Expected Trump Order to Shutter Education Dept. Could Amount to ‘Pocket Change'
Despite the fiery rhetoric, President Donald Trump's push to eliminate a Department of Education he accuses of abusing 'taxpayer dollars to indoctrinate America's youth' comes down, appropriately, to civics and math.
First, the president cannot legally abolish a department with statutory responsibilities embedded in the law. Only Congress can do that.
Most of the public money that flows to the department goes to programs codified in federal legislation. They include Title I ($18 billion annually), special education ($15 billion) and the Office for Civil Rights ($140 million).
Get stories like this delivered straight to your inbox. Sign up for The 74 Newsletter
Get stories like this delivered straight to your inbox. Sign up for The 74 Newsletter
To eliminate any of those programs — let alone, to shutter the department outright — or even to move them to another agency, requires a supermajority in Congress. That means six Democrats and every Republican in the Senate would need to be on board. The political calculus is daunting.
That leaves a motley assemblage of much smaller programs that are not bound up in Congress's authority. Michael Petrilli, president of the conservative Thomas B. Fordham Institute, described those offerings as relative 'pocket change' compared to the department's overall budget.
'I think it's going to be pretty slim pickings,' he said.
One notable exception would be the Office of Planning, Evaluation and Policy Development, which had almost 130 employees as of the end of December. Congress did not authorize the office, 'so it could get axed before 5 today if they wanted,' said David Cleary, a principal with The Group, a Washington lobbying firm and a former Republican education staffer for the Senate. Even this program has functions, like safeguarding student privacy, that only Congress can eliminate.
Trump's inner circle appears to have reckoned with its legal limitations in an executive order the president is expected to sign before the end of the month. Cleary is among those who was briefed on a draft that would call on lawmakers to eliminate the agency while Trump's yet-to-be-confirmed education secretary does her part to push out staff and offload functions to other agencies.
'The executive can't just reorganize or change the authorities on its own,' Cleary said. Laws like the Education Sciences Reform Act and the Elementary and Secondary Education Act 'empower and constrain the department in various ways.'
Two other sources, who either saw early drafts or an outline of the proposal and asked not to be named because of ongoing work with the department, agreed the order will take a two-part approach. The Wall Street Journal first reported on the deliberations Monday.
Some members of Congress are eager to help. A bill from South Dakota Sen. Mike Rounds would shutter the agency over a six-month timeline. And Republican Rep. Thomas Massie of Kentucky reintroduced a one-sentence bill on Friday that aims to close the department by the end of 2026.
But with those proposals unlikely to get the required votes, experts say there's little Linda McMahon, Trump's nominee to lead the department, can do on her own. In addition to legislation establishing the department in 1979, other laws, like the Higher Education Act and the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act, authorize what the department does and how much it spends.
Related
Petrilli recalled that the first Trump administration eliminated the Office of Innovation and Improvement, which he helped create when he was a department official during President George W. Bush's administration. The Blue Ribbon Schools program, which recognizes exemplary schools and costs about $100,000 a year to run, could be targeted this time. In keeping with Trump's executive order against diversity, equity and inclusion, any grants highlighted in a recent report from Parents Defending Education, a conservative advocacy group, would also likely be cut. Those total about $1 billion. Staff connected to DEI efforts have been among the first to be dismissed.
Trump's team is unafraid to push the envelope, as it has shown with the move to shut down USAID, but Petrilli doesn't expect Trump's Department of Government Efficiency to find much else to eliminate without Congress's OK.
'This is the big action,' he said of DOGE staff digging into department databases over the weekend. 'Then it's going to be over and they're going to be on to other things.'
The administration doesn't have the same level of hostility for the education department as it does for foreign aid programs, added Jim Blew, who served under former Education Secretary Betsy DeVos during Trump's first term and co-founded the conservative Defense of Freedom Institute.
'USAID sends money overseas, and people don't understand how that's in the U.S.' interest. 'I think the White House is reading those tea leaves,' he said. 'It's different for the department. I don't think the dynamics are the same.'
But he hasn't written off the idea that Trump could convince enough members of Congress to wind down the department and shift major programs to other agencies. While a recent poll showed a majority of Americans don't want the department eliminated, there are limits to that support.
'Congress is very frustrated with the amount of money spent and the lack of results,' he said. 'That always creates this inflammatory environment.'
The question is whether moving special education to the Department of Health and Human Services, for example, or shifting career and technical programs to the Department of Labor would result in less spending and bureaucracy, said Julia Martin, director of policy and government affairs with The Bruman Group, a Washington law firm.
Proponents of closing the department, like Sen. Rounds, haven't provided those details. His bill would send K-12 funding to the states as a block grant, but offered no specifics on how to do it.
Related
If Rounds gets his way, she added, states and districts might not receive the same attention they do now.
'Despite our occasional frustrations, [the Education Department] has … historically been a user-friendly and responsive agency,' she said. 'Having a new agency that is inexperienced and understaffed increases the potential for fraud, waste, and abuse, and decreases responsiveness.'
Some observers speculate that Trump is delaying his executive order so McMahon won't have to face pointed questions from the Senate education committee over how to implement it.
Related
While the fate of the department is unclear, the uncertainty over which programs would be cut is creating fear and chaos, said Keri Rodrigues, president of the National Parents Union.
'There is a lot of toxic distraction right now,' said Rodrigues, who plans to meet with Chief of Staff Rachel Oglesby on Thursday. 'What are the priorities? I would like to hope that they have a forward-looking vision for the future of education.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Gizmodo
19 minutes ago
- Gizmodo
MAGA Freaks Out as Man Arrested for Allegedly Handing Out ‘Bionic' Face Shields to Protesters
Chaos has been happening in isolated areas of Los Angeles, where federal forces and the LAPD are clashing with angry protesters and rioters. The Trump administration claims it is maintaining public order against lawlessness. California's governor, Gavin Newsom, meanwhile, says that the White House is engaged in an authoritarian power grab. As the drama in the city continues, a recent arrest would seem to be yet another opportunity for both sides to bicker with one another about who is right. A man named Alejandro Theodoro Orellana was arrested by the FBI on Thursday morning and is now expected to face a charge of conspiracy to commit civil disorders. U.S. Attorney Bill Essayli, who was appointed by Trump's Attorney General Pam Bondi in April, announced Orellana's arrest on social media, writing, 'Alejandro Theodoro Orellana was arrested this morning by @FBILosAngeles on an allegation of Conspiracy to Commit Civil Disorders (18 USC 371) for distributing face shields to suspected rioters on Tuesday.' He added: 'We are moving quickly to identify and arrest those involved in organizing and/or supporting civil disorder in Los Angeles.' In case you missed that, it would appear that Orellana has been arrested because he helped distribute gas masks to protesters. Pictures of the supposed masks that have circulated on social media seem to show that they are a 'bionic' face shield designed to protect against tear gas. Orellana's arrest is now being used by authorities to bolster a claim made by President Trump, which is that the protests in LA are being funded and organized by outside groups. 'These are radical left lunatics that you're dealing with. They're tough. They're smart. They're probably paid many of them. As you know, they're professionals,' Trump said during a press conference on Wednesday. Relatedly, White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt highlighted Orellana's arrest on social media on Thursday. 'Once again, President Trump was right,' Leavitt wrote on X. 'The President rightfully raised the important question of who is organizing and funding these dangerous riots in Los Angeles. This morning, the FBI arrested Alejandro Theodoro Orellana for conspiracy to commit civil disorders after handing out face shields to anti-ICE rioters.' This whole thing is bizarre for many reasons, but perhaps the most bizarre is that, despite the fact that cars have been set on fire and federal buildings have been attacked, one of the only people whose arrest has been actively platformed by the Trump administration is a guy whose sole alleged crime (as far as we know) is helping to hand out protective face coverings so that people's eyes don't get burned by tear gas. Also, handing out gas masks is not a crime, so what are officials even really talking about? It's not totally clear. It's easy to feel like they just arrested this guy for nothing. Many other things about the incident remain unclear. The Daily Mail reports that Orellana was not the person who actually handed out the masks, and was only driving the vehicle that delivered them. Another, so far unidentified woman, is said to have actually handed out the masks. When reached for comment by Gizmodo, a public information officer for the U.S. Attorney's Office for the Central District of California did little to clarify the situation. They said, 'Mr. Orellana was arrested today. We expect his initial appearance will be scheduled for tomorrow at 1:30 p.m. PDT in U.S. District Court in Los Angeles.' The officer added that the office anticipates that Orellana will be charged with conspiracy to commit civil disorders and aiding and abetting civil disorders. There have been over 350 arrests in recent days, and the LA district attorney is expected to begin bringing cases soon, so Orellana is unlikely to be the last protester to grace the headlines. Still, right-wingers have been having a field day with his arrest and have used the incident to spin a larger conspiratorial narrative. The usual cast of MAGA voices have jumped into the fray to imply that Orellana is associated with some sort of vast conspiracy to 'fund' and coordinate the protests in LA. 'This militant and his network are part of the conspiracy to raise cash to buy riot gear,' MAGA influencer Any Ngo posted on Thursday. 'Who is funding and supplying the insurgents in Los Angeles and in other cities? The FBI has arrested the insurgency leader observed handing out $60 'bionic shield' face masks to rioters,' another frequent conspiracy poster with over 600,000 followers wrote. The Daily Signal, a conservative news site that was originally created by the Heritage Foundation, recently ran a news article entitled: 'Who Organized the LA Anti-ICE Protests That Escalated Into Riots?' It's incredibly unclear who is doing what in LA, so—hypothetically—it's not totally out of the realm of possibility that someone is giving supplies to some of the activists. But, last I checked, that's not a crime—nor is not wanting to get hit in the face with tear gas.
Yahoo
21 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Ask Jordan: Who authorized the El Salvador prison contract?
'Who authorized the $6 million contract with taxpayer money [to imprison immigrants in El Salvador]?' — Gina Hi Gina, Your question provides a platform to spotlight a new lawsuit — the first of its kind, per the plaintiffs who brought it. The suit aims to invalidate the agreement between the Trump administration and El Salvador to remove people from the U.S. and hold them incommunicado and potentially indefinitely in a Salvadoran prison known for human rights abuses. To answer your specific question, the complaint that launched the suit said the State Department made the agreement. As for the possible legal basis to strike down the deal, the complaint cites a federal law called the Administrative Procedure Act, which requires federal agency actions to be both reasonable and reasonably explained. The lawsuit argues the agreement fails to meet those requirements because it is 'arbitrary and capricious' and 'was entered into without any legal basis.' While it called the facts 'extraordinary,' the suit says the application of the law to the deal is an 'ordinary' one requiring striking it down. The plaintiffs are a coalition of groups: Robert F. Kennedy Human Rights, the National Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers, Immigrant Defenders Law Center, Immigration Equality and the California Collaborative for Immigrant Justice, all of whom are represented by Democracy Forward. (RFK Human Rights, which is named for former senator and attorney general Robert F. Kennedy Sr., not the current health and human services secretary, is also representing itself.) It's still early in the new case, which was assigned to U.S. District Judge James Boasberg, Washington, D.C.'s chief federal trial judge, who is also presiding over separate litigation stemming from the administration's illegal Salvadoran renditions. The government hasn't yet responded in court to this latest suit; we don't know how it's going to play out or when it will be resolved. But the case provides another possible legal tool against one of the centerpieces of Trump's second-term agenda. Whatever the result of this latest litigation, it may uncover more information about the agreement along the way. Have any questions or comments for me? Please submit them on this form for a chance to be featured in the Deadline: Legal Blog and newsletter. This article was originally published on
21 minutes ago
As legal fight over Guard deployment plays out, Noem vows to continue Trump's immigration crackdown
LOS ANGELES -- Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem pledged to carry on with the Trump administration's immigration crackdown despite waves of unrest across the U.S. Hours after her comment Thursday, a judge directed the president to return control to California over National Guard troops he deployed after protests erupted over the immigration crackdown, but an appeals court quickly put the brakes on that and temporarily blocked the order that was to go into effect on Friday. The 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals scheduled a hearing on the matter for Tuesday. The federal judge's temporary restraining order said the Guard deployment was illegal and both violated the Tenth Amendment and exceeded President Donald Trump's statutory authority. The order applied only to the National Guard troops and not Marines who were also deployed to the LA protests. The judge said he would not rule on the Marines because they were not out on the streets yet. Gov. Gavin Newsom who had asked the judge for an emergency stop to troops helping carry out immigration raids, had praised the order before it was blocked saying 'today was really about a test of democracy, and today we passed the test" and had said he would be redeploying Guard soldiers to 'what they were doing before Donald Trump commandeered them.' White House spokesperson Anna Kelly said the president acted within his powers and that the federal judge's order 'puts our brave federal officials in danger. The district court has no authority to usurp the President's authority as Commander in Chief." The developments unfolded as protests continued in cities nationwide and the country braced for major demonstrations against Trump over the weekend. Noem said the immigration raids that fueled the protests would move forward and agents have thousands of targets. 'This is only going to continue until we have peace on the streets of Los Angeles,' she said during a news conference that was interrupted by shouting from U.S. Sen. Alex Padilla, a California Democrat who was forcibly removed from the event. Newsom has warned that the military intervention is part of a broader effort by Trump to overturn norms at the heart of the nation's democracy. He also said sending Guard troops on the raids has further inflamed tensions in LA. So far the protests have been centered mostly in downtown near City Hall and a federal detention center where some immigrants are being held. Much of the sprawling city has been spared from the protests. On the third night of an 8 p.m. curfew, Los Angeles police arrested several demonstrators who refused orders to leave a street downtown. Earlier in the night, officers with the Department of Homeland Security deployed flash bangs to disperse a crowd that had gathered near the jail, sending protesters sprinting away. Those incidents were outliers. As with the past two nights, the hourslong demonstrations remained peaceful and upbeat, drawing a few hundred attendees who marched through downtown chanting, dancing and poking fun at the Trump administration's characterization of the city as a 'war zone.' Elsewhere, demonstrations have picked up across the U.S., emerging in more than a dozen major cities. Some have led to clashes with police and hundreds have been arrested. The immigration agents conducting the raids in LA are 'putting together a model and a blueprint' for other communities, Noem said. She pledged that federal authorities 'are not going away' even though, she said, officers have been hit with rocks and bricks and assaulted. She said people with criminal records who are in the country illegally and violent protesters will 'face consequences.' 'Just because you think you're here as a citizen, or because you're a member of a certain group or you're not a citizen, it doesn't mean that you're going to be protected and not face consequences from the laws that this country stands for," she said. Noem criticized the Padilla's interruption, calling it "inappropriate.' A statement from her agency said the two met after the news conference for about 15 minutes, but it also chided him for 'disrespectful political theater.' Padilla said later that he was demanding answers about the 'increasingly extreme immigration enforcement actions' and only wanted to ask Noem a question. He said he was handcuffed but not arrested. 'If this is how this administration responds to a senator with a question, I can only imagine what they are doing to farmworkers, to cooks, to day laborers throughout the Los Angeles community,' he said. The administration has said it is willing to send troops to other cities to assist with immigration enforcement and controlling disturbances — in line with what Trump promised during last year's campaign. Some 2,000 Guard soldiers were in the nation's second-largest city and were soon to be joined by 2,000 more, along with about 700 Marines, said Maj. Gen. Scott Sherman, who is in charge of the operation. About 500 of the Guard troops deployed to the Los Angeles protests have been trained to accompany agents on immigration operations, Sherman said Wednesday. The Guard has the authority to temporarily detain people who attack officers, but any arrests must be made by law enforcement. With more demonstrations expected over the weekend, and the possibility that Trump could send troops to other states for immigration enforcement, governors are weighing what to do. Texas Gov. Greg Abbott, a Republican, has put 5,000 National Guard members on standby in cities where demonstrations are planned. In other Republican-controlled states, governors have not said when or how they may deploy troops. A group of Democratic governors earlier signed a statement this week calling Trump's deployments 'an alarming abuse of power.' There have been about 470 arrests since Saturday, the vast majority of which were for failing to leave the area at the request of law enforcement, according to the police department. There have been a handful of more serious charges, including for assault against officers and for possession of a Molotov cocktail and a gun. Nine officers have been hurt, mostly with minor injuries. ___ Rodriguez reported from San Francisco and Seewer from Toledo, Ohio. Associated Press writers Julie Watson in San Diego, Jesse Bedayn in Denver, and Jim Vertuno in Austin, Texas, and Hallie Golden in Seattle contributed.
