Council of Europe says Switzerland not doing enough to comply with landmark climate decision
Switzerland hasn't shown that it's meeting the requirements of a landmark climate change decision from Europe's highest human rights court, the Council of Europe announced Friday.
The council said the European Court of Human Rights has sided with a group of older Swiss women against their government, ruled in April 2024 that countries must better protect their people from the consequences of climate change and that Switzerland 'had failed to comply with its duties' to combat climate change and meet emissions targets.
Six months after the decision, Switzerland asked for the case to be shut, arguing it was fully in compliance with the obligations set by the Strasbourg-based court. The intergovernmental body that supervises the court's judgments, the Committee of Ministers, recognized that Switzerland had made some progress but hadn't demonstrated it was meeting all of the requirements.
Environmentalists hailed the decision as a victory.
'The Swiss Federal Council is not getting away with its arguments at the Committee of Ministers. Switzerland must improve its climate policy to remedy the violation of our human rights,' Rosmarie Wydler-Wälti, co-president of Senior Women for Climate Protection and one of the plaintiffs in the case, said in a statement.
The group, which counts around 2,000 members across Switzerland with an average age of 73, argued that older women's rights are especially infringed on because they are most affected by the extreme heat that will become more frequent due to global warming.
Following a three-day meeting this week, Bern was asked to provide more information on a number of topics including 'concrete measures being taken to alleviate the most severe or imminent consequences of climate change in Switzerland, including any particular needs for protection, especially for persons in vulnerable situation.'
The Committee of Ministers, composed of the foreign affairs ministers from the body's 46 member states, will meet again in September.
The decision ignited debate in Switzerland and the government claims the court has overstepped its mandate.
Corina Heri, an expert in climate change litigation at Tilburg Law School, said the decision to ask for more information was typical of the compliance process at the ECHR.
'Nothing is final yet,' she told The Associated Press.
Environmental groups, frustrated by what they see as the failure of elected officials to combat climate change, have increasingly turned to courts to advance their cause. Late last year, the International Court of Justice took up the largest case in its history, hearing the plight of several small island nations helpless in combating the devastating impact of climate change that they feel endangers their very survival.
The world has already warmed 1.3 degrees C (2.3 F) since pre-industrial times because of the burning of fossil fuels. Between 1990 and 2020, sea levels rose by a global average of 10 centimeters (3.9 inches) and parts of the South Pacific have seen significantly more.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Daily Mirror
3 hours ago
- Daily Mirror
Donald Trump's wild demand for 'no fat soldiers' at rambling US Army speech
The US leader turned what was intended to be a 250th birthday celebration for the US Army into a full-blown political rally, and demanded "no fat soldiers" be shown behind him at Fort Bragg Donald Trump has sparked a fresh military backlash after ordering 'no fat soldiers ' be shown behind him during a rambling speech at Fort Bragg. The US leader turned what was intended to be a 250th birthday celebration for the US Army into a full-blown political rally. The president, speaking to troops in North Carolina, launched into a tirade of abuse, mocking foes, slamming the media, and goading soldiers into cheering and booing his political enemies live on national television. But behind the scenes, the entire event had been carefully stage-managed. Internal army messages revealed that troops were handpicked for their loyalty to Trump as well as their looks. One blunt instruction read: 'No fat soldiers.' Another ordered that any troops who didn't back the president should be quietly replaced. 'If soldiers have political views that are in opposition to the current administration and they don't want to be in the audience, then they need to speak with their leadership and get swapped out,' the message said. His appearance came after Trump ordered the National Guard and US Marines to Los Angeles, after demonstrations about his immigration purge erupted. The move to pit the US military against civilians has been met with widespread condemnation, with the state of California successfully suing to take the military off its streets. During his speech, Trump, however, whipped up the hand-picked audience, taking aim at California Governor Gavin Newsom and LA Mayor Karen Bass, whom he branded 'incompetent' and accused of helping 'insurrectionists.' 'We will liberate Los Angeles and make it free, clean and safe again,' Trump roared. The shameless spectacle has sparked fury from senior military figures who say the event trampled over long-standing rules that bar political activity while in uniform. 'This has been a bad week for the Army for anyone who cares about us being a neutral institution,' one commander at Fort Bragg said anonymously. 'This was shameful.' To make matters worse, a pop-up shop flogging Trump campaign gear was allowed to set up on base. Soldiers were seen buying MAGA necklaces and mock 'White Privilege Cards' from Oklahoma-based vendor 365 Campaign. Selling political merchandise on a military base is a breach of Pentagon rules. The Army has long tried to avoid even the appearance of backing one party or candidate. Colonel Mary Ricks, a Fort Bragg spokesperson, admitted the stall's presence was under investigation. 'The vendor's presence is under review to determine how it was permitted and to prevent similar occurrences in the future,' she said. US defence experts said the event was a disaster for military credibility. The silence from top military leadership, they said, only made it worse. Trump is throwing himself a jaw-dropping £24 million military parade in Washington today/tomorrow (Sat) to mark his 78th birthday, complete with tanks, jets, marching bands and thousands of troops. Dubbed 'Salute to America,' the extravagant bash is being billed as a tribute to the Army's 250th anniversary, but critics say it's nothing more than a shameless campaign stunt wrapped in camouflage. 'This isn't about the Army, it's about Trump playing general on his big day,' one ex-military officer fumed. The former president will give a primetime speech flanked by uniformed soldiers, many of whom were reportedly ordered to attend. Taxpayers are footing the bill for the whole spectacle, with cash being diverted from military training budgets to cover the cost of flyovers, fuel, transport and security. 'The most expensive birthday party in American history,' one Pentagon insider said.
New Statesman
4 hours ago
- New Statesman
Greta Thunberg knows what she's doing
Photo by Anders Wiklund/AFP There's something about Greta Thunberg that provokes hot-blooded fury among a certain demographic. The rage the 22-year-old activist from Stockholm regularly incurs is on a similar level to that often incited by the Montecito-based Duchess of Sussex, Meghan Markle. The latest act which the founder of Skolstrejk för Kilmatet ('Fridays for Future') has undertaken was boarding a vessel chartered by the Freedom Flotilla Coalition, which attempted to transport humanitarian aid to Gaza through the current partial Israeli blockade. On Monday, the boat carrying Thunberg and other activists was intercepted by Israeli forces who boarded the vessel before accompanying it back to shore. The Israeli government has since deported Thunberg. Various predictable charges have been hurled at Thunberg (who guest-edited this magazine in 2022). Enraged critics have said that her participation was just a publicity-stunt or that she put herself in needless danger just to make a point. The Israeli foreign ministry nicknamed the British-flagged Madleen Yacht, which carried Thunberg and 12 others across the sea from Sicily, the 'selfie-yacht' when announcing that it had been seized. One article in the New York Post accused Thunberg of pretending to be in handcuffs after arriving in France following her deportation. Countless posts on X have mocked Thunberg, or have called her 'self-righteous', with one post going so far as to call her a 'useful idiot'. Google searches for 'Greta Thunberg' peaked at 6am on 9 June, reaching the top of Google Trends maximum searches. What all of the vitriol fails to acknowledge is that this attention is the result Thunberg's actions were intended to attract. She is, after all, an activist. One wonders how those spitting with fury over what they deem to be Thunberg's 'irresponsible' publicity stunt would have said about the resistance — armed and otherwise — used by anti-apartheid campaigners in South Africa under the leadership of the now-beloved Nelson Mandela. One imagines many of the same people who are probably furiously rage-posting about Thunberg on X are doing so from a home bedecked with kitschy posters bearing slogans such as 'It Always Seems Impossible Until It Is Done' (a phrase made popular by Mandela) or 'Be the Change you Want to See in the World', often attributed to Mahatma Gandhi. Gandhi certainly didn't make his name by keeping quiet – he devoted his life to peaceful civil disobedience in order to secure India's independence. In other words, he spent much of his life pissing people off. That is what activism is. And what to make of the charge against Thunberg that by boarding the flotilla, she was irresponsibly and needlessly putting her life in danger? Has everyone forgotten the Suffragettes? Emily Davidson stepped out in front of the King's horse at the 1913 Epsom Derby, killing herself and seriously injuring a jockey, with the aim of securing universal suffrage (Votes for Women!). This scene is now celebrated and Davidson is honoured; children are taught about it in school. Davidson's activism was dangerous and daring (and could have caused more injuries besides) but it achieved its desired result. Thunberg's journey on the Madleen, though perhaps personally reckless, has succeeded in keeping the desperate need for aid in Gaza at the top of the news agenda. An eleven-week blockade in the region, which was partially lifted by the Israeli government at the end of May, has left vulnerable Palestinian children and families starving. As of 4 June, 57,000 people have died in this war. That more outrage has been expressed online over a 22-year-old Swedish woman attempting to help those who are suffering is a damning indictment of where we are. The world's best-known campaigner has never hidden who she is or what she believes in. Yet she will always be a clueless teenager in the eyes of her detractors; someone to be seen, not heard. But Greta Thunberg has other ideas, and she won't go quietly. She is, after all, an activist. Subscribe to The New Statesman today from only £8.99 per month Subscribe Related
The Herald Scotland
6 hours ago
- The Herald Scotland
Politics overshadow pain of cuts at Alexander Dennis
This is all the more so when it comes to manufacturing job losses in Scotland, perhaps because of the extent to which this sector has dwindled over the decades. The news that up to 400 jobs are at risk at Falkirk bus manufacturing firm Alexander Dennis is first and foremost a massive blow to the people directly affected. It means there is a very real prospect of hundreds more people joining the ranks of the unemployed in an area hit hard by the closure of Scotland's only oil refinery at Grangemouth, with the loss of around 400 job losses. It is always disheartening when concerns over widespread job cuts come a distant second in the minds of those seeking to score political points from corporate decisions taken to reduce workforces. Yet, coming so soon after further job cuts were announced by oil and gas giant Harbour Energy in Aberdeen, a move blamed by the company on the UK Government's energy profits levy, the proposed cuts at Alexander Dennis have led to an impression of decline in Scottish industry. Opponents of the Scottish Government have been quick to assert that events at Alexander Dennis are yet more evidence of the administration's flawed strategy and failure to protect industry and jobs. These critics repeatedly point to the delays and cost over-runs in the delivery by the nationalised Ferguson Marine shipyard of two ferries to serve the west coast and the time it has taken to find a buyer for Prestwick Airport, which was taken into state ownership in 2013, in justification of these claims (even though Prestwick is now regularly making profits and beginning to build a lucrative air freight operation). The Scottish Government has also come under for fire failing to deliver the amount of "green" jobs in the transition from oil and gas production to renewable energy that ministers forecast. Read more: But in the matter of Alexander Dennis, which has been part of NFI Group since the North American company acquired the firm for £320 million in 2019, any culpability on the part of the Scottish Government seems hard to discern. Winnipeg-based NFI, which is listed on the Toronto Stock Exchange, looks simply to have assessed its costs and concluded that it can save money by consolidating its UK bus body building operations into a single site. Unfortunately for Scotland, the site selected for this work is in Scarborough, not Falkirk. Euan Stainbank, the Scottish Labour MP for Falkirk, said the Scottish Government should have done more to support Alexander Dennis by ordering more buses from domestic manufacturers to serve local networks. He said Greater Manchester had bought more than five times the amount of buses from Alexander Dennis than had been purchased to serve the industry in Scotland. But ultimately in Scotland it is down to private bus companies to decide which manufacturers they wish to buy their vehicles from – not the Scottish Government. Naturally, those fighting to prevent the proposed cuts in Falkirk are urging Scottish ministers to do all they can to stop or limit the amount of redundancies during the consultation period that is now under way. Perhaps there is some financial incentive that can be offered to entice NFI to change its mind, but it is hard to be optimistic. Paul Davies, president and managing director of Alexander Dennis, hinted at the limitations of UK policy when the proposed cuts were announced on Wednesday. 'While stakeholders have been sympathetic of the situation, the stark reality is that current UK policy does not allow for the incentivisation or reward of local content, job retention and creation, nor does it encourage any domestic economic benefit,' he said. 'We have warned of the competitive imbalance for some time and would like to see policy and legislative changes that incentivise the delivery of local benefit where taxpayer money is invested. We strongly believe funding that supports public transport should lead to investment in local jobs, domestic supply chains, technology creation and a recurrent tax base.' There is a certain, painful irony to the situation too. While the Grangemouth refinery was declared by Petroineos to be no longer financially viable in the face of global competition and the drive to net zero, the Alexander Dennis site in Falkirk has been involved in the production of buses powered by electrical batteries and hydrogen, in other words at the cutting edge of modern transport technology. As veteran Scottish politician Kenny MacAskill, leader of the Alba Party, noted, it is 'perverse when Scotland is awash with renewable energy and is the base for the UK's green hydrogen that a company specialising in hydrogen buses is forced to relocate elsewhere'. Sadly, past experience in Scotland suggests that once a company decides to close operations, there is no going back. Petroineos could not be persuaded to change course at Grangemouth, and back in 2009 Diageo proceeded to shut down its Johnnie Walker plant in Kilmarnock despite significant protests at the time. It looks for all the world that the proposed cuts at Alexander Dennis are destined to become another sad chapter in Scottish industrial history, and one that will be especially poignant given the company's proud and long manufacturing legacy.
