
What you should do if you experience racism in Germany
Reports of racism in Germany are rising. In 2023 alone, complaints jumped by
22 percent
compared to 2022. A separate report found that over
60 percent
of Black people - and nearly half of all ethnic or religious minorities - face regular discrimination. In 2024, 58.3 percent of our survey participants said they had noticed a rise in xenophobia.
Racism affects all levels of German society, from healthcare to jobs, housing and education. Most recently, reports have shown children being
bullied
so badly they're afraid to go to school or even
attacked
in broad daylight.
The issue persists at the political level. Despite being labelled a "suspected extremist" organisation, far-right parties like Alternative for Germany (AfD) have continued to gain support in Germany. The anti-migrant party recently achieved their highest-ever result in Germany's federal elections.
This isn't happening in isolation. Across Europe, racism has grown increasingly 'pervasive and relentless' in recent years. In late 2024, Anti-Racism Commissioner Reem Alabali-Radovan joined an unprecedented EU-wide statement warning of rising extremism and hate.
READ ALSO:
Levels of racism and discrimination in Germany revealed in new survey
What can you do if you experience racial discrimination?
Racism can take many forms - some overt and aggressive, others subtle and systemic.
Questions like 'Where are you really from?', racial 'jokes' or being ignored or dismissed are common occurrences for many across Germany and beyond.
Though less visible, these acts reinforce systemic racism and are proven to be profoundly
harmful
to mental and physical health. However, most incidents of racism go unreported.
Advertisement
If you experience racism or discrimination in Germany, knowing your options can help you regain control in a difficult moment.
The most important first step is to take your emotions seriously and not downplay what is happening. If possible, look to supportive friends, coworkers, classmates or even bystanders for assistance.
If the situation becomes overwhelming, you have every right to remove yourself - you are not obligated to tolerate mistreatment. If you feel safe enough, assert yourself calmly and clearly, pointing out that the behaviour or language is unacceptable.
Referencing anti-discrimination policies at your workplace or university - or German laws like
the
General Act on Equal Treatment (AGG)
-
can help reinforce your point.
Advertisement
Remember, responding in the moment is not always safe or possible. Sometimes, it's best to take action afterwards.
After experiencing racism, take steps to protect yourself. It can help to write down everything that happened as soon as possible, including dates, times, names and locations. Save any relevant messages, emails or images, and if there were witnesses, ask them to write down what they saw.
READ ALSO:
'No-one will offer me a job' - How having a foreign name affects life in Germany
If you have been physically attacked, seek medical care and photograph any injuries, even if they seem insignificant. Keep any damaged or contaminated clothing or other objects. A medical certificate or other evidence is helpful for any legal proceedings or claims.
Patients wait for their appointments in a doctor's surgery waiting room in Stuttgart, Baden-Württemberg. Photo: picture alliance/dpa | Sina Schuldt
Next, consider reaching out to counselling or advice centres. Several independent services in Germany offer anonymous emotional and legal support, like the
Federal Anti-Discrimination Agency
or the
VBRG
.
They are there to guide you through the next steps.
Most importantly, take care of yourself. Allow
yourself the time to process what has happened, s
urround yourself with supportive people and make time for activities that help you feel grounded and safe. Joining anti-racist or empowerment groups can also offer a powerful sense of solidarity.
T
herapeutic care can also be beneficial. You can find more information about the various forms of
therapy available in Germany here
.
Advertisement
Legal and institutional avenues for action
Germany offers several formal pathways if you choose to take action. If you feel comfortable, report the incident to a workplace or educational authority like a supervisor or lecturer. If that feels intimidating, bring a trusted person or reach out in writing.
If the discrimination occurs in a public institution like a jobcentre or the police, you can submit a formal disciplinary complaint to the
Federal Anti-Discrimination Agency
.
Victims of discrimination can sue in administrative or civil courts and may be eligible for state-funded legal aid. Alternatively, legal insurance can assist in these cases.
READ ALSO:
Do internationals face discrimination in the German workplace?
Parents of children who have faced discrimination can raise issues directly with teachers, file a complaint with the regional school authority or escalate to the Ministry of Education in their federal state.
A nursery school teacher reads to children at a Kita in Berlin. Photo: picture alliance/dpa | Wolfgang Kumm
Report illegal content on social media platforms by flagging it directly on the site. Organisations such as
Hate Aid
can help you complete the report. If the content qualifies as hate speech (or
Volksverhetzung
) under German law, it can also be reported to the police. Kliksafe have a
good resource
for deciding whether this is the case.
Reporting a crime to the police can be intimidating, but it's important for collecting the figures that drive public understanding and political action. To report, visit a nearby station,
report a crime online
or call 110. You can provide an alternative address such as a lawyer's, workplace or victim counselling centre if you're concerned about sharing your address.
Legal and institutional avenues for action
If you witness racial discrimination - whether verbal, exclusion, harassment or violence - your support can make a lasting difference. Even if the person isn't in immediate danger, stepping up helps counteract the isolation many victims feel.
In Germany, failing to provide 'necessary and reasonable' assistance during an accident, public danger or emergency - known as
"
unterlassene Hilfeleistung
" - can result in a fine or up to one year in prison.
Advertisement
However, as a witness to racism, you don't need to put yourself in danger. Stay calm and assess the situation. If it's safe to do so, make your presence known. Stand beside the person, speak up against the discrimination, or redirect the conversation. Even a simple question like 'Are you okay?' can deescalate tension and show solidarity.
READ ALSO:
Are German police racially profiling people at the border?
Remember: your role is to support, not to take over. Ask the person what they need. They might want you to say something, or simply stay close. In some cases, calling the police or alerting nearby staff is appropriate, but always prioritise the victim's wishes and safety.
If things escalate, avoid confrontation and instead gather information. Take notes or recordings if you can, and offer to be a witness later.
A sign outside a police station in Bremen. Photo: picture alliance/dpa | Sina Schuldt
Once the situation has calmed, check in with the person privately. Ask how they're feeling and if they need help contacting support services, filing a complaint, or simply talking things through. Your listening ear and encouragement can have a big impact.
Even if the victim chooses not to report the incident, you can still support them by helping them document what happened or directing them to anti-discrimination centres. And don't forget to reflect on your own response: what went well, and what you might do differently next time.
Being an ally means being ready to act, listen, and learn. Racism thrives in silence - but small, compassionate interventions can help break the cycle.
Is Germany still a racist society? Have you experienced discrimination in the workplace or elsewhere? Let us know your thoughts by emailing
news@thelocal.de
.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


DW
7 hours ago
- DW
Stymied French politicians turn to sins of the past – DW – 06/07/2025
Amid parliamentary deadlock, the politics of remembrance has gained momentum in France. Three new initiatives attempt to recognize and heal historical injustices — at least symbolically. On Thursday, two years after France's controversial retirement age increase, the National Assembly voted to withdraw the reform. While the news was politically explosive because the far-right National Rally helped the left-wing opposition gain a majority in the vote, the decision hasn't yielded any actual legal results. The situation reflects the country's ongoing failure to address structural reforms since the parliamentary elections last summer, which left the government won without an absolute majority. But in the area of remembrance policy there has been significant movement. In the same week as the toothless retirement resolution, parliamentarians adopted three texts that reclassify historical events or offer the prospect of reparations. Alfred Dreyfus, shown here in the 1930s, is considered a national hero by many French people today Image: epa/AFP/dpa/picture alliance Alfred Dreyfus posthumously promoted On June 2, the French parliament voted unanimously to posthumously appoint Alfred Dreyfus to the rank of brigadier general. The Jewish officer was wrongly accused of high treason in 1894, based on falsified evidence that he revealed military secrets to the German embassy in Paris. Dreyfus subsequently spent four years in the notorious Devil's Island penal colony off the coast of French Guiana. The Franco-German dimension of the case had explosive foreign policy implications even then. The suspect's Jewish origins and his family background in the Alsace-Lorraine region, which came under German rule after the Franco-Prussian War, and strained relations with Germany, made him an ideal target for the nationalist mistrust many French people harbored at the time. Writer Émile Zola famously sided with Dreyfus in his essay "J'accuse…!", which played a critical role in the officer's exoneration and military rehabilitation in 1906. Nevertheless, after serving in the First World War as a lieutenant colonel, Dreyfus was only reinstated at a lower rank. This posthumous promotion for Dreyfus still has to pass the Senate. Alsatian MP Charles Sitzenstuhl, a member of French President Emmanuel Macron's center-right Renaissance Party, who introduced the initiative, offered a link to the present as a warning: "The anti-Semitism that plagued Alfred Dreyfus is not a thing of the distant past," he said. In June 1954, Indochinese conscripts hastily erect new fortifications for French colonial forces in Phu Ly, south of Hanoi, Vietnam Image: AP/picture alliance Recognizing returnees from Indochina Just one day after the Dreyfus vote, the National Assembly also passed a law to recognize and compensate former returnees from French Indochina after the colonial rule of territories including Vietnam, Laos, and Cambodia ended in 1954. Around 44,000 people were repatriated to France, among them colonial officials, soldiers and their families, the descendants of French colonizers and local women, as well as local collaborators. Between 4,000 to 6,000 returnees ended up in temporary camps, which were often outfitted with wooden barracks that lacked heating and plumbing. Returnees were also subject to degrading policies that included bans on going out and owning cars or other luxury goods. The new law introduced by the left-wing Socialist Party now provides for financial support based on someone's length of stay in the camps. It is estimated that up to 1,600 people could claim compensation. Haiti is one of the world's poorest countries today Image: Java Reparations for Haiti? On June 5, the Assembly adopted a resolution addressing a "double debt" to Haiti that goes back to 1825. That was the year that France forced Haiti, which had declared independence in 1804, to pay compensation of 150 million gold francs. This was intended as a recognition of independence that would also compensate for the loss of French colonial possessions, including income from slaves. Haiti was forced to settle this "independence debt" over decades — a considerable economic burden that contributed to long-term poverty and instability on the island. The resolution, initiated by the Communist Party, calls for recognition, repayment and reparations for Haiti. But the text does not include concrete political steps or financial agreements. Nevertheless, the far-right National Rally voted against it. The "Senegalese riflemen," or "tirailleurs sénégalais," were a colonial infantry recruited by the French army during the First World War Image: The Print Collector/Heritage-Images/picture alliance A history of remembering Remembrance politics have some tradition in France. In 2001, the "Taubira" law, named after the parliamentarian who introduced it, recognized the slave trade and practice of slavery as crimes against humanity. The topic has been a part of school curricula in France ever since. In October 2006, the National Assembly passed a bill to criminalize the denial of the Armenian genocide of 1915 in the Ottoman Empire with a year in prison or fine of €45,000 ($51,300). The bill never came into force after it failed to pass in the Senate, and was followed by a similarly doomed initiative introduced under President Nicolas Sarkozy. That draft law passed both chambers of parliament, but was declared unconstitutional by the Constitutional Council in February 2012, which said that it amounted to unlawful interference with freedom of expression and research. Another example is the treatment of the so-called "Senegalese riflemen," the colonial soldiers from Africa who fought for France in the two world wars. For decades, many received significantly lower pensions than their French comrades, especially if they lived outside of France after decolonization. It was not until 2009 that President Sarkozy decreed an equalization of pension benefits, a step that held great symbolic significance. Social maturity or empty gestures? The latest spike in such initiatives has been met with mixed interpretations by political scientists. Some experts see the willingness to take historical responsibility as a form of social maturity. But others point out that in a politically paralyzed legislature, symbolic initiatives are easier to pass than structural reforms in areas such as pensions, education or the budget. This article was originally written in German.


DW
7 hours ago
- DW
German govt to ask EU court to rule on migrant turnbacks – DW – 06/07/2025
06/07/2025 June 7, 2025 German interior to seek EU verdict on border turnbacks Germany's Interior Minister Alexander Dobrindt said the German government would seek a ruling from the European Court of Justice (ECJ) on the legality of migrant turnbacks at the border. Dobrindt's comments to the Funke media group follow a ruling by a court in Berlin on Monday that the refusal to allow three Somali nationals to enter last month was unlawful. The court ruled that on May 9, border guards failed to initiate proper asylum procedures and returned the trio to Poland. According to the court, Germany should have applied the European Union's so-called Dublin Regulation, establishing which country is responsible for the asylum claim of the migrants, before they were sent back. The Dublin rule specifies which EU state should process an asylum application, partly to prevent arrivals from making claims in wealthier countries rather than the first EU nation that they entered. Dobrindt said the government would provide its rationale for invoking Article 72 — a special clause under EU law that permits exceptions to the Dublin rule in emergencies. "We will submit sufficient justification, but the European Court of Justice should decide on the matter," Dobrindt said, adding: "I am convinced that our actions are in line with European law." Dobrindt insisted that Germany had to crack down on illegal migration, which he said would prevent the far-right Alternative for Germany (AfD) party from pushing more radical solutions. German Chancellor Merz rejects criticism of border controls To view this video please enable JavaScript, and consider upgrading to a web browser that supports HTML5 video Germany introduced tougher border checks on May 7, including new rules allowing asylum seekers to be turned away at the border for the first time. In the first days of the new rule, 19 people who sought asylum in Germany were denied entry, along with nearly 300 other migrants, local media reported. Following this week's court ruling, the cabinet approved even stricter measures.


DW
7 hours ago
- DW
Germany: Car drives into crowd in Passau – DW – 06/07/2025
06/07/2025 June 7, 2025 German interior to seek EU verdict on border turnbacks Germany's Interior Minister Alexander Dobrindt said the German government would seek a ruling from the European Court of Justice (ECJ) on the legality of migrant turnbacks at the border. Dobrindt's comments to the Funke media group follow a ruling by a court in Berlin on Monday that the refusal to allow three Somali nationals to enter last month was unlawful. The court ruled that on May 9, border guards failed to initiate proper asylum procedures and returned the trio to Poland. According to the court, Germany should have applied the European Union's so-called Dublin Regulation, establishing which country is responsible for the asylum claim of the migrants, before they were sent back. The Dublin rule specifies which EU state should process an asylum application, partly to prevent arrivals from making claims in wealthier countries rather than the first EU nation that they entered. Dobrindt said the government would provide its rationale for invoking Article 72 — a special clause under EU law that permits exceptions to the Dublin rule in emergencies. "We will submit sufficient justification, but the European Court of Justice should decide on the matter," Dobrindt said, adding: "I am convinced that our actions are in line with European law." Dobrindt insisted that Germany had to crack down on illegal migration, which he said would prevent the far-right Alternative for Germany (AfD) party from pushing more radical solutions. German Chancellor Merz rejects criticism of border controls To view this video please enable JavaScript, and consider upgrading to a web browser that supports HTML5 video Germany introduced tougher border checks on May 7, including new rules allowing asylum seekers to be turned away at the border for the first time. In the first days of the new rule, 19 people who sought asylum in Germany were denied entry, along with nearly 300 other migrants, local media reported. Following this week's court ruling, the cabinet approved even stricter measures.