typically turn to this strategy to meet stock exchange requirements – like Nasdaq's minimum price threshold – and avoid delisting. Whether intended to boost investor interest or maintain compliance with exchange rules, these adjustments often serve as key signals for traders tracking a company's strategic direction. Let's take a look at the upcoming stock splits for the week. Nektar Therapeutics (NKTR) – Nektar Therapeutics is a biopharmaceutical company developing novel drug candidates. Following stockholder approval on May 23, the company formalized a 1-for-15 reverse stock split. The split takes effect on June 8, with trading on a split‑adjusted basis beginning June 9. Fangdd Network Group (DUO) – China-based Fangdd is a technology-driven real estate platform. The company confirmed a 16-for-1 reverse share consolidation, effective June 9, aimed at boosting its share price and maintaining compliance with listing standards. Bone Biologics (BBLG) – Bone Biologics develops orthobiologic products for spinal fusion procedures. After gaining shareholder approval on May 30, the company filed for a 1-for-6 reverse stock split, which takes effect on June 10. The goal is to elevate its share price back into compliance with Nasdaq's minimum pricing rules and enhance its appeal to institutional investors. Cero Therapeutics Holdings (CERO) – Cero Therapeutics is a biotech firm developing engineered T-cell immunotherapies for cancer. Following shareholder approval in November and board action on December 25, it enacted a 1-for-100 reverse stock split effective on January 8, consolidating every 100 shares into one. The move aimed to boost the stock above $1.00 and secure compliance with Nasdaq's listing standards. Inuvo, Inc. (INUV) – Inuvo specializes in AI-powered marketing technologies and is gearing up for a 1-for-10 reverse stock split on June 10. The move is designed to lift its share price, restore Nasdaq compliance, and strengthen its financial foundation for future growth. O'Reilly Automotive (ORLY) – O'Reilly Automotive is a specialty retailer of automotive aftermarket parts and accessories. On March 13, the company declared a 15-for-1 forward stock split, with the distribution of additional shares set for June 9 and split-adjusted trading beginning June 10. SaverOne 2014 (SVRE) – Israel-based SaverOne develops driver safety systems that block mobile-device distractions in vehicles. The company executed a 1-for-3 reverse ADS split, effective June 11, adjusting its American Depositary Share ratio to strengthen its Nasdaq standing and enhance market appeal. China Natural Resources, Inc. (CHNR) – China Natural Resources is focused on mining exploration in Inner Mongolia and is working toward picking up Zimbabwe's Williams Minerals lithium mine for up to $1.75 billion. The company executed an 8-for-1 reverse stock split effective June 12 to meet Nasdaq's $1 minimum bid price requirement, converting every eight shares into one to boost its per-share value and comply with listing rules

Farage to call for Port Talbot blast furnaces to reopen
Farage to call for Port Talbot blast furnaces to reopen

Yahoo

time42 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Farage to call for Port Talbot blast furnaces to reopen

Nigel Farage will call for Port Talbot's blast furnaces to reopen after they were shut down last year as Reform UK sets its sights on the Welsh elections in 2026. On a visit to the South Wales town, the party leader is expected to say that the resumption of traditional steelmaking should be a long-term ambition, a spokesman said. Mr Farage believes his party has a chance of ending Labour's long-standing dominance in Wales during the Senedd elections next year amid opinion poll momentum and gains made at the local polls last month. The Government has backed plans for a new £1.25 billion electric arc furnace at the Tata steelworks, with the switch-on due in 2027 as part of the push towards greener production. The plant's last blast furnace was shut down in September 2024. Some MPs have said workers in South Wales have been let down in comparison with those retaining jobs in Scunthorpe, where ministers took control of the steelworks to prevent the closure of its blast furnaces. The Government has said the two steelworks were in different situations. Mr Farage's speech comes as Reform seeks to draw a line under internal clashes after chairman Zia Yusuf quit the party on Thursday only to return 48 hours later, saying the resignation had been 'born out of exhaustion'. It followed a row in which he described a question to the Prime Minister concerning a ban on burkas from his party's newest MP, Sarah Pochin, as 'dumb'. Mr Yusuf will now have four jobs, including leading the party's plans to cut public spending via the so-called 'UK Doge', based on the US Department of Government Efficiency which was led by tech billionaire Elon Musk. Mr Farage's spokesman said: 'He will focus part of the speech on Keir Starmer's year of failure in the UK as a whole but especially Wales. Of course for years Welsh Labour blamed all issues on the Tories in Westminster, now their excuse is gone and the game is up for them.' Reform had also been hoping to cause an upset last week in Scotland, where it was fighting a Holyrood by-election in Hamilton, Larkhall and Stonehouse, but Labour secured a shock victory. Scotland's First Minister John Swinney had claimed the contest would be a 'two-horse race' between the SNP and Reform but Mr Farage's party came third with 7,088 votes to Labour's 8,559 and the SNP's 7,957.

Elliott Calls for Further Action to Enhance Corporate Value and Strengthen Corporate Governance Ahead of Sumitomo Realty's 2025 Annual General Meeting
Elliott Calls for Further Action to Enhance Corporate Value and Strengthen Corporate Governance Ahead of Sumitomo Realty's 2025 Annual General Meeting

Yahoo

timean hour ago

  • Yahoo

Elliott Calls for Further Action to Enhance Corporate Value and Strengthen Corporate Governance Ahead of Sumitomo Realty's 2025 Annual General Meeting

Elliott plans to vote against members of Sumitomo Realty's senior management at the 2025 AGM absent further corporate-governance and value-enhancement initiatives LONDON, June 8, 2025 /CNW/ -- Elliott Investment Management, L.P. and Elliott Advisors (UK) Limited ("Elliott"), which advise funds that together have a more than 3% ownership stake in Sumitomo Realty & Development Co., Ltd. ("Sumitomo Realty" or the "Company"), making it one of the Company's largest shareholders, today released an open letter to the Company's shareholders. In the letter, Elliott encouraged fellow shareholders to actively engage with Sumitomo Realty's management ahead of the upcoming 2025 Annual General Meeting of Shareholders ("AGM") and to hold the Company accountable for not addressing its long-standing valuation discount and weak corporate governance. The letter outlines four key areas of concern – poor shareholder returns, excessive cross shareholdings, declining capital efficiency and subpar governance – and urges the Company to implement tangible reforms. These include increasing its shareholder payout, reducing cross shareholdings, issuing a credible return target and enhancing governance. Elliott also emphasized that without meaningful progress from Sumitomo Realty, it intends to vote against the reappointment of senior management at the upcoming AGM. The full text of the letter can be read at and is included below: Dear Fellow Sumitomo Realty Shareholders, Elliott Investment Management, L.P. and Elliott Advisors (UK) Limited ("Elliott," or "we") advise funds that together have a more than 3% ownership stake in Sumitomo Realty & Development Co., Ltd. ("Sumitomo Realty", or the "Company"), which makes us one of the Company's largest shareholders. For months, we have engaged in private discussions with Sumitomo Realty management to express our conviction in the value-creation opportunity at the Company and to outline tangible actions to realize this potential. With the 2025 Annual General Meeting of Shareholders ("AGM") approaching, we are now making our views public because these issues are critical to the Company's future success, and we want our fellow shareholders to be able to assess the same views we have presented to the Company ahead of the 2025 AGM. We believe the 2025 AGM marks a critical juncture for evaluating management's performance over the past two years. We are encouraging investors to actively engage with Sumitomo Realty management ahead of the 2025 AGM and to use their voting rights to express their satisfaction or dissatisfaction with the Company's current strategy. We highlight recent opinions from ISS and Glass Lewis, who both recommended a vote against the reappointment of Sumitomo Realty's Chairman, due to the Company's high levels of cross shareholdings and lack of board independence. Sumitomo Realty is one of Japan's leading real estate developers, with a dominant position in Tokyo office real estate, an attractive business mix and a high-quality portfolio of assets. Our substantial investment reflects our conviction, based on months of thorough diligence, in Sumitomo Realty's strengths. However, despite these advantages, Sumitomo Realty trades at just half of the post-tax market value of its real estate ("PNAV"),1 making it the most undervalued real estate developer in Japan. Sumitomo Realty also trades at a depressed multiple of earnings, despite its stable, high-quality core office leasing business. Sumitomo Realty's persistent stock underperformance and valuation discount are not coincidental. The Company is an outlier in several areas: it holds a large portfolio of cross shareholdings, it has a unique policy of not selling property assets or managing REIT assets, and its board and governance structure rank near the bottom of all TOPIX 100 companies on several metrics2. In our view, these self-imposed problems and others we highlight below are responsible for the Company's significant undervaluation. We see a clear opportunity for Sumitomo Realty to close its discount to fair value by taking steps to resolve these issues. The upside potential is significant: Applying a peer-average PNAV multiple – a conservative approach given Sumitomo Realty's superior asset quality – would imply a share price of just under ¥8,000, over 40% higher than the current level. See Chart 1 – PNAV and Price Target Bridge. The Case for Change The market's negative sentiment toward Sumitomo Realty reflects deep shareholder concerns with the Company's performance. In 2024, Elliott commissioned a third-party shareholder perception study to better understand investor views on the Japanese real estate developer sector, including Sumitomo Realty and its large-cap peers. This study surveyed large and mostly long-term institutional investors, both in Japan and abroad, on topics including the Company's strategy, its shareholder-return policy and its cross-shareholding policy. The study's findings – as well as sell-side analyst ratings, expert commentary and AGM voting results – show consistently poor investor sentiment toward Sumitomo Realty and highlight meaningful opportunities for improvement. See Chart 2 – Shareholder Survey. Evidence of shareholder dissatisfaction is also clearly visible in the AGM approval rate for Sumitomo Realty's Board. Approval rates have steadily declined since 2017, with the Chairman's approval rating falling from 95% to a record-low 77% by 2023 – the lowest among peers. See Chart 3 – AGM Approval Rating. Publicly available proxy voting data shows that many of Sumitomo Realty's largest investors have already voted against management at previous AGMs. Their concerns center on Sumitomo Realty's excessive cross shareholdings and its antiquated board structure. With proxy voting guidelines from asset managers growing more stringent since the Board last stood for election in 2023, and with independent proxy advisory firms recently making recommendations to vote against the reappointment of Sumitomo Realty's Chairman at the 2025 AGM, it appears that continued inaction could lead to Sumitomo Realty's Board facing even broader disapproval from major asset managers this year. Diagnosing the Key Issues Four core issues underlie Sumitomo Realty's deep undervaluation and poor investor sentiment: Weak shareholder returns: Sumitomo Realty's dividend payout was just 17% of net income in the last fiscal year – half the peer group average. Larger peers have moved more aggressively on shareholder returns, with one key peer expecting its shareholder payout to exceed 80% of net income this fiscal year. Even with Sumitomo Realty's recently outlined plans to increase its shareholder payout, the pace of increase is too slow: we estimate it could take almost a decade to achieve the Company's target dividend payout ratio of 35%. Excessive cross shareholdings: At 26% of net assets as of March 31, 2025, Sumitomo Realty's cross shareholdings far exceed those of its peers as well as the maximum levels set by independent proxy advisory firms and key Japanese asset managers. The Company's high level of cross shareholdings was a major cause of shareholder disapproval at the 2023 AGM and will likely be a decisive issue again in 2025. Declining capital efficiency: Sumitomo Realty is the only company in its peer group that does not have a Return on Equity ("ROE") target, nor any clear strategy for maintaining or improving its ROE, such as by selling mature assets into a REIT structure. As a result, the Company's ROE has declined for six consecutive years and is forecast to continue Chart 4 – ROE. Poor corporate governance and board structure: Sumitomo Realty ranks near the bottom of the TOPIX 100 on corporate-governance metrics. A global company with the size and stature of Sumitomo Realty should aspire to market-leading governance standards. While the Company has recently outlined plans to gradually improve its governance, progress on these reforms can and should be accelerated. See Chart 5 – Corporate Governance Comparison. Setting the Right Course These issues are largely self-imposed and can be addressed quickly and decisively by management. Specifically, we believe that the Company should take the following steps: Shareholder return: Immediately increase its shareholder payout ratio to 50% or more, a level that is in-line with its peers, via a higher dividend payout and larger and more regular share repurchases; Cross shareholding: Decrease its cross-shareholdings portfolio, which we believe is worth more than ¥500 billion on a post-tax basis, to below 10% of net assets (based on current market value) by the end of its current medium-term management plan ("MTMP") period; ROE target: Set a ROE target of at least 10% and outline clear plans to achieve this target, such as by shifting capital from mature projects to growth projects. For instance, the Company could unlock ¥500 billion of capital by transferring rental apartment assets into a REIT structure; and Governance: Strengthen governance by adding independent directors and establishing a nomination and remuneration committee. The time to implement a more ambitious policy to unwind cross shareholdings is now. Several large holders of Sumitomo Realty shares – including Taisei Corp, Obayashi, Shimizu and Kajima, which collectively own more than ¥160 billion worth – have announced plans to aggressively sell their cross shareholdings. Sumitomo Realty reciprocally owns more than ¥60 billion worth of shares in these four construction companies. This dynamic presents a compelling opportunity for Sumitomo Realty: It can unlock significant capital by selling shares in these four firms and use the proceeds to repurchase a portion of the Sumitomo Realty shares they currently hold. Such a transaction would reduce cross shareholdings and deploy capital back into the Company's own shares at extremely attractive levels. While cross shareholdings have historically been seen as promoting business relationships across Japanese companies, they are now viewed as a poor use of capital and an enabler of corporate leadership entrenchment. Sumitomo Realty and its key cross shareholders are meant to adhere to the Corporate Governance Code, which requires Japanese companies to scrutinize the purpose and benefits of cross shareholdings, particularly those held for business relationships, which are increasingly viewed as inappropriate. We believe the Company should act decisively and expeditiously to unwind its cross-shareholdings portfolio. See Chart 6 – Key Corporate Cross Shareholding. The steps we have outlined would not only raise management's standing at the 2025 AGM, but also improve Sumitomo Realty's valuation. In the Japanese real estate developer sector, there is a clear relationship between valuation (PNAV), capital efficiency (ROE) and shareholder returns. We are confident that taking the steps above – particularly on improving shareholder payout and capital efficiency – will unlock significant value for Sumitomo Realty shareholders and increase management's credibility with shareholders ahead of the 2025 AGM. See Chart 7 – ROE and Shareholder Returns Explain Valuation. Companies that have proactively embraced Japan's ongoing corporate reforms – by unwinding cross shareholdings, improving capital efficiency, increasing shareholder returns and strengthening governance – have been rewarded with higher valuations and greater shareholder support. Examples from the general construction, non-life insurance, and real estate developer sectors show how such reforms can successfully unlock value and transform investor perception at previously underperforming companies. Conclusion We appreciate that in recent months, Sumitomo Realty management has taken several initial steps in the right direction – some of which are aligned with our recommendations. However, progress has been insufficient and too slow. The market reacted negatively to the uninspiring MTMP released in late March, which failed to address core issues. Many of our suggestions remain ignored. The 2025 AGM is a critical opportunity for shareholders to express their satisfaction or dissatisfaction with Sumitomo Realty's current strategy. Management's approval rating is the clearest and most effective way for shareholders to catalyse change. Despite the modest shareholder-friendly actions taken to date, there remains deep skepticism, including from Elliott, about management's genuine commitment to ambitiously and decisively address the Company's key issues. As such, absent further value- and governance-enhancing measures from Sumitomo Realty, Elliott plans to vote against the reappointment of senior management at the 2025 AGM. We urge all shareholders to carefully consider their voting decisions and engage with Sumitomo Realty management in the lead up to the AGM. Your vote can shape the Company's future. We are hopeful management will be attentive to shareholder viewpoints and will take decisive steps to raise Sumitomo Realty's corporate value and enhance its governance. Sincerely, Aaron TaiPortfolio Manager Elliott Investment Management, L.P. About ElliottElliott Investment Management L.P. (together with its affiliates, "Elliott") manages approximately $72.7 billion in assets as of December 31, 2024. Founded in 1977, it is one of the oldest funds under continuous management. The Elliott funds' investors include pension plans, sovereign wealth funds, endowments, foundations, funds-of-funds, high net worth individuals and families, and employees of the firm. Elliott Advisors (UK) Limited is an affiliate of Elliott Investment Management L.P. Media Contacts: LondonAlice BestElliott Advisors (UK) LimitedT: +44 203 009 1715abest@ TokyoBrett WallbuttonAshton ConsultingT: +81 (0) 3 DISCLAIMER THIS DOCUMENT HAS BEEN ISSUED BY ELLIOTT ADVISORS (UK) LIMITED ("EAUK"), WHICH IS AUTHORISED AND REGULATED BY THE UNITED KINGDOM'S FINANCIAL CONDUCT AUTHORITY ("FCA") AND ELLIOTT INVESTMENT MANAGEMENT L.P. ("EIMLP"). NOTHING WITHIN THIS DOCUMENT PROMOTES, OR IS INTENDED TO PROMOTE, AND MAY NOT BE CONSTRUED AS PROMOTING, ANY FUNDS ADVISED DIRECTLY OR INDIRECTLY BY EAUK AND EIMLP (THE "ELLIOTT FUNDS"). THIS DOCUMENT IS FOR DISCUSSION AND INFORMATIONAL PURPOSES ONLY. THE VIEWS EXPRESSED HEREIN REPRESENT THE OPINIONS OF EAUK, EIMLP AND THEIR AFFILIATES (COLLECTIVELY, "ELLIOTT MANAGEMENT") AS OF THE DATE HEREOF. ELLIOTT MANAGEMENT RESERVES THE RIGHT TO CHANGE OR MODIFY ANY OF ITS OPINIONS EXPRESSED HEREIN AT ANY TIME AND FOR ANY REASON AND EXPRESSLY DISCLAIMS ANY OBLIGATION TO CORRECT, UPDATE OR REVISE THE INFORMATION CONTAINED HEREIN OR TO OTHERWISE PROVIDE ANY ADDITIONAL MATERIALS. ALL OF THE INFORMATION CONTAINED HEREIN IS BASED ON PUBLICLY AVAILABLE INFORMATION WITH RESPECT TO SUMITOMO REALTY & DEVELOPMENT CO., LTD. (THE "COMPANY"), INCLUDING PUBLIC FILINGS AND DISCLOSURES MADE BY THE COMPANY AND OTHER SOURCES, AS WELL AS ELLIOTT MANAGEMENT'S ANALYSIS OF SUCH PUBLICLY AVAILABLE INFORMATION. ELLIOTT MANAGEMENT HAS RELIED UPON AND ASSUMED, WITHOUT INDEPENDENT VERIFICATION, THE ACCURACY AND COMPLETENESS OF ALL DATA AND INFORMATION AVAILABLE FROM PUBLIC SOURCES, AND NO REPRESENTATION OR WARRANTY IS MADE THAT ANY SUCH DATA OR INFORMATION IS ACCURATE. ELLIOTT MANAGEMENT RECOGNISES THAT THERE MAY BE CONFIDENTIAL OR OTHERWISE NON-PUBLIC INFORMATION WITH RESPECT TO THE COMPANY THAT COULD ALTER THE OPINIONS OF ELLIOTT MANAGEMENT WERE SUCH INFORMATION KNOWN. THIS DOCUMENT REFERS TO THE 92ND ORDINARY GENERAL MEETING OF SHAREHOLDERS OF THE COMPANY (THE "AGM"). NOTHING IN THIS DOCUMENT SEEKS ANY FORM OF AGREEMENT OR UNDERSTANDING FROM ANY RECIPIENT OF THIS DOCUMENT ABOUT VOTING IN RELATION TO ANY MATTER AT THE AGM OR THE EXERCISING OF SHAREHOLDERS' RIGHTS. YOU SHALL RETAIN AND EXERCISE DISCRETION TO VOTE IN ANY MANNER OR NOT TO VOTE AS DETERMINED BY YOU IN YOUR SOLE DISCRETION. THIS DOCUMENT IS NOT FOR OUR SOLICITATION OF YOUR PROXY IN CONNECTION WITH ANY MATTER AT THE AGM. NO REPRESENTATION, WARRANTY OR UNDERTAKING, EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, IS GIVEN AND NO RESPONSIBILITY OR LIABILITY OR DUTY OF CARE IS OR WILL BE ACCEPTED BY ELLIOTT MANAGEMENT OR ANY OF ITS DIRECTORS, OFFICERS, EMPLOYEES, AGENTS, OR ADVISORS (EACH AN "ELLIOTT PERSON") CONCERNING: (I) THIS DOCUMENT AND ITS CONTENTS, INCLUDING WHETHER THE INFORMATION AND OPINIONS CONTAINED HEREIN ARE ACCURATE, FAIR, COMPLETE OR CURRENT; (II) THE PROVISION OF ANY FURTHER INFORMATION, WHETHER BY WAY OF UPDATE TO THE INFORMATION AND OPINIONS CONTAINED IN THIS DOCUMENT OR OTHERWISE TO THE RECIPIENT AFTER THE DATE OF THIS DOCUMENT; OR (III) THAT ELLIOTT MANAGEMENT'S INVESTMENT PROCESSES OR INVESTMENT OBJECTIVES WILL OR ARE LIKELY TO BE ACHIEVED OR SUCCESSFUL OR THAT ELLIOTT MANAGEMENT'S INVESTMENTS WILL MAKE ANY PROFIT OR WILL NOT SUSTAIN LOSSES. PAST PERFORMANCE IS NOT INDICATIVE OF FUTURE RESULTS. TO THE FULLEST EXTENT PERMITTED BY LAW, NONE OF THE ELLIOTT PERSONS WILL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR ANY LOSSES, WHETHER DIRECT, INDIRECT OR CONSEQUENTIAL, INCLUDING LOSS OF PROFITS, DAMAGES, COSTS, CLAIMS OR EXPENSES RELATING TO OR ARISING FROM THE RECIPIENT'S OR ANY PERSON'S RELIANCE ON THIS DOCUMENT. EXCEPT FOR THE HISTORICAL INFORMATION CONTAINED HEREIN, THE INFORMATION AND OPINIONS INCLUDED IN THIS DOCUMENT CONSTITUTE FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS, INCLUDING ESTIMATES AND PROJECTIONS PREPARED WITH RESPECT TO, AMONG OTHER THINGS, THE COMPANY'S ANTICIPATED OPERATING PERFORMANCE, THE VALUE OF THE COMPANY'S SECURITIES, DEBT OR ANY RELATED FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS THAT ARE BASED UPON OR RELATE TO THE VALUE OF SECURITIES OF THE COMPANY (COLLECTIVELY, "COMPANY SECURITIES"), GENERAL ECONOMIC AND MARKET CONDITIONS AND OTHER FUTURE EVENTS. YOU SHOULD BE AWARE THAT ALL FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS, ESTIMATES AND PROJECTIONS ARE INHERENTLY UNCERTAIN AND SUBJECT TO SIGNIFICANT ECONOMIC, COMPETITIVE, AND OTHER UNCERTAINTIES AND CONTINGENCIES AND HAVE BEEN INCLUDED SOLELY FOR ILLUSTRATIVE PURPOSES. ACTUAL RESULTS MAY DIFFER MATERIALLY FROM THE INFORMATION CONTAINED HEREIN DUE TO REASONS THAT MAY OR MAY NOT BE FORESEEABLE. THERE CAN BE NO ASSURANCE THAT THE COMPANY SECURITIES WILL TRADE AT THE PRICES THAT MAY BE IMPLIED HEREIN, AND THERE CAN BE NO ASSURANCE THAT ANY ESTIMATE, PROJECTION OR ASSUMPTION HEREIN IS, OR WILL BE PROVEN, CORRECT. THIS DOCUMENT IS FOR INFORMATIONAL PURPOSES ONLY, AND DOES NOT CONSTITUTE (A) AN OFFER OR INVITATION TO BUY OR SELL, OR A SOLICITATION OF AN OFFER TO BUY OR SELL OR TO OTHERWISE ENGAGE IN ANY INVESTMENT BUSINESS OR PROVIDE OR RECEIVE ANY INVESTMENT SERVICES IN RESPECT OF, ANY SECURITY OR OTHER FINANCIAL INSTRUMENT AND NO LEGAL RELATIONS SHALL BE CREATED BY ITS ISSUE, (B) A "FINANCIAL PROMOTION" FOR THE PURPOSES OF THE FINANCIAL SERVICES AND MARKETS ACT 2000 OF THE U.K. (AS AMENDED), (C) "INVESTMENT ADVICE" AS DEFINED BY THE FCA'S HANDBOOK OF RULES AND GUIDANCE ("FCA HANDBOOK"), (D) "INVESTMENT RESEARCH" AS DEFINED BY THE FCA HANDBOOK, (E) AN "INVESTMENT RECOMMENDATION" AS DEFINED BY REGULATION (EU) 596/2014 AND BY REGULATION (EU) NO. 596/2014 AS IT FORMS PART OF U.K. DOMESTIC LAW BY VIRTUE OF SECTION 3 OF THE EUROPEAN UNION (WITHDRAWAL) ACT 2018 ("EUWA 2018") INCLUDING AS AMENDED BY REGULATIONS ISSUED UNDER SECTION 8 OF EUWA 2018, (F) ANY ACTION CONSTITUTING "INVESTMENT ADVISORY BUSINESS" AS DEFINED IN ARTICLE 28, PARAGRAPH 3, ITEM 1 OF THE FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS AND EXCHANGE LAW OF JAPAN (THE "FIEL"), (G) ANY ACTION CONSTITUTING "INVESTMENT MANAGEMENT BUSINESS" AS DEFINED IN ARTICLE 28, PARAGRAPH 4 OF THE FIEL, OR (H) FINANCIAL PROMOTION, INVESTMENT ADVICE OR AN INDUCEMENT OR ENCOURAGEMENT TO PARTICIPATE IN ANY PRODUCT, OFFERING OR INVESTMENT. NO INFORMATION CONTAINED HEREIN SHOULD BE CONSTRUED AS A RECOMMENDATION BY ELLIOTT MANAGEMENT. THIS DOCUMENT IS NOT INTENDED TO FORM THE BASIS OF ANY INVESTMENT DECISION OR AS SUGGESTING AN INVESTMENT STRATEGY. THIS DOCUMENT IS NOT (AND MAY NOT BE CONSTRUED TO BE) LEGAL, TAX, INVESTMENT, FINANCIAL OR OTHER ADVICE. EACH RECIPIENT SHOULD CONSULT THEIR OWN LEGAL COUNSEL AND TAX AND FINANCIAL ADVISERS AS TO LEGAL AND OTHER MATTERS CONCERNING THE INFORMATION CONTAINED HEREIN. THIS DOCUMENT DOES NOT PURPORT TO BE ALL-INCLUSIVE OR TO CONTAIN ALL OF THE INFORMATION THAT MAY BE RELEVANT TO AN EVALUATION OF THE COMPANY, COMPANY SECURITIES OR THE MATTERS DESCRIBED HEREIN. NO AGREEMENT, COMMITMENT, UNDERSTANDING OR OTHER LEGAL RELATIONSHIP EXISTS OR MAY BE DEEMED TO EXIST BETWEEN OR AMONG ELLIOTT MANAGEMENT AND ANY OTHER PERSON BY VIRTUE OF FURNISHING THIS DOCUMENT. ELLIOTT MANAGEMENT IS NOT ACTING FOR OR ON BEHALF OF, AND IS NOT PROVIDING ANY ADVICE OR SERVICE TO, ANY RECIPIENT OF THIS DOCUMENT. ELLIOTT MANAGEMENT IS NOT RESPONSIBLE TO ANY PERSON FOR PROVIDING ADVICE IN RELATION TO THE SUBJECT MATTER OF THIS DOCUMENT. BEFORE DETERMINING ON ANY COURSE OF ACTION, ANY RECIPIENT SHOULD CONSIDER ANY ASSOCIATED RISKS AND CONSEQUENCES AND CONSULT WITH ITS OWN INDEPENDENT ADVISORS AS IT DEEMS NECESSARY. THE ELLIOTT FUNDS MAY HAVE A DIRECT OR INDIRECT INVESTMENT IN THE COMPANY. ELLIOTT MANAGEMENT THEREFORE HAS A FINANCIAL INTEREST IN THE PROFITABILITY OF THE ELLIOTT FUNDS' POSITIONS IN THE COMPANY. ACCORDINGLY, ELLIOTT MANAGEMENT MAY HAVE CONFLICTS OF INTEREST AND THIS DOCUMENT SHOULD NOT BE REGARDED AS IMPARTIAL. NOTHING IN THIS DOCUMENT SHOULD BE TAKEN AS ANY INDICATION OF ELLIOTT MANAGEMENT'S CURRENT OR FUTURE TRADING OR VOTING INTENTIONS WHICH MAY CHANGE AT ANY TIME. ELLIOTT MANAGEMENT RESERVES THE RIGHT TO CHANGE ITS VOTING INTENTION AT ANY TIME NOTWITHSTANDING ANY STATEMENTS IN THIS DOCUMENT. ELLIOTT MANAGEMENT INTENDS TO REVIEW ITS INVESTMENTS IN THE COMPANY ON A CONTINUING BASIS AND DEPENDING UPON VARIOUS FACTORS, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, THE COMPANY'S FINANCIAL POSITION AND STRATEGIC DIRECTION, THE OUTCOME OF ANY DISCUSSIONS WITH THE COMPANY, OVERALL MARKET CONDITIONS, OTHER INVESTMENT OPPORTUNITIES AVAILABLE TO ELLIOTT MANAGEMENT, AND THE AVAILABILITY OF COMPANY SECURITIES AT PRICES THAT WOULD MAKE THE PURCHASE OR SALE OF COMPANY SECURITIES DESIRABLE, ELLIOTT MANAGEMENT MAY FROM TIME TO TIME (IN THE OPEN MARKET OR IN PRIVATE TRANSACTIONS, INCLUDING SINCE THE INCEPTION OF ELLIOTT MANAGEMENT'S POSITION) BUY, SELL, COVER, HEDGE OR OTHERWISE CHANGE THE FORM OR SUBSTANCE OF ANY OF ITS INVESTMENTS (INCLUDING COMPANY SECURITIES) TO ANY DEGREE IN ANY MANNER PERMITTED BY LAW AND EXPRESSLY DISCLAIMS ANY OBLIGATION TO NOTIFY OTHERS OF ANY SUCH CHANGES. ELLIOTT MANAGEMENT ALSO RESERVES THE RIGHT TO TAKE ANY ACTIONS WITH RESPECT TO ITS INVESTMENTS IN THE COMPANY AS IT MAY DEEM APPROPRIATE. ELLIOTT MANAGEMENT HAS NOT SOUGHT OR OBTAINED CONSENT FROM ANY THIRD PARTY TO USE ANY STATEMENTS OR INFORMATION CONTAINED HEREIN. ANY SUCH STATEMENTS OR INFORMATION SHOULD NOT BE VIEWED AS INDICATING THE SUPPORT OF SUCH THIRD PARTY FOR THE VIEWS EXPRESSED HEREIN. ALL TRADEMARKS AND TRADE NAMES USED HEREIN ARE THE EXCLUSIVE PROPERTY OF THEIR RESPECTIVE OWNERS. 1 Defined by dividing share price by book value per share adjusted for the post-tax difference between market value of leasing properties and the book value of leasing properties as disclosed in Sumitomo Realty's yuho. 2 Sumitomo Realty ranks at the bottom of the TOPIX 100 on its ISS Governance Score, director independence ratio and its usage of independent board committees (e.g. nomination, remuneration and audit committees). View original content to download multimedia: SOURCE Elliott Investment Management L.P. View original content to download multimedia: Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store