
UK should impose sanctions on Egypt over jailed activist, says Helena Kennedy
The UK government should impose sanctions on key figures in the Egyptian government in response to its refusal to release the British-Egyptian human rights activist Alaa Abd el-Fattah, Labour's most prominent human rights lawyer has proposed.
Writing in the Guardian, Helena Kennedy called for the UK to take the case to the international court of justice, as France has recently done in the case of a national held by Iran.
Lady Kennedy said the moves were necessary as Abd el-Fattah's 69-year-old mother, Leila Soueif, enters the 243rd day of her hunger strike at St Thomas' hospital in London. She started the strike to secure either British consular access to her son or his release. Doctors have told the family she is at risk of sudden death, but her body has also adapted to months without food. It is the second time she has been hospitalised.
Her son has been held in various forms of detention in Egypt for more than 10 years, but completed his latest five-year jail sentence last September. However, the Cairo judiciary kept him in prison on the grounds that the two years he had spent in jail prior to his sentencing did not count as part of his five years.
Soueif's two daughters remain by her bedside, but her family say she is determined not to back down and will see this through to a resolution.
Kennedy has urged the British government to elevate the case to a much higher level, including introducing 'sanctions against any Egyptian authorities responsible for Abd el-Fattah's continued detention beyond the end of his five-year sentence', a course she has recommended to the Commons foreign affairs select committee.
She is also calling for holding off any new trade and investment cooperation with Egypt. Overall, she says, the UK government's approach in the case has been too timid and Soueif, a distinguished human rights activist, 'wants more than anything else to reunite her son with his own 14-year-old son, who lives in Brighton and has barely been able to spend time with his father'.
Kennedy said: 'Laila's bravery and fortitude is astonishing. The time for relying solely on polite diplomacy is long past: the prime minister must demonstrate his strength and resolve on this case.'
Last week, Kennedy joined the former British ambassador to Egypt John Casson, the former Foreign Office minister Peter Hain and the campaigner Richard Ratcliffe in urging 'caution against travel to Egypt'.
Kennedy said: 'In light of what we have learned from Alaa's case, the British government must make clear that a British citizen who falls foul of the police state in Egypt cannot expect fair process, nor normal support from the British government. Hundreds of thousands of British citizens travel to Egypt each year, making a major contribution to the country's economy, and the truth is we can't guarantee their rights. The Egyptian government will undoubtedly take notice if its failure to abide by the rule of law starts affecting British hotel bookings for the winter season.'
The UK prime minister has twice phoned the Egyptian president to urge him to show clemency, but no punitive measures have been threatened by the UK government.
Soueif's determination has led to vigils being held for her in Berlin, Washington and Damascus.
Omar Robert Hamilton, a nephew of Soueif who was with his aunt over the weekend, said she had told him 'my course is irreversible'. He added: 'My aunt's resolve has only grown stronger in hospital. She is receiving the messages of support and solidarity from around the world, and she will see her struggle through to the end – whatever that end is.'
More than 120 former Egyptian political prisoners have also appealed to the president, Abdel Fatah al-Sisi, to show clemency. They wrote: 'What unites us is that we have been inside this circle, but what distinguishes us from Alaa and others still in detention is that the state has made decisions – at various stages – to give a presidential pardon, or release after the extension of our sentences has expired. And today, years or months after we left jail, we were not a threat or likely to damage to public safety, we simply returned to our lives, trying to restore what was lost.'
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

The National
8 minutes ago
- The National
MSPs pass bill giving Gaelic and Scots official status in Scotland
MSPs have passed a Bill which gives the Gaelic and Scots languages official status in Scotland. The Scottish Parliament voted unanimously in favour of the Scottish Languages Bill, which also makes changes to the support of Gaelic and Scots education, on Tuesday. Ministers say they are 'confident' the Bill will accelerate the growth of both languages, but Labour say it will do 'nowhere near enough'. Provisions included in the Bill involve the establishment of areas of linguistic significance in Gaelic communities, allowing ministers to focus grant funding in areas where the language is most fragile. READ MORE: Scotland must 'go beyond mitigating Westminster' with minimum income guarantee Ahead of the Stage 3 debate, Deputy First Minister Kate Forbes said: 'I am confident that this Bill will accelerate the growth of Gaelic and Scots by establishing both languages as official'. She said it would also 'strengthen the rights of parents to ask for a Gaelic school to be established in their area' as well as introduce targets for people speaking Gaelic and qualifications in the language. Forbes said: 'To support the growth of Scotland's indigenous languages, we are also providing an additional £5.7 million to promote Scots and Gaelic this year.' (Image: Jane Barlow/PA Wire) Labour's finance spokesperson Michael Marra said: 'This bill does nowhere near enough to protect the Gaelic language. 'Scottish Labour amendments will strengthen the legislation, but still the best that can be said is that this bill will do no harm. 'Without economic development in the heartlands, we know that the prospects for Scotland's ancient language are bleak. 'In the face of a Gaelic crisis, the SNP chose to bring a bill of limited scope that will, at best, make modest improvements.'


Sky News
8 minutes ago
- Sky News
How much does Starmer know about Trump's Iran plan?
👉Listen to Politics at Sam and Anne's on your podcast app👈 Sky News' Sam Coates and Politico's Anne McElvoy serve up their essential guide to the day in British politics. They start by picking over what Sir Keir Starmer had to say about the potential for an American attack on Iran - which sounded rather different from the line his German counterpart was taking. So what was going on there then? Back in Westminster, the details of benefit cuts which will impact millions get published - the government needs to convince dozens of Labour MPs to back the plan. And HS2 slows down - we'll hear today the new line will be delayed beyond 2033.


Daily Mirror
16 minutes ago
- Daily Mirror
How your MP voted in historic abortion amendment as law change backed
MPs voted by a majority of 379 to 137 to back a call by Labour backbencher Tonia Antoniazzi which ensures women will not be prosecuted for ending their own pregnancies MPs last night backed a historic amendment that will decriminalise women who end their own pregnancies. Politicians from all parties were given a free vote - meaning they were not bound to follow party lines. Legislation put forward by Labour backbencher Tonia Antoniazzi was backed by a majority by 379 votes to 137. Ms Antoniazzi said every prosecution of women is a "travesty". It is the biggest shake-up of women's reproductive rights in six decades. The result was hailed as a "landmark" by backers, but critics branded the change in the law "dangerous". Several Labour frontbenchers, including Ed Miliband, Liz Kendall, John Healey and Pat McFadden voted for the change. Conservative shadow eduction secretary Laura Trott also voted in favour, but the majority of her colleagues, including Kemi Badenoch, were against. See our tool below to find out how your MP voted. But critics including Justice Secretary Shabana Mahmood voiced their opposition to the change. At the moment abortion is allowed up to 24 weeks, although there are exceptions if a woman's life is in danger. Home medication is permitted up to 10 weeks. In the past three years, six women have appeared in court in England charged with ending or attempting to end their pregnancy illegally. Ms Antoniazzi told the Commons that women should never be prosecuted. She said her amendment to the Government's Crime and Policing Bill was a "once in a generation" chance to change the law. Under Ms Antoniazzi's amendment, a woman would not be prosecuted in relation to her own body, but others including medics and coercive partners could be. A separate amendment was put forward by fellow Labour backbencher Stella Creasy, which would offer legal protection to all involved. No vote was held on Ms Creasy's amendment. Ms Antoniazzi told the Commons: "This is urgent. We know multiple women are still in a system awaiting a decision, accused of breaking this law. They cannot afford to wait." Earlier this year Nicola Packer, 45, was acquitted after being tried for taking abortion medicine at home during the Covid pandemic when she was around 26 weeks pregnant. She told jurors she did not realise she was as far through her pregnancy as she was. Ms Antoniazzi said her amendment would result in "removing the threat of investigation, arrest, prosecution or imprisonment" of any woman who acts in relation to her own pregnancy. She added: "Originally passed by an all-male parliament elected by men alone, this Victorian law is increasingly used against vulnerable women and girls." Do you think abortion should be decriminalised? Take our poll below. If you can't see it, click here But Justice Secretary Shabana Mahmood, who said she believes safe and legal abortions are part of female healthcare, earlier branded the amendments "unnecessary" and "dangerous". Ms Mahmood, who will not be present for Tuesday's vote due to being away on Government business, said in a letter to constituents: "It is hard to see these measures as anything other than extreme." She continued: "I oppose extending abortions up until the point of birth beyond the exemptions that currently exist, as doing so would not only be unnecessary but dangerous. "I am deeply concerned to see these measures being progressed in the name of women's rights, when the potential physical and mental impacts on women would be so devastating." According to latest data, there were 252,122 abortions reported in England and Wales in 2022, the highest figure on record. MPs were given a free vote - meaning they were not required to vote along party lines. Justice minister Alex Davies-Jones told MPs the Government is neutral. She said: "If the will of Parliament is that the law in England and Wales should change, then the Government would not stand in the way of such change but would seek to ensure that the law is workable and enforced in the way that Parliament intended." The British Pregnancy Advisory Service (BPAS) said the vote is a "landmark moment for women's rights". Chief executive Heidi Stewart said: "This is a landmark moment for women's rights in this country and the most significant change to our abortion law since the 1967 Abortion Act was passed. "There will be no more women investigated after enduring a miscarriage, no more women dragged from their hospital beds to the back of a police van, no more women separated from their children because of our archaic abortion law. "This is a hard won victory, and we thank all those who have campaigned alongside us, and in particular those women, like Nicola Packer, who have spoken out about their traumatic experiences in the hope of achieving the change parliament has delivered today."