logo
China's Rival Receives Anti-Ship Boost From US

China's Rival Receives Anti-Ship Boost From US

Miami Herald14 hours ago

Taiwan, a self-ruled island claimed by China, has reportedly received missile launch systems from the United States that are designed to sink invading ships.
An official from China's Defense Ministry said last week that Beijing opposed any form of what he called "military collusion"-including arms sales-between the U.S. and Taiwan.
Newsweek has contacted the Taiwanese Defense Ministry for comment by email.
While the U.S. has maintained diplomatic ties with China since 1979, it is required by law-under the Taiwan Relations Act-to provide the island with defensive arms to "resist any attempt to resolve differences" across the Taiwan Strait by means other than peaceful ones.
China possesses the world's largest navy by hull count, including amphibious ships designed to project air and ground power in island-landing operations. Beijing has vowed to reserve all "necessary" options, including the use of force, to achieve unification with Taiwan.
Citing a source familiar with the matter, the Taiwanese Central News Agency reported on Saturday that the first five Harpoon anti-ship missile launcher vehicles-part of the Harpoon Coastal Defense Systems-had been delivered from the U.S. to Taiwan, along with a radar truck. Newsweek has been unable to independently verify this report.
In 2020, the Pentagon's Defense Security Cooperation Agency announced that the U.S. would sell 100 Harpoon Coastal Defense Systems and up to 400 RGM-84L-4 Harpoon Block II surface-launched missiles to Taiwan at an estimated total cost of $2.37 billion.
According to its manufacturer, Boeing, the Harpoon Block II missile is armed with a 500-pound penetrating high-explosive warhead and is capable of striking ships more than 77 miles away. Taiwan is scheduled to receive all of its Harpoon Coastal Defense Systems by 2028.
During a news conference on June 26, Senior Colonel Zhang Xiaogang, a spokesperson for the Chinese Defense Ministry, denounced Washington for "misleading Taiwan into the flames of war" through arms sales, adding that such actions harmed Taiwan and undermined the island's interests.
In its arms sale announcement in December 2020, the U.S. Defense Security Cooperation Agency said the "highly reliable and effective" land-based Harpoon anti-ship missile system would help Taiwan counter or deter maritime aggressions, coastal blockades and amphibious assaults.
"The proposed sale of this equipment and support will not alter the basic military balance in the region," the agency said, describing the Harpoon missile as an anti-surface warfare weapon with "day, night, and adverse weather, standoff air-to-surface capability."
Senior Colonel Zhang Xiaogang, a spokesperson for the Chinese Defense Ministry, said at a news conference on June 26: "We urge the U.S. side to abide by the one-China principle and the three China-U.S. joint communiqués, and stop sending wrong signals to the 'Taiwan independence' separatist forces."
The U.S. Defense Security Cooperation Agency said in an announcement in 2020: "This proposed sale [of Harpoon Coastal Defense Systems] serves U.S. national, economic, and security interests by supporting the recipient's continuing efforts to modernize its armed forces and to maintain a credible defensive capability."
It remains to be seen whether Taiwan will request additional ship-sinking weapons from the U.S. as Washington continues to arm its allies and partners in the western Pacific Ocean-including Australia and Japan-to counter China's growing naval threat.
Related Articles
Czech Intelligence Reveals China Plan to Crash Into Taiwan Vice President-ElectChina to Hegseth: US on Path to 'Fire and Suffering'Key US Ally Quietly Prepares for China's Pacific War With AmericaFootage Shows China Firing Water Cannon at US Ally Near Disputed Territory
2025 NEWSWEEK DIGITAL LLC.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Exclusive — India Hopes for Imminent US Trade Deal, Minister Tells Newsweek
Exclusive — India Hopes for Imminent US Trade Deal, Minister Tells Newsweek

Newsweek

time2 hours ago

  • Newsweek

Exclusive — India Hopes for Imminent US Trade Deal, Minister Tells Newsweek

Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. India is hopeful of reaching a trade deal with U.S. President Donald Trump's administration very soon, Indian foreign minister Subrahmanyam Jaishankar told Newsweek in an interview. Trump has set a July 9 deadline for imposing reciprocal tariffs, but trade talks have run into obstacles including discussions over duties on farm goods, steel and car parts. Trump has voiced optimism for a deal with India, an increasingly important diplomatic partner as well as being the world's most populous country and a Top Five global economy. "We are in the middle, hopefully more than the middle, of a very intricate trade negotiation. Obviously, my hope would be that we bring it to a successful conclusion, I cannot guarantee, because there's another party to that discussion, but no question," Jaishankar said at Newsweek's office. "I believe it's possible, and I think we'll have to watch this space for the next few days," he said. Left to right, Dr. Subrahmanyam Jaishankar, Indian minister of external affairs, and Dev Pragad, Newsweek CEO, speak onstage during a Newsweek Exclusive Fireside Chat With Indian Minister Of External Affairs, at 1 World Trade Center... Left to right, Dr. Subrahmanyam Jaishankar, Indian minister of external affairs, and Dev Pragad, Newsweek CEO, speak onstage during a Newsweek Exclusive Fireside Chat With Indian Minister Of External Affairs, at 1 World Trade Center on June 30 in New York City. Morefor Newsweek White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt told a news briefing on Monday that "they are finalizing these agreements." Trump has had a friendly relationship with Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi and Jaishankar also underlined the importance of the ties between the countries within the Quad of countries that serve as a counterweight to China in Asia and the Pacific. The other members are Japan and Australia. "You have four countries, in a way, four corners of the Indo-Pacific who are actually to have decided that they have a shared interest in creating a stable or more prosperous Indo-Pacific and are willing to work in a very practical basis," he said, adding that India wanted to stay on good terms with neighboring China. "We have very strong convergences with the United States. At the same time, we are China's largest neighbor," he said. Jaishankar was speaking nearly two months after the most serious conflict in decades between India and nuclear rival Pakistan, with India striking what it called terrorist targets across the border after an attack on civilians in Kashmir left 26 people dead. Rejects Pakistan Talks He rejected an offer of talks with Pakistan on anything except ending terrorism and said India would strike again if needed. "We are now moving to a policy of no impunity. We will not accept that the terrorists are proxies and somehow, therefore, the state is not culpable. I mean, we think it's very clear the Pakistani state is up to its eyeballs in this one," Jaishankar said at Newsweek's office in New York. "I think we will strike at terrorists. We will protect. We will exercise the right to defend our people. And I think that message has been made pretty clear." Pakistani Prime Minister Shehbaz Sharif expressed his readiness for peace talks last week, saying they could address a wide range of disputes between the countries. Pakistan denies supporting cross-border terrorists. "We are willing to hold talks on terror, but if there is an expectation that we will talk about other things while they continue their terrorism, I think that's, you know, that's not realistic," Jaishankar said. "Terrorism cannot be a diplomatic tactic of putting a neighbor under pressure, and saying, oh, OK, come and talk to me. You cannot be a good neighbor and be a terrorist at the same time. So, they have to end that terrorism." A view of the audience during a Newsweek Exclusive Fireside Chat With Indian Minister Of External Affairs, at 1 World Trade Center on June 30 in New York City. A view of the audience during a Newsweek Exclusive Fireside Chat With Indian Minister Of External Affairs, at 1 World Trade Center on June 30 in New York Newsweek India struck targets in Pakistan it said it had identified as terrorist bases on May 7 in response to the killing of 26 civilians in an attack on tourists at Pahalgam in Kashmir in April. Pakistan had denied any hand in the killings or other attacks in divided Kashmir, which it contests with India. Pakistan struck back at India with cross-border shelling and warned that it could resort to nuclear weapons if it felt its existence was threatened. "We are not going to yield to nuclear blackmail that you know there could be escalation, and therefore we should not do anything," Jaishankar said. Iran Offer The flare-up between India and Pakistan has been overshadowed globally by the war between Israel and Iran, with the United States also joining strikes against Tehran's nuclear program. Jaishankar offered India's help to bring a resolution to the crisis, highlighting its good relations with all parties and the important relationships the world's most populous country had through trade and migrant workers with the countries of the Middle East. "We have actually very good relations with both countries, both with Israel and Iran. I mean, we would be, quite honestly, one of the few who have the ability to talk to both of them very openly, very candidly. We have tried to do that for some years now," he said. "We know the complexity of this, of this issue, it's not something which is easily amenable to a solution. So, the long answer is, we are willing to do our part, if there's any way we can be of any help to either country to others, to the IAEA, to the United States." Left to right, Dr. Subrahmanyam Jaishankar, Indian minister of external affairs, and Dev Pragad, Newsweek CEO, speak onstage during a Newsweek Exclusive Fireside Chat With Indian Minister Of External Affairs, at 1 World Trade Center... Left to right, Dr. Subrahmanyam Jaishankar, Indian minister of external affairs, and Dev Pragad, Newsweek CEO, speak onstage during a Newsweek Exclusive Fireside Chat With Indian Minister Of External Affairs, at 1 World Trade Center on June 30 in New York City. Morefor Newsweek Geopolitical Shifts Jaishankar said the United States is bringing about a global change with a shift away from alliances and in which countries pursue their own interests more individualistically. "The change in America's stance is very fundamental to the world order," he said. "I would say, you are, you are seeing the emergence of a post-alliance thinking, it's not that the alliances are going to go away tomorrow, but the alliances are not going to be the fulcrum around which world politics revolves. "You have the rise of China. You have the rise of India. You have Russia … So yes, I think we are heading for a much more individualistic world, in a way, where countries will pursue their interests more vigorously, not necessarily as collectively as before."

Mitch McConnell Warns of 'Big Setback' For Republicans
Mitch McConnell Warns of 'Big Setback' For Republicans

Newsweek

time7 hours ago

  • Newsweek

Mitch McConnell Warns of 'Big Setback' For Republicans

Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. Republican Senator Mitch McConnell of Kentucky warned fellow Senators and Republicans that Thom Tillis, a North Carolina Republican Senator, not seeking re-election after serving out his term is a "big setback" for Washington. Newsweek reached out to Tillis' office via email Monday for comment. Why It Matters Tillis' announcement highlights ongoing ideological and leadership tensions within the Republican Party. Both Senator Tillis and Representative Don Bacon, a Nebraska Republican, have drawn criticism and isolation after challenging elements of President Donald Trump's policies. Their decisions to step down occur just as Republicans consolidated power in both congressional chambers after the 2024 election—a period when the party would typically anticipate increased cohesion and influence. This sequence of retirements signals heightened intra-party rifts, amplifying debates about the future direction of Republican leadership amid the party's electoral resurgence. Bacon formally announced his plan to retire on Monday, following numerous media outlets reporting his intent on Friday. What To Know Tillis announced his desire not to seek re-election in a post on X, formerly Twitter, over the weekend. "It has been a blessing to go on a journey from living in a trailer park and making minimum wage as a young man to having the honor of serving as U.S. Senator for North Carolina," Tillis said in part in his statement. "I am proud of my career in public service, including hard-fought victories like passing historic tax reform as North Carolina Speaker, and working in the Senate to help pass the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act and confirm three conservative Supreme Court justices and counting," the North Carolina lawmaker added. Tillis later continued: "As many of my colleagues have noticed over the last year, and at times even joked about, I haven't exactly been excited about running for another term. That is true since the choice is between spending another six years navigating the political theatre and partisan gridlock in Washington or spending that time with the love of my life Susan, our two children, three beautiful grandchildren, and the rest of our extended family back home. It's not a hard choice, and I will not be seeking re-election." Tillis' announcement brought bipartisan reaction from establishment lawmakers like McConnell and Independent Senator Bernie Sanders of Vermont. McConnell posted to X on Monday, saying, ".@SenThomTillis is one of the most effective and collegial members that I have ever served with in the United States Senate." "His announcement is a big setback for the Senate and the Republican Conference. I want to thank him for his service in this institution representing the people of North Carolina and our nation," McConnell said. Tillis's departure could impact committee assignments and majority margins in a closely divided Senate, while Bacon's pending retirement has Democratic strategists eyeing possible congressional gains in upcoming election cycles. Both races are expected to attract significant attention and resources as party leaders calculate risks of further moderate departures or primary challenges backed by Trump-aligned Republicans. Tillis' announcement also comes amid Senate lawmakers ramping up to vote on the reconciliation bill, dubbed the "big, beautiful bill" by Trump, which Tillis has been outspoken against regarding Medicaid. Senator Thom Tillis (R-NC) can be seen listening during a Senate Judiciary Hearing on June 18, 2025, in Washington, D.C. (Photo by) Senator Thom Tillis (R-NC) can be seen listening during a Senate Judiciary Hearing on June 18, 2025, in Washington, D.C. (Photo by) What People Are Saying Sanders on X on Sunday: "I do not agree with N.C. Senator Thom Tillis on much. But he's right on this. Trump's Republican Party does not allow for independent thought. The Republican Party today is a cult. Either you do as Trump wants, or you're out. Pathetic." Charlie Kirk, CEO and founder of conservative Turning Point USA, on X on Sunday: "Thom Tillis routinely fought to increase American intervention abroad while rejecting border security at home. He has also been a chief obstacle to the timely confirmation of President Trump's nominees. "His retirement is a golden opportunity to make North Carolina's senators reflect the priorities of North Carolina's Republican voters." What Happens Next Senator Tillis's retirement will trigger a new Senate race in North Carolina as party leaders and prospective candidates announce intentions to run.

North Korea Ignores Trump's Overtures
North Korea Ignores Trump's Overtures

Newsweek

time7 hours ago

  • Newsweek

North Korea Ignores Trump's Overtures

Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. North Korea continues to give the United States the cold shoulder, despite President Donald Trump's apparent willingness to resume dialogue with the country's supreme leader, Kim Jong Un. State media has branded Washington a "hostile force" after Trump expressed confidence in his ability to end a potential conflict on the Korean Peninsula. Why It Matters Trump claims to have considerable leverage over Kim, citing their correspondence during his first term in office. During this period, he also met with Kim face-to-face in a failed effort to entice the North Korean leader to draw down his regime's United Nations-sanctioned nuclear weapons program, which Pyongyang claims is necessary to deter aggression by the U.S. and its South Korean ally. The stalled talks sent bilateral ties into a chill, with North Korea moving to enshrine its nuclear weapons capability into its constitution and resuming its ballistic missile launches and bellicose rhetoric that drove up tensions with the South. Newsweek reached out to the North Korean embassy in China by email with a request for comment. What To Know Rodong Sinmun, the official mouthpiece of North Korea's ruling Workers' Party, took aim at the U.S.—without mentioning it by name—in an editorial published Sunday. "Hostile forces have, for over 10 years, clung to unprecedentedly harsh sanctions and blockades in an attempt to make us abandon the path of self-reliance," the article said. It went on to praise North Korea's continued determination to resist "imperialists," saying that their designs can only be countered by "stockpiling strong power to defend the nation's sovereignty and security." The article was published just two days after Trump touted his "good relationship" with Kim, but did not confirm or deny he had reached out to the North Korean strongman. Trump also expressed confidence he could resolve any conflict that might break out between Pyongyang and Seoul. Because Korean War hostilities ended with an armistice rather than a formal peace treaty, the neighbors technically remain in a state of war. Earlier this month, North Korea-focused outlet NK News reported Trump had written a letter to Kim, seeking to open the door for renewed dialogue. According to an "informed high-level source" cited by the outlet, in-person attempts to deliver the letter were rebuffed by staff members of North Korea's U.N. office. What's Next The conditions in which Kim would agree on returning to the negotiating table remain unclear, but analysts widely concur North Korea is unlikely to accept any deal that demands full denuclearization. Meanwhile, Russia's war in Ukraine and heightened tensions in the Middle East in the wake of the war between Iran and Israel are likely to keep North Korea off the White House's list of immediate priorities. What People Have Said Trump told reporters in the Oval Office Friday: "If there is a conflict, I get along with him very, very well. And we'll get the conflict solved. "I've had a good relationship with Kim Jong Un [...] but somebody's saying if there's a potential conflict—I think we'll work it out, and if there is it wouldn't involve us." Andrei Lankov, visiting research fellow for the Seoul-based Sejong Institute think tank, wrote in a June analysis: "Under current circumstances, compared with 2019, North Korea is under much less pressure to engage in negotiations with the United States. "This might mean that the North Korean side will not start where the talks ended in 2019, and will make a few steps back, withdrawing some of their 2019 proposals which might be seen now as excessively generous [...] This might mean that the U.S. delegation would have to accept the conditions it rejected in Hanoi in 2019 or accept the collapse of the talks."

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store