Arise, Lord Michael Gove
Photo byWhen does a commoner become a nobleman? Michael Gove entered the House of Lords, bedecked in ermin, just after 11 this morning as an ex-MP, two-time (failed) leadership candidate, and lately editor of the Spectator magazine. He emerged less than five minutes later as all of those things still, but as first and foremost Baron Gove of Torry, in the city of Aberdeen.
The Lords does pageantry in a way the Commons can only dream of, a wonderous juxtaposition of mundanity and tradition. The gold mace reclining behind the Speaker as he listed on the red velvet Woolsack, iPad in hand, like a student on a beanbag in the college library; sword-wielding officials next to peers in trainers; candles blazing with energy-efficient lightbulbs (we don't want a repeat of 1834 now do we); the adult children of the nobility jostling together on the steps of the glittering throne like fans on the football terraces keen to get the best view..
Surprisingly full of both peers and guests given recess is about to begin, Gove's ennoblement was top of the day's agenda in the Chamber. Known for his colourful expressions, the former education secretary, environment secretary and housing secretary, once decried by a furious teacher as a 'demented Dalek on speed', kept a straight face for his latest regeneration into one of the Lords Temporal. Or, if you will, a Time Lord.
To begin his new era as one of over 800 members of the House of Lords, Gove was led up the aisle by two familiar faces from his past life in government. Ed Vaizey (Baron Vaizey of Didcot) was culture minister under David Cameron back when Gove was Dalek of Education, while his other chaperone, Simone Finn, was a government adviser. Baroness Finn briefly returned to frontline politics as de facto Downing Street chief of staff in 2022 when Boris Johnson, having just sacked Gove for suggesting his boss should resign as Prime Minister, found himself unable to field a cabinet. Time works differently in the House of Lords. The past that was the future once (as Cameron so pointedly put it) comes back as the ermin-clad present.
Gove, of course, owes his ennoblement not to Johnson or Cameron (relations with both of whom remain cryogenic after small matters like hastening to their exits from Downing Street), but to Rishi Sunak, who put him top of his resignation honours list. Baron Cameron of Chipping Norton, another Sunak appointee, seemingly had a prior appointment – although Baron (Michael) Elliott of Mickle Fell, an ally from Gove's Vote Leave days, elevated by Liz Truss, was there on the Conservative benches.
'For us our heirs and successors, do appoint, give and grant unto him the said name, state, degree, style, dignity, title and honour of Baron Gove, to have and to hold unto him for his life,' Gove was told by the Lord Clerk. With all the solemnity of a marriage vow (albeit one to 832 other people – or, perhaps more accurately, the King), he replied: 'I, Michael, Lord Gove, do swear by almighty God that I will be faithful' – breathe – 'and bear true allegiance to His Majesty King Charles, his heirs and successors according to law, so help me God.' Amen.
All that remained was to sign the Lords' Code of Conduct and, just like that, it was over. A flick of a gold baton, a handshake with the (still-lounging) Speaker, a chorus of laughter and hear-hears. Lord Gove of Torry (a nod to his adoptive father, who was born there) was barely out of the Chamber before the real business began: the Lord Bishop of St Albans asking his final question before retirement on the government's efforts regarding the Hong Kong activist and British citizen Jimmy Lai, imprisoned by the Chinese government.
Subscribe to The New Statesman today from only £8.99 per month Subscribe
Five minutes only – but what minutes! One of the most significant politicians of the 2010-2024 Conservative era, the prime minister who never was, who shaped British politics in ways the residents of the Commons, just across the lobby, will be grappling with for decades to come, while he gets to watch from his lofty abode. Will such an esteemed political machinator miss the psychodrama of the Commons? At least the good Lord has a newsroom to run.
[See also: Will Labour's winter fuel U-turn work?]
Related
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
South Wales Guardian
2 hours ago
- South Wales Guardian
Trade Secretary to push for timeline on US tariff exemption
Sir Keir Starmer and Mr Trump announced the broad terms of an agreement last month that would exempt the UK from some of the US president's tariffs on steel and cars while increasing market access for other goods. The Prime Minister hailed the announcement as a major achievement, saying the UK was the first nation to reach such an agreement with Mr Trump. But the details are still being worked out ahead of a formal deal, and the Government hopes for an agreement within weeks. Mr Reynolds is expected to discuss implementing the deal during talks with US trade representative Jamieson Greer in Paris on Tuesday, where he is attending a meeting of the OECD. That meeting comes amid uncertainty about the future of Mr Trump's tariffs after a US court last week ruled many of them unlawful, before an appeals court reinstated the levies pending a further hearing. Last week also saw Mr Trump announce that he would double tariffs on steel to 50%, starting on Wednesday, and it remains unclear how the UK would be affected. Mr Reynolds's visit to Paris is part of a three-day trip, during which he is expected to meet other trade ministers and attend a G7 ministerial meeting before heading to Brussels for meetings with his EU counterparts. During the trip, the Trade Secretary will argue that the UK is a dependable partner in an era of increasing global volatility. He said: 'Our deals with the US, EU and India are proof that the UK is the most connected country in the world to do business. Along with our modern industrial strategy, our Plan for Change is making the UK a safe, stable bet in uncertain times. 'We recognise our relationship with G7 allies and EU counterparts must continue to evolve and deliver a better trading environment for our businesses and exporters. 'That's why we want to wipe away costly, business-blocking barriers and open up opportunities to grow our economy, create jobs and put more money in people's pockets.' Andrew Griffith, Conservative shadow business secretary, said: 'Labour told the British public we had a deal with the US – but one month on there is no deal in sight, meaning British businesses and workers continue to suffer because of Labour's failed negotiations. 'After snatching the winter fuel payment, lying about not increasing taxes, and misleading the public by saying the US trade deal was done, the public will rightly not trust a word Labour says. 'As all the other political parties wrangle over how to spend more taxpayers money, only the Conservatives are committed to being responsible with the public finances.'
South Wales Guardian
2 hours ago
- South Wales Guardian
MPs debate decriminalising abortion as opponents warn it would be a radical step
Parliament could debate amendments to the Crime and Policing Bill in the coming weeks around guaranteeing women will no longer face prosecution over ending a pregnancy. Monday's debate at Westminster Hall, on a petition calling for the decriminalisation of abortion, was described by one MP opposed to the change as 'a rehearsal' to the separate Commons debate and votes to come. The petition, which gathered some 103,653 signatures, has urged the Government at Westminster to 'remove abortion from criminal law so that no pregnant person can be criminalised for procuring their own abortion'. Abortion in England and Wales remains a criminal offence. It is legal with an authorised provider up to 24 weeks, with very limited circumstances allowing one after this time, such as when the mother's life is at risk or the child would be born with a severe disability. The issue has come to the fore in recent times with prominent cases such as those of Nicola Packer and Carla Foster. Ms Packer was cleared by a jury last month after taking prescribed abortion medicine when she was around 26 weeks pregnant, beyond the legal limit of 10 weeks for taking such medication at home. She told jurors during her trial, which came after more than four years of police investigation, that she did not realise she had been pregnant for more than 10 weeks. She has since indicated she will file a complaint with the police, prosecutors and the NHS over how she was treated. The case of Carla Foster, jailed in 2023 for illegally obtaining abortion tablets to end her pregnancy when she was between 32 and 34 weeks pregnant, eventually saw her sentence reduced by the Court of Appeal and suspended, with senior judges saying that sending women to prison for abortion-related offences is 'unlikely' to be a 'just outcome'. Labour MP Tony Vaughan, opening the Westminster Hall debate, said it is time to 'abandon these outdated practices' of prosecuting women. He said: 'I believe that our laws cannot be fixed relics of the past, but must reflect social attitudes and societal norms.' He insisted 'decriminalisation does not mean deregulation' and that he has not seen evidence 'to suggest that removing the criminal law deterrent would then motivate swathes of women to have abortions after 24 weeks'. He added: 'I'm in favour of regulation of abortion, but I'm also in favour of decriminalising it, so that abortion can once and for all be treated… as a matter of healthcare, not criminality.' But DUP MP Jim Shannon disagreed, stating that abortion is not 'simply medical treatment'. He added: 'This is not a simple matter. It's certainly not for me. It's not for my constituents. It's not for us who represent this point of view.' He said it would be a 'radical step' and 'seismic change' and suggested a late-term abortion on the basis of a baby's sex could be accepted if the law was to change. He said: 'Depending on the model of decriminalisation, the effect would range from de facto access to abortion for women up to birth for any reason, there would be no enforceable prohibition on abortion on the basis of the sex of the unborn baby, for example.' Labour MP Tonia Antoniazzi, who will table an amendment in the Commons to the Bill stating that 'no offence is committed by a woman acting in relation to her own pregnancy', told MPs on Monday: 'There must be no more Nicola Packers.' She said: 'I am staunchly pro choice, and as much as I believe future reforms are needed regarding abortion provision, we must not lose sight of the current moral imperative here and its urgency, namely, vulnerable women being dragged from hospital bed to police cell under suspicion of ending their own pregnancies. 'This can be stopped by disapplying the criminal law related to abortion from women.' Fellow Labour MP Stella Creasy spoke in favour of going further by enshrining a human right to abortion, and is expected to put forward a separate amendment to 'lock in' the right of a woman to have one and protect those who help them. DUP MP Carla Lockhart, who is opposed to decriminalisation, said she was speaking with 'deep conviction' on the issue. She said: 'For me, this is a debate on life and I believe that both lives matter in every pregnancy. The most basic human right is the right to life.' She said the number of abortions taking place in the UK is 'a national tragedy' and attributed a rise in prosecutions in recent years to women being able to take abortion medication at home. She said: 'It is surely not because the CPS (Crown Prosecution Service) or police have suddenly decided to handle this issue in a more draconian way. 'The pills-by-post scheme has enabled women, either dishonestly or because they have miscalculated their own gestational age, to obtain abortion pills beyond the 10-week limit.' Justice minister Alex Davies-Jones said the Government is neutral on decriminalisation and that it is an issue for Parliament to decide upon. She said: 'If the will of Parliament is that the law in England and Wales should change, then the Government would not stand in the way of such change but would seek to ensure that the law is workable and enforced in the way that Parliament intended.' The debate came as it was confirmed Mayor of London Sir Sadiq Khan had 'stepped in' after advertisements from the British Pregnancy Advisory Service (Bpas) in support of decriminalisation were rejected by Transport for London (TfL) last month. TfL said the proposed advertisements did not comply with its advertising policy 'because they made negative references about the police'. A spokesperson for the Mayor of London said: 'The mayor has stepped in and we are now urgently looking into this issue so we can allow adverts from the British Pregnancy Advisory Service on London's transport network.' Bpas said: 'Ahead of the vote in Parliament, it is absolutely vital that the voices of the women who have been so deeply harmed by the current law are allowed to be heard. We urge the mayor to take swift action and allow our charity to share these stories as a matter of urgency.'
Glasgow Times
2 hours ago
- Glasgow Times
Inquiry launched into appointment of football regulator chairman
David Kogan, a media rights expert, was named as the Government's preferred candidate to chair the Independent Football Regulator in April, and his appointment was endorsed by a cross-party committee of MPs last month. But the revelation that he had donated money to both Sir Keir Starmer and Culture Secretary Lisa Nandy – as well as other Labour figures – drew complaints from the Conservatives and calls for the commissioner for public appointments to investigate. In a letter to the permanent secretary at the Department for Culture, Media and Sport, commissioner Sir William Shawcross said he had carried out a series of 'spot checks' and now believed a full inquiry into Mr Kogan's appointment was 'necessary'. David Kogan, the Government's preferred candidate (House of Commons/UK Parliament) Sir William's inquiry will look into whether the rules on public appointments were followed, and is likely to involve interviews with both Mr Kogan and Ms Nandy. Mr Kogan was originally approached about the football regulator job by the Conservatives while they were still in office, and has advised the Premier League, EFL and other leagues on broadcast rights. He has also donated thousands of pounds to Labour MPs and candidates in recent years, and sat on the board of Labour news website LabourList. During his pre-appointment hearing with the Commons Culture, Media and Sport Committee – which later backed his appointment – he revealed he had also donated 'very small sums' to Sir Keir and Ms Nandy's leadership campaigns in 2020. Those donations had not previously been revealed as they were below the threshold for public declaration. A week later, Ms Nandy wrote to the committee to inform MPs that she had stepped back from making the final decision on whether to appoint Mr Kogan, delegating the choice to sport minister Stephanie Peacock. Stuart Andrew, the Conservative shadow culture secretary, said Mr Kogan's appointment 'bears all the hallmarks of yet more Labour cronyism', adding Ms Nandy's decision to step back 'highlights just how compromised this selection has become'. He said: 'Number 10 must now come clean about the involvement of the Downing Street appointments unit and special advisers in promoting David Kogan as the preferred candidate. 'The public has a right to know whether this was a fair and impartial process, or yet another case of political patronage disguised as due diligence.' Mr Kogan did not comment on the launch of the inquiry.
