logo
Fiona fallout: Insurance dispute has kept N.S. single mom, son out of their home for 2½ years

Fiona fallout: Insurance dispute has kept N.S. single mom, son out of their home for 2½ years

CBC12-05-2025

Claudia Sheehy and her son, Ciaran, moved into their home in Grand Lake, N.S., three years ago.
With a half hectare of land overlooking the lake, a park within walking distance and a nearby farm where she hoped her son would take horseback riding lessons one day, she had their future mapped out.
"It's just beautiful out here," said Sheehy. "If you could see the sunsets, the view just being on the water, [the great] neighbours, it's everything I would want a little boy to have growing up with."
But post-tropical storm Fiona in September 2022 tore part of the roof off their Halifax-area home. That set in motion a chain of events that has kept the family of two out of their home because of problems with the insurance claim, all while Sheehy has racked up roughly $60,000 in credit card debt to keep afloat.
She said her insurer, Allstate, hasn't paid her for items like living expenses and the cost of emergency repairs since December 2022. That total is now more than $100,000.
Sheehy and her son, now four, have mostly lived in Airbnbs and hotels since the storm.
When it rains or snows, water pools inside the home. When CBC News recently visited the home, the signs of water damage were visible with dark discoloration throughout and a mouldy smell.
The stress of the experience has taken a toll on Sheehy's health. She was off work for a year on medical leave. She said she still struggles with anxiety and depression.
"I feel like I've lost the last few years with my son because ... it's just been us moving and trying to just make it, instead of us building a life together," she said through tears.
After Fiona, a company installed sheathing and an ice/water shield to prevent further damage to the home, but Sheehy said water continued to get in the house whenever it rained.
But another powerful storm in November 2022 tore parts of the roof off again. Temporary repairs were done on the roof and to prevent a wall from collapsing.
The company who had been doing repairs for the first job — who was recommended by Allstate — stopped doing the work.
Sheehy was told she'd have to find a company to do the work. But she had trouble getting quotes, in part because of how busy firms were doing repairs after Fiona.
The permanent repairs have not been done because of a disagreement over how much the repairs should cost, said Sheehy.
A repair estimate from a company that was a preferred Allstate vendor said the repairs to fix the damage from the two storms would cost around $74,000, said Sheehy, while quotes she obtained were over $300,000.
With each passing day, she believes the home will need to be demolished and rebuilt.
Frustrated by her experience, Sheehy filed an appeal with the company's ombudsperson in December 2022. Six weeks later, she received an email in return saying that steps to cover the damage "have been identified and will be addressed."
Lawsuit
Sheehy hired a lawyer and sued Allstate in Nova Scotia Supreme Court in September 2023.
"This is a horrible case," said Barry Mason, Sheehy's lawyer. "It's one of the worst that I've seen in 30-plus years of practice and has had a devastating impact on Claudia — who's been incredibly patient — and her family, and getting back into their home."
In a statement, Allstate said it has high standards for customer service and has been in regular contact with Sheehy.
"Throughout the claims process, we have continued to honour the terms of the customer's insurance policy. We look forward to resolving the customer's claim as we work with them through the stages of the claims process," it said.
The legal action has effectively been paused because Allstate invoked something under the provincial Insurance Act known as the appraisal clause.
This happens when two parties disagree about the value of a claim, so each hires an appraiser to determine the claim value. If the two appraisers disagree, a party known as an umpire is brought in and the amount they determine is final.
Mason said this process places the insured at a disadvantage.
For one, Sheehy will have to pay for the services of an appraiser, which could cost her at least $8,000. If the matter needs to be resolved by the umpire, Sheehy would have to pay half. Mason said an umpire could cost around $10,000.
Sheehy said her appraiser submitted information to Allstate last December. She said that the company's appraiser visited her home last September, but has not filed anything since.
Once the insurance claim is sorted out, Mason said the legal action will resume.
"Insurance companies are under an obligation to promptly deal with claims like this and to assist their insured with processing the claim," said Mason. "In our view, they completely failed Claudia in that respect."
Mason said they will be seeking bad faith claims to cover things such as punitive damages (money an insurer pays as punishment for being unfair) and aggravated damages (money an insurer pays for being unfair and causing the insured emotional distress).
Allstate said it could not discuss the legal proceedings.
Sheehy said the ordeal has changed her.
"I'm not the kind of person that cries," she said through tears. "I'm not the kind of person that dwells on the negative or suffers from depression or anxiety. I make plans for the future, so the move here had amazing plans.
"And now we're what, three years later, and I'm five steps back instead of being where I should be."

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

‘Absolutely unacceptable': Parents raise concerns over hot, overcrowded school portables during B.C. heat wave
‘Absolutely unacceptable': Parents raise concerns over hot, overcrowded school portables during B.C. heat wave

CTV News

timean hour ago

  • CTV News

‘Absolutely unacceptable': Parents raise concerns over hot, overcrowded school portables during B.C. heat wave

A portable classroom in New Westminster is seen on Tuesday, June 10, 2025. (CTV News) During this unseasonably warm start to June, some parents are speaking out about stifling conditions inside portable classrooms, where they say students are struggling to learn in overheated, overcrowded spaces. In New Westminster, Kathleen Carlsen — a parent and school trustee — says the lack of proper cooling systems is putting children's well-being at risk. 'This is absolutely unacceptable,' Carlsen said. 'There's no air conditioning. There's absolutely no air conditioning.' Carlsen is calling on the province to provide permanent funding to cool these classrooms. 'Dedicated long-term funding for cooling and air conditioning systems. It's pretty simple,' she said. A typical portable classroom at Lord Kelvin Elementary contains roughly 30 to 35 students and staff. On warm days, staff report temperatures ranging from the high 20s to the mid 30s Celsius. Laura Kwong, chair of the New Westminster District Parent Advisory Council, said some students have come home sick after spending hours in overheated portables. 'We've heard about kids going home with heat stroke, throwing up, perhaps — and then kids who have additional or complex medical needs where overheating is a real medical concern for them,' Kwong said. Mark Davidson, the superintendent of School District 40, acknowledged the issue, but pointed to the high costs of addressing it. '(The) cost of placing cooling units in them, for the 53 that we have, would be well over $1.3 million in order to place those units. That does not take into account the cost of bumping up our power grids in order to be able to handle the increased power draw in those schools,' Davidson said. 'We do follow WorkSafe regulations around whether or not it's a safe place to work and attend school, but when it gets up to 28 or 30 degrees, it's uncomfortable. It makes it hard to learn. It makes it hard to teach.' B.C.'s Ministry of Infrastructure says that over the last seven years, the province has invested nearly $6 billion in schools to create more than 80,000 student seats that are either completed or underway. The ministry says that while the province provides funding for school upgrades, decisions on cooling and ventilation — including in portables — are made by individual school districts based on local priorities. The province says $150 million has been invested over the past three years to improve HVAC systems across B.C., and that all classrooms have either mechanical ventilation or standalone HEPA filters, maintained regularly by districts. Schools are also encouraged to educate families about heat risks and take steps to keep students safe during extreme temperatures. While the spotlight is currently on New Westminster, concerns over portable conditions are not limited to that district. In Surrey — home to some of the province's most overcrowded schools — parents have raised similar alarms. According to Surrey District Parent Advisory Council President Anne Whitmore, nine Surrey schools have 10 or more portables on site, while 23 others have between five and nine. 'These portables — originally meant to be short-term solutions — are now permanent fixtures in many over-capacity schools,' Whitemore said. 'Without proper cooling or ventilation, temperatures inside have reached 33 C or higher, while some older permanent classrooms have hit 44 C on hot days.' Whitmore says such conditions are not only uncomfortable, but can make learning nearly impossible. Some parents have even kept their children home during the hottest days, especially when no indoor spaces are available for relief. Parents like Carlsen say they'll continue pressing the province and school districts for permanent solutions. 'I consider it advocacy for our kids,' she said. 'Because they're worth it.'

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store