logo
The invisible war threatening to devastate air travel

The invisible war threatening to devastate air travel

Telegraph2 days ago

The escalating conflict in the Middle East poses an unseen but potentially deadly threat to planes crossing the region's airspace.
Electronic warfare technology used by Iran, Israel and other players in the region is increasingly drowning out the satellite signals modern jets use to determine their positions.
In turn, the risk of aircraft colliding or being shot down as they lose their GPS connections and stray off course has become heightened, aviation safety experts warn.
Airlines are faced with a choice of trusting pilots to fly through affected areas or making costly diversions that could add a thousand miles and two hours to each flight.
Tragedy has so far been largely averted, though the crash of an Azerbaijan Airlines plane in Kazakhstan has been linked to jamming.
However, Benoit Fuget, co-founder of SkAI, which maps GPS jamming, warns the increasing prevalence of the technique is presenting fresh challenges for airlines.
'The aim of jamming is to stop the missile reaching its target, but civil aircraft use the same GPS system to navigate,' he says. 'Pilots are very concerned about the increasing risk.'
Jamming and spoofing
Instances of disruption to navigational systems have surged since Benjamin Netanyahu's government launched its attacks on Iran 10 days ago.
FlightRadar24 reported a 'dramatic increase' in interference since the US attacked Iran's underground facilities over the weekend, while SkAI said that more than 160 flights were impacted in the Persian Gulf area on June 21 alone, together with close to 90 in the skies around Israel.
Civil aircraft can be sent off course in two distinct ways.
Jamming at its most basic involves broadcasting a signal strong enough to drown out the weaker signatures of satellites. Since this deprives the receiver of data, the flight's pilots would generally become quickly aware of the situation.
GPS spoofing is a more modern technique and involves indicating a false position for the missile or plane, leading the former to miss its target but sending the latter off course.
In a recent survey of 2,000 flight crew by Ops Group, an organisation for pilots, air traffic controllers and flight dispatchers, 70pc rated their level of concern about spoofing's impact on flight safety as very high or extreme.
Their biggest worries were going off course, being unable to use GPS-based landing aids, being unable to restore GPS and having to fly across the ocean without it, and receiving false ground proximity warnings, which could result in an emergency ascent and a collision.
Invisible conflict
While the 'hot war' in the Middle East presents a clear threat to overflying aircraft, with the danger of a passenger plane being accidentally or deliberately targeted, the risk from the invisible conflict is likely to linger long after military exchanges cease.
With Russia erecting electronic warfare systems along the length of its western border since the invasion of Ukraine more than three years ago, jamming is active along a 3,500-mile arc stretching from the Arctic Ocean to Oman.
Although narrow gaps of still-open airspace have allowed airlines to carry on flying from Europe and eastern US to the Middle East, Asia and and Australia, while avoiding conflict zones, those areas have not been immune to jamming.
Though aircraft are continuing to fly over Turkey, the Caucasus and across central Asia to reach the Far East, SkAI's map shows that those flights are potentially exposed to intense Russian jamming activity in the southern Black Sea.
The Azerbaijan Airlines crash last December involved suspected Russian jamming aimed at countering drone attacks. Having lost GPS contact, the plane was hit by shrapnel from a missile and diverted to Kazakhstan, where it came down, killing 38 of the 67 people on board.
Airlines bound for the Gulf and India had been flying a much more southerly route since the start of the Israeli offensive, with flights from Europe heading south over the Mediterranean and into Egypt before turning east over Saudi Arabia, giving the war zone a wide berth.
Despite that, numerous airlines abandoned services to the Gulf on Sunday following the US bombardment, with British Airways suspending flights to both Dubai and Doha, in Qatar, having already put Bahrain and Amman, in Jordan, on hold.
British Airways cancelled two more services on Monday before announcing that overnight trips to Dubai, normally the world's busiest international airport, and Doha would go ahead, following an assessment of the security situation.
Virgin Atlantic's winter-only flights to Dubai do not resume until October, while services to Riyadh, in Saudi Arabia, are continuing as normal. India flights have been diverted away from the Gulf and Iraq.
The International Air Transport Association (Iata), which represents 350 airlines, highlighted the threat from jamming and spoofing at its annual meeting earlier this month, saying that instances of GPS signal loss had increased threefold between 2021 and 2024.
Nick Careen, Iata's safety chief, said the typical response to spoofing right now is to reboot the system so that the plane can re-acquire its correct coordinates, though this is not possible with all models of aircraft.
He also urged governments to stop airports and air traffic controllers removing ground-based navigational aids that could help guide planes in the event of satellite guidance being lost.
He said: 'It doesn't take a rocket scientist to see where we're heading. To stay ahead of the threat, aviation must act together and without delay.'

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

CIA chief says Iran nuclear site 'severely damaged' by US strikes - despite leaked report claiming the impact was minimal
CIA chief says Iran nuclear site 'severely damaged' by US strikes - despite leaked report claiming the impact was minimal

Sky News

time11 minutes ago

  • Sky News

CIA chief says Iran nuclear site 'severely damaged' by US strikes - despite leaked report claiming the impact was minimal

The head of the CIA has said a "body of credible intelligence" indicates that Iran's nuclear programme was "severely damaged" by a US operation last weekend. Director John Ratcliffe revealed that information from a "historically reliable and accurate source" suggests several key sites were destroyed - and will take years to rebuild. This contrasts with a recently leaked report from the US Defence Department that cast doubt on the effectiveness of Operation Midnight Hammer. An assessment obtained by several media outlets concluded that bombing of three nuclear facilities might only have set back Iran's capabilities by a few months. Donald Trump has refuted this leak in the strongest possible terms - describing it as "fake news" and insisting the military's targets were "totally obliterated". The US president went on to reveal that defence secretary Pete Hegseth will be holding a "major news conference" on Thursday afternoon that will be "interesting and irrefutable". On Truth Social, he claimed that the "Great American Pilots" involved in the operation were "very upset" by the leaked report. "After 36 hours of dangerously flying through Enemy Territory, they landed, they knew the Success was LEGENDARY, and then, two days later, they started reading Fake News by CNN and The Failing New York Times," he wrote. 0:21 In other developments, Mr Trump has confirmed the US will be holding talks with Iran next week, but said he doesn't think an agreement to curtail its nuclear programme is needed. The president joined fellow world leaders at a NATO summit in The Hague, where members agreed to increase defence spending to 5% of GDP.

EXCLUSIVE They've vowed to blow America to pieces from the inside. Now experts reveal EXACTLY where Iranian sleeper agents are going to strike next... and who's really to blame
EXCLUSIVE They've vowed to blow America to pieces from the inside. Now experts reveal EXACTLY where Iranian sleeper agents are going to strike next... and who's really to blame

Daily Mail​

time29 minutes ago

  • Daily Mail​

EXCLUSIVE They've vowed to blow America to pieces from the inside. Now experts reveal EXACTLY where Iranian sleeper agents are going to strike next... and who's really to blame

A former FBI boss has warned that America remains vulnerable to a terrorist attack by pro-Iran militants who entered the US during the Biden-era's 'open borders' period. Chris Swecker, an assistant FBI director in the 2000s, believes that Hezbollah and other Iran-linked groups snuck sleeper agents into the country while the southern border was swamped with migrants.

Republican who pushed to ban lawmaker stock trading bought Lockheed shares ahead of Iran strikes
Republican who pushed to ban lawmaker stock trading bought Lockheed shares ahead of Iran strikes

The Independent

timean hour ago

  • The Independent

Republican who pushed to ban lawmaker stock trading bought Lockheed shares ahead of Iran strikes

Numerous members of Congress had investments in key defense firms on the line before the war between Israel and Iran reignited, only to see momentum fizzle with Monday's announcement of a ceasefire. Among them is the primary sponsor of a ban on congressional stock trading, drawing into question how serious Congress really is about separating its members from the appearance of profiting off of the office. Stock trading among members of Congress has long been a controversial practice. As the Covid pandemic raged across the U.S. in 2020, lawmakers fell under renewed scrutiny for their trades after it was revealed that some members of Congress dumped millions of dollars' worth of stock ahead of the coinciding economic crash. The effort to ban or restrict the trading of individual stocks by members or their spouses was renewed in May when Rep. Rob Bresnahan, a Pennsylvania Republican, re-introduced the TRUST Act — a piece of legislation that would bar sales of stock for members or their spouses unless those assets were held in a qualified blind trust. Originally introduced in January, the legislation has dozens of bipartisan co-sponsors. At the time, the swing-district congressman proclaimed that 'the public should never have to question whether their elected officials are serving the public or their own portfolios,' a clear reference to the suspicion under which his colleagues have fallen for stock trading in office. Speaker Mike Johnson and Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries both publicly back a ban, but the TRUST Act has yet to get a vote. Bresnahan, meanwhile, continues to own a sizable stock portfolio, containing millions in assets and making more than 600 trades since coming to office this year. Less than halfway through his first full term, the congressman is now facing the same kind of suspicion from voters regarding his financial activity outside of Congress. Recent trades have included a purchase of Lockheed Martin stock reported on May 15, less than a month before Israel's war with Iran broke out and eventually drew the U.S. into launching strikes against three targets associated with Iran's nuclear program. Lockheed is a major defense partner of the Israeli government, and is under contract to provide the Israeli Air Force with 75 of its F-35 strike fighters. He took a question from a woman at a tele-town hall earlier this month on the issue, and his portfolio's prolific trading was highlighted by the Twitter account Unusual Whales in early June. The popular account monitors trading by members of Congress and often highlights instances where lawmakers' portfolios vastly outperform the market. The congressman said in response that his portfolio is managed by a financial adviser, explaining: 'I honestly have no idea what's inside of the portfolio that I own...I do not have any dialogues with my financial advisers,' according to local NPR affiliate WHYY. Bresnahan's re-election campaign was the recipient of a $1,000 donation from a PAC representing Lockheed Martin Corporation two weeks after reporting the trade. The donation was one of dozens the PAC made at the end of May to centrist members of both parties, an early investment in the 2026 cycle. In a statement in May, Bresnahan claimed that he was in the process of setting up a blind trust that would meet the act's requirements in conversations with the House Ethics Committee. His office told The Independent on Wednesday: 'Rep. Bresnahan does not trade his own stocks – a point he has made repeatedly. All stock trades are and have been made by a financial advisor without his involvement, and he does not know what is traded or when. He believes Members of Congress should not be allowed to profit off the information they are entrusted with, which is why he introduced legislation to ban Congressional stock trading, restoring the integrity Americans expect and deserve from their government.' Two Democrats co-sponsoring the TRUST Act both made similar trades. Josh Gottheimer, a New Jersey Democrat (and another hawkish figure in foreign policy circles) purchased Raytheon stock in late April, while Jared Moskowitz of Florida purchased Qualcomm and Lockheed stock at the beginning of the same month. Moskowitz has never taken a donation from Lockheed Martin's PAC, and Gottheimer took a donation of the same amount ($1,000) earlier this year (though he never purchased the company's stock). Moskowitz's office said in a statement in May that his trades are "managed by an outside third-party financial advisor.' Gottheimer said in 2022 that he would put his investments in a blind trust, but blamed the House Ethics Committee for procedural delays in that process when questioned by the Washington Examiner earlier this year. 'Prior to taking office, Josh turned over management of his retirement savings and investments to a third party, who has full investment discretion,' his spokesman said. 'Throughout his time in Congress, decisions related to his managed investments have been made at the direction of that third party. Josh is also awaiting approval from Congress of a blind trust. In the meantime, he has taken the extra step of setting up an independent trust.' The Independent has reached out to Gottheimer and Moskowitz's offices for further comment. Several members of Congress bought defense stocks within the last two months, including such well-known figures as Marjorie Taylor Greene — who repeatedly condemned the prospect of war with Iran after purchasing Palantir stock twice in April, then Boeing and Qualcomm stock in May. Rep. Jefferson Shreve, another freshman, bought Lockheed stock in April. Florida's newly-appointed Senator Ashley Moody purchased Howmet Aerospace stock in early April. The Independent has reached out for comment. But none are co-sponsors of restrictions on stock trading under the current Congress. Greene, in particular, has already been publicly dinged by one of her own Republican colleagues, Mike Lawler, for a lucrative trade she made in May. 'After many successful years of running my own business, I ran for Congress to bring that mindset to Washington. Now that I'm proudly serving the people of Northwest Georgia, I have signed a fiduciary agreement to allow my financial advisor to control my investments,' Greene told The Independent in a statement. 'All of my investments are reported with full transparency. I refuse to hide my stock trades in a blind trust like many others do. Since my portfolio manager makes my trades for me, I usually find out about them when the media asks.' If any members of Congress were looking to defense stocks for a quick profit after Israel began its assault on Iran earlier this month, they may already have been disappointed. A ceasefire hammered into place by Trump on Monday evening appeared shaky at first, but nevertheless appears to be holding — sending stocks including Lockheed tumbling. As the president delivered a public tongue-lashing aimed at both sides of the conflict on Tuesday, the message from Washington was clear: the outbreak of further violence would be unacceptable. Two Democratic senators, Mark Kelly and Jon Ossoff, introduced another version of a stock trading ban in the Senate near the end of May. John Thune, the Senate Majority Leader, has expressed skepticism about the need for stronger protections.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store