Why Nicholas Prosper did not get whole life order
The sentence given to a teenager who murdered his mother and siblings has been referred to the Unduly Lenient Sentence Scheme by the shadow justice minister.
Nicholas Prosper admitted to using a shotgun to kill Juliana Falcon, 48, Kyle Prosper, 16, and Giselle Prosper, 13, at their home in Luton in September.
The 19-year-old had planned to kill about 30 students and staff at his former primary school, but the noise his family made during the struggle alerted neighbours who called the police and interrupted his plans.
A spokesperson from the Attorney General's Office confirmed it has received the request by the Conservative MP Kieran Mullan.
The office has 28 days from the point of sentencing to make a decision.
Unlike a life sentence, which has a minimum time to serve in a prison, a whole life order (WLO) means the person will never be released.
Home secretaries have been able to impose whole life orders since 1983 and judges have held such powers since the passing of the Criminal Justice Act in 2003.
It is the harshest penalty available to courts since capital punishment was abolished.
The sentence can be considered in exceptional cases such as those where two or more people have been killed with a significant degree of pre-meditation, or where one child is killed with similar pre-planning.
Triple murderer and rapist Kyle Clifford was given three WLOs earlier this month, after he killed his ex-girlfriend, her sister and her mother in a crossbow and knife attack in Bushey, Hertfordshire.
Nurse Lucy Letby received a total of 15 WLOs after murdering and attempting to murder babies at the Countess of Chester Hospital.
Previously, an individual under the age of 21 could not be given a WLO.
In 2022 this was changed to include offenders aged between 18-20, but only in cases where the seriousness was "exceptionally high" even when compared to similar offences committed by those 21 and over.
This was introduced after the judge could not give Hashem Abedi, the brother of the Manchester Arena bomber, an WLO because of his age.
If Prosper had been given a WLO he would have been the youngest offender to receive one.
When passing sentence, High Court judge Mrs Justice Cheema-Grubb explained that while a WLO would be a starting point for similar crimes for defendants over the age of 21, those that are younger require the seriousness of their offences to be "exceptionally high".
While Prosper is "indisputably a very dangerous young man", the risk to the public is met with a life sentence, she concluded.
Mrs Justice Cheema-Grubb told him: "Despite the gravity of your crimes, it is the explicit joint submission of counsel that a lengthy finite term will be a sufficiently severe penalty."
During sentencing David Bentley KC argued mitigating factors on Prosper's behalf and described his client as a "young man at the start of his adult life".
He pointed to the defendant's lack of previous convictions and that he had been living with an undiagnosed neurological development disorder in autism spectrum disorder (ASD).
Mr Bentley told the court how Prosper's parents had separated when he was nine years old and Prosper had "retreated into a harmful, internet world" that was "isolated from the real world".
The killer must also receive credit for pleading guilty "at the earliest possible opportunity", said his defence.
The judge said she would not impose a whole life order because Prosper was stopped from carrying out the school shooting: "otherwise this case would have had a very different and even more appalling outcome."
She explained: "I have decided to impose a minimum term. In drawing back from a whole life order I have already taken into account your age, your guilty pleas and the fact that you did not carry out any violence after you left your flat despite having reloaded the shotgun.
"Having reflected, I agree with the parties and do not impose a whole life order in this case. Firstly, because you were thwarted from completing your intentions, otherwise this case would have had a very different and even more appalling outcome. Secondly, this prosecution has resulted in guilty pleas. Thirdly, you were 18 at the relevant time."
She explained all three murders reach the threshold for a 30-year minimum term individually and "the increase I impose is the least possible in all the circumstances".
After passing sentence she told Prosper: "You remain highly dangerous and it may be that you will never be released."
On Wednesday the Conservative shadow justice minister, Kieran Mullan, posted on X that Prosper's sentence of life with a minimum of 49 years was not enough for the nature of his crimes.
He referred the case to the Unduly Lenient Sentence Scheme and said: "If we don't give criminals like this whole life orders what are they for?"
The scheme allows anyone to ask for certain crown court sentences to be reviewed by the attorney general.
A spokesperson from the Attorney General's Office confirmed it has received the request to consider Prosper's sentence and have 28 days from the point of sentencing to make a decision.
Mullan thought it was "particularly galling" that Prosper's failure to see through his shooting plans were considered mitigating circumstances.
In his letter to Attorney General Lord Hermer, he wrote: "This was the gravest of crimes that would be difficult to surpass in its seriousness and has rightly generated public outrage.
"I struggle to imagine a case of such seriousness not being that for which the WLO sentence is there to be used."
He described a "yawning gap" between public expectation of justice and sentences issued for serious crimes.
Mullan said: "What exactly does someone have to do in this country to be sent away for life? This was the most serious of crimes - including the murder of two children.
"What is the point of making provision for WLOs if they aren't used in cases like this? It makes a mockery of the justice system and is an insult to the victims."
Bedfordshire's police and crime commissioner supported the sentencing decision.
Speaking to BBC Three Counties Radio, Labour's John Tizard explained: "If you listen, as I did, to [the judge's] summary and her presentation in sentencing it was a very considered view that took into account the law as well as circumstances."
Follow Beds, Herts and Bucks news on BBC Sounds, Facebook, Instagram and X.
Prosper murders 'expose lack of control' over guns
The 'sliding doors' moment that stopped Sandy Hook-obsessed killer's school massacre
Watch: Footage shows teen planning triple murder
Teenage killer planned 'massacre of the century'
The disturbing internet history of a triple killer
HM Courts and Tribunals Service
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
13 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Commuters who appeal penalty fares risk criminal record
SCHEDULE FOR 6.30AM LIVE PRIORITY TAG Commuters who challenge train ticket inspectors now risk getting a criminal record, The Telegraph can reveal. Passengers who are handed penalty fares for making mistakes when buying their tickets can now be prosecuted as criminals if their appeals against those penalties are rejected. Rules have changed thanks to a judgment made by the Chief Magistrate earlier this year, the existence of which The Telegraph is revealing now. Penalty fares are given to train passengers who cannot produce a valid ticket when asked by an inspector. The rule change, likely to affect tens of millions of journeys per year, comes after the Office of Rail and Road warned train companies last week to stop punishing people who make 'seemingly unintentional or minor transgressions of fares and ticketing rules'. Public concern about fare-dodging has reached a high point after Robert Jenrick, the Conservative shadow justice secretary, was filmed challenging miscreants in London. Credit: X/@RobertJenrick Yet those who formally dispute an inspector's view of the notoriously complex web of British train ticketing rules could now find themselves with a criminal record if they stand up for what they believe is right. Chief Magistrate Paul Goldspring said in a written ruling dated February 21, which has not previously been published: 'I rule that criminal prosecutions can be brought following a penalty fare appeal being dismissed…' The judge said he had been given 'an undertaking that all [Department for Transport Train Operating Companies] will follow the guidance given by the court'. Fines of up to £1,000 and, for repeat offenders, prison sentences of up to three months can result from a conviction for failing to produce a ticket or travelling with intent to avoid payment. A conviction under the Regulation of Railways Act 1889 will appear on DBS background checks, potentially affecting someone's job prospects. Campaigners fear that Judge Goldspring's ruling has given train companies a green light to threaten honest but mistaken commuters with a criminal record as the price of challenging ticket inspectors. Christian Waters, 47, of Leeds, who was targeted for prosecution in 2022 after having his penalty fare appeal rejected, said: 'Why was this ruling not published, given it affects the protection that hundreds of thousands of passengers would assume they had from the regulations? Mr Waters, whose case was dropped after he realised that Government-owned rail company Northern had broken the rules by trying to haul him in front of a judge, said: 'I do feel like they are saying I got off on a technicality now. I still dispute that I did anything wrong; their machine was not working!' 'No one has any protection at all, a sham of an appeal system and then money [is] demanded backed up by criminal law,' he continued. Westminster magistrates' court's unpublicised ruling came about after another Government-owned train company, Southeastern, asked the court if a number of previous prosecutions it brought were lawful. The exact number was not revealed in the judgment. 'It is clearly irrational that a person who brought an unmeritorious appeal could not be prosecuted, whereas someone who did not appeal could be,' ruled Judge Goldspring. While an out-of-court appeals process exists for penalty fares, Parliament never intended for commuters to be criminalised when it created the scheme some 35 years ago. Introducing the 1988 law that created penalty fares, Tory peer Lord Marshall of Leeds told Parliament: 'If, however, a passenger on a train is not in possession of a ticket, he is not to be treated as a criminal under this Bill. He is simply asked to pay a penalty fare, which is a civil penalty and not a criminal one.' Today, Regulation 11(3) of the Railways (Penalty Fares) Regulations 2018 says that prosecution is only allowed where the penalty has been cancelled by the train company before the appeal panel has decided the outcome. Yet in his February 2025 ruling, Judge Goldspring said: 'The prosecutor obviously should not bring a prosecution if it is excluded,' but added: 'There is no obligation on the court to investigate whether the defendant has a defence.' Penalty fare appeals are decided on by a private company called Appeal Services, which is a contractor paid by train companies to decide penalty fare appeals. According to Appeal Services' website, in the last 28 days, its assessors rejected 80 per cent of first-stage appeals. Southeastern and the Department for Transport were contacted for comment. Broaden your horizons with award-winning British journalism. Try The Telegraph free for 1 month with unlimited access to our award-winning website, exclusive app, money-saving offers and more.
Yahoo
10 hours ago
- Yahoo
Teen accused of shooting Colombian presidential candidate Miguel Uribe
June 8 (UPI) -- Colombian police have arrested a teenage boy in connection with Saturday's shooting of far-right presidential candidate Miguel Uribe. Uribe, a 39-year-old senator, was shot while he addressed his supporters during a campaign event in a park in Bogotá, the Colombian Attorney General's Office said in a statement Sunday. He was hit twice and remains in intensive care. Two other people were also injured, and police arrested a 15-year-old who was carrying a 9mm Glock pistol. Footage shared on social media appears to show when Uribe was shot, causing his followers to flee in panic. Fundación Santa Fe Bogotá, the hospital where Uribe was airlifted Saturday, said in a statement Sunday that he was admitted to the emergency room in critical condition. "After all the evaluations by various specialties, he was immediately taken to surgery to perform the initial damage control," the hospital said. "Once the neurosurgical and left thigh procedures were completed, he was transferred to intensive care for postoperative stabilization. His condition is of the utmost seriousness and the prognosis is reserved." The government of left-wing President Gustavo Petro, who is term-limited and cannot run for reelection, condemned the attack in a statement and expressed solidarity with Uribe. "The National Government categorically and forcefully rejects the attack that Senator Miguel Uribe Turbay was the victim of in the last few hours," the statement said. "This act of violence is an attack not only against the personal integrity of the senator, but also against democracy, freedom of thought and the legitimate exercise of politics in Colombia." Petro's government called peace, coexistence and respect for differences the "fundamental pillars" of a democratic society. Prosecutors said they were considering the shooting an attack on the "democratic participation" in the country, and Attorney General Luz Adriana Camargo Garzón expressed her alarm at the seriousness of the attack and urged for political unity in the country "to shield the electoral process." She said her office would investigate the shooting with the National Police.
UPI
12 hours ago
- UPI
Teen accused of shooting Colombian presidential candidate Miguel Uribe
People participate in a walk for peace and in support of Senator Miguel Uribe Turbay in Bogota, Colombia, on Sunday. The senator was shot during a campaign event in Bogota. Photo by Mauricio Dueñas Castañeda/EPA-EFE June 8 (UPI) -- Colombian police have arrested a teenage boy in connection with Saturday's shooting of far-right presidential candidate Miguel Uribe. Uribe, a 39-year-old senator, was shot while he addressed his supporters during a campaign event in a park in Bogotá, the Colombian Attorney General's Office said in a statement Sunday. He was hit twice and remains in intensive care. Two other people were also injured, and police arrested a 15-year-old who was carrying a 9mm Glock pistol. Footage shared on social media appears to show when Uribe was shot, causing his followers to flee in panic. Fundación Santa Fe Bogotá, the hospital where Uribe was airlifted Saturday, said in a statement Sunday that he was admitted to the emergency room in critical condition. "After all the evaluations by various specialties, he was immediately taken to surgery to perform the initial damage control," the hospital said. "Once the neurosurgical and left thigh procedures were completed, he was transferred to intensive care for postoperative stabilization. His condition is of the utmost seriousness and the prognosis is reserved." The government of left-wing President Gustavo Petro, who is term-limited and cannot run for reelection, condemned the attack in a statement and expressed solidarity with Uribe. "The National Government categorically and forcefully rejects the attack that Senator Miguel Uribe Turbay was the victim of in the last few hours," the statement said. "This act of violence is an attack not only against the personal integrity of the senator, but also against democracy, freedom of thought and the legitimate exercise of politics in Colombia." Petro's government called peace, coexistence and respect for differences the "fundamental pillars" of a democratic society. Prosecutors said they were considering the shooting an attack on the "democratic participation" in the country, and Attorney General Luz Adriana Camargo Garzón expressed her alarm at the seriousness of the attack and urged for political unity in the country "to shield the electoral process." She said her office would investigate the shooting with the National Police.
