Cornyn campaign launches ad buy accusing Paxton of ‘funding the left'
Sen. John Cornyn's (R-Texas) campaign is rolling out four new ads attacking Texas Attorney General and Senate candidate Ken Paxton (R) for money his office gave to several Texas entities, accusing Paxton of 'funding the left.'
The ads, roughly 30 seconds each and shared first with The Hill, criticize Paxton for issuing grant money to Legal Aid of NorthWest Texas, the Tahirih Justice Center, the Montrose Center , and Texas RioGrande Legal Aid, insinuating that the organizations run counter to Republicans on issues related to immigration and gender.
For example, a narrator in one of the ads accuses the Montrose Center of offering 'gender programs for children as young as seven,' noting that they have hosted 'child-accessible drag shows.'
The Montrose Center, a group serving the LGBTQIA+ Houston community, offers various services, including case management and counseling. The group has previously hosted events that have included drag shows – events that have nationally drawn scorn and scrutiny from some Republicans.
The ad is also likely referencing the center's Hatch Youth, which the center describes as 'Houston's oldest, currently active social group dedicated to empowering LGBTQIA+ youth and young adults between the ages of 7 and 24.'
Cornyn's team told The Hill that the ads are part of a five-figure digital buy.
Cornyn campaign senior adviser Matt Mackowiak alleged that the grants had cost millions of taxpayer dollars 'approved that went to radical left organizations that do not share our conservative Texas values,' describing Paxton as 'crooked' and suggesting that 'Texans cannot trust Ken Paxton.'
Paxton's campaign did not respond to a request for comment when contacted by The Hill regarding the ads.
The different groups mentioned in the Cornyn campaign ads were approved for different types of grants in the past, largely under the 'other victim assistance grant,' whose service areas include direct victim services, victim services training, outreach and education, victim assistance coordinator and crime victim liaison.
That hasn't stopped some of those groups from receiving scrutiny, however. Paxton investigated the Tahirih Justice Center, a recipient of Texas Bar Foundation funding, in 2022 to see 'whether these funds are being used to exacerbate the current crisis at the border and to thwart the efforts of federal and state law enforcement to secure the border.'
Republicans are bracing for a bitter primary between Cornyn and Paxton as Cornyn vies for a fifth term in the Senate. Paxton has described Cornyn as a 'RINO' or 'Republican in name only' while Cornyn's campaign has called Paxton a 'fraud.'
The primary is already laying bare divisions within the Texas GOP and could threaten Republicans' chances of holding the seat. A poll commissioned by the Senate Leadership Fund, released this month, found Paxton leading Cornyn 56 percent to 40 percent.
When Rep. Wesley Hunt (R-Texas) is added into the mix, the polling finds 44 percent behind Paxton, 34 percent behind Cornyn and 19 percent behind Hunt. But the polling also showed that Cornyn did the best among the three Republicans in a hypothetical matchup against former Rep. Colin Allred (D-Texas), who could launch a second Senate campaign.
President Trump has notably not weighed in on the Texas Senate GOP primary.
'They're both friends of mine. They're both good men. And I don't know. We don't know who else is running, but these two— Ken, John —they're both friends of mine. So I'll make a determination at the right time,' the president said on Air Force One last month.
Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
11 minutes ago
- Yahoo
GOP bill would oust, arrest elected officials who share immigration enforcement information
U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement walk back to the agency's North Nashville facility after escorting a bus filled with immigrants out of the parking lot. (Photo: John Partipilo/Tennessee Lookout) Tennessee Republican lawmakers unveiled legislation this week that would make it a felony for public officials to release the names of immigration officers in yet another public swipe aimed at the Democratic mayor of Nashville. The bill, filed by a half dozen lawmakers who comprise Tennessee's GOP House and Senate leadership, would also subject state and local officials to ouster from office under the state's moral turpitude laws for revealing the names of immigration agents or information 'related to specific future immigration enforcement operational activities.' The bill's filing, announced in a news release, is the latest effort by Republicans in Tennessee and members of the Trump Administration to target Mayor Freddie O'Connell, who decried mass immigration sweeps on Nashville streets in early May. 'The people of Tennessee expect their elected leaders to protect law enforcement — not endanger them,' said Senate Majority Leader Jack Johnson of Franklin, who is sponsoring the measure. 'When a public official like Mayor O'Connell chooses political activism over public safety, especially by interfering with federal immigration enforcement, he has no business holding office in the state,' Johnson said. The bill, he said, 'sends a message not only to Mayor O'Connell, but to any other blue-city mayor who may consider following his lead.' Republican leaders have focused on an executive order by the mayor requiring certain city employees to report any interaction with federal immigration officials to the mayor's office. The order, originally issued by former Nashville Mayor David Briley in 2019, was revised by O'Connell to require reporting within 24 hours, instead of three days. The mayor's office then began publicly posting notes of those reports in an online spreadsheet. 'There will be repercussions' Homeland Security official targets Nashville mayor over immigration The initial public posts identified three federal immigration officials by their full names and one by her first name. The posts were inadvertent and later removed, the mayor's office said. Trump Administration officials highlighted the posts as an effort by O'Connell to disrupt immigration enforcement activities and 'dox' immigration agents. White House 'border czar' Tom Homan pledged to 'flood the zone' with immigration enforcement activities in Nashville in response to the mayor's public statements condemning immigration raids. Tennessee House Speaker Cameron Sexton publicly called on O'Connell to rescind the executive order. Two Republican-led U.S. House panels — the House Judiciary and Homeland Security committees — also launched an inquiry into the response by Nashville's mayor to federal immigration enforcement activities. Asked Tuesday to address O'Connell's statement that the release of immigration agent names was inadvertent, Johnson noted the bill addresses both intentional and negligent actions, calling them 'unacceptable and dangerous.' House Speaker demands Nashville mayor ax order to report federal immigration interactions 'This bill ensures that such breaches are not tolerated,' Johnson said. 'Regardless of the intention behind the release of the information, public officials have a duty to protect sensitive information. Any failure to do so puts both public safety and the lives of law enforcement officers and their families at risk.' The bill makes clear that sharing information between local, state and federal agencies to support the enforcement of immigration laws remains 'fully permitted,' he said. Johnson did not address a question about whether a mayor had a right or responsibility to ascertain whether immigration enforcement actions were taking place in his city. O'Connell's office did not respond to a request for comment about the bill filing Tuesday. At the height of immigration sweeps, which took place in the heart of Nashville's busy immigrant enclave in early May, O'Connell spoke out against the actions he said were conducted by 'people who do not share our values of safety and community and have the authority to cause deep community harm.' SUPPORT: YOU MAKE OUR WORK POSSIBLE
Yahoo
11 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Coal miners are fighting Trump's safety cuts — and winning
When the Trump administration took the first steps toward shutting down two major programs aimed at protecting the nation's miners, the grassroots response was immediate, and vehement. And, it turns out, successful. In March, the administration moved to shutter over 30 field offices of the Mine Safety and Health Administration, or MSHA, throughout coal country. Weeks later, it proposed cutting 90 percent of the staff at the National Institute for Occupational Health. That would have killed its efforts to screen miners for black lung and treat that progressive fatal disease, which is caused by chronic exposure to silica dust. Miners and their advocates swiftly demanded that Trump, who has never shied away from celebrating coal miners as 'real people,' change course. The United Mine Workers of America, the Black Lung Association, and environmental groups like Appalachian Voices came together to protest the cuts and tell lawmakers to back their calls to undo them. Two miners sued the administration, arguing the government is not meeting its obligations to protect those who produce a resource Trump deemed a 'critical mineral' in an April 8 executive order vowing to restore the coal industry. The administration seems to have heard them, at least in part. Late last month, MSHA offices were quietly removed from the list of government buildings slated for closure and sale. The administration also has reinstated hundreds of occupational health workers, including some of those in the Coal Worker Health Surveillance Program. Bipartisan support for miner safety came from Virginia Democratic senators Tim Warner and Tim Kaine and West Virginia Republican Shelly Moore Capito. Capito did not respond to a request for comment, but in a letter she sent to Trump in April the lawmaker expressed concern that eliminating NIOSH would hurt her state. She also said it would cost taxpayer dollars, by forcing the expensive decommissioning of specialized research labs where NIOSH scientists studied the effects of silica, coal dust and mold on the human respiratory system. 'As the President recognizes the importance of coal, we must also recognize the health of our miners,' Capito wrote in the letter, dated April 22. 'I encourage you to bring back the NIOSH coal programs and researchers that will help ensure the President's vision to unleash American energy can be done safely.' Erin Bates, director of communications for United Mine Workers of America, credited Capito for her role in reversing the field office closures. She said the union's president, Cecil Roberts met with Robert Kennedy, the secretary of health and human services, to lobby for saving NIOSH. The union has longstanding relationships with Democrats over worker safety issues, Bates said, but also has maintained good relationships with Republicans, given that much of coal country leans that way. Democrats have pushed the administration on some of the remaining cuts to MSHA. During a House hearing on Thursday, Representative Bobby Scott urged Labor Secretary Lori Chavez-DeRemer to hire more people. Scott drew attention to the revocation of job offers for dozens of mine inspectors. They will be urgently needed as the nation's demand for critical minerals increases in the years ahead, Scott said. 'We must invest in MSHA's pipeline of talent so that qualified inspectors will be there to ensure safety in these dangerous jobs,' Scott, a Democrat from Virginia, said. 'We know that the process takes years.' Miners and their advocates applauded the victories, but said there is still much work to do. 'I feel like we've won some,' said Vonda Robinson, vice president of the Black Lung Association. 'But I don't think that we've got enough yet.' Robinson remains concerned about the fate of the so-called silica rule, which tightens the acceptable level of exposure to that toxin. The rule, for the first time, brings the standard in line with what workers in other sectors have worked with for decades. But the rule has been placed in limbo since the cuts to NIOSH were announced, effectively eliminating the possibility of enforcement. Even with some job restorations, staffing shortages at the agency also make it difficult for various government departments to work together to safeguard worker health, Bates said. 'We're in a major push to prevent an operations lag while most of the workers are out,' she said. The president's proposed federal budget also cuts funding from the Mine Safety Health Administration by 10 percent, down to $348.2 million from $387.8 million. 'That is going to affect the offices that are still open and the inspectors that are working there,' Bates said. About $14 million of these cuts come from Mine Safety and Health Enforcement, and the agency would lose 47 salaried positions. In a statement, the Department of Health and Human Services told Grist it remains committed to protecting the health and safety of coal miners. The Labor Department did not respond to requests for comment. For now, miners and their advocates remain focused on determining just how many federal workers have been reinstated, whether any field offices remain closed, and securing further guarantees that the government will not step back from its critical safety work. 'Our push is trying to get answers now and no more waiting and worrying,' Bates said. This story was originally published by Grist with the headline Coal miners are fighting Trump's safety cuts — and winning on Jun 11, 2025.
Yahoo
11 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Elon Musk says he now 'regrets' some of his social media posts about Trump after fallout
A reunion of the world's richest man and its most powerful may not be imminent, but at least one of them has expressed his regrets as their relationship lies in ruins. Elon Musk said on X in the early hours Wednesday that he 'regrets' some of the barbs he posted as he and President Donald Trump traded insults on social media, saying "they went too far.' Musk didn't elaborate in his 3 a.m. ET message on which posts from last week he regretted, and he didn't explain what caused his sudden change of heart. At the height of their online feud — sparked by landmark spending legislation Trump calls the 'big beautiful bill' — Musk said president wouldn't have won the election without him and accused him of undermining the work of DOGE in cutting billions from federal budgets. Musk called the bill a 'disgusting abomination' that would land the U.S. in unsustainable debt. Hours after Musk posted about regretting his comments, the New York Post published a pre-taped interview with Trump in which the president said he had 'no hard feelings' toward Musk. Asked whether he and Musk could reconcile, Trump said, 'I guess I could.' 'I think he feels very badly that he said that, actually,' Trump said in the interview, which was taped on Monday before Musk's early morning posts. The president also said he was 'not a happy camper' when Musk attacked the Trump-backed reconciliation package. 'I was disappointed in him,' Trump said in the interview. 'But it is what it is. It happens. Things like that happen. I don't blame him for anything. I was a little disappointed.' Trump on Saturday made clear his disappointment with his former ally, suggesting the U.S. government could cut its lucrative ties with Musk's businesses and prompting the angry Tesla founder to highlight the president's one-time links with the late sex offender Jeffrey Epstein. Musk replied 'Yes' to an X user who suggested Trump should be impeached. In an interview Saturday, Trump told NBC News that there would be unspecified 'serious consequences' for Musk were he to financially back any Democrat candidates who oppose the government's sweeping budget bill. The bill has passed the House, but could be rejected in the Senate with just four Republican defections needed to defeat it. Musk has previously been an influential adviser to the Trump administration and a major Republican donor, leading the Department of Government Efficiency in cutting billions from federal budgets and fronting election campaigns. The pair showered each other with praise and the president even invited Musk to attend Cabinet meetings. Trump marked the official end of Musk's government role with a ceremony in the Oval Office during which he handed the Tesla founder a symbolic golden key. But as Trump's priorities shifted to passing his budget bill and Musk wound down his time at the White House to return to his businesses, the relationship soured. The stakes are high for Musk and his companies, some of which rely on government subsidies. Tesla lost $152 billion in market capitalization in the wake of the spat, its biggest hit ever, but its stock price has since recouped some of those losses. This article was originally published on
